Neurodegenerative

神经退行性
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:额颞叶变性(FTLD)是65岁以下人群痴呆的主要原因。在FTLD进行面对面评估的几个挑战表明,迫切需要开发远程,可访问,和低负担评估技术。对轻度认知障碍的老年人在家中使用计算机的不显眼监测的研究表明,功能下降反映在计算机使用减少;然而,与智能手机使用的关联是未知的。
    目的:本研究旨在表征智能手机电池使用的日常轨迹,智能手机使用的代理,并检查与FTLD严重程度临床指标的关系。
    方法:参与者为231名成年人(平均年龄52.5,SD14.9岁;n=94,40.7%的男性;n=223,96.5%的非西班牙裔白人)参加了额颞叶变性的高级研究和治疗(ARTFL研究)和家族性额颞叶痴呆的纵向评估(LEFtottotalFrontompanalDeuding研究)包括49例(21.2%)患有轻度神经行为变化且无功能障碍(即,前驱FTLD),43(18.6%)伴有神经行为变化和功能障碍(即,有症状的FTLD),和139名(60.2%)临床正常成年人,其中55(39.6%)在常染色体显性遗传FTLD基因中具有杂合致病性或可能的致病性变异。参与者完成了临床痴呆评分加上国家阿尔茨海默病协调中心额颞叶变性行为和语言领域(CDR+NACCFTLD)量表,神经心理电池;神经精神清单;和脑磁共振成像。ALLFTD移动应用程序安装在参与者的智能手机上,用于远程,被动,并持续监控智能手机的使用。在平均28天(SD4.2;范围14-30)内每15分钟收集电池百分比。为了确定电池百分比的时间模式是否随疾病严重程度而变化,线性混合效应模型检查线性,二次,以及一天中的时间的立方效应以及它们与每种疾病严重程度度量对电池百分比的相互作用。模型因年龄而异,性别,智能手机类型,和估计的智能手机年龄。
    结果:CDR+NACCFTLD全球评分与电池百分比的时间相互作用,因此具有前驱或有症状的FTLD的参与者在一天中显示电池百分比的变化较小(代表较少使用智能手机)比临床正常参与者(两种情况下P<.001)。其他模型显示,评估的所有认知领域的表现较差(即,执行功能,记忆,语言,和视觉空间技能),更多的神经精神症状,和较小的脑容量也与全天使用较少的电池相关(所有情况下P<.001)。
    结论:这些发现支持了一个概念证明,即被动收集有关智能手机使用行为的数据与FTLD的临床损害有关。这项工作强调了未来研究的必要性,以开发和验证对神经退行性疾病的纵向临床下降敏感的被动数字标记。具有增强对神经行为变化的现实监控的潜力。
    BACKGROUND: Frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) is a leading cause of dementia in individuals aged <65 years. Several challenges to conducting in-person evaluations in FTLD illustrate an urgent need to develop remote, accessible, and low-burden assessment techniques. Studies of unobtrusive monitoring of at-home computer use in older adults with mild cognitive impairment show that declining function is reflected in reduced computer use; however, associations with smartphone use are unknown.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to characterize daily trajectories in smartphone battery use, a proxy for smartphone use, and examine relationships with clinical indicators of severity in FTLD.
    METHODS: Participants were 231 adults (mean age 52.5, SD 14.9 years; n=94, 40.7% men; n=223, 96.5% non-Hispanic White) enrolled in the Advancing Research and Treatment of Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (ARTFL study) and Longitudinal Evaluation of Familial Frontotemporal Dementia Subjects (LEFFTDS study) Longitudinal Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (ALLFTD) Mobile App study, including 49 (21.2%) with mild neurobehavioral changes and no functional impairment (ie, prodromal FTLD), 43 (18.6%) with neurobehavioral changes and functional impairment (ie, symptomatic FTLD), and 139 (60.2%) clinically normal adults, of whom 55 (39.6%) harbored heterozygous pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in an autosomal dominant FTLD gene. Participants completed the Clinical Dementia Rating plus National Alzheimer\'s Coordinating Center Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration Behavior and Language Domains (CDR+NACC FTLD) scale, a neuropsychological battery; the Neuropsychiatric Inventory; and brain magnetic resonance imaging. The ALLFTD Mobile App was installed on participants\' smartphones for remote, passive, and continuous monitoring of smartphone use. Battery percentage was collected every 15 minutes over an average of 28 (SD 4.2; range 14-30) days. To determine whether temporal patterns of battery percentage varied as a function of disease severity, linear mixed effects models examined linear, quadratic, and cubic effects of the time of day and their interactions with each measure of disease severity on battery percentage. Models covaried for age, sex, smartphone type, and estimated smartphone age.
    RESULTS: The CDR+NACC FTLD global score interacted with time on battery percentage such that participants with prodromal or symptomatic FTLD demonstrated less change in battery percentage throughout the day (a proxy for less smartphone use) than clinically normal participants (P<.001 in both cases). Additional models showed that worse performance in all cognitive domains assessed (ie, executive functioning, memory, language, and visuospatial skills), more neuropsychiatric symptoms, and smaller brain volumes also associated with less battery use throughout the day (P<.001 in all cases).
    CONCLUSIONS: These findings support a proof of concept that passively collected data about smartphone use behaviors associate with clinical impairment in FTLD. This work underscores the need for future studies to develop and validate passive digital markers sensitive to longitudinal clinical decline across neurodegenerative diseases, with potential to enhance real-world monitoring of neurobehavioral change.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:有证据表明,社会互动与神经退行性疾病的发展呈负相关。PREDICT-帕金森病(PREDICT-PD)是一项在线英国队列研究,对参与者的未来帕金森病(PD)风险进行分层。
    目的:本研究旨在探索在PREDICT-PD平台中评估有发展PD风险的人的数字社会特征及其社会资本的方法和可行性,对基于网络的社交参与与PD的潜在预测风险指标之间的关系进行假设。
    方法:构建了一个基于Web的应用程序,以通过PREDICT-PD门户进行社交互动。从该队列的现有成员那里寻求反馈,并告知飞行员的设计。敬业的员工使用每周的参与活动,由PD相关研究组成,事实,和查询,激发讨论。数据由托管平台收集。我们使用社交网络分析,通过帖子和回复的累积数量以及自我网络来检查随着时间的推移产生的联系模式。我们使用网络度量来描述这种联系,桥接,以及平台上参与者之间的社会资本联系。使用描述性统计学分析相关的人口统计学数据和帕金森风险评分(表示为奇数1:x)。进行回归分析以估计风险评分(经过对数转换)与网络度量之间的关系。
    结果:总体而言,219名参与者参加了嵌入研究网站的为期4个月的试点论坛。在它,200人(n=80,40%的男性和n=113,57%的女性)连接在一个大的群体,大多数用户可以通过其他用户直接或间接地联系到对方。共有59%(20/34)的讨论是由参与者自发开始的。参与是异步的,一些人充当讨论小组之间的“经纪人”。随着越来越多的参与者加入论坛并通过在线帖子相互联系,不同的连接用户群开始出现。该试点表明,队列网络平台中的论坛应用程序是可行且可接受的,并促进了数字社交互动。在PREDICT-PD研究中,将参与者基于网络的社交参与与先前收集的个人数据进行匹配是可行的,显示出未来分析的潜力,将在线网络特征与随着时间的推移的PD风险相关联,以及测试数字社交参与作为一种干预措施,以改变患神经退行性疾病的风险。
    结论:试点结果表明,在线论坛可以作为一种干预措施,以增强社交联系,并调查在线参与模式是否会通过长期随访影响发展为PD的风险。这凸显了利用在线平台研究社会资本在调节PD风险中的作用的潜力,并强调了此类方法在未来研究或干预中的可行性。
    BACKGROUND: There is evidence that social interaction has an inverse association with the development of neurodegenerative diseases. PREDICT-Parkinson Disease (PREDICT-PD) is an online UK cohort study that stratifies participants for risk of future Parkinson disease (PD).
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to explore the methodological approach and feasibility of assessing the digital social characteristics of people at risk of developing PD and their social capital within the PREDICT-PD platform, making hypotheses about the relationship between web-based social engagement and potential predictive risk indicators of PD.
    METHODS: A web-based application was built to enable social interaction through the PREDICT-PD portal. Feedback from existing members of the cohort was sought and informed the design of the pilot. Dedicated staff used weekly engagement activities, consisting of PD-related research, facts, and queries, to stimulate discussion. Data were collected by the hosting platform. We examined the pattern of connections generated over time through the cumulative number of posts and replies and ego networks using social network analysis. We used network metrics to describe the bonding, bridging, and linking of social capital among participants on the platform. Relevant demographic data and Parkinson risk scores (expressed as an odd 1:x) were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Regression analysis was conducted to estimate the relationship between risk scores (after log transformation) and network measures.
    RESULTS: Overall, 219 participants took part in a 4-month pilot forum embedded in the study website. In it, 200 people (n=80, 40% male and n=113, 57% female) connected in a large group, where most pairs of users could reach one another either directly or indirectly through other users. A total of 59% (20/34) of discussions were spontaneously started by participants. Participation was asynchronous, with some individuals acting as \"brokers\" between groups of discussions. As more participants joined the forum and connected to one another through online posts, distinct groups of connected users started to emerge. This pilot showed that a forum application within the cohort web platform was feasible and acceptable and fostered digital social interaction. Matching participants\' web-based social engagement with previously collected data at individual level in the PREDICT-PD study was feasible, showing potential for future analyses correlating online network characteristics with the risk of PD over time, as well as testing digital social engagement as an intervention to modify the risk of developing neurodegenerative diseases.
    CONCLUSIONS: The results from the pilot suggest that an online forum can serve as an intervention to enhance social connectedness and investigate whether patterns of online engagement can impact the risk of developing PD through long-term follow-up. This highlights the potential of leveraging online platforms to study the role of social capital in moderating PD risk and underscores the feasibility of such approaches in future research or interventions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:迄今为止,尚无研究纵向评估握力与帕金森病(PD)发病率之间的剂量-反应关系.
    目的:研究欧洲有代表性的老年人群的握力与PD发展之间的纵向关联。
    方法:来自27个欧洲国家和以色列的50岁及以上的个人参加。我们从健康调查中检索了数据,欧洲的老龄化和退休波1、2、4、5、6、7和8。使用手测力计测量握力,参与者报告他们是否有医学PD诊断。使用Cox回归和受限三次样条对随时间变化的暴露和协变量进行建模。
    结果:共有71702名参与者(平均年龄65.2岁)在平均5.0年的时间内接受了随访。其中,314名参与者开发了PD。在完全调整的模型中,我们观察到握力较低(第1组)的参与者发生PD的风险较高(风险比[HR]:2.50;95%CI:1.92~3.32),第3组(第1组)的参与者发生PD的风险较低(HR:1.41;95%CI:1.06~1.87).在剂量反应分析中,男性的PD风险较低,从27公斤(HR:0.94;95%CI:0.91-0.97)到59公斤(HR:0.10;95%CI:0.04-0.22),而女性从24kg(HR:0.68;95%CI:0.46-0.99)显著降低至38kg(HR:0.44;95%CI:0.22-0.88).
    结论:手握力应作为预后工具箱中可能存在PD风险的老年人筛查的指标之一。
    BACKGROUND: To date, no study has longitudinally assessed the dose-response association between handgrip strength and incidence of Parkinson\'s Disease (PD).
    OBJECTIVE: to investigate the longitudinal association between handgrip strength and the development of PD within a representative European population of older adults.
    METHODS: Individuals aged 50 years and older from 27 European countries and Israel participated. We retrieved data from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe waves 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8. Handgrip strength was measured using a hand dynamometer and participants reported whether they had a medical PD diagnosis. Time-varying exposure and covariates were modeled using both Cox regression and restricted cubic splines.
    RESULTS: A total of 71 702 participants (mean age 65.2 years) were followed over a median period of 5.0 years. Among them, 314 participants developed PD. In the fully adjusted model, we observed a higher risk (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.50; 95% CI:1.92-3.32) of PD for participants with lower handgrip strength (third 1) and a lower risk of PD for participants in the second third (HR: 1.41; 95% CI: 1.06-1.87). In dose-response analyses, men showed lower risk of PD from 27 kg (HR:0.94; 95% CI: 0.91-0.97) to 59 kg (HR:0.10; 95% CI: 0.04-0.22), whereas women showed significant reductions from 24 kg (HR:0.68; 95% CI: 0.46-0.99) to 38 kg (HR:0.44; 95% CI: 0.22-0.88).
    CONCLUSIONS: Handgrip strength ought to be incorporated as one of the measures in the prognostic toolbox for the screening of older adults who are possibly at risk of developing PD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:阿尔茨海默病(AD)和帕金森病(PD)是影响全球数百万人的两种最常见的神经退行性疾病。促进老年人生活质量的个性化综合护理(PC4L)项目提出了一个综合,可扩展,和交互式护理生态系统,可以很容易地适应多种神经退行性疾病和慢性疾病的需求,护理机构,和最终用户需求。
    目的:在PC4L项目框架内开发的研究协议旨在迭代地测试集成平台及其模块,并主要侧重于评估拟议解决方案的影响(即,PC4L平台)对患者的生活质量,以及它在3种不同场景(家庭,神经康复,和日托中心)。
    方法:在5个欧洲国家(德国,意大利,葡萄牙,罗马尼亚,和西班牙)在6个不同的试点中心,三个月,在PD患者中,帕金森病,AD,和其他痴呆(OD)。患者以1:1的比例随机分为干预组(使用PC4L系统)或对照组(无干预)。PC4L系统主要包括一个腕带,用于监测参数,如步骤和身体活动水平,和PC4L应用程序,其中包括不同的参与功能。两组均通过基线和研究结束临床评估进行评估,包括通过EQ-5D-3L量表评估生活质量。
    结果:研究方案是由欧盟委员会Horizon2020批准和资助的项目的一部分(赠款协议号875221)。所有相关中心的伦理委员会审查并批准了研究方案。该研究始于2022年9月的招聘阶段,并于2023年2月结束注册。招聘现已结束(2023年4月)。这项研究的结果预计将于2023年夏季发表。共有558名患者,每个研究组279个,被招募。结果将有助于阐明PC4L对生活质量的影响,将评估患者的赋权和医疗资源的使用,以及PC4L系统最终版本的可用性。它还将提供有关该系统支持的信息,作为促进决策过程的工具。
    结论:PC4L项目旨在测试基于技术的,集成,可扩展,和神经退行性疾病患者的交互式护理平台,并提出了所有相关参与者之间的良好协调护理模式。PC4L解决方案的未来发展可能会让护理人员和社会健康专业人员参与决策过程,以促进所有利益相关者之间的有效沟通,并确保在欧洲范围内可靠和受保护地访问数据。
    背景:ClinicalTrials.govNCT05538455;https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05538455。
    DERR1-10.2196/47916。
    BACKGROUND: Alzheimer disease (AD) and Parkinson disease (PD) are the 2 most common neurodegenerative diseases affecting millions of people worldwide. The Personalized Integrated Care Promoting Quality of Life for Older People (PC4L) project proposes an integrated, scalable, and interactive care ecosystem that can be easily adapted to the needs of several neurodegenerative and chronic diseases, care institutions, and end user requirements.
    OBJECTIVE: The study protocol developed within the framework of the PC4L project aims to iteratively test the integrated platform and its modules, and focuses primarily on assessing the impact of the proposed solution (ie, the PC4L platform) on patients\' quality of life, as well as its usability and feasibility on a large-scale sample size in 3 different scenarios (home, neurorehabilitation, and day care centers).
    METHODS: A prospective multicenter clinical study is conducted in 5 European countries (Germany, Italy, Portugal, Romania, and Spain) at 6 different pilot centers, for 3 months, in patients with PD, Parkinsonism, AD, and other dementias (ODs). Patients were randomized in a ratio of 1:1 to the intervention group (use of the PC4L system) or the control group (no intervention). The PC4L system consists mainly of a wristband for monitoring parameters such as steps and levels of physical activity, and the PC4L app, which includes different engaging functionalities. Both groups are assessed through baseline and end-of-study clinical evaluations, including assessment of quality of life through the EQ-5D-3L scale.
    RESULTS: The study protocol is part of a project approved and funded by the European Commission Horizon 2020 (grant agreement number 875221). The ethics committees of all involved centers reviewed and approved the study protocol. The study began with the recruitment phase in September 2022, and enrollment ended in February 2023. Recruitment is now closed (April 2023). The results of this study are expected to be published in summer 2023. A total of 558 patients, 279 per study group, were recruited. The results will allow to clarify the impact of PC4L on quality of life, will assess the empowerment of patients and the medical resources use, as well as the usability of the final version of the PC4L system. It will also provide information on the support of the system as a tool to facilitate the decision-making process.
    CONCLUSIONS: The PC4L project intends to test a technology-based, integrated, scalable, and interactive care platform on patients with neurodegenerative diseases and proposes a good coordinated care model between all involved actors. Future developments of the PC4L solution may involve caregivers and socio-health professionals in the decision-making process in order to facilitate efficient communication between all stakeholders and ensure reliable and protected access to data within Europe.
    BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05538455; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05538455.
    UNASSIGNED: DERR1-10.2196/47916.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    高强度间歇训练(HIIT)对于某些帕金森氏症(PwP)患者是有用且可行的,尽管长期坚持可能会有问题。如果可行,在家庭环境中开展HIIT可能是鼓励继续参与的一种方式。然而,没有为这一人口制定以家庭为基础的HIIT计划。因此,这项研究的目的是共同创造一个可行的,可访问,和PwP的安全家庭HIIT计划,包括干预组件和逻辑模型。这支持了评估PwP基于家庭的HIIT的实用性和实用性的长期目标。研究包括三个阶段。首先,基于现有证据,开发了初始的HIIT程序和逻辑模型提案。这是通过迭代改进的,焦点小组的共同创作过程,涉及最终用户和相关利益相关者的运动测试和访谈。最后,在共同创作者的进一步投入下,制定了干预草案。在迭代过程中,五个焦点小组,进行了10次运动测试会议和10次运动后访谈,涉及学术研究人员,6PwP,一名家庭成员和两名临床医生。这些共同创作者开发了HIIT-Home4Parkinson's(HH4P),一个为期12周的每周三次的基于家庭的基于适应性的PwPHIIT计划,个性化,远程支持。尽管在开发过程中存在方法上的局限性,共同创建的HH4P计划可能是可行的,安全,对PwP有用。现在应该进行可行性研究,以在全面试验之前解决剩余的不确定性。
    High-intensity interval training (HIIT) is useful and feasible for some people with Parkinson\'s (PwP), although long-term adherence may be problematic. If practical, undertaking HIIT in the home setting could be a way to encourage continued participation. However, no home-based HIIT programme has been developed for this population. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to co-create a feasible, accessible, and safe home-based HIIT programme for PwP, including intervention components and logic model. This supports the longer term aim to assess the practicality and utility of home-based HIIT for PwP. The study included three stages. Firstly, an initial HIIT programme and logic model proposal was developed based on existing evidence. This was refined through an iterative, co-creative process of focus groups, exercise testing and interviews involving end-users and relevant stakeholders. Finally, a draft intervention was produced with further co-creator input. During the iterative process, five focus groups, 10 exercise testing sessions and 10 post exercise interviews were undertaken, involving academic researchers, 6 PwP, one family member and two clinicians. These co-creators developed HIIT-Home4Parkinson\'s (HH4P), a 12-week thrice weekly home-based HIIT programme for PwP based on adaptability, individualisation, and remote support. Despite methodological limitations within the development process, the co-created HH4P programme could be feasible, safe, and useful for PwP. A feasibility study should now be undertaken to address remaining uncertainties prior to a full trial.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    CSF1R基因突变是成年发病的白质脑病的最常见原因,伴有轴突球状体和色素胶质细胞(ALSP),一种进展迅速、预后不详的神经退行性疾病。造血干细胞移植(HSCT)已越来越多地提供给CSF1R-ALSP患者。然而,观察到不同的治疗结果,且未阐明应转介HSCT的患者。本研究旨在确定CSF1R-ALSP中HSCT结局好坏的预测因子。我们回顾性分析了15例患者,14有症状,1无症状,CSF1R-ALSP接受HSCT。发病年龄中位数为39岁,HSCT的中位年龄为43岁。认知障碍是最常见的初始表现(43%),其次是步态问题(21%)和神经精神症状(21%)。HSCT后的中位随访时间为26个月。良好的结果与步态问题相关,如HSCT的初始(p=0.041)和主要(p=0.017)表现以及年龄较小(p=0.044)。首先表现为认知障碍是预后不良(p=0.016)和HSCT后认知恶化(p=0.025)的预测指标。总之,步态问题表明表型较温和,对HSCT的反应较好,治疗效果良好。相比之下,认知症状负担较高的患者最有可能无法从HSCT获益.
    Mutations in the CSF1R gene are the most common cause of adult-onset leukoencephalopathy with axonal spheroids and pigmented glia (ALSP), a neurodegenerative disease with rapid progression and ominous prognosis. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has been increasingly offered to patients with CSF1R-ALSP. However, different therapy results were observed, and it was not elucidated which patient should be referred for HSCT. This study aimed to determine predictors of good and bad HSCT outcomes in CSF1R-ALSP. We retrospectively analyzed 15 patients, 14 symptomatic and 1 asymptomatic, with CSF1R-ALSP that underwent HSCT. Median age of onset was 39 years, and the median age of HSCT was 43 years. Cognitive impairment was the most frequent initial manifestation (43%), followed by gait problems (21%) and neuropsychiatric symptoms (21%). Median post-HSCT follow-up was 26 months. Good outcomes were associated with gait problems as initial (p = 0.041) and predominant (p = 0.017) manifestation and younger age at HSCT (p = 0.044). Cognitive impairment as first manifestation was a predictor of a bad outcome (p = 0.016) and worsening of cognition post-HSCT (p = 0.025). In conclusion, gait problems indicated a milder phenotype with better response to HSCT and good therapy outcomes. In contrast, patients with a higher burden of cognitive symptoms were most likely not to benefit from HSCT.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:双任务训练是用于帕金森病(PD)患者改善其身体和认知健康的新兴领域,但是病人的可接受性,安全,和坚持这样的培训在网上设置是未知的。
    目的:本研究旨在评估双任务认知和运动在线训练计划作为一组在线社区计划对PD患者的可接受性。
    方法:患有PD的人被邀请参加一个在线计划(PD3Move),该计划由身体和声音练习组成,以应对在Zoom上显示为动态背景的不同认知挑战。该计划每周运行两次,持续16周。在4个月时,通过监测出勤率和通过电子邮件发送给所有参与者的退出问卷的反馈来评估患者的可接受性,感知效益,安全,并愿意继续向他人推荐。
    结果:在线计划已提供给15名参与者(n=9,60%,女性)诊断为PD,平均年龄69.4(SD9.3)岁,以及Hoehn和Yahr(H&Y)阶段I-IV。出勤率很高,参与者参加了13次以上(81%)的会议。参与者对该计划非常满意(n=8,53%)或满意(n=7,47%)。参与者报告说,他们最喜欢的是新的认知物理挑战。参与的三个主要促进者是感知好处,教师的灵活性和参与度,以及与他人的社交互动时刻。三个主要困难是处理电机波动(n=3,20%),使用技术的困难(n=2,13%),和听力损失导致的听力指示困难(n=2,13%)。患者对该计划有良好的感觉,14(93%)认为它对当前的健康管理非常有用,而1(7%)则中等有用。未报告不良事件,所有参与者表示,他们愿意继续该计划并将其推荐给其他人。
    结论:我们的研究结果表明,在线认知和运动程序很受欢迎,安全,并被认为对H&YI-IV期PD患者组有益。通过在线社区团体计划,可以获得专门的护理并增强对定期锻炼的长期坚持。
    BACKGROUND: Dual-task training is an emerging field used for people with Parkinson disease (PD) to improve their physical and cognitive well-being, but the patients\' acceptability, safety, and adherence to such training in online settings are unknown.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the acceptability of a dual-task cognitive and motor online training program for people with PD as a group online community program.
    METHODS: People with PD were invited to participate in an online program (PD3 Move) consisting of physical and vocal exercises in response to different cognitive challenges displayed as dynamic backgrounds on Zoom. The program ran twice per week for 16 weeks. Patient acceptability was assessed at 4 months by monitoring attendance rates and feedback from an exit questionnaire emailed to all participants assessing satisfaction, perceived benefit, safety, and willingness to continue and recommend to others.
    RESULTS: The online program was delivered to 15 participants (n=9, 60%, females) with a diagnosis of PD, a mean age of 69.4 (SD 9.3) years, and Hoehn and Yahr (H&Y) stages I-IV. The attendance rate was high, with participants coming to more than 13 (81%) of the sessions. Participants were very satisfied (n=8, 53%) or satisfied (n=7, 47%) with the program. Participants reported that what they most liked were the new cognitive physical challenges. The 3 main facilitators to participating were perceiving the benefits, instructor\'s flexibility and engagement, and the social interaction moments with others. The 3 main difficulties were dealing with motor fluctuations (n=3, 20%), difficulties in using technology (n=2, 13%), and difficulty hearing instructions due to hearing loss (n=2, 13%). Patients had favorable perceived benefits of the program, with 14 (93%) considering it very useful for the current management of health and 1 (7%) moderately useful. No adverse events were reported, and all participants said that they were willing to continue the program and recommend it to others.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the online cognitive and motor program was well received, safe, and perceived to be of benefit to this group of medically stable people with PD in H&Y stages I-IV. Access to specialized care and enhancement of long-term adherence to regular exercise can be achieved with online community group programs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:对痴呆症患者的非正式护理不仅会影响主要照顾者的福祉,还会改变他们的角色以及与社会环境的互动。新的在线干预措施可能有助于获得社会支持。最近,一个在线社交支持平台,Inlife,是在荷兰开发的,旨在加强非正式支持网络中的社会支持和积极互动。
    目的:本研究旨在评估Inlife对痴呆症患者照顾者的有效性。
    方法:对96名痴呆患者照顾者进行了一项随机对照试验。参与者被随机分配到Inlife干预或等待列表对照组。Inlife使用16周后,等待列表控制组可以开始使用Inlife。在基线(T0)评估效果,8周(T1),和16周(T2)。16周随访评估(T2)作为主要终点,用于评估通过在线自我报告问卷评估的主要和次要结果变量的结果。主要结果包括对护理人员能力的感受和感知的社会支持。次要结果包括获得支持,孤独的感觉,心理抱怨(例如,焦虑,stress),和生活质量。
    结果:在主要结局方面,干预组(n=48)相对于对照组(n=48)没有显着改善(护理能力感:b=-0.057,95%CI-0.715至0.602,P=.87;感知社会支持:b=-15.877,95%CI-78.284至46.530,P=.62)或任何次要结局。这与我们的定性发现形成鲜明对比,这些发现表明Inlife具有促进日常生活中护理过程的潜力。对于所有Inlife用户来说,坚持并不是最佳的。额外的符合方案和敏感性分析也显示,对于高活跃的Inlife用户或特定亚组,没有有益的结果。当成为更大网络的一部分时,Inlife用户更加活跃。
    结论:研究人员在幸福感和生活质量的定量指标方面,对在线护理人员干预的有效性应保持适度。然而,在线工具有可能促进日常生活中的照顾者过程。吸取的经验教训包括在电子健康中利用人类互动力量的重要性,利用用户的社会资本,以及需要开发研究方法,以确定对护理人员在生态上有效的日常生活中的益处。
    背景:荷兰试验注册NTR6131;https://trialsearch。谁。int/Trial2。aspx?试验ID=NTR6131。
    未经批准:RR2-10.1186/s13063-017-2097-y。
    BACKGROUND: Informal care for people with dementia not only affects the well-being of the primary caregiver but also changes their roles and interactions with the social environment. New online interventions might facilitate access to social support. Recently, an online social support platform, Inlife, was developed in the Netherlands and aims to enhance social support and positive interactions in informal support networks.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of Inlife for caregivers of people with dementia.
    METHODS: A randomized controlled trial with 96 caregivers of people with dementia was performed. Participants were randomly assigned to the Inlife intervention or the waiting list control group. After 16 weeks of Inlife use, the waiting list control group could start using Inlife. Effects were evaluated at baseline (T0), 8 weeks (T1), and 16 weeks (T2). The 16-week follow-up assessment (T2) served as the primary endpoint to evaluate the results for the primary and secondary outcome variables evaluated with online self-report questionnaires. The primary outcomes included feelings of caregiver competence and perceived social support. The secondary outcomes included received support, feelings of loneliness, psychological complaints (eg, anxiety, stress), and quality of life.
    RESULTS: No significant improvements were demonstrated for the intervention group (n=48) relative to the control group (n=48) for the primary outcomes (feeling of carer competence: b=-0.057, 95% CI -0.715 to 0.602, P=.87; perceived social support: b=-15.877, 95% CI -78.284 to 46.530, P=.62) or any secondary outcome. This contrasts with our qualitative findings showing the potential of Inlife to facilitate the care process in daily life. Adherence was not optimal for all Inlife users. Additional per-protocol and sensitivity analyses also revealed no beneficial results for high active Inlife users or specific subgroups. Inlife users were more active when part of a larger network.
    CONCLUSIONS: Researchers should be modest regarding the effectiveness of online caregiver interventions in terms of quantitative measures of well-being and quality of life. Nevertheless, online tools have the potential to facilitate the caregiver process in daily life. Lessons learned include the importance of harnessing the power of human interaction in eHealth, making use of the user\'s social capital, and the need to develop research methods that can identify benefits in daily life that are ecologically valid for caregivers.
    BACKGROUND: Netherlands Trial Register NTR6131; https://trialsearch.who.int/Trial2.aspx?TrialID=NTR6131.
    UNASSIGNED: RR2-10.1186/s13063-017-2097-y.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:由于所谓的“三赢效应”,在神经退行性疾病的医疗保健中引入信息和通信技术(ICT)有利于延迟对机构护理的需求,降低相关的医疗保健成本,减轻护理负担,提高个人的生活质量。然而,用户期望与实际需求之间的不匹配仍然是降低技术解决方案可用性的主要挑战之一。因此,欧洲项目个性化综合护理促进老年人生活质量(PROCare4Life),旨在为参与神经退行性疾病保健的所有各方开发一个基于ICT的平台,采用了以用户为中心的设计方法,所有用户从一开始就参与平台的开发和实施,以将他们的需求和要求集成到拟议的平台中。
    目的:本文介绍了对潜在最终用户(患有神经退行性疾病的老年人,看护者,和医疗保健专业人员)以及PROCare4Life平台开发中的其他关键利益相关者。
    方法:采用定性和定量混合的研究设计,包括2个基于网络的调查,40次采访,4个工作坊该研究于2020年4月至9月在5个欧洲国家进行:德国,意大利,葡萄牙,罗马尼亚,和西班牙。两种数据类型分别进行分析,然后合并和解释,更优先考虑定性研究。
    结果:共招募了217名参与者;其中157名(72.4%)完成了基于网络的调查(n=85,54.1%的患者,n=72,45.9%的护理人员)。60人(27.6%)参与了定性研究(20/60,33%的卫生保健专业人员;5/60,8%的患者;5/60,8%的护理人员;30/60,50%的主要利益相关者).我们确定了3个主要主题(T):(T1)与疾病相关的经历,(T2)关于平台技术的思考,和(T3)期望的性质。不良事件警报,通信工具,提醒,监控是不断需要的功能,而易用性,个性化,和用户友好性被预见为必要的功能。
    结论:本文确定了关键的个人,社会,和影响潜在最终用户日常生活的健康因素,并反映他们对拟议的PROCare4Life平台设计的需求和期望。收集的数据对PROCare4Life平台的开发很有用。尽管不同用户组的功能组合和集合对于集成护理平台是典型的,它导致设计师的指数复杂性,开发者,和用户。在这项研究中,相互矛盾的观点和一些担忧表明,ICT集成的护理平台不应该为太多的人承诺太多。相反,选择,焦点,and,有时,限制必需品是必要的。用户和其他利益相关者应参与这些决策。
    UNASSIGNED:RR2-10.2196/22463。
    BACKGROUND: With what has been known as the \"triple-win effect\", introducing information and communication technologies (ICTs) in the health care of neurodegenerative diseases is beneficial in delaying the need for institutional care, reducing the associated health care costs, reducing the caregiving burden, and improving individuals\' quality of life. Nevertheless, the mismatch between the users\' expectations and their actual needs remains one of the main challenges that can reduce the usability of technology solutions. Therefore, the European project Personalized Integrated Care Promoting Quality of Life for Older People (PROCare4Life), which aimed to develop an ICT-based platform for all parties involved in the health care of neurodegenerative diseases, adopted a user-centered design approach, where all users are involved from the inception and throughout the platform development and implementation to integrate their needs and requirements in the proposed platform.
    OBJECTIVE: This paper presents the results of a study on the needs and requirements of the potential end users (older people with neurodegenerative diseases, caregivers, and health care professionals) and other key stakeholders in the development of the PROCare4Life platform.
    METHODS: A mixed qualitative and quantitative study design was used, including 2 web-based surveys, 40 interviews, and 4 workshops. The study was conducted between April and September 2020 in 5 European countries: Germany, Italy, Portugal, Romania, and Spain. Both data types were analyzed separately and then merged and interpreted, with greater priority placed on qualitative research.
    RESULTS: A total of 217 participants were recruited; 157 (72.4%) of them completed the web-based surveys (n=85, 54.1% patients and n=72, 45.9% caregivers), and 60 (27.6%) individuals participated in the qualitative research (20/60, 33% health care professionals; 5/60, 8% patients; 5/60, 8% caregivers; and 30/60, 50% key stakeholders). We identified 3 main themes (T): (T1) experiences associated with illness, (T2) thoughts about the platform technology, and (T3) desired properties. Alerts for adverse events, communication tools, reminders, and monitoring are constantly needed functionalities, whereas ease of use, personalization, and user-friendliness are foreseen as necessary features.
    CONCLUSIONS: This paper identified the key personal, social, and health factors that influence the daily lives of the potential end users and reflected on their needs and expectations regarding the design of the proposed PROCare4Life platform. The collected data were useful for the development of the PROCare4Life platform. Although the combination and collection of features for diverse user groups are typical for integrated care platforms, it results in exponential complexity for designers, developers, and users. Contradicting opinions and several concerns in this study demonstrate that an ICT-integrated care platform should not promise too much for too many. Instead, selection, focus, and, sometimes, restriction to essentials are necessary. Users and other stakeholders should be involved in these decisions.
    UNASSIGNED: RR2-10.2196/22463.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:患有晚期帕金森病(PD)和帕金森病相关疾病(PRD)的人经常被推荐接受家庭联合治疗和护理,然而,家庭保健专业人员在PD/PRD方面的培训有限。在认识到需要这种护理的同时,患者和家属报告说,家庭保健专业人员不熟悉这些情况,这可能是由神经恐惧症驱动的,可能导致护理欠佳和服务提前终止。我们试图确定虚拟的可行性和效果,对PD知识的多模态教育干预,信心,以及家庭保健专业人员之间的同理心。
    方法:家庭健康护士,职业治疗师,物理治疗师和物理治疗助理,语言病理学家参加了为期一天的活动,高级PD/PRD虚拟研讨会,结合重点讲座,特定学科的分组会议,身临其境的虚拟现实小插曲,以及与患者和家属的互动小组,运动障碍和家庭保健专家。参与者完成了研讨会前后的在线调查,包括:人口统计;PD/PRD知识(可能为0-10分);同理心(人际反应指数);以及对PD/PRD个人的10分信心和态度量表,分别。使用配对t检验和Cohen'sd评估干预前的变化和效应大小。我们使用扎根的理论方法对研讨会后的自由文本反馈进行了定性分析,以确定参与者改变其实践的意图。
    结果:参与者在PD/PRD知识测试中平均提高了3.1分(p<0.001,d=1.97),以及改善对患有PD/PRD的个人的信心管理(p=0.0003,d=0.36),移情没有改变。互动,虚拟格式被评为有效95%。关于以研讨会为动机的实践变革的共同主题包括:跨学科合作;患者和护理人员在护理计划中的更多参与和权重;关注与患者功能相关的访问安排;对PD/PRD突然变化的原因的识别和实际管理,包括感染和直立性低血压。
    结论:虚拟,多模态,简短的教育试点干预提高了家庭护理护士和专职医疗专业人员对PD/PRD的特定知识和信心。未来的研究有必要更广泛地测试这种干预措施的短期和长期效果,并调查这种教育对患者和护理人员结果的影响。
    BACKGROUND: Individuals with advanced Parkinson\'s Disease (PD) and Parkinson-related disorders (PRD) are frequently referred for home allied therapies and nursing care, yet home healthcare professionals have limited training in PD/PRD. While recognizing the need for such care, patients and families report home healthcare professionals are unfamiliar with these conditions, which may be driven by neurophobia and may contribute to suboptimal care and early termination of services. We sought to determine the feasibility and effects of a virtual, multimodal educational intervention on PD knowledge, confidence, and empathy among home health professionals.
    METHODS: Home health nurses, occupational therapists, physical therapists and physical therapy assistants, and speech-language pathologists participated in a daylong, virtual symposium on advanced PD/PRD, combining focused lectures, discipline-specific breakout sessions, immersive virtual reality vignettes, and interactive panels with both patients and families, and movement disorders and home healthcare experts. Participants completed online pre- and post-symposium surveys including: demographics; PD/PRD knowledge (0-10 points possible); empathy (Interpersonal Reactivity Index); and 10-point scales of confidence with and attitudes towards individuals with PD/PRD, respectively. Pre-post intervention changes and effect sizes were evaluated with paired t-tests and Cohen\'s d. We performed qualitative analyses of post-symposium free-text feedback using a grounded theory approach to identify participants\' intentions to change their practice.
    RESULTS: Participants had a mean improvement of 3.1 points on the PD/PRD knowledge test (p < 0.001, d = 1.97), and improvement in confidence managing individuals with PD/PRD (p = 0.0003, d = .36), and no change in empathy. The interactive, virtual format was rated as effective by 95%. Common themes regarding symposium-motivated practice change included: interdisciplinary collaboration; greater involvement and weighting of the patient and caregiver voice in care plans; attention to visit scheduling in relation to patient function; recognition and practical management of the causes of sudden change in PD/PRD, including infections and orthostatic hypotension.
    CONCLUSIONS: A virtual, multimodal, brief educational pilot intervention improved PD/PRD-specific knowledge and confidence among home healthcare nurses and allied health professionals. Future studies are necessary to test the short- and long-term effects of this intervention more broadly and to investigate the impact of this education on patient and caregiver outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号