暂无摘要。

OBJECTIVE: Neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) and schwannomatosis (SWN) are genetically distinct tumor predisposition syndromes with overlapping phenotypes. We sought to update the diagnostic criteria for NF2 and SWN by incorporating recent advances in genetics, ophthalmology, neuropathology, and neuroimaging.
METHODS: We used a multistep process, beginning with a Delphi method involving global disease experts and subsequently involving non-neurofibromatosis clinical experts, patients, and foundations/patient advocacy groups.
RESULTS: We reached consensus on the minimal clinical and genetic criteria for diagnosing NF2 and SWN. These criteria incorporate mosaic forms of these conditions. In addition, we recommend updated nomenclature for these disorders to emphasize their phenotypic overlap and to minimize misdiagnosis with neurofibromatosis type 1.
CONCLUSIONS: The updated criteria for NF2 and SWN incorporate clinical features and genetic testing, with a focus on using molecular data to differentiate the 2 conditions. It is likely that continued refinement of these new criteria will be necessary as investigators study the diagnostic properties of the revised criteria and identify new genes associated with SWN. In the revised nomenclature, the term \"neurofibromatosis 2\" has been retired to improve diagnostic specificity.

A Guideline Group (GG) was convened from multiple specialties and patients to develop the first comprehensive schwannomatosis guideline. The GG undertook thorough literature review and wrote recommendations for treatment and surveillance. A modified Delphi process was used to gain approval for recommendations which were further altered for maximal consensus. Schwannomatosis is a tumour predisposition syndrome leading to development of multiple benign nerve-sheath non-intra-cutaneous schwannomas that infrequently affect the vestibulocochlear nerves. Two definitive genes (SMARCB1/LZTR1) have been identified on chromosome 22q centromeric to NF2 that cause schwannoma development by a 3-event, 4-hit mechanism leading to complete inactivation of each gene plus NF2. These genes together account for 70-85% of familial schwannomatosis and 30-40% of isolated cases in which there is considerable overlap with mosaic NF2. Craniospinal MRI is generally recommended from symptomatic diagnosis or from age 12-14 if molecularly confirmed in asymptomatic individuals whose relative has schwannomas. Whole-body MRI may also be deployed and can alternate with craniospinal MRI. Ultrasound scans are useful in limbs where typical pain is not associated with palpable lumps. Malignant-Peripheral-Nerve-Sheath-Tumour-MPNST should be suspected in anyone with rapidly growing tumours and/or functional loss especially with SMARCB1-related schwannomatosis. Pain (often intractable to medication) is the most frequent symptom. Surgical removal, the most effective treatment, must be balanced against potential loss of function of adjacent nerves. Assessment of patients\' psychosocial needs should be assessed annually as well as review of pain/pain medication. Genetic diagnosis and counselling should be guided ideally by both blood and tumour molecular testing.

Non-vestibular schwannomas are relatively rare, with trigeminal and jugular foramen schwannomas being the most common. This is a heterogenous group which requires detailed investigation and careful consideration to management strategy. The optimal management for these tumours remains unclear and there are several controversies. The aim of this paper is to provide insight into the main principles defining management and surgical strategy, in order to formulate a series of recommendations.
A task force was created by the EANS skull base section committee along with its members and other renowned experts in the field to generate recommendations for the surgical management of these tumours on a European perspective. To achieve this, the task force performed an extensive systematic review in this field and had discussions within the group. This article is the second of a three-part series describing non-vestibular schwannomas (V, VII).
A summary of literature evidence was proposed after discussion within the EANS skull base section. The constituted task force dealt with the practice patterns that exist with respect to pre-operative radiological investigations, ophthalmological assessments, optimal surgical and radiotherapy strategies, and follow-up management.
This article represents the consensually derived opinion of the task force with respect to the treatment of trigeminal and facial schwannoma. The aim of treatment is maximal safe resection with preservation of function. Careful thought is required to select the appropriate surgical approach. Most middle fossa trigeminal schwannoma tumours can be safely accessed by a subtemporal extradural middle fossa approach. The treatment of facial nerve schwannoma remains controversial.

OBJECTIVE:  To identify the frequency of reports of sporadic schwannomatosis, the types of patients affected, and the nerves affected.
METHODS:  We identified all case reports and case series that reported on patients with sporadic schwannomatosis according to established criteria.
RESULTS:  The initial search yielded 1,597 studies, of which 15 were included. A total of 38 of 55 individuals met the inclusion criteria. The mean age of the patients was 48 years; 41% were male. Thirty-three patients had peripheral nerve tumors, and 17 had spinal tumors. Twelve had tumors in both locations. Tumor distribution was unilateral in 25 of 30 cases (83.3%) and segmental (limited to one limb or five or fewer contiguous segments of the spine) in 28 of 38 cases (73.7%).
CONCLUSIONS:  This systematic review quantified the number of individuals who meet the criteria for sporadic schwannomatosis and better described this population to facilitate the classification of neurofibromatosis in regard to the 2005 consensus statement. Unilateral or segmental distribution of nerve tumors are key aspects when dealing with multiple noncutaneous schwannomas without involvement of the vestibular nerve.

Patients with neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1) develop multiple neurofibromas, with 8% to 15% of patients experiencing malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST) during their lifetime. Prediction of transformation, typically from plexiform neurofibroma, is clinically and histologically challenging. In this overview, after a consensus meeting in October 2016, we outline the histopathologic features and molecular mechanisms involved in the malignant transformation of neurofibromas. Nuclear atypia alone is generally insignificant. However, with atypia, loss of neurofibroma architecture, high cellularity, and/or mitotic activity >1/50 but <3/10 high-power fields, the findings are worrisome for malignancy. We propose the term \"atypical neurofibromatous neoplasms of uncertain biologic potential (ANNUBP)\" for lesions displaying at least 2 of these features. This diagnosis should prompt additional sampling, clinical correlation, and possibly, expert pathology consultation. Currently, such tumors are diagnosed inconsistently as atypical neurofibroma or low-grade MPNST. Most MPNSTs arising from neurofibromas are high-grade sarcomas and pose little diagnostic difficulty, although rare nonnecrotic tumors with 3-9 mitoses/10 high-power fields can be recognized as low-grade variants. Although neurofibromas contain numerous S100 protein/SOX10-positive Schwann cells and CD34-positive fibroblasts, both components are reduced or absent in MPNST. Loss of p16/CDKN2A expression, elevated Ki67 labeling, and extensive nuclear p53 positivity are also features of MPNST that can to some degree already occur in atypical neurofibromatous neoplasms of uncertain biologic potential. Complete loss of trimethylated histone 3 lysine 27 expression is potentially more reliable, being immunohistochemically detectable in about half of MPNSTs. Correlated clinicopathological, radiologic, and genetic studies should increase our understanding of malignant transformation in neurofibromas, hopefully improving diagnosis and treatment soon.

Improvements in our understanding of the genetic basis of human disease and increased utilization of genetic testing have identified a variety of heritable disorders associated with the onset of benign or malignant neoplasms during childhood. In many cases, the optimal management of affected children is dependent upon the early detection and treatment of tumors. Surveillance strategies based on the natural history of these lesions are often complex, requiring clinical examinations and radiologic and laboratory studies that evolve over a patient\'s lifetime. A general pediatrician may be the first to suspect one of these disorders in a patient, or may be faced with questions regarding genetic testing, cancer risk, and cancer screening. The pediatrician may also coordinate and interpret the results of specific surveillance studies. In this review, we present the genetic etiology, presentation, natural history, and surveillance recommendations for four disparate hereditary tumor predisposing syndromes, including Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome/idiopathic hemihyperplasia, von Hippel-Lindau disease, Li-Fraumeni syndrome, and rhabdoid tumor/schwannomatosis. These examples are meant to offer the clinician practical recommendations as well as a framework upon which to base the understanding and management of other conditions associated with an increased risk to develop tumors in childhood.

A 5-year-old girl presented with multiple tumours of the central nervous system. As on the first MRI scan bilateral vestibular schwannomas were not detected due to their small size, she initially did not meet the criteria for neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2), although her clinical symptoms were highly suggestive for the diagnosis. Using molecular studies, a mutation in the NF2 gene was found confirming the clinical suspicion at an early age and indicating the value of molecular analysis. Follow-up MRI 3 years later demonstrated bilateral vestibular schwannomas more clearly, since they had increased in size.
CONCLUSIONS: In children, magnetic resonance imaging can be inconclusive for the diagnosis of neurofibromatosis type 2, since very small vestibular schwannomas may be missed. In these cases molecular studies may provide additional evidence for the diagnosis. We propose guidelines for a screening protocol for children at risk for having neurofibromatosis type 2.

暂无摘要。