Nerve stimulation

神经刺激
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:系统性红斑狼疮是一种慢性,多系统,自身免疫性病因的炎症性疾病主要发生在女性。诊断的主要障碍,治疗,这种疾病的治疗进展是其异质性,表现为广泛的症状,如疲劳,发烧,肌肉骨骼受累,神经精神疾病,和不同严重程度的心血管受累。目前对这种疾病的治疗方法包括施用可能产生不利的副作用的免疫调节药物。
    目的:本研究探讨了自主神经系统与炎症通路之间的已知关系,通过无创迷走神经刺激治疗患者的自主神经系统失调来改善患者的预后。在这项研究中,数据包括生物标志物,生理信号,患者结果,和患者的生活质量正在被收集和分析。临床试验完成后,将开发一个计算机模型来识别与狼疮活动相关的生物标志物和生理信号,以了解它们如何随着不同的非侵入性迷走神经刺激频率参数而变化。最后,我们建议建立一个决策支持系统,集成非侵入式可穿戴技术,用于连续的心血管和外周生理传感,实时优化非侵入性迷走神经刺激频率参数。
    方法:该方案旨在评估经耳廓迷走神经刺激对系统性红斑狼疮患者的疗效和安全性。这个多中心,国家,随机化,双盲,平行组,安慰剂对照研究将招募至少18名被诊断患有这种疾病的患者。患者的评估和治疗将在门诊进行,包括12次就诊。访问1包括筛选会议。随后的访问直到访问6包括混合治疗和评估会议。最后,其余访视与治疗后的早期和晚期随访相对应.
    结果:2022年11月,开始数据收集。在预定初次任命的10名参与者中,8符合纳入标准,和6成功完成了整个协议。目前正在进行患者登记和数据收集,预计将于2023年12月完成。
    结论:这项研究的结果将促进患者定制的迷走神经刺激疗法,为系统性红斑狼疮提供辅助治疗解决方案,这将促进技术的采用,因此,扩大可以从改善自主神经失调中受益的系统性红斑狼疮的人群,转化为降低成本和更好的生活质量。
    背景:ClinicalTrials.govNCT05704153;https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05704153。
    DERR1-10.2196/48387。
    BACKGROUND: Systemic lupus erythematosus is a chronic, multisystem, inflammatory disease of autoimmune etiology occurring predominantly in women. A major hurdle to the diagnosis, treatment, and therapeutic advancement of this disease is its heterogeneous nature, which presents as a wide range of symptoms such as fatigue, fever, musculoskeletal involvement, neuropsychiatric disorders, and cardiovascular involvement with varying severity. The current therapeutic approach to this disease includes the administration of immunomodulatory drugs that may produce unfavorable secondary effects.
    OBJECTIVE: This study explores the known relationship between the autonomic nervous system and inflammatory pathways to improve patient outcomes by treating autonomic nervous system dysregulation in patients via noninvasive vagus nerve stimulation. In this study, data including biomarkers, physiological signals, patient outcomes, and patient quality of life are being collected and analyzed. After completion of the clinical trial, a computer model will be developed to identify the biomarkers and physiological signals related to lupus activity in order to understand how they change with different noninvasive vagus nerve stimulation frequency parameters. Finally, we propose building a decision support system with integrated noninvasive wearable technologies for continuous cardiovascular and peripheral physiological sensing for adaptive, patient-specific optimization of the noninvasive vagus nerve stimulation frequency parameters in real time.
    METHODS: The protocol was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of transauricular vagus nerve stimulation in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. This multicenter, national, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study will recruit a minimum of 18 patients diagnosed with this disease. Evaluation and treatment of patients will be conducted in an outpatient clinic and will include 12 visits. Visit 1 consists of a screening session. Subsequent visits up to visit 6 involve mixing treatment and evaluation sessions. Finally, the remaining visits correspond with early and late posttreatment follow-ups.
    RESULTS: On November 2022, data collection was initiated. Of the 10 participants scheduled for their initial appointment, 8 met the inclusion criteria, and 6 successfully completed the entire protocol. Patient enrollment and data collection are currently underway and are expected to be completed in December 2023.
    CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study will advance patient-tailored vagus nerve stimulation therapies, providing an adjunctive treatment solution for systemic lupus erythematosus that will foster adoption of technology and, thus, expand the population with systemic lupus erythematosus who can benefit from improved autonomic dysregulation, translating into reduced costs and better quality of life.
    BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05704153; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05704153.
    UNASSIGNED: DERR1-10.2196/48387.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:膀胱过度活动症(OAB)的全球患病率估计为11.8%。尽管现有的治疗选择,如骶神经调节,大量患者仍未治疗。一种潜在的替代方案是无创经皮电刺激。这种形式的刺激不需要植入电极,从而消除了对高技能外科医生的需求,昂贵的植入式设备,或定期住院。我们假设替代神经通路可以影响膀胱收缩。
    方法:在这项试点研究中,我们进行了腹壁的经皮电刺激(T6-L1),耳朵(迷走神经),和3只麻醉的雌性Sprague-Dawley大鼠的脚踝(胫神经)。在20Hz至20kHz的范围内进行刺激,并测量其对膀胱内压的影响。我们关注与膀胱内压力相关的3个主要结果:(1)从收缩开始到峰值的压力变化,(2)平均收缩持续时间,和(3)在指定时间范围内的收缩次数。这些测量是在膀胱充满盐水或乙酸(用作OAB的模型)时进行的。
    结果:经皮刺激腹壁,耳朵,在20Hz的频率下,踝关节减少了输注乙酸期间的膀胱收缩次数。通过比较膀胱输注乙酸期间胫神经的各种刺激频率,1kHz和3kHz刺激期间的收缩持续时间明显短于20Hz刺激(P=0.025和P=0.044).
    结论:经皮电刺激腹壁的应用,耳朵,与经皮胫神经刺激和骶神经调节相比,胫神经可以为OAB提供侵入性较低且更具成本效益的治疗选择。建议进行涉及更大样本量的后续研究。
    OBJECTIVE: The global prevalence of overactive bladder (OAB) is estimated at 11.8%. Despite existing treatment options such as sacral neuromodulation, a substantial number of patients remain untreated. One potential alternative is noninvasive transcutaneous electrical stimulation. This form of stimulation does not necessitate the implantation of an electrode, thereby eliminating the need for highly skilled surgeons, expensive implantable devices, or regular hospital visits. We hypothesized that alternative neural pathways can impact bladder contraction.
    METHODS: In this pilot study, we conducted transcutaneous electrical stimulation of the abdominal wall (T6-L1), the ear (vagus nerve), and the ankle (tibial nerve) of 3 anesthetized female Sprague-Dawley rats. Stimulation was administered within a range of 20 Hz to 20 kHz, and its impact on intravesical pressure was measured. We focused on 3 primary outcomes related to intravesical pressure: (1) the pressure change from the onset of a contraction to its peak, (2) the average duration of contraction, and (3) the number of contractions within a specified timeframe. These measurements were taken while the bladder was filled with either saline or acetic acid (serving as a model for OAB).
    RESULTS: Transcutaneous stimulation of the abdominal wall, ear, and ankle at a frequency of 20 Hz decreased the number of bladder contractions during infusion with acetic acid. As revealed by a comparison of various stimulation frequencies of the tibial nerve during bladder infusion with acetic acid, the duration of contraction was significantly shorter during stimulation at 1 kHz and 3 kHz relative to stimulation at 20 Hz (P = 0.025 and P = 0.044, respectively).
    CONCLUSIONS: The application of transcutaneous electrical stimulation to the abdominal wall, ear, and tibial nerve could provide less invasive and more cost-effective treatment options for OAB relative to percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation and sacral neuromodulation. A follow-up study involving a larger sample size is recommended.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究的目的是评估绵羊的椎旁臂丛神经阻滞。使用一组13只健康绵羊,体重为20.10±2.20kg,年龄为5个月。在第一阶段,五只羊,将连接到神经刺激器的绝缘针指向C6,C7,C8和T1神经的位置,并在每个部位注射1.50mL含有1:1亚甲蓝1.00%和利多卡因1.00%的溶液.然后,在尸体中解剖并评估了颈部和胸部区域。在第二阶段,在8只活羊中使用2.00%利多卡因进行颈椎旁阻滞,随后进行评估.尸体评估显示染料在C6至T1神经中扩散:61.75±5.50、72.75±9.18、40.75±2.99和18.75±3.30mm,分别。三只羊,染料分布在前纵隔观察。在第二阶段,在10和15分钟内确定感觉和运动阻滞的麻醉开始,分别。腋窝麻醉,肌肉皮肤,桡骨和尺骨皮肤部位和运动阻滞持续67.50±15.80、63.70±16.00、55.00±21.70、56.70±19.70和76.40±24.30min,分别。三只羊,没有观察到桡骨和尺骨皮肤部位的麻醉。总之,绵羊的椎旁臂丛神经阻滞为肘关节的上部提供了可接受的阻滞,然而,对于更多的远端结构,它不是有效和可靠的。
    The Objective of the present study was to evaluate paravertebral brachial plexus block in sheep. A group of 13 healthy sheep with 20.10 ± 2.20 kg weight and five months of age were used. In phase I, in five sheep, an insulated needle attached to a nerve stimulator was directed to the location of C6, C7, C8 and T1 nerves and a 1.50 mL of a solution containing 1:1 methylene blue 1.00% and lidocaine 1.00% was injected at each site. Then, the cervical and thoracic areas were dissected and assessed in the cadavers. In phase II, cervical paravertebral block with 2.00% lidocaine and subsequent assessments were done in eight live sheep. Cadaveric evaluations revealed dye spread in C6 to T1 nerves: 61.75 ± 5.50, 72.75 ± 9.18, 40.75 ± 2.99 and 18.75 ± 3.30 mm, respectively. In three sheep, dye distribution in the anterior mediastinum was observed. In phase II, the onsets of anesthesia were determined within 10 and 15 min for sensory and motor blocks, respectively. Anesthesia at axillary, musculocutaneous, radial and ulnar skin sites and motor block lasted for 67.50 ± 15.80, 63.70 ± 16.00, 55.00 ± 21.70, 56.70 ± 19.70 and 76.40 ± 24.30 min, respectively. In three sheep, no anesthesia was observed for radial and ulnar skin sites. In conclusion, paravertebral brachial plexus block in sheep provided an acceptable block for the upper parts of the elbow joint, however, it was not effective and reliable for more distal structures.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    评估耳廓经皮神经电场刺激(PENFS)治疗的纤维肌痛退伍军人的皮质厚度和右后脑岛(r-pIns)γ-氨基丁酸(GABA)浓度的变化。
    这是一个随机的,控制,在政府医院进行的开放标签调查。21名患有纤维肌痛的退伍军人被随机分配接受标准治疗(ST;即每周4次与疼痛医生一起就诊)或ST伴耳廓PENFS(STPENFS)。在基线时(即在第一次治疗阶段之前)和在治疗后2周内再次收集神经成像数据。在这些时间点还评估了临床疼痛和身体功能。在r-pIns中进行单体素磁共振波谱以评估r-pInsGABA浓度的变化,并收集高分辨率T1加权图像以使用皮质厚度评估区域灰质体积的变化。
    ST+PENFS组和ST组均报告治疗后疼痛减轻。体积:ST+PENFS治疗后,左中后扣带皮质厚度显着降低(p=0.018),左尾肌皮质厚度增加(p=0.014)。这些发现在对多重比较进行FDR校正后具有重要意义。ST组右半球脑岛皮质厚度在治疗后增加,与疼痛评分呈负相关(p=0.02)。ST+PENFS组右半球后背扣带回大小与疼痛评分呈显著正相关(p=0.044)。GABA:与GABA无显著相关性,尽管使用线性混合效应模型观察到两组治疗后GABA增加的趋势(p=0.083)。
    结果表明,与ST相比,PENFS的体积差异变化反映了PENFS的新作用。两组中发生的GABA变化更可能与ST有关。关键感兴趣区域的岛礁GABA和皮质厚度可以被开发为用于评估慢性疼痛病理和治疗结果的潜在生物标志物。
    UNASSIGNED: To evaluate changes in cortical thickness and right posterior insula (r-pIns) gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) concentrations in veterans with fibromyalgia treated with auricular percutaneous electric nerve field stimulation (PENFS).
    UNASSIGNED: This was a randomized, controlled, open label investigation conducted in a government hospital. Twenty-one veterans with fibromyalgia were randomized to receive either standard therapy (ST; i.e., 4 weekly visits with a pain practitioner) or ST with auricular PENFS (ST + PENFS). Neuroimaging data was collected at baseline (i.e. before the first treatment session) and again within 2 weeks post-treatment.​ Clinical pain and physical function were also assessed at these timepoints. Single-voxel magnetic resonance spectroscopy was carried out in r-pIns to assess changes in r-pIns GABA concentrations and high-resolution T1-weighted images were collected to assess changes in regional gray matter volume using cortical thickness.
    UNASSIGNED: Both the ST + PENFS and ST groups reported a decrease in pain with treatment. Volumetric: Cortical thickness significantly decreased in the left middle posterior cingulate (p = 0.018) and increased in the left cuneus (p = 0.014) following ST + PENFS treatment. These findings were significant following FDR correction for multiple comparisons. ST group right hemisphere insula cortical thickness increased post-treatment and was significantly (p = 0.02) inversely correlated with pain scores. ST + PENFS group right hemisphere posterior dorsal cingulate size significantly (p = 0.044) positively correlated with pain scores. GABA: There were no significant correlations with GABA, though a trend was noted towards increased GABA following treatment in both groups (p = 0.083) using a linear mixed effects model.
    UNASSIGNED: Results suggest a novel effect of PENFS reflected by differential volumetric changes compared to ST. The changes in GABA that occur in both groups are more likely related to ST. Insular GABA and cortical thickness in key regions of interest may be developed as potential biomarkers for evaluating chronic pain pathology and treatment outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    下肢骨折患者常因体位变化而出现急性疼痛和不适,这种疼痛会影响术后早期恢复。本研究旨在比较超声联合神经刺激器引导腰骶丛阻滞(LSPB)在仰卧位和侧卧位下肢骨折手术中的适用性和有效性。
    我们纳入126例择期行下肢骨折内固定的患者,按随机数字表法分为S组和L组,在仰卧位和侧卧位超声引导下联合神经刺激器行LSPB,分别。主要结果是手术中舒芬太尼的剂量。次要结果是LSPB放置位置时的最大VAS(视觉模拟评分)疼痛评分,位置放置的时间,神经阻滞的时间,尝试穿刺的次数,血液动力学指标,术后1、12和24小时的VAS评分,术后镇痛满意度及与神经阻滞相关的不良事件。
    两组使用舒芬太尼的剂量差异无统计学意义(P=0.142)。置位时最大VAS疼痛评分(P<0.01),位置放置时间(P<0.01),S组腰丛阻滞时间和穿刺次数明显低于L组(P<0.01)。然而,S组骶丛阻滞时间高于L组(P=0.029)。血流动力学指标无显著差异,骶丛的穿刺次数,术后VAS评分,两组患者术后镇痛满意度及与神经阻滞相关的不良事件(均P>0.05)。
    我们的研究为接受下肢骨折手术的患者提供了一种更舒适,更好接受的麻醉方案。仰卧位的LSPB易于应用,并具有明确的麻醉效果。此外,具有较高的术后镇痛效果,值得推广应用。
    该试验在中国临床试验注册登记之前注册(日期:11/03/2021编号:ChiCTR2100044117)。
    Patients with lower limb fracture often have acute pain and discomfort from changes in position, and such pain affects early postoperative recovery. This study aimed to compare the applicability and effectiveness of ultrasound combined with nerve stimulator-guided lumbosacral plexus block (LSPB) in the supine versus lateral position during lower limb fracture surgery.
    We included 126 patients who underwent elective internal fixation for lower limb fracture who were divided into the S group and the L group by the random number table method and underwent LSPB guided by ultrasound combined with a nerve stimulator in the supine and lateral positions, respectively. The primary outcome was the dose of sufentanil used in surgery. The secondary outcomes were the maximum VAS (visual analogue scale) pain score at position placing for LSPB, the time of position placing, the time for nerve block,the number of puncture attempts,the haemodynamic indicators, the VAS score at 1, 12, and 24 h following surgery, postoperative satisfactory degree to analgesia and adverse events related to nerve block.
    There was no statistically significant difference in dose of sufentanil used between the two groups(P = 0.142). The maximum VAS pain score at position placing(P < 0.01), the time of position placement(P < 0.01), the time for lumbar plexus block and the time of puncture attempts were significantly lower in the S group than in the L group (P < 0.01). However, the time for sacral plexus block was higher in the S group than in the L group (P = 0.029). There was no significant difference in haemodynamic indicators,number of puncture attempts for the sacral plexus, postoperative VAS scores, postoperative satisfactory degree to analgesia or adverse events related to nerve block between the two groups (all P > 0.05).
    Our study provides a more comfortable and better accepted anaesthetic regimen for patients undergoing lower limb fracture surgery. LSPB in the supine position is simple to apply and has definite anaesthetic effects. Additionally, it has a high level of postoperative analgesia and therefore should be widely applied.
    The trial was registered prior to patient enrolment at the Chinese Clinical Trail Registry (Date:11/03/2021 Number: ChiCTR2100044117 ).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:重复周围神经感觉刺激(RPSS)是一种潜在的运动训练附加干预措施,用于中风后上肢麻痹的康复。在中风后慢性期的受试者中报道了RPSS的益处,但在第1周或第1个月内,有关该干预措施效果的信息有限.这项研究的主要目标是比较,在一项正面交锋的原理验证研究中,单个会话的超感官与亚急性和慢性期和中风后轻度上肢运动障碍的亚感觉RPSS对中风后不同阶段受试者上肢运动表现和学习的影响。此外,我们研究了RPSS对脑灌注的影响,功能成像激活,和γ-氨基丁酸(GABA)水平。患有轻度上肢运动障碍的受试者将在卒中后早期(卒中后7天至3个月)或慢性(>6个月)阶段进行MRI和临床评估测试。
    方法:在这个多中心中,随机化,平行组,具有结果盲化评估的原则验证临床试验,我们比较了缺血性或出血性卒中和上肢轻瘫患者一次超感觉或亚感觉RPSS的疗效.临床评估和MRI将在每个受试者中仅进行一次(在早期或在慢性期)。主要结果是捷成-泰勒测试中的性能变化。次要结果:手部力量,用动脉自旋标记评估脑血流量,在用麻痹手进行手指敲击任务期间,用功能性MRI(fMRI)评估的左半球和右半球的同损和对比性初级运动皮层(M1)的血氧水平依赖性(BOLD)变化,以及用光谱学评估的同损和对照M1中GABA水平的变化。结果的变化将在四组中进行比较:超感觉,早期的;亚感官的,早期;超感官,慢性;和亚感官,慢性。
    结论:这项研究的结果与未来的临床试验有关,以便为更有可能从这种干预中受益的患者定制RPSS。
    背景:NCT03956407。
    BACKGROUND: Repetitive peripheral nerve sensory stimulation (RPSS) is a potential add-on intervention to motor training for rehabilitation of upper limb paresis after stroke. Benefits of RPSS were reported in subjects in the chronic phase after stroke, but there is limited information about the effects of this intervention within the 1st weeks or months. The primary goal of this study is to compare, in a head-to-head proof-of-principle study, the impact of a single session of suprasensory vs. subsensory RPSS on the upper limb motor performance and learning in subjects at different phases after stroke subacute and chronic phases and mild upper limb motor impairments after stroke. In addition, we examine the effects of RPSS on brain perfusion, functional imaging activation, and γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) levels. Subjects with mild upper limb motor impairments will be tested with MRI and clinical assessment either at an early (7 days to 3 months post-stroke) or at a chronic (>6 months) stage after stroke.
    METHODS: In this multicenter, randomized, parallel-group, proof-of-principle clinical trial with blinded assessment of outcomes, we compare the effects of one session of suprasensory or subsensory RPSS in patients with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke and upper limb paresis. Clinical assessment and MRI will be performed only once in each subject (either at an early or at a chronic stage). The primary outcome is the change in performance in the Jebsen-Taylor test. Secondary outcomes: hand strength, cerebral blood flow assessed with arterial spin labeling, changes in the blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) effect in ipsilesional and contralesional primary motor cortex (M1) on the left and the right hemispheres assessed with functional MRI (fMRI) during a finger-tapping task performed with the paretic hand, and changes in GABA levels in ipsilesional and contralesional M1 evaluated with spectroscopy. The changes in outcomes will be compared in four groups: suprasensory, early; subsensory, early; suprasensory, chronic; and subsensory, chronic.
    CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study are relevant to inform future clinical trials to tailor RPSS to patients more likely to benefit from this intervention.
    BACKGROUND: NCT03956407.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Controlled Clinical Trial
    本文介绍了经皮迷走神经刺激实验的数据,该实验表明,在前臂电刺激和有节奏的呼吸任务期间,年轻男性与女性相比,心脏压力感受器敏感性(cBRS)减弱。连续心电图,在20名年轻健康受试者的性别匹配队列中评估了心阻抗描记术和连续血压记录.之前,通过使用阈值跟踪方法结合两个有节奏的呼吸任务(0.1和0.2Hz)进行正中神经的电刺激,在主动或假性经皮迷走神经刺激期间和之后。计算自主神经和血液动力学参数,并采用线性混合模型和事后F检验进行差异分析。在假手术和活动条件之间,自主神经和血液动力学参数均无差异。然而,与女性相比,与神经刺激期间的刺激状况无关,男性参与者的总cBRS总体较低(女性:14.96±5.67ms/mmHg,男性:11.89±3.24ms/mmHg,p=0.031)和0.2Hz的节律呼吸(女性:21.49±8.47ms/mmHg,男性:15.12±5.70ms/mmHg,p=0.004)。而左内耳屏的迷走神经刺激并不影响心脏的传出迷走神经控制,我们发现在刺激期间男女压力感受器敏感性激活的模式相似,which,然而,它们的大小有很大不同,女性表现出总体较高的cBRS。
    This paper presents data from a transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation experiment that point towards a blunted cardiac baroreceptor sensitivity (cBRS) in young males compared to females during electrical stimulation of the forearm and a rhythmic breathing task. Continuous electrocardiography, impedance cardiography and continuous blood-pressure recordings were assessed in a sex-matched cohort of twenty young healthy subjects. Electrical stimulation of the median nerve was conducted by using a threshold-tracking method combined with two rhythmic breathing tasks (0.1 and 0.2 Hz) before, during and after active or sham transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation. Autonomic and hemodynamic parameters were calculated, and differences were analyzed by using linear mixed models and post hoc F-tests. None of the autonomic and hemodynamic parameters differed between the sham and active conditions. However, compared to females, male participants had an overall lower total cBRS independent of stimulation condition during nerve stimulation (females: 14.96 ± 5.67 ms/mmHg, males: 11.89 ± 3.24 ms/mmHg, p = 0.031) and rhythmic breathing at 0.2 Hz (females: 21.49 ± 8.47 ms/mmHg, males: 15.12 ± 5.70 ms/mmHg, p = 0.004). Whereas vagus nerve stimulation at the left inner tragus did not affect the efferent vagal control of the heart, we found similar patterns of baroreceptor sensitivity activation over the stimulation period in both sexes, which, however, significantly differed in their magnitude, with females showing an overall higher cBRS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:超声引导不能消除神经内注射的风险,在PNB期间必须避免。结合超声引导(USG),神经刺激(NS),并提倡注射压力监测以防止PNB期间的神经损伤。我们假设,与传统的固定阈值(控制)程序相比,结合患者量身定制的动态NS和实时压力感测(RTPS)可以降低USGPNB期间神经内注射和神经穿刺的发生率。
    方法:随机化,前瞻性研究。
    方法:手术室。
    方法:100名ASA体格状态I至III的骨科手术患者。
    方法:患者使用腋窝麻醉,坐骨神经或股骨USGPNB随机分为PresStim组(动态RTPS和NS设定为1.5mA,然后降低;n=50)或对照组(在线压力机械压力计和NS设定为0.2mA;n=50).
    方法:记录手术超声图像和视频,由两名超声引导下的PNB专家以随机顺序进行存储和审查。他们注意到所有阻塞神经的针与神经的关系和神经内注射。
    结果:进行了123例USGPNB(56例腋路臂丛神经阻滞,40例股神经阻滞和27例坐骨pop神经阻滞);记录和分析了235条阻塞的神经和视频(PresStim,118;控制,117).与对照组(18.8%)相比,PresStim组(12.7%)的感觉异常较少。对照组神经内注射的风险明显更高(比值比[OR],17.1;95%置信区间[CI],2.2-135,P=0.007)。神经穿刺的风险(OR,22.7;95%CI,2.9-175,p=0.003)和针-神经接触(OR,4.7;95%CI,2.4-9.5,p<0.001)在对照组中明显高于PresStim组。
    结论:在研究条件下,结合RTPS的动态三重监控,NS和USG减少了PNB手术期间的神经内注射和无意的针-神经接触和穿刺。
    OBJECTIVE: Ultrasound guidance does not eliminate the risk of intraneural injection, which must be avoided during PNB. Combining ultrasound guidance (USG), nerve stimulation (NS), and injection pressure monitoring is advocated to prevent nerve injury during PNB. We hypothesized that combining patient-tailored dynamic NS and real-time pressure sensing (RTPS) could reduce the incidence of intraneural injection and nerve puncture during USG PNB compared with a traditional fixed thresholds (Control) procedure.
    METHODS: Randomized, prospective study.
    METHODS: Operating room.
    METHODS: One hundred ASA physical status I to III patients undergoing orthopedic surgery.
    METHODS: Patient anesthetized using axillary, sciatic or femoral USG PNB were randomized to the PresStim group (Dynamic RTPS and NS set at 1.5 mA then decreased; n = 50) or Control group (fixed thresholds for in-line pressure mechanical manometer and NS at 0.2 mA; n = 50).
    METHODS: Procedural ultrasound images and videos were recorded, stored and reviewed in random order by two experts in ultrasound-guided PNB blinded to the group. They noted the needle-to-nerve relationship and intraneural injection for all blocked nerves.
    RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-three USG PNBs were performed (56 axillary brachial plexus blocks, 40 femoral nerve blocks and 27 sciatic popliteal nerve blocks); 235 blocked nerves and videos were recorded and analyzed (PresStim, 118; Control, 117). Less paresthesia was noted in the PresStim group (12.7%) compared with the Control group (18.8%). The risk of intraneural injection was significantly higher in the Control group (odds ratio [OR], 17.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.2-135, P = 0.007). The risk of nerve puncture (OR, 22.7; 95% CI, 2.9-175, p = 0.003) and needle-nerve contact (OR, 4.7; 95% CI, 2.4-9.5, p < 0.001) was significantly higher in the Control group than the PresStim group.
    CONCLUSIONS: Under the conditions of the study, dynamic triple monitoring combining RTPS, NS and USG decreases intraneural injection and unintentional needle-nerve contact and puncture during a PNB procedure.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    跟腱的手术修复可导致小腿长期萎缩和功能受限,即使是早期的负重。神经肌肉电刺激(NMES)的使用已在前交叉韧带修复后的肌肉康复计划中进行了研究。注意到加速恢复和疼痛减轻。本研究的目的是评估电刺激在维持小腿肌肉横截面积体积和改善跟腱手术后患者报告的结果指标方面的应用。随机对照临床试验。纳入40例患者。所有患者均接受了跟腱修复。在手术时应用4导联NMES装置,患者和外科医生均不知道装置的活动。所有患者都遵循标准化的术后方案。第1组由接受协议特异性NMES的20名患者组成。第2组是“假装置”对照组,接受亚治疗电刺激。术前和术后小腿围(2、6、12周)和磁共振成像(MRI)扫描(2、6周)。测量患者报告的功能结果评分。在40名患者中,男性23人(57.5%),女性17人(42.5%)。平均年龄为48.9岁(11.1标准偏差[SD]),平均体重指数为32.2kg/m2(5.7SD)。在术后6周和12周时,第1组(39.3cm和39.7cm)的小腿测量值略高于第2组(38.4cm和39.2cm)。最后随访时,第1组和第2组的功能评分相似。脚/脚踝计算机自适应测试得分为55.1(6.9SD)和58.4(8.6SD),美国骨科足踝协会踝足评分分别为82.3(8.2SD)和83.9(9.3SD),分别。第1组和第2组12周随访时的视觉模拟量表为8.4(9.3SD)和8.4(9.1SD),分别。这项前瞻性随机对照试验旨在量化和验证NMES在急性或慢性修复后最小化小腿萎缩的效果和能力。在活跃NMES和假对照组之间没有发现统计学上的显着差异。有一种趋势显示,每次MRI研究都会维持小腿体积。
    Surgical repair of the Achilles tendon can lead to prolonged calf atrophy and functional limitations, even with early weightbearing. The use of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) has been studied in muscle rehabilitation programs following anterior cruciate ligament repair. Accelerated recovery and pain reduction were noted. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the use of electrical stimulation on maintaining calf muscle cross-sectional area volume and improving patient reported outcome measures following Achilles tendon surgery. Randomized controlled clinical trial. Forty patients were enrolled. All patients had undergone repair of the Achilles tendon. A 4 lead NMES device was applied at time of surgery with both patient and surgeon blinded to activity of the device. All patients followed a standardized postoperative protocol. Group 1 consisted of 20 patients who received protocol specific NMES. Group 2 was the \"sham device\" control group, receiving subtherapeutic electrical stimulation. Preoperative and postoperative calf circumference (2, 6, 12 weeks) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans (2, 6 weeks) were conducted. Patient-reported functional outcome scores were measured. Of the 40 patients, 23 (57.5%) were male and 17 (42.5%) were female. The mean age was 48.9 years (11.1 standard deviation [SD]) with a mean body mass index of 32.2 kg/m2 (5.7 SD). Calf measurements for Group 1 (39.3 cm and 39.7 cm) were slightly higher compared Group 2 (38.4 cm and 39.2 cm) at 6 and 12 weeks postoperative. Functional scores were similar between Groups 1 and 2 at final follow-up. Foot/Ankle Computer Adaptive Test scores were 55.1 (6.9 SD) versus 58.4(8.6 SD), and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot scores were 82.3 (8.2 SD) and 83.9 (9.3 SD), respectively. The visual analog scale at 12-week visit for Groups 1 and 2 was 8.4 (9.3 SD) and 8.4 (9.1 SD), respectively. This prospective randomized controlled trial was undertaken to quantify and validate the effect and ability of NMES to minimize calf atrophy after acute or chronic repair. No statistically significant difference was found between active NMES and sham control group. There was a trend showing some maintenance of calf volume per MRI study.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号