BACKGROUND: International practice guidelines advocate for the use of anti-phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R) antibody testing to diagnose primary membranous nephropathy (pMN). This study aimed to clarify the current status of anti-PLA2R antibody testing in the diagnosis of pMN in Japan and to scrutinize the factors associated with the implementation of this antibody test.
METHODS: Utilizing a web-based questionnaire for nephrologists, responses were collected from 306 facilities and 427 nephrologists between November 2021 and December 2021. Preference for anti-PLA2R antibody testing was also investigated. Factors related to the experience of quantifying anti-PLA2R antibodies were estimated by generalized estimating equations using a robust analysis of variance with clusters of facilities of affiliation.
RESULTS: Of the 427 respondents, 140 (32.8%) had previous measurement experience at their current workplace and 165 (38.6%) had previous measurement experience overall. In pMN-suspected cases without contraindications to renal biopsy, 147 (34.4%) of the respondents opted to request anti-PLA2R antibody testing. The respondents\' experience with anti-PLA2R antibody quantification at their current place of work was generally higher in university hospitals and increased with the annual number of kidney biopsies and the number of years since graduation.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that a significant proportion of nephrologists in Japan have no experience in performing anti-PLA2R antibody assays, and that the assays may be hampered by the limited capabilities of the current workplace and the financial burden on facilities and patients.

A large proportion of hospitalized surgical and medical patients are at risk for venous thromboembolism. Depending on the type of surgical intervention, venous thrombosis develops in 15-60% of surgical patients without prophylaxis. Although venous thromboembolism is most often considered to be associated with recent surgery or trauma, 50 to 70% of symptomatic thromboembolic events and 70 to 80% of fatal pulmonary embolisms occur in nonsurgical patients. International and national registries show that the majority of at-risk surgical patients actually received the appropriate thromboembolic prophylaxis. However, despite of international and national recommendations, prophylaxis was not provided for a large proportion of at-risk medical patients. The rate of medical patients receiving prophylaxis should be increased, and appropriate thrombosis prophylaxis should be offered to at-risk medical patients. The thrombosis risk assessment is an important tool to identify patients at increased risk for venous thromboembolism, to simplify decision making on prophylaxis administration, and to improve the adherence to guidelines. When the risk is recognized, if there is no contraindication, prophylaxis should be ordered. The 4th Hungarian Antithrombotic Guideline entitled \"Risk reduction and treatment of thromboembolism\" calls attention to the importance of risk assessment and for the first time it includes and recommends risk assessment models for hospitalized surgical and medical patients. The risk assessment models are presented and the evidence based data for the different risk factors included in these models are reviewed.

暂无摘要。