The NLRP3 inflammasome drives release of pro-inflammatory cytokines including interleukin (IL)-1β and IL-18 and is a potential target for ulcerative colitis (UC). Selnoflast (RO7486967) is an orally active, potent, selective and reversible small molecule NLRP3 inhibitor. We conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled Phase 1b study to assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of selnoflast.
Nineteen adults with previous diagnosis of UC and current active moderate to severe disease were randomized 2:1 to selnoflast or placebo for 7 days. A dose of 450 mg QD (once daily) was selected to achieve 90% IL-1β inhibition in plasma and colon tissue. Consecutive blood, sigmoid colon biopsies and stool samples were analyzed for a variety of PD markers. Safety and PK were also evaluated.
Selnoflast was well-tolerated. Plasma concentrations increased rapidly after oral administration, reaching Tmax 1 h post-dose. Mean plasma concentrations stayed above the IL-1β IC90 level throughout the dosing interval (mean Ctrough on Day 1 and Day 5: 2.55 μg/mL and 2.66 μg/mL, respectively). At steady state, post-dose selnoflast concentrations in sigmoid colon (5-20 μg/g) were above the IC90 . Production of IL-1β was reduced in whole blood following ex vivo stimulation with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (in the selnoflast arm). No changes were observed in plasma IL-18 levels. There were no meaningful differences in the expression of an IL-1-related gene signature in sigmoid colon tissue, and no differences in the expression of stool biomarkers.
Selnoflast was safe and well-tolerated. Selnoflast 450 mg QD achieved plasma and tissue exposure predicted to maintain IL-1β IC90 over the dosing interval. However, PD biomarker results showed no robust differences between treatment arms, suggesting no major therapeutic effects are to be expected in UC. The limitations of this study are its small sample size and indirect assessment of the effect on IL-1β in tissue.
ISRCTN16847938.

BACKGROUND: Erosive Hand OsteoArthritis (EHOA) is a common rheumatological problem. We aim to determine characteristics of EHOA patients: comorbidities, radiographic erosivity and pain experienced after being diagnosed, in order to find which of these are potentially relevant in upcoming interventional trials.
METHODS: Retrospective analysis of EHOA patients within the electronic database in one centre, with a telephone interview on pain as experienced even exceeding 12 months after being diagnosed.
RESULTS: Eighty-four non-academic EHOA patients were found: 89% females (median age 69 years), 11% males (similar age distribution). Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) erosivity scores in both sexes were comparable; DIPs scored higher than PIP\'s. Comorbid conditions were crystal-induced arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in 8%, 5% and 1%, respectively; seropositivity for rheumatoid factor and anti-citrullinated protein antibodies in 8% and 1% respectively. Pain worst experienced often exceeded a visual analogue score of 5.0, but was unrelated to the total KL score. Some pain reduction was reached with non-steroidals (perorally/transcutaneously) as deduced from continued use in 1 in 3.
CONCLUSIONS: In many EHOA patients, there is an unmet need regarding the treatment of pain, which per se was not directly correlated with erosivity score. Future studies may be designed considering the aforementioned characteristics, acting on the inflammatory process resulting in PIP/DIP erosions, with the exclusion of RA and PsA in order to get a clean study on EHOA. Several studies with monoclonal antibodies have been performed but demonstrated ineffectivity on the outcome of pain. Hope glooms with the arrival of innovative small molecules that may reach EHOA target cells. Key Points • Erosive handOA is a common problem in non-academic rheumatology; it is often associated with significant pain in both sexes exceeding a VASpain of 5.0 even years after being diagnosed; 1 in 3 found some relief in non-steroidals perorally/transcutaneously. • Future studies will have to focus on (episodic) inflammatory hand OA resulting in proven erosivity (EHOA) located in PIP plus DIP joints and may have to exclude comorbid active crystal-induced arthritis as well as rheumatoid/psoriatic arthritis and possibly even RF/ACPA seropositivity in order to get a clean study on EHOA. • As several big monoclonals have failed in EHOA, we may have to search for promising new drugs within the group of small molecules. These will have to show a significant pain-reducing effect and preferably also a disease-modifying osteoarthritis drug (DMOAD) effect.