BACKGROUND: The goal was to improve the clinical cognition of nonaccelerating myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms-unclassifiable (MDS/MPN-U) and avoid misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis.
METHODS: The clinical manifestations, laboratory indicators, histopathology, and therapeutic effects of a patient with nonaccelerating MDS/MPN-U were analyzed and the relevant literature was reviewed.
RESULTS: Blood routine: white blood cell 98.48 x 109/L, red blood cell 3.20 x 1012/L, basophils 0.42 x 109/L, eosinophils 1.31 x 109/L, hemoglobin 112 g/L, and platelet 113 x 109/L. Blood smears showed granulocytosis and cells at various stages, polylobular granulocytes also can be seen. Bone marrow images show granulocytosis and dysplastic neutrophils, such as binuclear granulocyte, cyclic nuclear granulocyte, nuclear punch, cytoplasm vacuoles, polylobular granulocytes and so on. Bone marrow biopsy: Bone marrow proliferation tumor, combined with cell morphology and molecular biochemistry is recommended. Gene test showed Jak-2 positive, BCR/ABL and MPL negative. Chromosome examination indicated the presence of 46, XY, add (2)(p25), del (12) (p11.2p13)[16]/46, XY.
CONCLUSIONS: MDS/MPN-U with granulocytosis and dysplastic neutrophils is rare, mostly in the elderly, and the diagnosis should be made except for other myeloid tumors. Currently, there is no uniform treatment guideline or expert consensus. The treatment options are limited and need to be further confirmed by more studies. MDS/ MPN-U with granulocytosis and dysplastic neutrophils has adverse prognostic factors such as advanced age, increase of bone marrow original cells and related gene mutations. Whether the adverse prognosis is related to specific gene mutations and cytogenetic variation remains to be clarified by more research data.

We investigated data from 180 consecutive patients with myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms with SF3B1 mutation and thrombocytosis (MDS/MPN-SF3B1-T) who were diagnosed according to the 2022 World Health Organization (WHO) classification of myeloid neoplasms to identify covariates associated with survival. At a median follow-up of 48 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 35-61 months), the median survival was 69 months (95% CI 59-79 months). Patients with bone marrow ring sideroblasts (RS) < 15% had shorter median overall survival (OS) than did those with bone marrow RS ≥ 15% (41 months [95% CI 32-50 months] versus 76 months [95% CI 59-93 months]; P < 0.001). According to the univariable analyses of OS, age ≥ 65 years (P < 0.001), hemoglobin concentration (Hb) < 80 g/L (P = 0.090), platelet count (PLT) ≥ 800 × 10E + 9/L (P = 0.087), bone marrow RS < 15% (P < 0.001), the Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R) cytogenetic category intermediate/poor/very poor (P = 0.005), SETBP1 mutation (P = 0.061) and SRSF2 mutation (P < 0.001) were associated with poor survival. Based on variables selected from univariable analyses, two separate survival prediction models, a clinical survival model, and a clinical-molecular survival model, were developed using multivariable analyses with the minimum value of the Akaike information criterion (AIC) to specifically predict outcomes in patients with MDS/MPN-SF3B1-T according to the 2022 WHO classification.

Myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative diseases of childhood cause a relevant disease burden, and many of these diseases may have a fatal course. The use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) has led to the identification of novel genetic variants in patients with these diseases, advancing our understanding of the underlying pathophysiology. However, novel mutations can often only be interpreted as variants of unknown significance (VUS), hindering adequate diagnosis and the use of a targeted therapy. To improve variant interpretation and test targeted therapies in a preclinical setting, we are using a rapid zebrafish embryo model that allows functional evaluation of the novel variant and possible therapeutic approaches within days. Thereby, we accelerate the translation from genetic findings to treatment options. Here, we establish this workflow on a novel in-frame tandem duplication in NRAS (c.192_227dup; p.G75_E76insDS65_G75) identified by Sanger sequencing in a 2.5-year-old patient with an unclassifiable myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasm (MDS/MPN-U). We show that this variant results in a myeloproliferative phenotype in zebrafish embryos with expansion of immature myeloid cells in the caudal hematopoietic tissue, which can be reversed by MEK inhibition. Thus, we could reclassify the variant from likely pathogenic to pathogenic using the American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) criteria.

UNASSIGNED: SETBP1 mutations are found in various clonal myeloid disorders. However, it is unclear whether they can initiate leukemia, because SETBP1 mutations typically appear as later events during oncogenesis. To answer this question, we generated a mouse model expressing mutated SETBP1 in hematopoietic tissue: this model showed profound alterations in the differentiation program of hematopoietic progenitors and developed a myeloid neoplasm with megakaryocytic dysplasia, splenomegaly, and bone marrow fibrosis, prompting us to investigate SETBP1 mutations in a cohort of 36 triple-negative primary myelofibrosis (TN-PMF) cases. We identified 2 distinct subgroups, one carrying SETBP1 mutations and the other completely devoid of somatic variants. Clinically, a striking difference in disease aggressiveness was noted, with patients with SETBP1 mutation showing a much worse clinical course. In contrast to myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms, in which SETBP1 mutations are mostly found as a late clonal event, single-cell clonal hierarchy reconstruction in 3 patients with TN-PMF from our cohort revealed SETBP1 to be a very early event, suggesting that the phenotype of the different SETBP1+ disorders may be shaped by the opposite hierarchy of the same clonal SETBP1 variants.

Atypical chronic myeloid leukemia (aCML) is included in the group of myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms by the International Consensus Classification and has been renamed as MDS/MPN with neutrophilia by the fifth edition of World Health Organization classification. It is always characterized by morphologic identification of granulocytic dysplasia with >10% circulating immature myeloid cells, 2 distinguished features that differentiate this disease among the others. Somatic mutations may help to diagnose but are not specifically pathognomonic of the disease, with the most detected including ASXL1, SETBP1, NRAS, KRAS, SRSF2, and TET2 and with low-frequency CBL, CSF3R, JAK2, and ETNK1. The genomic landscape of aCML has been recently unravelling, revealing that SETBP1 and ETNK1 are usually not ancestral but secondary events associated with disease progression. Unfortunately, until now, no consensus on risk stratification and treatment has been developed: Mayo Clinic prognostic score identified as adverse events age >67 years, hemoglobin level <10  g/dL, and TET2 mutations. Although some possible genetic markers have been identified, allogeneic transplant remains the only curative strategy.

Myelodysplastic and myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPN) with neutrophilia, until recently called atypical chronic myeloid leukemia (aCML), being part of the MDS/MPN is a very rare disease with poor prognosis. Although emerging data reveal its cytogenetic and molecular profile, integrated survival and treatment data remain scarce. We analyzed a cohort of 347 adult patients diagnosed with MDS/MPN with neutrophilia, registered in the Netherlands Cancer Registry between 2001 and 2019. Our demographic baseline data align with other cohorts. We observed cytogenetic aberrations exclusively in patients aged >65 years, with trisomy 8 being the most common abnormality. We identified 16 distinct molecular mutations, with some patients (16/101) harboring up to 3 different mutations; ASXL1 being the most frequent one (22%). In a multivariable Cox regression analysis, only age, hemoglobin level and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (alloHSCT) were associated with overall survival (aged >65 years; hazard ratio [HR] 1.85; P = .001 and alloHSCT HR, 0.51; P = .039). Because no other treatment modality seemed to affect survival and might cause toxicity, we propose that all patients eligible for alloHSCT should, whenever possible, receive an allogeneic transplant. It is imperative that we strive to improve outcomes for patients who are not eligible for alloHSCT. Tackling this challenge requires international collaborative efforts to conduct prospective intervention studies.

Diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) is often challenging and requires integration of clinical, morphologic, cytogenetics and molecular information. Flow cytometry immunophenotyping (FCIP) can support the diagnosis by demonstration of numerical and immunophenotypic abnormalities of progenitor and maturing myelomonocytic and erythroid populations. We have previously shown that comprehensive immunophenotypic analysis of the progenitor population is valuable in the diagnosis of MDS and myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPN). This study was designed to improve the analysis method and confirm its value in a larger cohort of patients.
FCIP of bone marrow samples from 105 patients with cytopenia(s) (with or without leukocytosis) and clinical concern for MDS or MDS/MPN was performed using a single-tube/10-color/13-marker assay. A modified analysis approach was used to obtain 11 progenitor parameters and 2 myelomonocytic parameters.
Significantly higher number of abnormalities were identified in MDS and MDS/MPN cases when compared to cytopenic patients not meeting the diagnostic criteria for MDS (Non-MDS). A FCIP score that combined the 13 parameters showed a sensitivity of 89.8% and specificity of 93.5% for the diagnosis of MDS and MDS/MPN. The sensitivity was 100% for both MDS/MPN and higher-risk MDS, and 81.3% for lower-risk MDS.
This study confirms that detailed immunophenotypic analysis of the progenitor population is powerful in the diagnosis of MDS and MDS/MPN. The combination of markers used in the panel allowed for evaluation of two relatively new parameters, namely myeloid progenitor heterogeneity and stem cell aberrancy, which improved the sensitivity of the assay for lower-risk MDS.

Haploidentical donors offer a potentially readily available donor, especially for non-White patients, for hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). In this North American collaboration, we retrospectively analyzed outcomes of first HCT using haploidentical donor and post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) in myelodysplastic syndrome/myeloproliferative neoplasm (MDS/MPN) overlap neoplasms (MDS/MPN). We included 120 consecutive patients who underwent HCT using a haploidentical donor for MDS/MPN across 15 centers. Median age was 62.5 years and 38% were of non-White/Caucasian ethnicity. The median follow-up was 2.4 years. Graft failure was reported in seven of 120 (6%) patients. At 3 years, nonrelapse mortality (NRM) was 25% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 17-34), relapse 27% (95% CI: 18-36), grade 3-4 acute graftversus- host disease 12% (95% CI: 6-18), chronic graft-versus-host disease requiring systemic immunosuppression 14% (95% CI: 7-20), progression-free survival (PFS) 48% (95% CI: 39-59), and overall survival (OS) 56% (95% CI: 47-67). On multivariable analysis, NRM was statistically significantly associated with advancing age at HCT (per decade increment, subdistribution hazard ratio [sdHR] =3.28; 95% CI: 1.30-8.25); relapse with the presence of mutation in EZH2/RUNX1/SETBP1 (sdHR=2.61; 95% CI: 1.06-6.44); PFS with advancing age at HCT (per decade increment, HR=1.98, 95% CI: 1.13-3.45); and OS with advancing age at HCT (per decade increment, HR=2.01; 95% CI: 1.11-3.63) and splenomegaly at HCT/prior splenectomy (HR=2.20; 95% CI: 1.04-4.65). Haploidentical donors are a viable option for HCT in MDS/MPN, especially for those disproportionately represented in the unrelated donor registry. Hence, donor mismatch should not preclude HCT for patients with MDS/MPN, an otherwise incurable malignancy. In addition to patient age, disease-related factors including splenomegaly and high-risk mutations dominate outcomes following HCT.

Identification of genomic signatures with consistent clinicopathological features in myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasm (MDS/MPN) is critical for improved diagnosis, elucidation of biology, inclusion in clinical trials, and development of therapies. We describe clinical and pathological features with co-existence of mutations in ASXL1 (missense or nonsense), SRSF2, and SKI homologous region of SETBP1, in 18 patients. Median age was 68 years with a male predominance (83%). Leukocytosis and neutrophilia were common at presentation. Marrow features included hypercellularity, granulocytic hyperplasia with megakaryocytic atypia, while the majority had myeloid hyperplasia and/or erythroid hypoplasia, myeloid dysplasia, and aberrant CD7 expression on blasts. Mutations in growth signaling pathways (RAS or JAK2) were noted at diagnosis or acquired during the disease course in 83% of patients. Two patients progressed upon acquisition of FLT3-TKD (acute myeloid leukemia) or KIT (aggressive systemic mastocytosis) mutations. The prognosis is poor with only two long-term survivors, thus far, who underwent blood or marrow transplantation. We propose that the presence of co-occurring ASXL1, SRSF2, and SETBP1 mutations can be diagnostic of a subtype of MDS/MPN with neutrophilia if clinical and morphological findings align. Our report underscores the association between genotype and phenotype within MDS/MPN and that genomic signatures should guide categorization of these entities.

BACKGROUND: Bilateral adrenal infarction is rare and only a small number of cases have been reported so far. Adrenal infarction is usually caused by thrombophilia or a hypercoagulable state, such as antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, pregnancy, and coronavirus disease 2019. However, adrenal infarction with myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasm (MDS/MPN) has not been reported.
METHODS: An 81-year-old man with a sudden severe bilateral backache presented to our hospital. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) led to the diagnosis of bilateral adrenal infarction. Previously reported causes of adrenal infarction were all excluded and a diagnosis of MDS/MPN-unclassifiable (MDS/MPN-U) was reached, which was considered to be attributed to adrenal infarction. He developed a relapse of bilateral adrenal infarction, and aspirin administration was initiated. Partial primary adrenal insufficiency was suspected as the serum adrenocorticotropic hormone level was persistently high after the second bilateral adrenal infarction.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first case of bilateral adrenal infarction with MDS/MPN-U encountered. MDS/MPN has the clinical characteristics of MPN. It is reasonable to assume that MDS/MPN-U may have influenced bilateral adrenal infarction development, considering the absence of thrombosis history and a current comorbid hypercoagulable disease. This is also the first case of recurrent bilateral adrenal infarction. It is important to carefully investigate the underlying cause of adrenal infarction once adrenal infarction is diagnosed, as well as to assess adrenocortical function.