Guidelines for mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome clinical trials were published in 2011 to standardize endpoint criteria and trial design. Our retrospective cohort study of mycosis fungoides/Sézary syndrome clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov and pivotal trials supporting drug approvals and label extensions evaluates adherence to these guidelines. Sixty-three trials met our inclusion criteria. In a subpopulation of trials, mean adherence to the guidelines was approximately 60%. When comparing trials that began in the first 6 years after their publication with those that started after, we found no difference in mean adherence (4.12 vs 3.41) (P = .15). Among the 8 pivotal trials supporting new mycosis fungoides or Sézary syndrome systemic therapies from 1990 to 2020, systemic trials published after 2011 were more likely to randomize patients (100 vs 0%, P = .036), perform superiority testing (100 vs 0%, P = .036), and use an intention-to-treat analysis (100 vs 0%, P = .036). The design of trials registered on Clinicaltrials.gov did not change significantly between the first 6 years after the publication of the guidelines and after. This demonstrates that the guidelines are still not consistently implemented across all trials. However, registrational trials were more likely to implement the recommendations.

On behalf of the EORTC Cutaneous Lymphoma Tumours Group (EORTC-CLTG) and following up on earlier versions published in 2006 and 2017 this document provides an updated standard for the treatment of mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome (MF/SS). It considers recent relevant publications and treatment options introduced into clinical practice after 2017. Consensus was established among the authors through a series of consecutive consultations in writing and a round of discussion. Treatment options are assigned to each disease stage and, whenever possible and clinically useful, separated into first- and second line options annotated with levels of evidence. Major changes to the previous version include the incorporation of chlormethine, brentuximab vedotin, and mogamulizumab, recommendations on the use of pegylated interferon α (after withdrawal of recombinant unpegylated interferons), and the addition of paragraphs on supportive therapy and on the care of older patients. Still, skin-directed therapies are the most appropriate option for early-stage MF and most patients have a normal life expectancy but may suffer morbidity and impaired quality of life. In advanced disease treatment options have expanded recently. Most patients receive multiple consecutive therapies with treatments often having a relatively short duration of response. For those patients prognosis is still poor and only for a highly selected subset long term remission can be achieved with allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Understanding of the disease, its epidemiology and clinical course, and its most appropriate management are gradually advancing, and there is well-founded hope that this will lead to further improvements in the care of patients with MF/SS.

BACKGROUND: In Europe chlormethine gel is licensed for the management of patients with mycosis fungoides of all stages. However, the optimal regimen regarding frequency and dosing as well as combination and maintenance therapy is not well established.
METHODS: Ten experts experienced in research and management of cutaneous T-cell lymphomas from Germany, Austria, and Switzerland (DACH region) were asked in written form to report on indication for chlormethine gel, frequency of use, monitoring, concomitant therapies, adverse effects, combination therapies in later stages of the disease, maintenance therapy, and adherence to this therapy for mycosis fungoides. The structured answers were discussed in a consensus conference and recommendations were developed.
RESULTS: Essential for therapy with chlormethine gel is an individualized and symptom-oriented management. Because of the lack of systemic resorption of topically administered chlormethine gel, systemic adverse events are unlikely. An allergic or irritative-toxic contact dermatitis is common but manageable with adaptation of the regimen, interruption of administration, and symptom-specific supportive measurements. A step-up initial approach with application of chlormethine gel every other day is associated with a better tolerability, especially if it is alternated with topical corticosteroids.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of chlormethine gel in the management of mycosis fungoides is often limited by a concomitant contact dermatitis. An adequate therapeutic regimen and the management of adverse effects can preclude an unnecessary withdrawal of therapy so that more patients can benefit from this treatment option.

Primary cutaneous lymphoma is a heterogeneous group of diseases where the malignant lymphocytes are primarily present in the skin at the time of diagnosis. The most common type of primary cutaneous lymphoma is mycosis fungoides. Early stages of mycosis fungoides present with flat or slightly elevated red skin lesions and can resemble eczema or psoriasis. In advanced stages erythrodermia or skin tumors can develop. For many patients with mycosis fungoides effective albeit not curative treatment is available. Large randomized treatment studies for mycosis fungoides are largely lacking, which makes decisions on treatment strategy difficult. The new national clinical guidelines will hopefully enable more equal care for patients with mycosis fungoides and other types of primary cutaneous lymphoma in Sweden.

Mycosis fungoides (MF) is a rare neoplasm representing the most frequent form of primary cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). Diagnosis of MF is generally complex, often requiring integration of clinical, histological, immunophenotypic and molecular data. Currently, there are no epidemiological data supported by registries or local studies on MF in Italy. Moreover, the clinical management of MF in Italy is heterogeneous, and differs according to the geographical area and experience of the physician who manages the disease. Considering the uncertainties in the current scenario for MF in Italy, a consensus project involving experts on CTCL was initiated to define the epidemiological impact of MF and obtain information about the current diagnostic and therapeutic pathway of this disease in Italy. The prevalence of MF in Italy was estimated to be 6,800 patients, 4,900 of whom with early stage of disease; the estimated incidence ranged between 270 and 330 new cases per year. Among the clinical figures involved in the multidisciplinary management of MF, dermatologists were recognized as a reference point for both diagnosis and therapeutic decisions. These findings suggest the importance of monitoring both the disease and its management; it is, therefore, interesting to set up regional registries for monitoring and recognition of rare tumor status for MF. The results further indicate the need to train physicians to favor more rapid diagnosis and simplify the pathway for referring patients to reference centers with adequate diagnostic and treatment standards. In light of the forthcoming introduction of new therapies, the development of a nationwide PDTA (Path of Diagnostic Therapeutic Care, in Italian defined as Percorso Diagnostico-Terapeutico Assistenziale) is also of substantial importance.

In this paper, we present a review of critical concepts, and produce recommendations on management issues in cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCLs) of adults. A panel of nine experts was selected for their expertise in research and clinical practice of CTCLs. During an initial meeting, the areas of major concern in the management of CTCLs were selected by generating and rank-ordering clinical key questions using the criterion of clinical relevance, through group discussion. Recommendations were achieved by multiple-step formalized procedures to reach a consensus after a comprehensive analysis of the scientific literature. The panel produced recommendations on how to facilitate the clinical suspicion of CTCL; indication of cutaneous biopsy; optimal histological diagnosis, immunohistochemistry and genetic markers; and staging pathway and up-to-date therapeutics (with particular focus on new treatments). The critical concept of integration of the different medical expertise in the management of the patients with CTCL was thoroughly examined. These recommendations are intended for use not only by expert centers but above all by \"not experienced\" dermatologists and hematologists as well as general practitioners.

BACKGROUND: Phototherapy is a mainstay for the treatment of MF. However, there is scarce evidence for its use, mostly due to the lack of a unified schedule.
OBJECTIVE: The primary aim of this study was to establish the first structured, expert-based consensus regarding the indications and technical schedules of NB-UVB and PUVA for MF. The secondary aim was to determine the consensus level for each specific item.
METHODS: E-delphi study. Item-specific expert consensus was defined as the number of \"Totally Agree\" results to ≥80% of the panelists. Cronbach alpha index ≥0.7 was used as a measure of homogeneity in the responses among questions related to the same topic.
RESULTS: Overall, there was a high homogeneity among responders (0.78). On specific topics, the highest grade was observed for technical items (0.8) followed by indications for early (0.73) and advanced stages (0.7).
CONCLUSIONS: Items related to the most canonical indications of phototherapy and to treatment schedules showed the highest agreements rates. There is consensus about the use of standardized treatment schedules for the induction and consolidation phases for NB-UVB and PUVA in MF.

Introducing a sensitive and specific peripheral blood flow cytometric assay for Sézary syndrome and mycosis fungoides (SS/MF) requires careful selection of assay design characteristics, and translation into a laboratory developed assay through development/optimization, validation, and continual quality monitoring. As outlined in a previous article in this series, the recommended design characteristics of this assay include at a minimum, evaluation of CD7, CD3, CD4, CD8, CD26, and CD45, analyzed simultaneously, requiring at least a 6 color flow cytometry system, with both quantitative and qualitative components. This article provides guidance from an international group of cytometry specialists in implementing an assay to those design specifications, outlining specific considerations, and best practices. Key points presented in detail are: (a) Pre-analytic components (reagents, specimen processing, and acquisition) must be optimized to: (i) identify and characterize an abnormal population of T-cells (qualitative component) and (ii) quantitate the abnormal population (semi/quasi-quantitative component). (b)Analytic components (instrument set-up/acquisition/analysis strategy and interpretation) must be optimized for the identification of SS/MF populations, which can vary widely in phenotype. Comparison with expert laboratories is strongly encouraged in order to establish competency. (c) Assay performance must be validated and documented through a validation plan and report, which covers both qualitative and semi/quasi-quantitative assay components (example template provided). (d) Ongoing assay-specific quality monitoring should be performed to ensure consistency.

Mycosis fungoides (MF) is the most common subtype of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), and Sézary syndrome (SS) is a rare erythrodermic and leukemic subtype of CTCL characterized by significant blood involvement. Although early-stage disease can be effectively treated predominantly with skin-directed therapies, systemic therapy is often necessary for the treatment of advanced-stage disease. Systemic therapy options have evolved in recent years with the approval of novel agents such as romidepsin, brentuximab vedotin, and mogamulizumab. These NCCN Guidelines Insights discuss the diagnosis and management of MF and SS (with a focus on systemic therapy).

A peripheral blood flow cytometric assay for Sézary syndrome (SS) or circulating mycosis fungoides (MF) cells must be able to reliably identify, characterize, and enumerate T-cells with an immunophenotype that differs from non-neoplastic T-cells. Although it is also important to distinguish SS and MF from other subtypes of T-cell neoplasm, this usually requires information in addition to the immunophenotype, such as clinical and morphologic features. This article outlines the approach recommended by an international group with experience and expertise in this area. The following key points are discussed: (a) At a minimum, a flow cytometric assay for SS and MF should include the following six antibodies: CD3, CD4, CD7, CD8, CD26, and CD45. (b) An analysis template must reliably detect abnormal T-cells, even when they lack staining for CD3 or CD45, or demonstrate a phenotype that is not characteristic of normal T-cells. (c) Gating strategies to identify abnormal T-cells should be based on the identification of subsets with distinctly homogenous immunophenotypic properties that are different from those expected for normal T-cells. (d) The blood concentration of abnormal cells, based on any immunophenotypic abnormalities indicative of MF or SS, should be calculated by either direct enumeration or a dual-platform method, and reported.