Musculoskeletal Manipulations

肌肉骨骼手法
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究旨在研究手动治疗(MT)对健康年轻人呼吸功能的直接影响。这项研究包括104名参与者,由大学生组成(87名女性,17名男性,平均年龄20.1±2.2)。参与者被随机分配到MT(实验;n=52)和假MT(对照组;n=52)组。实验组进行了胸部操作和动员以及隔膜动员。在对照组中,手放在相同的区域,但没有具体的干预措施。所有参与者在干预前后均使用便携式肺活量计(PEF-峰值呼气流量;FEV1-1s内用力呼气量;FVC-用力肺活量和FEV1/FVC-Tiffeneau指数)进行呼吸功能测试。在实验组中,应用MT后平均PEF值从296.3±110.8显著增加至316.1±119.1(p=0.018).相反,对照组的平均PEF值从337.1±93.3略微下降至324.5±89.2(p=0.002).在FVC中没有观察到显著的变化,两组干预前后的FEV1或FEV1/FVC值。单个MT会话导致健康年轻人PEF的显着改善。需要进一步的研究来探索MT对呼吸功能的长期影响及其在临床实践中的潜在意义。试验注册ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT05934240(2023年6月7日)。
    This study aimed to investigate the immediate effects of manual therapy (MT) on the respiratory functions of healthy young individuals. The study included 104 participants, consisting of university students (87 females, 17 males, mean age 20.1 ± 2.2). Participants were randomly assigned to the MT (experimental; n = 52) and sham-MT (control; n = 52) groups. The experimental group underwent thoracic manipulations and mobilizations along with diaphragm mobilization. In the control group, the hands were placed on the same regions, but no specific intervention was applied. All participants underwent respiratory function testing before and after the intervention using a portable spirometer (PEF- Peak expiratory flow; FEV 1- Forced expiratory volume in 1 s; FVC- Forced vital capacity and FEV1/FVC- Tiffeneau index). In the experimental group, there was a significant increase in the mean PEF value following MT application from 296.3 ± 110.8 to 316.1 ± 119.1 (p = 0.018). Conversely, the mean PEF value in the control group showed a slight decrease from 337.1 ± 93.3 to 324.5 ± 89.2 (p = 0.002). No significant changes were observed in FVC, FEV1, or FEV1/FVC values pre- and post-intervention in either groups. A single MT session led to a significant improvement in PEF in healthy young individuals. Further research is needed to explore the long-term effects of MT on respiratory functions and its potential implications in clinical practice.Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05934240 (06/07/2023).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在慢性下腰痛(CLBP)患者中纳入腰骨盆稳定核心和控制运动锻炼的重要性加强了通过减少生物医学假设来改善生物心理社会信念的策略的使用。然而,临床实践指南推荐结合运动和手动治疗(MT)的多模式方法,相反,孤立地拒绝应用kinsiotape(KT)。因此,本研究的目的是使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)分析12周运动联合MT或KT对CLBP(轻度残疾)中腹直肌和多裂肌肌电图(EMG)测量的感觉下腰痛的影响,并探讨干预后腹直肌和多裂比率与疼痛感知之间的关系.一个盲人,进行为期12周的随机对照试验(RCT),涉及三个平行的CLBP患者组。该研究已在Clinicaltrial.gov注册,并分配了标识号NCT05544890(19/09/22)。该试验进行了意向治疗分析。主要结果揭示了多模式治疗计划,辅以额外的治疗方法,如MT和KT,导致感觉下腰痛显著减少。对CLBP个体的主观评估表明,与MT或KT结合使用时,独家核心稳定性练习和控制运动训练之间没有明显区别。值得注意的是,我们的研究结果表明,在运动组中,右腹直肌的平均和峰值EMG值都发生了积极的变化,表明对肌肉激活的有益影响。这项研究的重点是评估躯干肌肉组织的激活水平,特别是腹直肌(RA)和多裂肌(MF),根据Oswestry残疾指数,CLBP表现出轻度残疾的个体。重要的是,观察到VAS值的改善与肌肉电活动的变化无关.
    The importance of incorporating lumbo-pelvic stability core and controlling motor exercises in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) reinforces the use of strategies to improve biopsychosocial beliefs by reducing biomedical postulations. However, clinical practice guidelines recommend multimodal approaches incorporating exercise and manual therapy (MT), and instead reject the application of kinesiotape (KT) in isolation. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to analyze the effects of 12 weeks of exercises combined with MT or KT on perceived low back pain using the visual analog scale (VAS) and muscle electric activity measured with electromyography (EMG) of the rectus abdominis and multifidus in CLBP (mild disability) and to explore the relationship between the rectus abdominis and multifidus ratios and pain perception after intervention. A blinded, 12-week randomized controlled trial (RCT) was carried out, involving three parallel groups of patients with CLBP. The study was registered at Clinicaltrial.gov and assigned the identification number NCT05544890 (19/09/22). The trial underwent an intention-to-treat analysis. The primary outcome revealed a multimodal treatment program supplemented by additional therapies such as MT and KT, resulting in significant reductions in perceived low back pain. The subjective assessment of individuals with CLBP indicated no discernible distinction between exclusive core stability exercises and control-motor training when combined with MT or KT. Notably, our findings demonstrated positive alterations in both the mean and peak EMG values of the right rectus abdominis in the exercise group, suggesting a beneficial impact on muscle activation. This study focused on assessing the activation levels of the trunk musculature, specifically the rectus abdominis (RA) and multifidus (MF), in individuals with CLBP exhibiting mild disability according to the Oswestry Disability Index. Importantly, improvements in the VAS values were observed independently of changes in muscle electrical activity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    2024年是国际骨科手法物理治疗师联合会(IFOMPT)成立50周年。IFOMPT成为世界物理治疗的第一个亚组。IFOMPT旨在并致力于全球促进手册/肌肉骨骼物理治疗师的临床和学术标准的卓越和统一。本文反映了IFOMPT作为一个国际组织在前50年的一些举措和成就,以及未来50年的挑战。IFOMPT在几项举措中取得了成就。其中包括开发操纵/肌肉骨骼理疗的国际教育课程,该课程是会员教育标准的基础。会员的教育标准是专业组织相对独特的要求。IFOMPT在制定若干举措方面取得了成就,为其成员和更广泛的社区传播最佳实践标准的知识。顶峰是其四届年度国际科学会议,其中介绍和讨论了研究和实践中的最新问题。IFOMPT还开发了框架,以指导安全实践的关键领域的临床实践-颈部血管病变,识别“危险信号”的临床推理途径,以及在儿科中使用脊柱操纵。其他资源包括在线讲座,播客和研究评论。IFOMPT对未来有挑战。这些措施包括增加成员国的数量,并在国际范围内进一步确立其在手动/肌肉骨骼理疗方面的形象和领导地位,特别是世界卫生决策者。
    2024 marks the 50th anniversary of the International Federation of Orthopaedic Manipulative Physical Therapists (IFOMPT). IFOMPT became the first subgroup of World Physiotherapy. IFOMPT aims and works for global promotion of excellence and unity in clinical and academic standards for manual/musculoskeletal physiotherapists. This dissertation reflects on some of IFOMPT\'s initiatives and achievements as an international organisation in its first 50 years as well as challenges for next 50 years. IFOMPT has achieved in several initiatives. These include the development of an international educational curriculum in manipulative/musculoskeletal physiotherapy which underpins education standards for membership. Educational standards for membership is a relatively unique requirement of a professional organisation. IFOMPT has achieved in developing several initiatives to disseminate knowledge for best standards of practice for its members and the wider community. The pinnacle is its four yearly international scientific conferences where the latest issues in both research and practice are presented and discussed. IFOMPT has also developed frameworks to guide clinical practice in key areas for safe practice - vascular pathologies of the neck, a clinical reasoning pathway to identify \'red flags\', and the use of spinal manipulation in paediatrics. Other resources include on-line lectures, podcasts and research reviews. IFOMPT has challenges for the future. These include increasing the number of member countries and further establishing its profile and position of leadership in manual/musculoskeletal physiotherapy in the international context, particularly with decision makers in world health.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    慢性非特异性颈痛(CNNP)的脊柱操作包括颈椎,颈胸交界处,和胸椎(CCT)操作以及上颈椎(UCS)操作。这项研究旨在比较UCS操作与CCT脊柱操作组合对疼痛强度的短期影响,残疾,CNNP患者的颈椎活动度(CROM)。在私人物理治疗诊所,186名CNNP参与者被随机分配到UCS(n=93)或CCT(n=93)操作组。颈部疼痛,残疾,在干预前和干预后一周测量CROM。两组之间在疼痛强度和CROM方面没有发现显着差异。然而,颈部残疾有统计学上的显著差异,CCT组的下降幅度稍大(CCT:16.9±3.8vs.UCS:19.5±6.8;p=0.01)。研究结果表明,与一周后的CNNP患者进行UCS操作相比,CCT脊柱操作的组合可导致自我感知的残疾减少。然而,两组间疼痛强度或CROM无统计学差异.
    Spinal manipulations for chronic non-specific neck pain (CNNP) include cervical, cervicothoracic junction, and thoracic spine (CCT) manipulations as well as upper cervical spine (UCS) manipulations. This study aimed to compare the short-term effects of UCS manipulation versus a combination of CCT spine manipulations on pain intensity, disability, and cervical range of motion (CROM) in CNNP patients. In a private physiotherapy clinic, 186 participants with CNNP were randomly assigned to either the UCS (n = 93) or CCT (n = 93) manipulation groups. Neck pain, disability, and CROM were measured before and one week after the intervention. No significant differences were found between the groups regarding pain intensity and CROM. However, there was a statistically significant difference in neck disability, with the CCT group showing a slightly greater decrease (CCT: 16.9 ± 3.8 vs. UCS: 19.5 ± 6.8; p = 0.01). The findings suggest that a combination of manipulations in the CCT spine results in a slightly more pronounced decrease in self-perceived disability compared to UCS manipulation in patients with CNNP after one week. However, no statistically significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of pain intensity or CROM.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    The paper introduces professor ZHANG Weihua\'s experience in treatment of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR) with ulna-tibia needling therapy combined with decompression-loosening manual manipulation. Using \"palpating, detecting and imaging observing\", professor ZHANG Weihua gives the accurate diagnosis for the location, the stage and the severity of the disease. According to the nature of the disease, CSR is treated in three stages. He proposes the academic thought, \"taking the tendons as the outline, regarding the meridians as the essential, rooting at qi and blood, co-regulating tendons and bones\". The ulna-tibia needling therapy and decompression-loosening manual manipulation are combined in treatment. In the ulna-tibia needling therapy, the acupuncture is delivered at the lower 1/3 of the cutaneous regions of taiyang and shaoyang meridians, on the ulnar region (belt-like distribution). The decompression-loosening manual manipulation is operated in 3 steps, i.e. relaxing the nape region, decompressing and relaxing (includes positioning rotational wrenching, upward and backward elevation) and supination wrenching, and analgesia and regulating tendons; and the manipulation for analgesia and regulating tendons is supplemented to enhance the effect.
    介绍张卫华教授运用尺胫针疗法结合减压松动手技治疗神经根型颈椎病的经验。张卫华教授采用“二摸三查两阅”法对疾病的病位、分期、程度进行精确诊断,根据疾病的性质认为神经根型颈椎病当从3期论治,提出“以筋为纲,以经为要,以气血为基,筋骨并调”的学术思想,运用尺胫针疗法结合减压松动手技进行治疗。尺胫针选取太阳、少阳经尺部之区带的下1/3皮部(带状)范围进针;减压松动手技分为放松颈项、减压松动(包括定位旋转扳法、上抬后顶法、仰侧扳法)、镇痛理筋3步,并配合镇痛理筋手法加强疗效。.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:慢性下腰痛(CLBP)是一种常见的肌肉骨骼疾病。按摩在CLBP管理中的效果已有文献记载,但尚不清楚哪种按摩方案更有效。这项研究是为了比较结缔组织按摩和经典按摩对疼痛的影响,腰椎活动度,函数,残疾,以及CLBP患者的幸福感。
    方法:该研究包括30名参与者,他们被随机分配到三个干预组之一:结缔组织按摩组(CTMG;n=10),经典按摩组(CMG;n=10),和标准物理治疗/对照组(CG;n=10)。干预措施每周三次,连续四周。在基线和第四周结束时进行评估。疼痛严重程度(视觉模拟量表),腰椎活动度(改良Schober测试),功能(背痛功能量表),残疾(罗兰·莫里斯残疾问卷),和幸福感(简表-36/SF-36)进行评估。
    结果:所有组的疼痛都有改善,腰椎活动度,函数,4周后残疾(p<0.05)。CMG显示身体功能增强,身体疼痛,物理角色,和SF-36的作用情绪亚组。除一般健康外,所有SF-36亚组的CTMG均有改善(p<0.05),而CG仅在身体功能亚组有所改善(p<0.05)。双向重复测量方差分析显示,MST存在显著的群体时间相互作用(p=0.04),身体疼痛(p=0.025)和身体作用(p=0.015)。
    结论:从这项研究中获得的结果表明,在增加腰椎活动度方面,CTMG优于CMG和CG,两种按摩应用在增加幸福感方面均优于CG。
    BACKGROUND: Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a common musculoskeletal disorder. Effect of massage in the management of CLBP has been documented, but it is not clear which massage regimen is more effective. This study was carried out to compare the effect of connective tissue massage and classical massage on pain, lumbar mobility, function, disability, and well-being among patients with CLBP.
    METHODS: The study included 30 participants who were randomly assigned to one of three intervention groups: the connective tissue massage group (CTMG; n = 10), the classical massage group (CMG; n = 10), and a standard physiotherapy/control group (CG; n = 10). The interventions were administered three times a week for four consecutive weeks. Assessments were conducted at baseline and at the end of the fourth week. Pain severity (Visual Analog Scale), lumbar mobility (Modified Schober Test), function (Back Pain Functional Scale), disability (Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire), and well-being (Short Form-36/SF-36) was evaluated.
    RESULTS: All groups exhibited improvements in pain, lumbar mobility, function, and disability after 4 weeks (p < 0.05). The CMG showed enhancements in physical function, bodily pain, role physical, and role emotional subgroups of SF-36. The CTMG demonstrated improvements in all subgroups of SF-36 except general health (p < 0.05), while the CG only improved in the physical function subgroup (p < 0.05). A 2-way repeated measures ANOVA revealed a significant group-time interaction for MST (p = 0.04), Bodily Pain (p = 0.025) and Role Physical (p = 0.015).
    CONCLUSIONS: The findings obtained from this study showed that CTMG was superior to CMG and CG in increasing lumbar mobility, and both massage applications were superior to the CG in increasing the well-being.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:睡眠障碍常见于纤维肌痛综合征(FMS);然而,印度人口缺乏针对与FMS相关的不良睡眠质量的手动治疗的高质量研究。
    目的:颅骨治疗(CST),已经发现Bowen疗法和锻炼会影响自主神经系统,在睡眠生理学中起着至关重要的作用。鉴于缺乏有关FMS个体中这些影响的证据,我们的研究测试了CST的有效性,Bowen疗法和针对静态触摸(手动安慰剂组)的标准运动计划对FMS睡眠质量的影响。
    方法:在班加罗尔的一家医院对132名睡眠不足的FMS参与者进行了安慰剂对照随机试验。参与者被随机分配到四个研究组之一,包括CST,Bowen疗法,标准锻炼计划,和接受静态触摸的手动安慰剂对照组。CST,Bowen疗法和静态触摸疗法每周一次,每次45分钟,持续12周;标准运动组每周接受有监督的运动,持续6周,并进行家庭运动,直至12周。12周后,所有研究参与者在家中再进行12周的标准锻炼.
    方法:睡眠质量,压力痛阈值(PPT),生活质量和纤维肌痛的影响,物理功能,疲劳,痛苦的灾难,运动恐惧症,在基线时记录阳性-阴性影响,在干预的第12周和第24周。
    结果:在12周结束时,CST组(P=0.037)和Bowen治疗组(P=0.023)睡眠质量显著改善,Bowen治疗组(P=0.002)和标准运动组(P<0.001)的PPT明显改善,与静态触摸组相比。这些改善在24周保持。其他次要结局没有观察到组间差异。
    结论:CST和Bowen疗法改善了睡眠质量,Bowen疗法和标准锻炼在短期内改善了疼痛阈值。通过增加练习,这些改进长期保留在小组中。CST和Bowen疗法是改善睡眠和减轻FMS疼痛的治疗选择。
    背景:在印度临床试验注册中心注册,编号为CTRI/2020/04/024551。请引用这篇文章:UghrejaRA,VenkatesanP,GopalakrishnaDB,SinghYP,LakshmiVR.颅骶骨治疗的有效性,Bowen疗法,静态触摸和标准运动计划对纤维肌痛综合征睡眠质量的影响:一项随机对照试验。JIntegrMed。2024年;Epub提前打印。
    BACKGROUND: Sleep disturbance is commonly seen in fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS); however, high quality studies involving manual therapies that target FMS-linked poor sleep quality are lacking for the Indian population.
    OBJECTIVE: Craniosacral therapy (CST), Bowen therapy and exercises have been found to influence the autonomic nervous system, which plays a crucial role in sleep physiology. Given the paucity of evidence concerning these effects in individuals with FMS, our study tests the effectiveness of CST, Bowen therapy and a standard exercise program against static touch (the manual placebo group) on sleep quality in FMS.
    METHODS: A placebo-controlled randomized trial was conducted on 132 FMS participants with poor sleep at a hospital in Bangalore. The participants were randomly allocated to one of the four study groups, including CST, Bowen therapy, standard exercise program, and a manual placebo control group that received static touch. CST, Bowen therapy and static touch treatments were administered in once-weekly 45-minute sessions for 12 weeks; the standard exercise group received weekly supervised exercises for 6 weeks with home exercises until 12 weeks. After 12 weeks, all study participants performed the standard exercises at home for another 12 weeks.
    METHODS: Sleep quality, pressure pain threshold (PPT), quality of life and fibromyalgia impact, physical function, fatigue, pain catastrophizing, kinesiophobia, and positive-negative affect were recorded at baseline, and at weeks 12 and 24 of the intervention.
    RESULTS: At the end of 12 weeks, the sleep quality improved significantly in the CST group (P = 0.037) and Bowen therapy group (P = 0.023), and the PPT improved significantly in the Bowen therapy group (P = 0.002) and the standard exercise group (P < 0.001), compared to the static touch group. These improvements were maintained at 24 weeks. No between-group differences were observed for other secondary outcomes.
    CONCLUSIONS: CST and Bowen therapy improved sleep quality, and Bowen therapy and standard exercises improved pain threshold in the short term. These improvements were retained within the groups in the long term by adding exercises. CST and Bowen therapy are treatment options to improve sleep and reduce pain in FMS.
    BACKGROUND: Registered at Clinical Trials Registry of India with the number of CTRI/2020/04/024551. Please cite this article as: Ughreja RA, Venkatesan P, Gopalakrishna DB, Singh YP, Lakshmi VR. Effectiveness of craniosacral therapy, Bowen therapy, static touch and standard exercise program on sleep quality in fibromyalgia syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. J Integr Med. 2024; 22(4): 474-484.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:机械下腰痛(MLBP)已采用各种治疗方式,但是它们功效的证据差异很大。Objectve:这项随机对照试验旨在评估Mulligan概念应用的结果,包括持续的自然突滑行(SNAGS)和自然突滑行(NAGS),在患有MLBP的肥胖患者中。
    方法:研究,2021年1月至2022年6月在一家三级医院进行,将患者随机分为两组。两组每隔一天进行六次伸展和加强锻炼。Mulligan组接受了SNAG和NAGS技术的额外干预。测量视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分,患者MLBP水平的Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)评分和活动范围(ROM)。
    结果:干预后,两组均表现出屈曲ROM的积极变化,扩展ROM,左右旋转ROM,左右外侧屈曲ROM,VAS评分,与干预前相比,ODI评分(两组和变量均p<0.001)。Mulligan组的ROM增加更高,VAS和ODI评分下降更明显。结论:Mulligan动员技术证明对增强各个方向的ROM有显著的好处,降低疼痛程度,减轻患有MLBP的肥胖者的残疾。
    BACKGROUND: Various treatment modalities have been employed for mechanical low back pain (MLBP), but evidence of their efficacy varies greatly. Objectıve: This randomized controlled trial aimed to assess the outcomes of Mulligan concept applications, including sustained natural apophyseal glides (SNAGS) and natural apophyseal glides (NAGS), in obese patients with MLBP.
    METHODS: The study, conducted between January 2021 and June 2022 at a tertiary hospital, involved randomizing patients into two groups. Both groups underwent six sessions of stretching and strengthening exercises every other day. The Mulligan group received additional intervention with SNAG and NAGS techniques. Measurements were made regarding the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score and range of motion (ROM) for the patients\' MLBP level.
    RESULTS: Post-interventions, both groups exhibited positive changes in flexion ROM, extension ROM, right and left rotation ROM, right and left lateral flexion ROM, VAS score, and ODI score compared to pre-intervention (p < 0.001 for both groups and variables). The Mulligan group showed a higher increase in ROM and a more significant decrease in VAS and ODI scores. Conclusıons: Mulligan mobilization techniques prove significantly beneficial for enhancing ROM in all directions, reducing pain levels, and alleviating disability in obese individuals with MLBP.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:与单纯运动相比,4周的Mulligan手法治疗(MMT)加运动治疗颈源性头痛的效果如何?MMT加运动是否比假MMT加运动更有效?在26周的随访中是否有任何益处?
    方法:三臂,平行组,隐蔽分配的随机临床试验,对某些结果进行盲化评估和意向治疗分析。
    方法:根据国际头痛疾病分类(ICHD-3),九十九人患有颈源性头痛。
    方法:参与者被随机分配到4周:MMT和锻炼,假MMT与运动或单独运动。
    方法:主要结果是头痛频率。次要结果是头痛强度,头痛持续时间,药物摄入量,头痛相关的残疾,上颈椎旋转的活动范围,压力疼痛阈值和患者满意度。在基线和第4、13和26周收集结果测量值。
    结果:MMT加运动在干预后立即比单独运动减少了头痛频率(两组之间的MD从基线变化:2天/月,95%CI2至3),这种效果在26周时仍然很明显(MD4天,95%CI3至4)。在几个次要结果的所有时间点也有益处:头痛强度,头痛持续时间,头痛相关的残疾,上颈椎旋转和患者满意度。压力疼痛阈值在所有时间点均显示出zygapophyseal关节和枕下区域的益处,但在上斜方肌则没有。假MMT运动组的结果与单纯运动组的结果非常相似。
    结论:在宫颈源性头痛患者中,增加MMT锻炼改善:头痛频率,强度和持续时间;头痛相关残疾;上颈椎旋转;和患者满意度。这些益处不是由于安慰剂效应。
    背景:CTRI/2019/06/019506。
    OBJECTIVE: What is the effect of a 4-week regimen of Mulligan manual therapy (MMT) plus exercise compared with exercise alone for managing cervicogenic headache? Is MMT plus exercise more effective than sham MMT plus exercise? Are any benefits maintained at 26 weeks of follow-up?
    METHODS: A three-armed, parallel-group, randomised clinical trial with concealed allocation, blinded assessment of some outcomes and intention-to-treat analysis.
    METHODS: Ninety-nine people with cervicogenic headache as per International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD-3).
    METHODS: Participants were randomly allocated to 4 weeks of: MMT with exercise, sham MMT with exercise or exercise alone.
    METHODS: The primary outcome was headache frequency. Secondary outcomes were headache intensity, headache duration, medication intake, headache-related disability, upper cervical rotation range of motion, pressure pain thresholds and patient satisfaction. Outcome measures were collected at baseline and at 4, 13 and 26 weeks.
    RESULTS: MMT plus exercise reduced headache frequency more than exercise alone immediately after the intervention (MD between groups in change from baseline: 2 days/month, 95% CI 2 to 3) and this effect was still evident at 26 weeks (MD 4 days, 95% CI 3 to 4). There were also benefits across all time points in several secondary outcomes: headache intensity, headache duration, headache-related disability, upper cervical rotation and patient satisfaction. Pressure pain thresholds showed benefits at all time points at the zygapophyseal joint and suboccipital areas but not at the upper trapezius. The outcomes in the sham MMT with exercise group were very similar to those of the exercise alone group.
    CONCLUSIONS: In people with cervicogenic headache, adding MMT to exercise improved: headache frequency, intensity and duration; headache-related disability; upper cervical rotation; and patient satisfaction. These benefits were not due to placebo effects.
    BACKGROUND: CTRI/2019/06/019506.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:尽管清醒磨牙症与颞下颌关节紊乱病(TMD)以及头颈部疼痛有关,针对这些因素的物理治疗和磨牙症教育的效果尚未得到研究.
    目的:本研究的目的是通过开放式随访问卷,评估3周内面部手法治疗和磨牙症神经科学教育(BNE)对清醒磨牙症的影响。
    方法:将受试者(n=28)随机分为两组,干预组和对照组。关于残疾的数据,在评估前和评估后收集功能和疼痛,所有措施都以单盲的方式进行。在此期间,两组参与者都接受了6次治疗。除了手动治疗,向参与者提供了有关磨牙症的神经生理机制和影响因素的信息.与治疗师协商后确定了个人行为指南和日常锻炼。磨牙症特定应用程序的介绍(Brux。还提供了App),所有参与者都将其用作治疗的辅助手段。
    结果:干预组表现出显著改善,表现为颈部残疾指数(NDI)评分(p=.008),疼痛残疾指数(PDI)(p=.007)和颌骨残疾列表(JDL)(p=.03)。此外,对颞下颌关节(TMJ)的临床评估显示,在张口(p=.03)和侧颌运动(侧向运动)(p=.03)方面取得了显着进步。咬肌(p=.02)和颞肌(p=.05)的机械痛阈值(PTT)也显示出显着改善。在3个月的随访中,问卷显示,大多数干预组(13/15,87%)报告了治疗获益.
    结论:疼痛和残疾的减轻以及功能的改善和应对能力的增加表明,通过专门的肌肉骨骼干预和针对个体患者量身定制的BNE,可能会改变清醒磨牙症。
    BACKGROUND: Although awake bruxism is associated with temporomandibular disorder (TMD) as well as head and neck pain, the effects of physical therapy and bruxism education to address these factors have not been investigated.
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of oro-facial manual therapy and bruxism neuroscience education (BNE) on awake bruxism over a 3-week period with an open-ended follow-up questionnaire after 3 months.
    METHODS: Subjects (n = 28) were randomly allocated to one of two groups, an intervention group and a control group. Data regarding disability, function and pain were collected pre- and post-assessment, with all measures administered in a single-blind fashion. Participants in both groups received six treatment sessions during this period. In addition to manual therapy, participants were provided with information on the neurophysiological mechanisms of bruxism and contributing factors. Individual behavioural guidelines and daily exercises were determined in consultation with the therapist. An introduction to a bruxism specific app (Brux.App) was also provided, which all participants used as an adjunct to their treatment.
    RESULTS: The intervention group demonstrated notable improvement as indicated by their scores in the Neck Disability Index (NDI) (p = .008), Pain Disability Index (PDI) (p = .007) and Jaw Disability List (JDL) (p = .03). Furthermore, clinical assessments of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) revealed a significant progress in terms of mouth opening (p = .03) and lateral jaw movement (laterotrusion) (p = .03). The mechanical pain threshold (PTT) of both the masseter (p = .02) and temporalis muscle (p = .05) also showed significant improvement. At 3-month follow-up, the questionnaire revealed that the majority of the intervention group (13/15, 87%) reported a benefit from the treatment.
    CONCLUSIONS: The reduction in pain and disability together with improvement in function and increased coping suggest a potential modification of awake bruxism through specialised musculoskeletal intervention and BNE tailored to the individual patient.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号