背景:通过流式细胞术监测多发性骨髓瘤(MM)免疫表型(IPT)和可测量的残留疾病(MRD)是临床试验中无进展生存期和总生存期的替代指标。然而,由于样品处理过程中的形态学差异和浆细胞(PC)损失,浆细胞计数具有挑战性。
方法:在(n=87)新诊断的MM患者中,我们评估了基线时PC的免疫表型,对35例患者亚组诱导后的MRD进行量化,并分析其与结局和生存的相关性.社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)版本16.0(SPSSInc.,芝加哥,IL,美国)用于所有统计分析。
结果:免疫分型显示CD56强阳性表达(83%),CD200(94%),CD38(92%),CD117(91%)和CD19阴性/弱表达(83%),CD45(89%),CD27(74%),和CD81(90%)。CD19阴性/弱表达与年龄≥56岁显著相关(p<0.048),白蛋白较低(<3.4g/dL,p<0.001)。强阳性CD56表达与M蛋白的存在显著相关(p<0.03)。强阳性CD117表达与低白蛋白显著相关(p<0.02)。强阳性CD200表达与良好反应显著相关(p<0.02)。骨髓(BM)-MRD%的中位数(IQR)值为0.005(0.002-0.034)。我们发现相关性没有显着差异,协会,和MRD%的生存结果。
结论:本研究揭示了IPT作为疾病管理中一种宝贵的诊断工具的实用性。这项研究的结果对于修改高风险疾病的标准和在临床实践中实施适应风险的第一疗法可能很重要。
BACKGROUND: Multiple myeloma (MM) immunophenotyping (IPT) and measurable residual disease (MRD) monitoring by flow cytometry is a surrogate for progression-free survival and overall survival in clinical trials. However, plasma cell enumeration is challenging owing to morphological discrepancies and plasma cell (PC) loss during the sample processing.
METHODS: In (n=87) newly diagnosed MM patients, we evaluated the immunophenotype of PCs at baseline, and for a subset of 35 patients MRD at post-induction was quantified and analyzed for association with outcomes and survival. The software Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS), version 16.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for all the statistical analysis.
RESULTS: Immunophenotyping showed strong positive expression of CD56 (83%), CD200 (94%), CD38 (92%), and CD117 (91%) and negative/weak expression of CD19 (83%), CD45 (89%), CD27 (74%), and CD81 (90%) respectively. Negative/weak expression of CD19 was significantly associated with age ≥56 years (p<0.048), with lower albumin (<3.4g/dL, p<0.001). Strong positive CD56 expression was significantly associated with the presence of M-protein (p<0.03). Strong positive CD117 expression was significantly associated with lower albumin (p<0.02). Strong positive CD200 expression was significantly associated with a good response (p<0.02). The median (IQR) value of bone marrow (BM)-MRD% was 0.005 (0.002-0.034). We found that there was no significant difference in the correlation, association, and survival outcomes with MRD%.
CONCLUSIONS: This study sheds light on the utility of IPT as an invaluable diagnostic tool in disease management. The findings of this study could be important when it comes to modifying the criteria for high-risk diseases and implementing a risk-adapted first therapy in clinical practice.