BACKGROUND: Spinal cord ischemia is one of the complications that can occur after open and endovascular thoracoabdominal aortic repair. This occurs despite various perioperative approaches, including distal aortic perfusion, hybrid procedures with extra anatomical bypasses, motor-evoked potential, and cerebrospinal fluid drainage. The inability to recognize spinal ischemia in a timely manner remains a devastating complication after thoracoabdominal aortic repair.This review aims to look at novel technologies that are designed for continuous monitoring to detect early changes that signal the development of spinal cord ischemia and to discuss their benefits and limitations.
METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of the technologies available for continuous monitoring in the intensive care unit for early detection of spinal cord ischemia. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they used different technologies for monitoring spinal ischemia during the postoperative period. All articles that were not available in English were excluded. To ensure that all relevant articles were included, no other significant restrictions were imposed.
RESULTS: We identified 59 studies from the outset to December 2022 to be included in our study. New techniques have been studied as potentially useful monitoring tools that could provide simple and effective monitoring of the spinal cord. These include near-infrared spectroscopy, contrast-enhanced ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, fiber optic monitoring of the spinal cord, and cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the development of new techniques to monitor for postoperative spinal cord ischemia, their use remains limited. We recommend more future research to ensure rapid intervention for our patients.

Mirror movements (MMs) are specifically defined as involuntary movements occurring on one side of homologous muscles when performing unilateral movements with the contralateral limb. MMs have been considered a kind of soft neurological signs, and the persistence or reappearance of MMs in adults is usually pathologic. In addition to some congenital syndrome, MMs have been also described in age-related neurological diseases including pyramidal system diseases (e.g., stroke, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis) and extrapyramidal disorders (e.g., Parkinson\'s disease, essential tremor). With the advances in instrumentation and detection means, subtle or subclinical MMs have been deeply studied. Furthermore, the underlying mechanism is also being further elucidated. In this mini-review, we firstly discuss the MM examination means, and then review the literature regarding MMs in individuals with acquired neurological disorders, in order to further understand the pathogenesis of MMs.

During intraoperative monitoring of motor evoked potentials (MEP), heterogeneity across studies in terms of study populations, intraoperative settings, applied warning criteria, and outcome reporting exists. A scoping review of MEP warning criteria in supratentorial surgery was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Sixty-eight studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria. The most commonly used alarm criteria were MEP signal loss, which was always a major warning sign, followed by amplitude reduction and threshold elevation. Irreversible MEP alterations were associated with a higher number of transient and persisting motor deficits compared with the reversible changes. In almost all studies, specificity and Negative Predictive Value (NPV) were high, while in most of them, sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value (PPV) were rather low or modest. Thus, the absence of an irreversible alteration may reassure the neurosurgeon that the patient will not suffer a motor deficit in the short-term and long-term follow-up. Further, MEPs perform well as surrogate markers, and reversible MEP deteriorations after successful intervention indicate motor function preservation postoperatively. However, in future studies, a consensus regarding the definitions of MEP alteration, critical duration of alterations, and outcome reporting should be determined.

Background: Electrophysiological measures are being increasingly utilized due to their ability to provide objective measurements with minimal bias and to detect subtle changes with quantitative data on neural function. Heterogeneous reporting of trial outcomes limits effective interstudy comparison and optimization of treatment. Objective: The objective of this systematic review is to describe the reporting of electrophysiological outcome measures in spinal cord injury (SCI) clinical trials in order to inform a subsequent consensus study. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed and EMBASE databases was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Adult human SCI clinical trials published in English between January 1, 2008 and September 15, 2018 with at least one electrophysiological outcome measure were eligible. Findings were reviewed by all authors to create a synthesis narrative describing each outcome measure. Results: Sixty-four SCI clinical trials were included in this review. Identified electrophysiological outcomes included electromyography activity (44%), motor evoked potentials (33%), somatosensory evoked potentials (33%), H-reflex (20%), reflex electromyography activity (11%), nerve conduction studies (9%), silent period (3%), contact heat evoked potentials (2%), and sympathetic skin response (2%). Heterogeneity was present in regard to both methods of measurement and reporting of electrophysiological outcome measures. Conclusion: This review demonstrates need for the development of a standardized reporting set for electrophysiological outcome measures. Limitations of this review include exclusion of non-English publications, studies more than 10 years old, and an inability to assess methodological quality of primary studies due to a lack of guidelines on reporting of systematic reviews of outcome measures.

OBJECTIVE: The increase in voluntary force of an untrained limb (i.e. Cross-education) after unilateral resistance training (RT) is believed to be a consequence of cortical adaptations. However, studies measuring neurophysiological adaptations with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) found inconsistent results. One unexamined factor contributing to the conflicting data is the variation in the type and intensity of muscle contractions, fatigue, and the strategies of pacing the movement. Therefore, the purpose was to analyse how those unilateral RT variables affect the adaptations in ipsilateral M1 (iM1) and cross-education.
METHODS: We performed a systematic literature review, with the following search terms with Boolean conjunctions: \"Transcranial magnetic stimulation\" AND \"Ipsilateral cortex\" AND \"Resistance training\".
RESULTS: The 11 acute and 12 chronic studies included partially support the idea of increased cortical excitability and reduced intracortical inhibition in iM1, but the inconsistency between studies was high.
CONCLUSIONS: Differences in type and intensity of contraction, fatigue, and strategies of pacing the movement contributed to the inconsistencies. The tentative conclusion is that high intensity eccentric or externally paced contractions are effective to increase iM1 excitability but cross-education can occur in the absence of such changes. Thus, the mechanism of the cross-education examined with TMS remains unclear.

Background: Parafalcine and parasagittal meningiomas present unique challenges for resection. Although maximal safe resection is the primary goal of surgical management for these lesions, venous infarction and eloquent cortical structure damage occur in up to 14% of cases. Therefore, optimal preoperative planning and intraoperative technique is critical.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed a single surgeon\'s case series with resection of 58 parafalcine and parasagittal meningiomas. Operative strategy included not crossing the superior sagittal sinus (SSS) during craniotomy, not resecting the falx, use of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) to avoid damage to eloquent brain, and selective use of preoperative embolization.Results: Fifty-eight patients, 45 with parasagittal meningiomas and 13 with parafalcine meningiomas were evaluated. Median age 58.34 years and mean follow-up was 7.7 months. Gross total resection (GTR) was achieved in 51.7% of patients and near-gross total resection rate was 48.3%. Postoperative day one discharge rate was 62.1%. Complication rate was 8.6%, with new postoperative neurologic deficit rate of 5.2%. Tumor recurrence/growth documented on postoperative imaging rate was 3.4%.Conclusions: In our series of parasagittal and parafalcine meningioma resection, we report a 51.7% GTR rate associated with a low complication rate. Techniques to minimize perioperative morbidity include not crossing the SSS on craniotomy, avoiding falx resection, using MEPs, and selective preoperative embolization to optimize the chance of a maximal safe resection. We utilize a strategy of conservative initial tumor resection focused on maximizing the chances of a favorable neurologic outcome, followed as necessary by adjuvant therapies such as radiosurgery and salvage therapies such as laser interstitial thermal therapy, although longer follow-up comparable to that of series with more radical approaches is required to determine if long term outcomes are comparable.

Numerous studies have indicated that non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) of the cerebellum could modulate corticospinal excitability (CSE) in young healthy individuals. However, there is no systematic review and meta-analysis that clarifies the effects of cerebellar NIBS on CSE. The aim of this study was to provide a meta-analytic summary of the effects of cerebellar NIBS on CSE. Seven search engines were used to identify any trial evaluating CSE before and after one session of cerebellar NIBS in healthy individuals up to June 2018. Twenty-six studies investigating the corticospinal responses following cerebellar NIBS were included. Meta-analysis was used to pool the findings from included studies. Effects were expressed as mean differences (MD) and the standard deviation (SD). Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane tool. Meta-analysis found that paired associative stimulation (PAS) with 2 ms interval, a combination of PAS with 21.5 ms interval and anodal transcranial direct current stimulation, and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with a frequency of < 5 Hz increase CSE (P PAS2 < 0.00001, P PAS21.5 +a-tDCS = 0.02, P rTMS = 0.04). However, continuous theta burst stimulation, a combination of PAS with 25 ms interval and anodal transcranial direct current stimulation, and PAS with a 6 ms interval decreased CSE (P PAS6 < 0.00001, P cTBS < 0.00001, P PAS25 +a-tDCS = 0.003). The results of this review show that cerebellar NIBS techniques are a promising tool for increasing CSE.

Several studies have used transcranial magnetic stimulation to probe the corticospinal-motoneuronal responses to a single session of strength training; however, the findings are inconsistent. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined whether a single bout of strength training affects the excitability and inhibition of intracortical circuits of the primary motor cortex (M1) and the corticospinal-motoneuronal pathway. A systematic review was completed, tracking studies between January 1990 and May 2018. The methodological quality of studies was determined using the Downs and Black quality index. Data were synthesised and interpreted from meta-analysis. Nine studies (n=107) investigating the acute corticospinal-motoneuronal responses to strength training met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analyses detected that after strength training compared to control, corticospinal excitability [standardised mean difference (SMD), 1.26; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.88, 1.63; p<0.0001] and intracortical facilitation (ICF) (SMD, 1.60; 95% CI, 0.18, 3.02; p=0.003) were increased. The duration of the corticospinal silent period was reduced (SMD, -17.57; 95% CI, -21.12, -14.01; p=0.00001), but strength training had no effect on the excitability of the intracortical inhibitory circuits [short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) SMD, 1.01; 95% CI, -1.67, 3.69; p=0.46; long-interval intracortical inhibition (LICI) SMD, 0.50; 95% CI, -1.13, 2.13; p=0.55]. Strength training increased the excitability of corticospinal axons (SMD, 4.47; 95% CI, 3.45, 5.49; p<0.0001). This systematic review and meta-analyses revealed that the acute neural changes to strength training involve subtle changes along the entire neuroaxis from the M1 to the spinal cord. These findings suggest that strength training is a clinically useful tool to modulate intracortical circuits involved in motor control.

We aim to evaluate the diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) of intraoperative evoked potential (EP) monitoring to detect cerebral injury during clipping of cerebral aneurysms.
Systematic review.
Major electronic databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS.
We included studies that reported the DTA of intraoperative EP monitoring during intracranial aneurysm clipping procedures in adult patients.
After quality assessment, we performed a meta-analysis using the bivariate random effects model, and calculated the possible range of DTA point estimates using a new best-case/worst-case scenario approach to quantify the impact of rescue intervention on DTA.
A total of 35 studies involving 4011 patients were included. The quality of the primary studies was modest and the heterogeneity across studies was high. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for predicting postoperative neurological deficits for the somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) monitoring was 59% (95% CI: 39% to 76%; I2: 76%) and 86% (95% CI: 77% to 92%; I2: 94%), for motor evoked potential (MEP) monitoring was 81% (95% CI: 58% to 93%; I2: 54%) and 90% (95% CI: 86% to 93%; I2: 81%), and for combined SSEP and MEP monitoring was 92% (95% CI: 62% to 100%) and 88% (95% CI: 83% to 93%). The best-case/worst-case range for the pooled point estimates for sensitivity and specificity for SSEP was 50%-63% and 81%-100%, and for MEP was 59%-74% and 93%-100%, and for combined SSEP and MEP was 89%-94% and 83%-100%.
Due to the modest quality and high heterogeneity of the existing primary studies, it is not possible to confidently support or refute the diagnostic value of EP monitoring in cerebral aneurysm clipping surgery. However, combined SSEP and MEP appears to provide the best DTA for predicting postoperative stroke. Contrary to popular assertion, the modest sensitivity of SSEP monitoring is not explained by the use of rescue intervention.
CRD42015016884.

We reviewed the evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) focusing on the neurophysiological adaptations in the untrained side associated with cross-education of strength (CE) and pooled data into definite effect estimates for neurophysiological variables assessed in chronic CE studies. Furthermore, scoping directions for future research were provided to enhance the homogeneity and comparability of studies investigating the neural responses to CE. The magnitude of CE was 21.1 ± 18.2% (mean ± SD; P < 0.0001) in 22 RCTs ( n = 467 subjects) that measured at least 1 neurophysiological variable in the untrained side, including the following: electromyography (EMG; 14 studies); motor evoked potential (MEP; 8 studies); short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), recruitment curve, and M wave (6 studies); cortical silent period (cSP; 5 studies); interhemispheric inhibition, intracortical facilitation (ICF), and H reflex (2 studies); and V wave, short-interval ICF, short-latency afferent inhibition, and long-latency afferent inhibition (1 study). Only EMG, MEP, ICF, cSP, and SICI could be included in the meta-analysis (18 studies, n = 387). EMG ( P = 0.26, n = 235) and MEP amplitude ( P = 0.11, n = 145) did not change in the untrained limb after CE. cSP duration ( P = 0.02, n = 114) and SICI ( P = 0.001, n = 95) decreased in the untrained hemisphere according to body region and type and intensity of training. The magnitude of CE did not correlate with changes in these transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) measures. The design of this meta-analytical study and the lack of correlations prevented the ability to link mechanistically the observed neurophysiological changes to CE. Notwithstanding the limited amount of data available for pooling, the use of TMS to assess the ipsilateral neurophysiological responses to unilateral training still confirms the central neural origin hypothesis of chronic CE induced by strength training. However, how these neural adaptations contribute to CE remains unclear.