Motor dysfunction

运动功能障碍
  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:帕金森病(PD)是一种神经退行性疾病,其特征是大脑中多巴胺能神经元的进行性丧失。尽管现有的治疗方法,对于可以阻止或逆转疾病进展的疗法,仍有未满足的需求.基因疗法已经尝试并测试了各种疾病,包括PD.本系统综述的目的是评估基因治疗技术在PD临床试验中的安全性和有效性。
    方法:在线数据库PubMed/Medline,和Cochrane用于筛选本系统综述的研究。使用标准工具评估纳入研究的偏倚风险。
    结果:基因疗法可以修复疾病中受损的多巴胺能神经元,或处理与帕金森病症状相关的基底神经节回路异常。而不仅仅是治疗症状,这种神经保护方法改变了疾病本身。基因治疗药物目前在患者的床边给药。它可以过度激活与运动功能障碍相关的特定脑回路。PD疗法发展迅速,并且没有足够的头对头试验来评估现有治疗方法的安全性和有效性。当选择高级疗法时,除了每种治疗方案的有效性和安全性外,还应考虑患者的具体因素.
    结论:与常规疗法相比,基因治疗可能有利于PD。它可以最大限度地减少副作用,缓解症状,并提供可靠的多巴胺替代品。
    BACKGROUND: Parkinson\'s disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by the progressive loss of dopaminergic neurons in the brain. Despite existing treatments, there remains an unmet need for therapies that can halt or reverse disease progression. Gene therapy has been tried and tested for a variety of illnesses, including PD. The goal of this systematic review is to assess gene therapy techniques\' safety and effectiveness in PD clinical trials.
    METHODS: Online databases PubMed/Medline, and Cochrane were used to screen the studies for this systematic review. The risk of bias of the included studies was assessed using standard tools.
    RESULTS: Gene therapy can repair damaged dopaminergic neurons from the illness or deal with circuit anomalies in the basal ganglia connected to Parkinson\'s disease symptoms. Rather than only treating symptoms, this neuroprotective approach alters the illness itself. Medication for gene therapy is currently administered at the patient\'s bedside. It can hyperactivate specific brain circuits associated with motor dysfunction. PD therapies are developing quickly, and there aren\'t enough head-to-head trials evaluating the safety and effectiveness of available treatments. When choosing an advanced therapy, patient-specific factors should be considered in addition to the effectiveness and safety of each treatment option.
    CONCLUSIONS: In comparison to conventional therapies, gene therapy may be advantageous for PD. It may minimize side effects, relieve symptoms, and offer dependable dopamine replacement.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    近年来,脑卒中发病率逐年上升,以及中风后的相关后遗症,如认知障碍,运动功能障碍,和中风后抑郁,严重影响患者的康复和日常活动。重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS),作为一个保险箱,非侵入性,和有效的新康复方法,在临床实践中得到了广泛的认可。本文综述了rTMS在治疗不同功能损害(认知障碍、运动功能障碍,单方面的空间忽视,抑郁症)近年来中风后,并初步总结了可能的机制。已经发现,确定rTMS在改善中风后功能损害方面的有效性的关键参数包括脉冲数,受刺激的大脑区域,刺激强度和频率,以及持续时间。一般来说,高频刺激用于刺激同侧大脑皮层,而低频刺激是用来抑制对侧大脑皮层的,从而实现两个半球之间的兴奋性平衡。然而,不同功能损害的具体机制和最佳刺激模式尚未得出一致的结论,需要更多的研究来探索和阐明使用rTMS的最佳方法。此外,我们将确定当前研究中的问题和挑战,探索可能的机制,加深对rTMS的理解,提出未来的研究方向,并为更好的临床应用提供有见地的见解。
    In recent years, the stroke incidence has been increasing year by year, and the related sequelae after stroke, such as cognitive impairment, motor dysfunction, and post-stroke depression, seriously affect the patient\'s rehabilitation and daily activities. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), as a safe, non-invasive, and effective new rehabilitation method, has been widely recognized in clinical practice. This article reviews the application and research progress of rTMS in treating different functional impairments (cognitive impairment, motor dysfunction, unilateral spatial neglect, depression) after stroke in recent years, and preliminary summarized the possible mechanisms. It has been found that the key parameters that determine the effectiveness of rTMS in improving post-stroke functional impairments include pulse number, stimulated brain areas, stimulation intensity and frequency, as well as duration. Generally, high-frequency stimulation is used to excite the ipsilateral cerebral cortex, while low-frequency stimulation is used to inhibit the contralateral cerebral cortex, thus achieving a balance of excitability between the two hemispheres. However, the specific mechanisms and the optimal stimulation mode for different functional impairments have not yet reached a consistent conclusion, and more research is needed to explore and clarify the best way to use rTMS. Furthermore, we will identify the issues and challenges in the current research, explore possible mechanisms to deepen understanding of rTMS, propose future research directions, and offer insightful insights for better clinical applications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    脑瘫(CP)是一种复杂的神经系统疾病,其特征是影响全球数百万人的运动功能障碍。这项全面的审查探讨了评估在管理CP中的关键作用。从探索它的定义和背景开始,我们阐明了CP评估的不同目标,从诊断和目标设定到研究和流行病学。我们研究标准评估量表和工具,讨论CP评估固有的挑战,突出新兴趋势,包括集成技术,个性化医疗,和神经成像。CP评估在临床诊断中的应用,治疗计划,研究,强调教育。未来的建议包括标准化,跨学科合作,研究重点,和专业培训。总之,我们强调评估作为指导CP患者护理的指南针的重要性,呼吁采取行动,改进评估做法,为受这种情况影响的人塑造更光明的未来。
    Cerebral palsy (CP) is a complex neurological condition characterized by motor dysfunction affecting millions worldwide. This comprehensive review delves into the critical role of assessment in managing CP. Beginning with exploring its definition and background, we elucidate the diverse objectives of CP assessment, ranging from diagnosis and goal setting to research and epidemiology. We examine standard assessment scales and tools, discuss the challenges inherent in CP assessment, and highlight emerging trends, including integrating technology, personalized medicine, and neuroimaging. The applications of CP assessment in clinical diagnosis, treatment planning, research, and education are underscored. Recommendations for the future encompass standardization, interdisciplinary collaboration, research priorities, and professional training. In conclusion, we emphasize the importance of assessment as a compass guiding the care of individuals with CP, issuing a call to action for improved assessment practices to shape a brighter future for those affected by this condition.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED:本综述旨在评估重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)治疗脑瘫(CP)的运动和语言能力的有效性证据的质量。
    未经批准:Medline,科克伦图书馆,WebofScience,Embase,PubMed,截至2021年7月,两名独立审稿人对CNKI数据库进行了搜索。纳入以英文和中文发表并符合以下标准的随机对照试验(RCT)。该人群包括符合CP诊断标准的患者。干预包括:rTMS和假rTMS的比较或rTMS与其他物理治疗和其他物理治疗的比较。结果包括电机功能,如下:粗大运动功能测量(GMFM),Gesell发育诊断量表,精细运动功能测量(FMFM),皮博迪发育运动量表,和改良的Ashworth量表。对于语言能力,包括符号显著关系(S-S)。使用物理治疗证据数据库(PEDro)量表评估方法学质量。
    未经评估:最后,29项研究纳入荟萃分析。使用Cochrane协作网络偏差风险评估量表进行评估的结果表明,有19项研究专门解释了随机化,其中两项研究描述了分配隐藏,四项研究使参与者和人员蒙蔽,偏见风险低,6项研究解释说,结局指标的评估是盲目的.观察到运动功能的显着改善。总分GMFM采用随机效应模型[I2=88%;MD=-1.03;95%CI(-1.35,-0.71);P<0.0001],FMFM采用固定效应模型[P=0.40,I2=3%;SMD=-0.48,95%CI(-0.65,-0.30);P<0.01]。对于语言能力,语言改善率采用固定效应模型[P=0.88,I2=0%;MD=0.37,95%CI(0.23,0.57);P<0.01].根据PEDro量表,10项研究质量低,四项研究质量很好,其他研究质量很好。使用GRADEProGDT在线工具,我们总共纳入了31项结果指标,如下:低质量的22,七个中等质量,和两个非常低的质量。
    UNASSIGNED:rTMS可以改善CP患者的运动功能和语言能力。然而,rTMS处方多种多样,研究样本量较低。需要使用有关处方和大样本的严格和标准研究设计进行研究,以收集有关使用rTMS治疗CP患者有效性的足够证据。
    UNASSIGNED: This review was conducted to assess the quality of the evidence of effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in treating motor and language ability of cerebral palsy (CP).
    UNASSIGNED: Medline, Cochrane library, Web of Science, Embase, PubMed, and CNKI databases were searched up to July 2021 by two independent reviewers. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that were published in English and Chinese and met the following criteria were included. The population comprised patients who met the diagnostic criteria for CP. Intervention included the following: comparison about rTMS and sham rTMS or comparison about rTMS combine with other physical therapy and other physical therapy. Outcomes included motor function, as follows: gross motor function measure (GMFM), Gesell Development Diagnosis Scale, fine motor function measure (FMFM), Peabody developmental motor scale, and Modified Ashworth scale. For language ability, sign-significant relation (S-S) was included. Methodological quality was assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale.
    UNASSIGNED: Finally, 29 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Results of evaluation using the Cochrane Collaborative Network Bias Risk Assessment Scale showed that 19 studies specifically explained randomization, among which two studies described allocation concealment, four studies blinded participants and persons and had low risk of bias, and six studies explained that the assessment of outcome measures was blinded. Significant improvements in motor function were observed. The GMFM of total score was determined by using the random-effect model [I2 = 88%; MD = -1.03; 95% CI (-1.35, -0.71); P < 0.0001] and FMFM was determined by using the fixed-effect model [P = 0.40 and I2 = 3%; SMDs = -0.48, 95% CI (-0.65, -0.30); P < 0.01]. For language ability, the language improvement rate was determined using a fixed-effect model [P = 0.88 and I2 = 0%; MD = 0.37, 95% CI (0.23, 0.57); P < 0.01]. According to the PEDro scale, 10 studies had low-quality, four studies had excellent quality, and the other studies had good quality. Using the GRADEpro GDT online tool, we included a total of 31 outcome indicators, as follows: 22 for low quality, seven for moderate quality, and two for very low quality.
    UNASSIGNED: The rTMS could improve the motor function and language ability of patients with CP. However, rTMS prescriptions varied, and the studies had low sample sizes. Studies using rigorous and standard research designs about prescriptions and large samples are needed to collect sufficient evidence about the effectiveness of using rTMS to treat patients with CP.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    未经授权:约束诱导运动疗法(CIMT)是中风后上肢运动功能障碍的常用治疗方法。然而,是否能有效改善脑卒中患者下肢运动功能仍存在争议。本系统综述综合研究现有证据,评价CIMT治疗脑卒中后下肢运动功能障碍的有效性。
    UNASSIGNED:我们在八个电子数据库中全面搜索了与本研究相关的随机对照试验(PubMed,Embase,科克伦图书馆,WebofScience,CBM,CNKI,万方,和VIP)。我们根据平均差异和相应的95%置信区间(95%CI)评估了CIMT对卒中后下肢运动功能障碍的有效性。我们基于Cochrane偏差风险评估工具评估了方法学质量。提取一般信息后,意思是,以及纳入研究的标准偏差,我们使用RevMan5.3和Stata16.0进行了荟萃分析。主要指标是下肢Fugl-Meyer评估量表(FMA-L)。次要指标是伯格平衡量表(BBS),10米步行测试(10MWT),步态速度(GS),6分钟步行试验(6MWT),功能行走类别量表(FAC),定时并进行测试(TUGT),Brunnstrom下肢功能分期,承重,修改后的Barthel指数(MBI),功能独立性度量(FIM),卒中特定生活质量问卷(SSQOL),世界卫生组织生活质量评估(WHOQOL)和美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)。
    未经评估:我们最初确定了343项相关研究。其中,34名(总计2,008名患者)符合纳入标准。我们发现,接受CIMT治疗的患者的主要指标(FMA-L)评分明显优于未接受CIMT治疗的患者。CIMT治疗和常规理疗治疗的患者之间的平均差异为3.46(95%CI2.74-4.17,P<0.01,I2=40%),在接受CIMT加常规理疗治疗的患者和仅接受常规理疗治疗的患者之间有3.83(95%CI2.89-4.77,P<0.01,I2=54%),接受CIMT联合西药治疗的患者与仅接受西药治疗的患者之间的比率为3.50(95%CI1.08-5.92,P<0.01)。次要指标遵循相同的趋势。亚组分析显示,带设备的下肢CIMT似乎比不带设备的下肢CIMT产生更高的FMA-L评分平均差异(4.52,95%CI=3.65-5.38,P<0.01和3.37,95%CI分别=2.95-3.79,P<0.01)。
    UNASSIGNED:CIMT可有效改善卒中后患者的下肢运动功能障碍;然而,符合条件的研究具有高度异质性.系统审查注册:https://www。crd.约克。AC.uk/prospro/display_record.php?RecordID=277466。
    UNASSIGNED: Constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) is a common treatment for upper extremity motor dysfunction after a stroke. However, whether it can effectively improve lower extremity motor function in stroke patients remains controversial. This systematic review comprehensively studies the current evidence and evaluates the effectiveness of CIMT in the treatment of post-stroke lower extremity motor dysfunction.
    UNASSIGNED: We comprehensively searched randomized controlled trials related to this study in eight electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CBM, CNKI, WAN FANG, and VIP). We evaluated CIMT effectiveness against post-stroke lower extremity motor dysfunction based on the mean difference and corresponding 95% confidence interval (95% CI). We assessed methodological quality based on the Cochrane Bias Risk Assessment Tool. After extracting the general information, mean, and standard deviation of the included studies, we conducted a meta-analysis using RevMan 5.3 and Stata 16.0. The primary indicator was the Fugl-Meyer Assessment scale on lower limbs (FMA-L). The secondary indicators were the Berg balance scale (BBS), 10-meter walk test (10MWT), gait speed (GS), 6-min walk test (6MWT), functional ambulation category scale (FAC), timed up and go test (TUGT), Brunnstrom stage of lower limb function, weight-bearing, modified Barthel index (MBI), functional independence measure (FIM), stroke-specific quality of life questionnaire (SSQOL), World Health Organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL), and National Institute of Health stroke scale (NIHSS).
    UNASSIGNED: We initially identified 343 relevant studies. Among them, 34 (totaling 2,008 patients) met the inclusion criteria. We found that patients treated with CIMT had significantly better primary indicator (FMA-L) scores than those not treated with CIMT. The mean differences were 3.46 (95% CI 2.74-4.17, P < 0.01, I2 = 40%) between CIMT-treated and conventional physiotherapy-treated patients, 3.83 (95% CI 2.89-4.77, P < 0.01, I2 = 54%) between patients treated with CIMT plus conventional physiotherapy and patients treated only with conventional physiotherapy, and 3.50 (95% CI 1.08-5.92, P < 0.01) between patients treated with CIMT plus western medicine therapy and those treated only with western medicine therapy. The secondary indicators followed the same trend. The subgroup analysis showed that lower extremity CIMT with device seemed to yield a higher mean difference in FMA-L scores than lower extremity CIMT without device (4.52, 95% CI = 3.65-5.38, P < 0.01 and 3.37, 95% CI = 2.95-3.79, P < 0.01, respectively).
    UNASSIGNED: CIMT effectively improves lower extremity motor dysfunction in post-stroke patients; however, the eligible studies were highly heterogeneous.Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=277466.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    小脑重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)对神经系统疾病患者运动功能障碍的有效性因其对神经调节的潜力而受到越来越多的关注。然而,关于神经调节效应的研究,参数,在小脑实施rTMS以缓解运动功能障碍的安全性有限。本系统综述旨在评估小脑rTMS治疗神经系统疾病引起的运动功能障碍的有效性和安全性,并回顾流行的刺激参数。五个电子数据库-Medline,WebofScience,Scopus,科克伦图书馆,和Embase-搜索了从成立到2022年7月发表的相关研究。所有报道小脑rTMS联合行为评定量表对运动功能障碍影响的随机对照试验(RCT)均符合入选条件。此外,我们手动检查了纳入研究的参考列表.在筛选的1156篇文章中,包括21个RCT和666名受试者。在小脑进行的rTMS显示中风改善(痉挛,balance,和步态),宫颈肌张力障碍,帕金森病(震颤),小脑共济失调,和特发性震颤,但不是多发性硬化症。直径为70mm的8形线圈被确定为最常见的治疗选择。除了三个研究中的轻度副作用外,没有一个研究报告了严重的不良事件。因此,rTMS似乎是治疗运动功能障碍的一种有前途且安全的技术,靶向小脑以诱导运动行为改善。进一步严格的RCT,包括更多的样本和更长的随访期,需要精确探索有效的刺激参数和可能的机制。
    The effectiveness of cerebellar repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on motor dysfunction in patients with neurological disorders has received increasing attention because of its potential for neuromodulation. However, studies on the neuromodulatory effects, parameters, and safety of rTMS implementation in the cerebellum to alleviate motor dysfunction are limited. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of cerebellar rTMS treatment for motor dysfunction caused by neurological disorders and to review popular stimulation parameters. Five electronic databases-Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Embase-were searched for relevant research published from inception to July 2022. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that reported the effects of cerebellar rTMS combined with behavioral rating scales on motor dysfunction were eligible for enrollment. Additionally, reference lists of the enrolled studies were manually checked. Among 1156 articles screened, 21 RCTs with 666 subjects were included. rTMS conducted on the cerebellum showed an improvement in stroke (spasticity, balance, and gait), cervical dystonia, Parkinson\'s disease (tremor), cerebellar ataxia, and essential tremor but not in multiple sclerosis. The 8-shaped coil with a diameter of 70 mm was determined as the most common therapeutic choice. None of the studies reported severe adverse events except mild side effects in three. Therefore, rTMS appears to be a promising and safe technique for the treatment of motor dysfunction, targeting the cerebellum to induce motor behavioral improvement. Further rigorous RCTs, including more samples and longer follow-up periods, are required to precisely explore the effective stimulation parameters and possible mechanisms.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Schizencephaly is a rare congenital cerebral malformation associated with serious neurological manifestations. The number of studies regarding schizencephaly is limited.
    We conducted a literature review and extracted data from the case reports. Of 199 articles retrieved, 156 articles (734 patients) met our inclusion criteria.
    Patient characteristics included microcephaly (41.5% of patients), seizures (74.1%), bilateral cleft (41.4%), open lip (61.3%), septo-optic dysplasia (69.1%), and ventricular dilation (60.5%). The majority of clefts were in the frontal and parietal lobes. When these potential association factors were assessed by univariate logistic regression microcephaly (OR = 21.75, P < 0.001), corpus callosum agenesis (OR = 9, P < 0.001), motor impairments (OR = 6.21, P < 0.001), and bilateral clefts (OR = 6.31, P < 0.001) seems to have the strongest association, but also age at diagnosis <10 years (OR = 1.05, P < 0.001), right (OR = 1.85, P = 0.001) or left (OR = 2.71, P < 0.001) side clefts and septum pellucidum (OR = 3.7, P = 0.002) agenesis were associated with neurocognitive dysfunctions.
    We describe novel findings with practical implications for predicting neurocognitive outcomes in patients with schizencephaly. Most patients had neurological impairments including motor (90.0%) or cognitive (77.5%) dysfunctions. Bilateral clefts, motor impairment, microcephaly, and corpus callosum agenesis were strongly associated with neurocognitive impairment. A lack of large cohorts of patients with schizencephaly prevented comparison of our results; most previous studies are case reports or small case series.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    The sensory and motor cortical representation corresponding to the affected limb is altered in patients with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) represents a useful non-invasive approach for studying cortical physiology. If delivered repetitively, TMS can also modulate cortical excitability and induce long-lasting neuroplastic changes. In this review, we performed a systematic search of all studies using TMS to explore cortical excitability/plasticity and repetitive TMS (rTMS) for the treatment of CRPS. Literature searches were conducted using PubMed and EMBASE. We identified 8 articles matching the inclusion criteria. One hundred fourteen patients (76 females and 38 males) were included in these studies. Most of them have applied TMS in order to physiologically characterize CRPS type I. Changes in motor cortex excitability and brain mapping have been reported in CRPS-I patients. Sensory and motor hyperexcitability are in the most studies bilateral and likely involve corresponding regions within the central nervous system rather than the entire hemisphere. Conversely, sensorimotor integration and plasticity were found to be normal in CRPS-I. TMS examinations also revealed that the nature of motor dysfunction in CRPS-I patients differs from that observed in patients with functional movement disorders, limb immobilization, or idiopathic dystonia. TMS studies may thus lead to the implementation of correct rehabilitation strategies in CRPS-I patients. Two studies have begun to therapeutically use rTMS. This non-invasive brain stimulation technique could have therapeutic utility in CRPS, but further well-designed studies are needed to corroborate initial findings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    This study aimed to quantify whether there is association between music-based movement therapy and motor dysfunction in patients with Parkinson\'s disease, and, if so, whether music-based movement therapy can be used as first-line non-pharmacological treatment. To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials that examined the effect of music-based movement therapy on patient-relevant and disease-specific outcomes. Comprehensive literature was searched of PubMed, EMbase, and the Cochrane Library from inception to November 2016. Randomized controlled trial of patients with Parkinson\'s disease was searched to identify trials comparing music-based movement therapy with no music care. A total of 8 studies (11 analyses, 241 subjects) were included; all of them had acceptable quality by PEDro scale score. Studies based on any type of Parkinson\'s disease patients were combined and subgroup analyzed. Compared with the control group, the SMD of Berg Balance Scale score was 0.85(0.46 to 1.25), -0.60 (-0.98 to -0.22) in Parkinson Disease Questionnaire-39 summary index, -0.90s (-1.56 to -0.23) in Time Up and Go text, and -0.43 (-1.11 to 0.25) in Unified Parkinson\'s Disease Rating Scale Motor Subscale 3 as instrument methods for motor function. Secondary outcomes included cognitive function and quality of life. There was positive evidence to support the use of music-based movement therapy on treatment of motor function; there was neutral evidence to support the use of music for the treatment of cognitive function quality of life.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    OBJECTIVE: This case report highlights the implication of the concept of \"geste antagoniste\" in conservatively managing oromotor dysfunction and its complications.
    METHODS: A 66-year-old female with a 1-year history of tardive dyskinesia (TD) was referred to the Craniofacial Pain Department (CPC) at Tufts University School of Dental Medicine for management of sore labial/lingual mucosa secondary to excessive daytime involuntary activity of the tongue, lips, and mandible. A detailed head/neck examination revealed excessive involuntary movements of the tongue, lips, and mandible with generalized tenderness of her masticatory muscles. No TMJ or bone pathology was evident in a panoramic radiograph.
    METHODS: A lower daytime appliance with bilateral posterior contacts was fabricated to protect her oral mucosa. On reevaluation, excessive movement of the jaw/tongue was significantly reduced with the presence of the appliance in her mouth. Face/neck muscle tenderness was also greatly reduced.
    CONCLUSIONS: The use of oral appliance therapy in TD patients plays an important role in protecting the teeth/oral mucosa. The subsequent inhibition of excessive motor activity is proposed and should be further investigated.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号