OBJECTIVE: Asians have a high prevalence of young-onset diabetes, but the pattern of monogenic diabetes is unknown. We aimed to determine the prevalence of monogenic diabetes in Chinese patients with young-onset diabetes and compare the clinical characteristics and outcome between patients with and without monogenic diabetes.
METHODS: We sequenced a targeted panel of 33 genes related to monogenic diabetes in 1021 Chinese patients with non-type 1 diabetes diagnosed at age ≤40 years. Incident complications including cardiovascular disease (CVD), end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) and all-cause death were captured since enrolment (1995-2012) until 2019.
RESULTS: In this cohort (mean ± SD age at diagnosis: 33.0 ± 6.0 years, median[IQR] diabetes duration 7.0[1.0-15.0] years at baseline, 44.9% men), 22(2.2%, 95% confidence interval[CI] 1.4%-3.2%) had monogenic diabetes. Pathogenic (P) or likely pathogenic (LP) variants were detected in GCK (n = 6), HNF1A (n = 9), HNF4A (n = 1), PLIN1 (n = 1) and PPARG (n = 2), together with copy number variations in HNF1B (n = 3). Over a median follow-up of 17.1 years, 5(22.7%) patients with monogenic diabetes (incidence rate 12.3[95% CI 5.1-29.4] per 1000 person-years) versus 254(25.4%) without monogenic diabetes (incidence rate 16.7[95% CI 14.8-18.9] per 1000 person-years) developed the composite outcome of CVD, ESKD and/or death (p = 0.490). The multivariable Cox model did not show any difference in hazards for composite events between groups.
CONCLUSIONS: In Chinese with young-onset non-type 1 diabetes, at least 2% of cases were contributed by monogenic diabetes, over 80% of which were accounted for by P/LP variants in common MODY genes. The incidence of diabetes complications was similar between patients with and without monogenic diabetes.

UNASSIGNED: We aimed to verify the usefulness of targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology for diagnosing monogenic diabetes in a single center.
UNASSIGNED: We designed an amplicon-based NGS panel targeting 34 genes associated with known monogenic diabetes and performed resequencing in 56 patients with autoantibody-negative diabetes mellitus diagnosed at < 50 years who had not been highly obese. By bioinformatic analysis, we filtered significant variants based on allele frequency (< 0.005 in East Asians) and functional prediction. We estimated the pathogenicity of each variant upon considering the family history.
UNASSIGNED: Overall, 16 candidate causative variants were identified in 16 patients. Among them, two previously known heterozygous nonsynonymous single-nucleotide variants associated with monogenic diabetes were confirmed as causative variants: one each in the GCK and WFS1 genes. The former was found in two independent diabetes-affected families. Two novel putatively deleterious heterozygous variants were also assumed to be causative from the family history: one frameshift and one nonsynonymous single-nucleotide variant in the HNF4A gene. Twelve variants remained as candidates associated with the development of diabetes.
UNASSIGNED: Targeted NGS panel testing was useful to diagnose various forms of monogenic diabetes in combination with familial analysis, but additional ingenuity would be needed for practice.
UNASSIGNED: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13340-023-00669-3.

UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to evaluate the utility of C-peptide levels in the differentiation of monogenic forms of diabetes from type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in clinical practice.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 104 patients aged >16 who visited the Dicle University\'s Faculty of Medicine between April 2011 and December 2020 and were diagnosed with monogenic diabetes by genetic analysis or with T1DM and T2DM were randomly selected for retrospective evaluation. The C-peptide levels of these patients at the time of diagnosis of diabetes were compared.
UNASSIGNED: Of the 104 patients, 24 (23%) were diagnosed with maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY), 40 (38.5%) with T1DM, and 40 (38.5%) with T2DM. Median C-peptide levels (ng/mL) (interquartile range) were 1.78 (1.24-2.88) in MODY group, 0.86 (0.34-1.22) in T1DM group, and 2.38 (1.58-4.27) in T2DM group.
UNASSIGNED: There was a difference in C-peptide levels between MODY and T1DM groups but not between MODY and T2DM groups. As per clinical evaluations, although C-peptide levels of patients with MODY are similar to those of patients with T2DM patients, the possibility of C-peptide levels being similar to those required for T1DM diagnosis should also be considered.

UNASSIGNED: The Rare and Atypical DIAbetes NeTwork (RADIANT) aims to discover the underlying pathoetiology of atypical diabetes by conducting both genotyping and non-genetic deep phenotyping. While the return of genetic test results in research settings has been investigated, the return of non-genetic results (RoR-NG) has received less attention. We explore the RoR-NG with RADIANT investigators and participants.
UNASSIGNED: We conducted one-on-one interviews with 10 adult RADIANT participants and 10 RADIANT investigators. Participants also completed two health literacy screening tools and a survey on perspectives regarding return of results (RoR). Investigators completed one survey on experience and confidence in explaining clinical tests utilized in the RADIANT study and another survey on perspectives regarding RoR.
UNASSIGNED: Most participants were non-Hispanic White. All participants had high scores on health literacy screens. Both RADIANT participants and investigators expressed strong support for RoR-NG. RADIANT participants and investigators acknowledged the different roles and responsibilities between research and clinical care for interpreting and acting on non-genetic results. However, the lines between clinical care and research in returning and acting on results were often blurred by both participants and investigators.
UNASSIGNED: Our study provides important insight into how both investigators and participants simultaneously distinguish and blur clinical and research roles and responsibilities when discussing non-genetic research results and the return of these results. Further study should engage individuals from diverse racial and ethnic backgrounds and with varying levels of health literacy to understand how best to support all participants when returning research results.

OBJECTIVE: Monogenic diabetes is estimated to account for 1-6% of paediatric diabetes cases in primarily non-consanguineous populations, while the incidence and genetic spectrum in consanguineous regions are insufficiently defined. In this single-centre study we aimed to evaluate diabetes subtypes, obtain the consanguinity rate and study the genetic background of individuals with syndromic and neonatal diabetes in a population with a high rate of consanguinity.
METHODS: Data collection was carried out cross-sectionally in November 2021 at the paediatric diabetic clinic, Dr Jamal Ahmad Rashed Hospital, in Sulaimani, Kurdistan, Iraq. At the time of data collection, 754 individuals with diabetes (381 boys) aged up to 16 years were registered. Relevant participant data was obtained from patient files. Consanguinity status was known in 735 (97.5%) participants. Furthermore, 12 families of children with neonatal diabetes and seven families of children with syndromic diabetes consented to genetic testing by next-generation sequencing. Prioritised variants were evaluated using the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines and confirmed by Sanger sequencing.
RESULTS: A total of 269 of 735 participants (36.5%) with known consanguinity status were offspring of consanguineous families. An overwhelming majority of participants (714/754, 94.7%) had clinically defined type 1 diabetes (35% of them were born to consanguineous parents), whereas only eight (1.1%) had type 2 diabetes (38% consanguineous). Fourteen (1.9%) had neonatal diabetes (50% consanguineous), seven (0.9%) had syndromic diabetes (100% consanguineous) and 11 (1.5%) had clinically defined MODY (18% consanguineous). We found that consanguinity was significantly associated with syndromic diabetes (p=0.0023) but not with any other diabetes subtype. The genetic cause was elucidated in ten of 12 participants with neonatal diabetes who consented to genetic testing (homozygous variants in GLIS3 [sibling pair], PTF1A and ZNF808 and heterozygous variants in ABCC8 and INS) and four of seven participants with syndromic diabetes (homozygous variants in INSR, SLC29A3 and WFS1 [sibling pair]). In addition, a participant referred as syndromic diabetes was diagnosed with mucolipidosis gamma and probably has type 2 diabetes.
CONCLUSIONS: This unique single-centre study confirms that, even in a highly consanguineous population, clinically defined type 1 diabetes is the prevailing paediatric diabetes subtype. Furthermore, a pathogenic cause of monogenic diabetes was identified in 83% of tested participants with neonatal diabetes and 57% of participants with syndromic diabetes, with most variants being homozygous. Causative genes in our consanguineous participants were markedly different from genes reported from non-consanguineous populations and also from those reported in other consanguineous populations. To correctly diagnose syndromic diabetes in consanguineous populations, it may be necessary to re-evaluate diagnostic criteria and include additional phenotypic features such as short stature and hepatosplenomegaly.

The aim of this study was to perform familial co-segregation analysis and functional trial in vivo during mixed meal tolerance test (MMTT) of novel variants in diabetes candidate genes.
It is a continuation of the project \"Genetic diabetes in Lithuania\" with the cohort of 1209 patients with diabetes. Prior screening for autoimmune markers confirmed type 1 diabetes (T1D) diagnosis in 88.1% (n=1065) of patients, and targeted next-generation sequencing identified 3.5% (n=42) pathogenic variants in MODY genes. Subsequently, 102 patients were classified as having diabetes of unknown etiology. 12/102 were found to have novel variants in potential diabetes genes (RFX2, RREB1, SLC5A1 (3 patients with variants in this gene), GCKR, MC4R, CASP10, TMPRSS6, HGFAC, DACH1, ZBED3). Co-segregation analysis and MMTT were carried out in order to study beta-cell function in subjects with specific variants.
MMTT analysis showed that probands with variants in MC4R, CASP10, TMPRSS6, HGFAC, and SLC5A1 (c.1415T>C) had sufficient residual beta-cell function with stimulated C-peptide (CP) >200 pmol/L. Seven individuals with variants in RFX2, RREB1, GCKR, DACH1, ZBED3 and SLC5A1 (c.1415T>C, and c.932A>T) presented with complete beta-cell failure. No statistical differences were found between patients with sufficient CP production and those with complete beta-cell failure when comparing age at the onset and duration of diabetes. Nineteen family members were included in co-segregation analysis; no diabetes cases were reported among them. Only in patient with the variant c.1894G>A in RFX2 gene, none of the family members were affected by proband\'s variant.
Functional beta-cell study in vivo allowed to select five most probable genes for monogenic diabetes. Familial co-segregation analysis showed that novel variant in RFX2 gene could be a possible cause of diabetes. Future functional analysis in vitro is necessary to support or rule out the genetic background as a cause of diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: Maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY), an autosomal dominant disease, is frequently misdiagnosed as type 1 or 2 diabetes. Molecular diagnosis is essential to distinguish them. This study was done to investigate the prevalence of MODY subtypes and patients\' clinical characteristics.
METHODS: A total of 43 out of 230 individuals with diabetes were selected based on the age of diagnosis >6 months, family history of diabetes, absence of marked obesity, and measurable C-peptide. Next-generation and direct SANGER sequencing was performed to screen MODY-related mutations. The variants were interpreted using the Genome Aggregation Database (genomAD), Clinical Variation (ClinVar), and pathogenicity prediction tools.
RESULTS: There were 23 males (53.5%), and the mean age at diabetes diagnosis was 6.7 ± 3.6 years. Sixteen heterozygote single nucleotide variations (SNVs) from 14 patients (14/230, 6%) were detected, frequently GCK (37.5%) and BLK (18.7%). Two novel variants were identified in HNF4A and ABCC8. Half of the detected variants were categorized as likely pathogenic. Most prediction tools predicted Ser28Cys in HNF4A as benign and Tyr123Phe in ABCC8 as a pathogenic SNV. Six cases (42.8%) with positive MODY SNVs had islet autoantibodies. At diagnosis, age, HbA1C, and C-peptide level were similar between SNV-positive and negative patients.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study investigating 14 variants of MODY in Iran. The results recommend genetic screening for MODY in individuals with unusual type 1 or 2 diabetes even without family history. Treatment modifies depending on the type of patients\' MODY and is associated with the quality of life.

BACKGROUND: Maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY), which is the most common cause of monogenic diabetes, has an autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance and exhibits marked clinical and genetic heterogeneity. The aim of the current study was to investigate molecular defects in patients with clinically suspected MODY using a next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based targeted gene panel.
METHODS: Candidate patients with clinical suspicion of MODY and their parents were included in the study. Molecular genetic analyses were performed on genomic DNA by using NGS. A panel of ten MODY-causal genes involving GCK, HNF1A, HNF1B, HNF4A, ABCC8, CEL, INS, KCNJ11, NEUROD1, PDX1 was designed and subsequently implemented to screen 40 patients for genetic variants.
RESULTS: Ten different pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants were identified in MODY-suspected patients, with a diagnostic rate of 25%. Three variants of uncertain significance were also detected in the same screen. A novel pathogenic variant in the gene HNF1A (c.505_506delAA [p.Lys169AlafsTer18]) was described for the first time in this report. Intriguingly, we were able to detect variants associated with rare forms of MODY in our study population.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that in heterogenous diseases such as MODY, NGS analysis enables accurate identification of underlying molecular defects in a timely and cost-effective manner. Although MODY accounts for 2-5% of all diabetic cases, molecular genetic diagnosis of MODY is necessary for optimal long-term treatment and prognosis as well as for effective genetic counseling.

UNASSIGNED: 1. To study the clinical outcome, growth and glycaemic control, 2. To study the frequency and type of genetic mutations.
UNASSIGNED: This is a retrospective study with a review of data of medical records from 2008 till date.
UNASSIGNED: Twelve patients (six males) with neonatal diabetes mellitus (NDM) were identified. Median (interquartile range - (IQR)) age at diagnosis was 72 (31-95) days with a history of consanguinity in 75%. The median birth weight (range) was 2345 (900-3300) g. Follow-up data were available for eight patients with a median age at (IQR) follow-up of 3.3 (3-5.3) years. At follow-up, the mean annual HbA1c was 8.2% at a mean insulin dose of 1.1 U/kg/d. One patient with Wolcott-Rallison syndrome (WRS) and 21α-hydroxylase deficiency had poor growth and intellectual difficulty. The rest demonstrated satisfactory growth with an increase of mean weight centile from 2nd to 13th, height centile from 6.5th to 20th and normal neuro-cognitive development. Eleven patients underwent genetic testing with a molecular diagnosis in 54% (6/11): EIF2AK3 (n = 2) and one each in INS, PDX1, IL2RA and FOXP3. None had variants in ABCC8 or KCNJ11. One with immune dysregulation, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, X-linked (IPEX) syndrome underwent haematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) and later succumbed.
UNASSIGNED: Our study demonstrates good clinical outcomes among NDM patients without immune dysfunction. Molecular diagnosis was attained only in around half of the patients (54%) with a great genetic heterogeneity.

OBJECTIVE: Identification of monogenic diabetes (MgD) conveys benefits for patients\' care. Algorithms for selecting the patients to be genetically tested have been established in EuroCaucasians, but not in non-EuroCaucasian individuals. We assessed the diagnosis rate, the phenotype of MgD, and the relevance of selection criteria, according to ancestry in patients referred for a suspected MgD.
METHODS: Seven genes (GCK, HNF1A, HNF4A, HNF1B, ABCC8, KCNJ11, INS) were analyzed in 1975 adult probands (42% non-EuroCaucasians), selected on the absence of diabetes autoantibodies and ≥2 of the following criteria: age ≤40 years and body mass index <30 kg/m2 at diagnosis, and a family history of diabetes in ≥2 generations.
RESULTS: Pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants were identified in 6.2% of non-EuroCaucasian and 23.6% of EuroCaucasian patients (OR 0.21, [0.16-0.29]). Diagnosis rate was low in all non-EuroCaucasian subgroups (4.1-11.8%). Common causes of MgD (GCK, HNF1A, HNF4A), but not rare causes, were less frequent in non-EuroCaucasians than in EuroCaucasians (4.1%, vs. 21.1%, OR 0.16 [0.11-0.23]). Using ethnicity-specific body mass index cutoffs increased the diagnosis rate in several non-EuroCaucasian subgroups.
CONCLUSIONS: The diagnosis rate of MgD is low in non-EuroCaucasian patients, but may be improved by tailoring selection criteria according to patients\'ancestry.