BRAF mutations are found in 1-5% of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with V600 and non-V600 accounting for approximately 50% each. It has been confirmed that targeted therapy with dabrafenib + trametinib is effective in patients with metastatic NSCLC carrying BRAF V600E mutations. Preclinical studies have shown that dabrafenib + trametinib may also have inhibitory effects on some types of non-V600E mutations, especially some class II BRAF mutations. However, the efficacy of dabrafenib + trametinib on non-V600E mutant NSCLC in clinical practice only exists in some case reports. Here, we report a case of NSCLC patient carrying BRAF ex15 p.T599dup, who showed a clinical response to the combined therapy of dabrafenib + trametinib.

Pancreatic acinar cell carcinomas are rare malignant neoplasms. High-quality evidence about the best treatment strategy is lacking. We present the case of a 52-year-old male with a BRAFV600E -mutated PACC who experienced a complete remission after chemotherapy with BRAF-/MEK-inhibitors.
The patient presented with upper abdomen pain, night sweat, and weight loss. CT scan showed a pancreatic tumor extending from the pancreas head to body. Histological workup identified an acinar cell carcinoma. As the tumor was inoperable, chemotherapy with FOFIRNIOX was initiated and initially showed a slight regression of disease. The regimen had to be discontinued due to severe side effects. Molecular analysis identified a BRAFV600E mutation, so the patient was started on BRAF- and MEK-inhibitors (dabrafenib/trametinib). After 16 months, CT scans showed a near complete remission with a markedly improved overall health.
Studies suggest that up to one-fourth of PACCs carry a BRAF mutation and might therefore be susceptible to a BRAF-/MEK-inhibitor therapy. This offers a new therapeutic pathway to treat this rare but malignant neoplasm.

Primary meningeal melanomatosis is an extremely rare tumor with very few documented responses to treatment. A 3-year-old male with a complex past medical history, including prematurity and shunted hydrocephalus, was diagnosed with primary meningeal melanomatosis with peritoneal implants. Molecular testing revealed an NRAS Q61R mutation. The patient received proton craniospinal radiation followed by immunotherapy with nivolumab (1 mg/kg) and ipilimumab (3 mg/kg) IV every 3 weeks and, upon progression, he was switched to a higher dose of nivolumab (3 mg/kg IV every 2 weeks) and binimetinib (24 mg/m2/dose, twice a day). The patient had significant improvement of CNS disease with radiation therapy and initial immunotherapy but progression of extracranial metastatic peritoneal and abdominal disease. Radiation was not administered to the whole abdomen. After two cycles of nivolumab and treatment with the MEK inhibitor binimetinib, he had radiographic and clinical improvement in abdominal metastasis and ascitis. He ultimately died from RSV infection, Klebsiella sepsis, and subdural hemorrhage without evidence of tumor progression. This is the first report of a child with primary meningeal melanomatosis with extracranial metastatic disease with response to a combination of radiation, immunotherapy and MEK inhibitor therapy.

暂无摘要。

UNASSIGNED: Melanoma is an aggressive malignancy, historically characterized with a poor prognosis and few treatment options. The advent of target therapy with BRAF and MEK inhibitors, as well as immunotherapy, changed this scenario and improved the prognosis of patients with BRAF V600E mutation. These therapies are generally well tolerated. Neurological toxicities, especially polyradiculopathy, are very rare with BRAF inhibitors and MEK inhibitors although some cases have been described in recent years, regardless of the type of target therapies combination used.
UNASSIGNED: We report the case of a patient with BRAF V600E-mutated metastatic melanoma treated with dabrafenib and trametinib who has developed a demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy.
UNASSIGNED: This case, once more, should draw our attention to the possibility of rare, but potentially serious side effects, even in the case of generally well-tolerated treatments. Especially in the presence of side effects, it is important a close relationship between clinicians and patients for the management of adverse events and the choice of the best treatment strategy.

A 28-year old Japanese man with Noonan syndrome (NS) presented to our emergency department with painful erythema of the trunk and lower extremities since the previous day. He had been diagnosed with protein-losing enteropathy (PLE) with intestinal lymphangiectasia at age 25 years, and undergone lymphaticovenular anastomosis (LVA) twice. Three episodes of cellulitis of both lower extremities had occurred in the past 2 years. Extensive cellulitis with sepsis was diagnosed and piperacillin/tazobactam was started, which was de-escalated to ceftriaxone. He was discharged after 13 days of antibiotic therapy. After discharge, low-dose trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SMZ-TMP) was started as the primary prophylaxis, but three episodes of cellulitis occurred in the next year and were treated with other antibiotics. NS, an autosomal dominant disease known as a RASopathy, is caused by germline mutations in RAS-MAPK pathway genes. Lymphedema resulting from lymphatic abnormalities is a concomitant manifestation in 20 % of patients with NS, and can be a risk factor for cellulitis. Hypoalbuminemia and hypoglobulinemia associated with PLE facilitate infections such as cellulitis. As a treatment for lymphedema in the extremities, LVA has shown objective and subjective improvements in most patients, and some studies have also reported its efficacy for lymphedema in patients with NS. Targeted molecular therapy with mitogen-activated protein kinase enzyme (MEK) inhibitor is used in treatment of cancers with activation of the RAS/MAPK pathway. MEK inhibitors have recently been tried in patients with RASopathies and severe lymphatic disorders, and can lead to rapid resolution of symptoms.

暂无摘要。

Although a benign intracranial tumor, craniopharyngioma treatment has always been considered a challenging clinical problem. Recently, BRAF V600E mutation in the pathogenesis of papillary craniopharyngioma (PCP) has been further revealed. Thus, BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi) serve as an applicable treatment for patients with PCP.
Two patients with recurrent PCP were treated with combined BRAFi dabrafenib (150 mg, orally twice daily) and MEK inhibitors (MEKi) trametinib (2 mg, orally twice daily). A follow-up exceeding 2 years was conducted. We meticulously scrutinized the treatment\'s safety and efficacy profiles by delving into existing literature.
One patient harboring a solid tumor achieved a complete tumor response devoid of any adverse events and encountered no recurrence over 2 years subsequent to discontinuation. Moreover, within a mere month of commencing targeted therapy, the tumor demonstrated observable shrinkage. This finding substantiates the considerable potential inherent in targeted therapy for PCP cases marked by the somatic BRAF V600E mutation.
Under specific conditions, individuals diagnosed with PCP can attain a complete tumor response following combined treatment with BRAFi/MEKi.

Targeted and immune therapies have changed the paradigm of treatment for patients with metastatic melanoma. Treatment of patients with symptomatic melanoma brain metastases, however, is complicated by the frequent use of immune suppression for the management of vasogenic edema and the urgency in addressing disease burden. Use of BRAF/MEK inhibitors in patients with a corresponding BRAF V600 mutation often results in rapid response but is hindered by high rates of disease relapse and progression. Immunotherapy has higher durability of response, but the rate of response is slower and responses can be significantly diminished for patients on concurrent steroid therapy. Considering this gap in evidence-based guidance for optimal adjuvant therapy sequence in immunosuppressed patients with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma brain metastases, we report on 4 cases utilizing BRAF/MEK inhibitors as a bridging therapy for brain metastases management before initiation of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Future prospective studies will be required to determine the optimal treatment sequencing for patients in this population with high unmet medical need.

Recurrent and anaplastic pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma (r&aPXA) is a rare primary brain tumor that is challenging to treat. Two-thirds of PXA tumors harbor a BRAF gene mutation. BRAF inhibitors have been shown to improve tumor control. However, resistance to BRAF inhibition develops in most cases. Concurrent therapy with MEK inhibitors may improve tumor control and patient survival. In this study, we identified 5 patients diagnosed with BRAF-mutated PXA who received BRAF and MEK inhibitors over a 10-year interval at our institution. Patient records were evaluated, including treatments, adverse effects (AEs), outcomes, pathology, next-generation sequencing, and MRI. The median age was 22 years (range, 14-66 years), 60% male, and 60% anaplastic PXA. Median overall survival was 72 months (range, 19-112 months); 1 patient died of tumor-related hemorrhage while off therapy, and the other 4 experienced long-term disease control (21, 72, 98, and 112 months, respectively). Dual BRAF/MEK inhibitors were well tolerated, with only grade 1-2 AEs, including rash, neutropenia, fatigue, abdominal discomfort, and diarrhea. No grade 3-5 AEs were detected. A literature review was also performed of patients diagnosed with BRAF-mutated PXA and treated with BRAF and/or MEK inhibitors through August 2021, with a total of 32 cases identified. The median age was 29 years (range, 8-57 years) and the median PFS and OS were 8.5 months (range, 2-35 months) and 35 months (range, 10-80 months), respectively. The most common AEs were grade 1-2 fatigue and skin rash. Results of this case series and literature review indicate that dual-drug therapy with BRAF and MEK inhibitors for r&aPXA with BRAF V600E mutation may delay tumor progression without unexpected AEs.