We conducted a phase I trial in newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) to investigate the combination of two novel targeted agents, gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) and midostaurin, with intensive chemotherapy in FLT3-mutated AML and CBF leukaemia. Three dose levels of midostaurin and one to three sequential doses of 3 mg/m2 GO in combination with \'7 + 3\' induction were evaluated. Based on safety findings in 12 patients, our results show that 3 mg/m2 GO on Days 1 + 4 and 100 mg midostaurin on Days 8-21 can be safely combined with IC in newly diagnosed AML.

Early induction response assessment with day-21 bone marrow (D21-BM) is commonly performed in patients with FLT3-mutated acute myeloid leukaemia (AML), where detection of residual leukaemia (RL; blasts ≥5%) typically results in the administration of a second induction course. However, whether D21-BM results predict for RL at the end of first induction has not been systematically assessed. This study evaluates the predictive role of D21-BM morphology in detecting RL following first induction. Between August 2018 and March 2022, all patients with FLT3-AML receiving 7+3 plus midostaurin, with D21-BM performed, were identified. Correlation between D21-BM morphology vs D21-BM ancillary flow/molecular results, as well as vs D28-BM end of first induction response, were retrospectively reviewed. Subsequently, D21-BMs were subjected to anonymised morphological re-assessments by independent haematopathologists (total in triplicate per patient). Of nine patients included in this study, three (33%) were designated to have RL at D21-BM, all of whom entered complete remission at D28-BM. Furthermore, only low-level measurable residual disease was detected in all three cases by flow or molecular methods at D21-BM, hence none proceeded to a second induction. Independent re-evaluations of these cases failed to correctly reassign D21-BM responses, yielding a final false positive rate of 33%. In summary, based on morphology alone, D21-BM assessment following 7+3 intensive induction plus midostaurin for FLT3-AML incorrectly designates RL in some patients; thus correlating with associated flow and molecular results is essential before concluding RL following first induction. Where remission status is unclear, repeat D28-BMs should be performed.

BACKGROUND: FLT3-ITD mutation is associated with adverse prognosis (ELN2017, Dohner et al., Blood 2017) and SCT has been the standard of treatment for FLT3-mutated AML for decades. Midostaurin (Midos) has been approved in combination with intensive chemotherapy (IC) for FLT3-mutated AML; Midos maintenance was part of the treatment schedule in the RATIFY trial but not randomly explored (Stone et al., N Engl J Med 2017).
OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study are to analyze the safety and effectiveness of Midos maintenance in FLT3 AML in a real-world setting and evaluate maintenance versus allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) versus watch and wait (W&W) and the impact of risk factors.
METHODS: We carried out a retrospective multicenter study (MDA-AML-2018-06) in 27 Spanish centers.
METHODS: age >18 years, FLT3-mutated AML diagnosis according to WHO criteria, and start of treatment with Midos in combination with IC between June 2016 and December 2020. We evaluated the response according to 2017 ELN criteria, toxicity according to CTCAE v4.0, and overall survival (OS) by Kaplan-Meier. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 20.0.
RESULTS: A total of 175 (93 female) patients with a median age of 53 years (18-76 years) were included. The median OS for the whole population was not reached; 24-month OS was 68%. Of those who achieved CR after Induction 1 or 2 (144 patients, 81.4%), 24 received maintenance, 76 were consolidated with alloSCT, and 41 proceeded to W&W.
RESULTS: The only AE during maintenance was one case of QT prolongation, which required Midos discontinuation. There were no cases of febrile neutropenia nor deaths related to Midos. Regarding OS, the ELN2017 classification resulted in a trend of differences in all groups: maintenance, alloSCT, and W&W. We observed significant differences for maintenance versus W&W (P=0.001) in low- and intermediate-risk patients. Comparing maintenance and alloSCT, we observe no differences in the Int ELN2017 group.
CONCLUSIONS: Our experience confirms the safety of maintenance therapy in AML FLT3 patients after IC. We also observed a benefit for maintenance versus W&W in the low- and intermediate-risk population.

Advanced Systemic Mastocytosis (Adv-SM) is rare and has a poor prognosis. Midostaurin (Rydapt® ) is one of the few treatments for Adv-SM in Europe. The study aims were to describe the characteristics of patients treated with midostaurin, their treatment modalities, outcomes, and serious events requiring hospitalization. This retrospective observational study was conducted using the French National Healthcare Database (SNDS) and included adult Adv-SM patients treated with midostaurin between 01-01-2012 and 09-30-2018. Kaplan-Meier method was used to assess survival and treatment duration. Eighty-one patients were included: 37 with Aggressive Systemic Mastocytosis (SM) (46%), 31 with SM with an Associated Hematological Neoplasm (38%), and 4 with Mast Cell Leukemia (5%). The SM subtype was undetermined in 9 patients (11%). The median age was 67 years; 64% of patients were male. Over the mean follow-up of 11.4 months, median midostaurin treatment duration was 8.4 months and 28 patients (35%) were still under treatment at the end of the study. One-year and 5-year overall survival rates estimated since the time of diagnosis were 83% and 56%, respectively. Twelve serious events (among those frequently reported during clinical trials and compassionate use) requiring hospitalization were identified; a causal association with Adv-SM treatment could neither be excluded nor established. In this first real-life study on patients treated with midostaurin for Adv-SM, the patients\' characteristics, their management, treatment discontinuation, and survival were in line with previous results (compassionate use and clinical trials).

The potential drug-drug interactions of midostaurin may impact the choice of antifungal (AF) prophylaxis in FLT3-positive acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. To evaluate the incidence of invasive fungal diseases (IFD) during the treatment of FLT3-mutated AML patients and to correlate it to the different AF prophylaxis strategies, we planned a multicenter observational study involving 15 SEIFEM centers. One hundred fourteen patients treated with chemotherapy + midostaurin as induction/reinduction, consolidation or both were enrolled. During induction, the incidence of probable/proven and possible IFD was 10.5% and 9.7%, respectively; no statistically significant difference was observed according to the different AF strategy adopted. The median duration of neutropenia was similar in patients with or without IFD. Proven/probable and possible IFD incidence was 2.4% and 1.8%, respectively, during consolidation. Age was the only risk factor for IFD (OR, 95% CI, 1.10 [1.03-1.19]) and complete remission achievement after first induction the only one for survival (OR, 95% CI, 5.12 [1.93-13.60]). The rate of midostaurin discontinuation was similar across different AF strategies. The IFD attributable mortality during induction was 8.3%. In conclusion, the 20.2% overall incidence of IFD occurring in FLT3-mutated AML during induction with chemotherapy + midostaurin, regardless of AF strategy type, was noteworthy, and merits further study, particularly in elderly patients.

BACKGROUND: Patients diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia with a FLT3 mutation (FLT3+ AML) have historically had poor outcomes. While the addition of the FLT3 inhibitors to induction therapy has been shown to improve survival outcomes in FLT3+ AML, interactions and overlapping toxicities between FLT3 inhibitors and standard of care medications used during induction therapy (e.g. azole antifungals, anthracyclines) and logistical barriers have complicated their use. To avoid these concerns, our institution has opted to defer initiation of midostaurin until after completion of induction therapy. However, to our knowledge no study confirming the effectiveness of this strategy for real world FLT3 inhibitor use has been published.
METHODS: We performed a single center, propensity-score matched, retrospective cohort study characterizing efficacy and safety of our strategy for use of FLT3 inhibitors in the treatment of FLT3+ AML. The primary outcome was median event-free survival (EFS), while secondary endpoints included median overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), 30-day mortality, duration of neutropenia, duration of thrombocytopenia, consolidation cycle delays, documented infections, and all-cause hospital readmission.
RESULTS: A total of 83 FLT3+ AML patients treated with intensive induction therapy were included in the study, of whom 48 were propensity-score matched and analyzed. Baseline characteristics were similar between the patients who received a FLT3 inhibitor after induction therapy and the historical control arm. Median EFS was not significantly different but compared favorably between the FLT3 inhibitor cohort and historical controls (not reached vs 8 months, p = 0.343) with 18-month EFS of 54% and 43% for the two cohorts, respectively. Similarly, no significant differences were noted with regard to median OS (not reached vs 28.7 months, p = 0.752), ORR (79.2% vs 79.2%), or safety outcomes between groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared to historical controls, addition of a FLT3 inhibitor to intensive chemotherapy post-induction may improve EFS or OS in a real world patient cohort with longer follow-up and a larger sample size. The omission of midostaurin in induction allowed for the use of an azole antifungal and the intensification of anthracycline dose may have contributed to high remission rates in both groups.

暂无摘要。

The addition of midostaurin, a FLT3-inhibitor, to intensive chemotherapy (IC) was previously shown to improve outcome of younger patients with FLT3-mutated AML. The toxicity and efficacy of adding midostaurin to IC in patients not originally included in the RATIFY study or with intensified daunorubicin dosing are unknown. We conducted a retrospective, multi-center, historical-control study to characterize the safety and efficacy of adding midostaurin to IC in a \"real-world\" setting. Sixty-nine adult patients were included in the analysis (midostaurin n = 34, historical controls n = 35) with a mean follow-up of 18.4 (± 15) months. Median age of patients was 60 (range 26-82) years; 32% and 20% of patients were > 65 and 70 years, respectively. No differences in baseline characteristics were noted between the groups. Midostaurin was administered with 90 mg/m2 daunorubicin in 29% of patients; One-third of patients experienced dose reductions/interruptions during midostaurin therapy. Overall toxicity was comparable between the midostaurin and control groups.CR/CRi rates were higher in patients treated with midostaurin compared with controls (80% vs. 57%, p = 0.047) and significantly more patients in the midostaurin group were transplanted in first remission (95% vs. 68%, p = 0.04).Median OS and DFS were higher in the midostaurin vs. control group (not reached vs. 11 months (p = 0.085) and 13 vs. 6 months (p = 0.09), respectively). In our analysis, midostaurin was not associated with increased toxicity including in older patients, in those with secondary AML or when administered with intensified daunorubicin dosage. Higher remission rates in the midostaurin group and increased transplantation rates in first CR were associated with a trend towards better outcomes.

Overexpression of ABC transporters in cancer cells is an underlying mechanism of multidrug resistance (MDR), leading to insensitive response to chemotherapeutic strategies. Thus, MDR is often results in treatment failure in the clinic. In this study, we found midostaurin, a Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved anti-leukemia drug, can antagonize ATP-binding cassette subfamily B member 1 (ABCB1)-mediated MDR. Our results indicated that midostaurin has the capacity to antagonize ABCB1-mediated MDR, while no significant reversal effect was found on ATP-binding cassette subfamily G member 2 (ABCG2)-mediated MDR. Our subsequent resistance mechanism studies showed that midostaurin directly inhibited the efflux function of the ABCB1 transporter without alteration of the expression level or the subcellular localization of ABCB1 transporter. In addition, midostaurin inhibited the ATPase activity of ABCB1 transporter in a dose-dependent manner. Moreover, our in silico docking study predicted that midostaurin could interact with the substrate-binding sites of ABCB1 transporter. This novel finding could provide a promising treatment strategy that co-administrating midostaurin with anticancer drugs in the clinic could overcome MDR and improve the efficiency of cancer treatment.

暂无摘要。