Middle Aged

中老年人
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    评估血液透析实践指南对透析指标和血流动力学并发症的影响。这项比较研究是在谢赫扎耶德医院的透析部门进行的,拉合尔,巴基斯坦,并将接受血液透析的患者分为干预组A,其中使用了最新的血液透析实践指南,对照组B给予常规基础透析。使用自结构化工具收集数据。使用McNemar检验和Mann-WhitneyU检验分析数据,p<0.05。与基线相比,在具有特定分布体积(V)的患者中,由时间(t)表征的治疗导致的有效清除(K)的干预后比率显着改善,或Kt/V,中位数和IQR0.83(0.355)vs1.21(0.11)和尿素减少率百分比中位数和IQR49(12)vs.66.5(18.65)(p<0.05)。B组17名(56.6%)受试者和A组4名(13.4%)受试者中发现了透析中低血压(p=0.002)。B组8例(25.6%)患者和A组1例(3.4%)患者存在透析性高血压(p=0.039)。建议根据最新的临床指南进行透析,以改善实践并提高血液透析的有效性。
    To assess the effect of haemodialysis practice guidelines on dialysis indicators and haemodynamic complications, the comparative study was conducted at the dialysis unit of Sheikh Zayed Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan, and comprised patients undergoing haemodialysis who were divided into intervention group A in which updated haemodialysis practice guidelines were used, and control group B in which routine base dialysis was given. Data was collected using a self-structured tool. Data was analysed using McNemar test and Mann-Whitney U-test with p<0.05. Compared to baseline, there was a significant improvement in post-intervention ratio of effective removal of clearance (K) resulting from the treatment characterised by time (t) in the patient with a specific volume of distribution (V), or Kt/V, median & IQR 0.83(0.355) vs 1.21(0.11) and percentage of urea reduction ratio with median & IQR 49(12) vs. 66.5(18.65) (p<0.05). Intradialytic hypotension was found in 17(56.6%) subjects in group B and in 4(13.4%) in group A (p=0.002). Intradialytic hypertension was found in 8(25.6%) patients in group B and 1(3.4%) in group A (p=0.039). It is recommended that dialysis be performed in accordance with the most recent clinical guidelines in order to improve practices and to increase haemodialysis effectiveness.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肺癌(LC)是美国癌症死亡率的主要原因。为了应对这种困境,早期筛查和严格评估其危险因素仍然至关重要.这项研究的目的是从2001-2018年的国家健康和营养检查调查(NHANES)中确定特定因素的价值,因为它们与美国预防服务工作组(USPSTF)的肺癌死亡率有关。从81,595名NHANES参与者中提取了总共3545名符合USPSTF标准的成年人。LC死亡风险评估工具用于计算每1000个人的死亡人数。Mann-WhitneyU检验和单向ANOVA确定了与LC死亡率有关的因素的统计学显著性。男性,非洲和西班牙裔,受教育程度较低,二手烟暴露与LC死亡风险增加相关.此外,对来自NHANES数据的情绪支持因素进行了分析,未显示对降低风险有任何益处.通过识别高危人群,可以最大限度地采取预防措施,以产生最佳结果。
    Lung cancer (LC) is the leading cause of cancer mortality in the United States. To combat this predicament, early screening and critically assessing its risk factors remain crucial. The aim of this study was to identify the value of specific factors from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 2001-2018, as they relate to lung cancer mortality in the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF)-eligible population. A total of 3545 adults who met USPSTF criteria were extracted from 81,595 NHANES participants. The LC Death Risk Assessment Tool was used to calculate the number of deaths per 1000 individuals. The Mann-Whitney U test and one-way ANOVA determined the statistical significance of the factors involved in LC mortality. Male sex, African and Hispanic ethnicity, lower education attainment, and secondhand exposure to cigarette smoke correlated with an increased risk of LC mortality. Additionally, the factor of emotional support from NHANES data was analyzed and did not show any benefit to reducing risk. By identifying individuals at high-risk, preventative measures can be maximized to produce the best possible outcome.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:观察性研究的证据表明,肺癌筛查(LCS)指南对肺癌(LC)的低诊断率很高,尽管目前的筛查指南已经更新,筛查的资格标准也已经扩大,没有研究比较中国人群中LCS指南的效率。
    方法:在2005年至2022年之间,在我们机构使用低剂量计算机断层扫描(LDCT)筛查了31,394名无症状个体。收集人口统计学数据和相关LC危险因素。每个指导标准的LCS效率表示为效率比(ER)。包容率,合格率,LC检测率,并根据ER的不同合格标准对4个指南进行了比较分析。四个指南如下:中国肺癌筛查和早期发现指南(CGSL),国家综合癌症网络(NCCN)美国预防服务工作队(USPSTF),和国际早期肺癌行动计划(I-ELCAP)。
    结果:在31,394名参与者中,298(155名妇女,143名男性)被诊断为LC。对于CGSL,NCCN,USPSTF,和I-ELCAP指南,准则的合格率为13.92%,6.97%,6.81%,和53.46%;资格标准的ERe为1.46%,1.64%,1.51%,和1.13%,分别是;对于包容率,他们是19.0%,9.5%,9.3%,73.0%,分别。符合CGSL筛选标准的LC,NCCN,USPSTF,I-ELCAP指南为29.2%,16.4%,14.8%,和86.6%,分别。CGSL的年龄和吸烟标准更严格,因此导致符合筛查标准的LC比率较低。CGSL,NCCN,USPSTF指南显示,45-49岁年龄组的漏诊率最高(17.4%),而I-ELCAP指南显示35-39岁年龄组的漏诊率最高(3.0%)。根据四个指南的标准,男性和女性的资格显着不同(P<0.001)。
    结论:I-ELCAP指南对男性和女性的合格率最高。但是对于指南认为合格的人,其实际效率比率最低。而NCCN指南对于那些被指南认为符合条件的人具有最高的ERe值。
    BACKGROUND: Evidence from observational studies indicates that lung cancer screening (LCS) guidelines with high rates of lung cancer (LC) underdiagnosis, and although current screening guidelines have been updated and eligibility criteria for screening have been expanded, there are no studies comparing the efficiency of LCS guidelines in Chinese population.
    METHODS: Between 2005 and 2022, 31,394 asymptomatic individuals were screened using low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) at our institution. Demographic data and relevant LC risk factors were collected. The efficiency of the LCS for each guideline criteria was expressed as the efficiency ratio (ER). The inclusion rates, eligibility rates, LC detection rates, and ER based on the different eligibility criteria of the four guidelines were comparatively analyzed. The four guidelines were as follows: China guideline for the screening and early detection of lung cancer (CGSL), the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), and International Early Lung Cancer Action Program (I-ELCAP).
    RESULTS: Of 31,394 participants, 298 (155 women, 143 men) were diagnosed with LC. For CGSL, NCCN, USPSTF, and I-ELCAP guidelines, the eligibility rates for guidelines were 13.92%, 6.97%, 6.81%, and 53.46%; ERe for eligibility criteria were 1.46%, 1.64%, 1.51%, and 1.13%, respectively; and for the inclusion rates, they were 19.0%, 9.5%, 9.3%, and 73.0%, respectively. LCs which met the screening criteria of CGSL, NCCN, USPSTF, and I-ELCAP guidelines were 29.2%, 16.4%, 14.8%, and 86.6%, respectively. The age and smoking criteria for CGSL were stricter, hence resulting in lower rates of LC meeting the screening criteria. The CGSL, NCCN, and USPSTF guidelines showed the highest underdiagnosis in the 45-49 age group (17.4%), while the I-ELCAP guideline displayed the highest missed diagnosis rate (3.0%) in the 35-39 age group. Males and females significantly differed in eligibility based on the criteria of the four guidelines (P < 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: The I-ELCAP guideline has the highest eligibility rate for both males and females. But its actual efficiency ratio for those deemed eligible by the guideline was the lowest. Whereas the NCCN guideline has the highest ERe value for those deemed eligible by the guideline.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:右心室损害在接受经导管边缘到边缘修复治疗继发性二尖瓣返流(SMR)的患者中很常见。这些患者对指南指导的药物治疗(GDMT)的依从性较差。
    目的:本研究的目的是评估GDMT对该患者队列长期生存的影响。
    方法:在EuroSMR(经导管修复继发性二尖瓣反流的欧洲注册中心)国际注册中,我们选择了SMR和右心室损害(三尖瓣环平面收缩期偏移≤17mm和/或超声心动图右心室-肺动脉耦合<0.40mm/mmHg)的患者.滴定的指南指导药物治疗(GDMTtit)被定义为3种药物的共同处方,在最近的随访中至少占目标剂量的一半。主要结果是6年全因死亡率。
    结果:在1,213例SMR和右心室损害患者中,852有关于药物治疗的完整数据。使用GDMTtit的123例患者的长期生存率明显高于未使用GDMTtit的729例患者(61.8%vs36.0%;P<0.00001)。倾向评分匹配分析证实GDMTtit与更高生存率之间存在显著关联(61.0%vs43.1%;P=0.018)。GDMTtit是全因死亡率的独立预测因子(HR:0.61;95%CI:0.39-0.93;GDMTtit患者与未GDMTtit患者的P=0.02)。在分析的所有亚组中证实了其与更好结果的关联。
    结论:在接受经导管边缘到边缘修复SMR的右心室损害患者中,将GDMT滴定至目标剂量的至少一半与长达6年的全因死亡风险降低40%相关,并且应独立于合并症进行。
    BACKGROUND: Right ventricular impairment is common among patients undergoing transcatheter edge-to-edge repair for secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR). Adherence to guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for heart failure is poor in these patients.
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of GDMT on long-term survival in this patient cohort.
    METHODS: Within the EuroSMR (European Registry of Transcatheter Repair for Secondary Mitral Regurgitation) international registry, we selected patients with SMR and right ventricular impairment (tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion ≤17 mm and/or echocardiographic right ventricular-to-pulmonary artery coupling <0.40 mm/mm Hg). Titrated guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMTtit) was defined as a coprescription of 3 drug classes with at least one-half of the target dose at the latest follow-up. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 6 years.
    RESULTS: Among 1,213 patients with SMR and right ventricular impairment, 852 had complete data on medical therapy. The 123 patients who were on GDMTtit showed a significantly higher long-term survival vs the 729 patients not on GDMTtit (61.8% vs 36.0%; P < 0.00001). Propensity score-matched analysis confirmed a significant association between GDMTtit and higher survival (61.0% vs 43.1%; P = 0.018). GDMTtit was an independent predictor of all-cause mortality (HR: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.39-0.93; P = 0.02 for patients on GDMTtit vs those not on GDMTtit). Its association with better outcomes was confirmed among all subgroups analyzed.
    CONCLUSIONS: In patients with right ventricular impairment undergoing transcatheter edge-to-edge repair for SMR, titration of GDMT to at least one-half of the target dose is associated with a 40% lower risk of all-cause death up to 6 years and should be pursued independent of comorbidities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    慢性肾脏病(CKD)是2型糖尿病(T2D)的一种通常无症状的并发症,需要每年进行筛查才能诊断。与筛查和治疗不足相关的患者水平因素可以为实施策略提供信息,以促进指南推荐的CKD护理。
    确定T2D患者与指南推荐的CKD筛查和治疗不一致的危险因素。
    这项回顾性队列研究在20个卫生保健系统中进行,为美国国家以患者为中心的临床研究网络提供数据。为了评估与CKD筛查指南的一致性,纳入了在2015年1月1日至2020年12月31日期间进行了与T2D诊断相关的门诊临床医师就诊,且无已知CKD的成人.一项单独的分析回顾了CKD成人的血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)或血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARBs)和钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2(SGLT2)抑制剂的处方(估计肾小球滤过率[eGFR]为30-90mL/min/1.73m2和尿白蛋白与肌酐比率[UACR]为200-5000mg/g),以及2019年12月1日与T2D数据从2022年7月8日至2023年6月22日进行了分析。
    人口统计,生活方式因素,合并症,药物,和实验室结果。
    筛查需要在指诊后15个月内测量肌酐水平和UACR。治疗反映了在索引访视前12个月或后6个月内ACEI或ARB和SGLT2抑制剂的处方。
    在316234名成年人中评估了与CKD筛查指南的一致性(平均年龄,59[IQR,50-67]年),其中51.5%是女性;21.7%,黑色;10.3%,西班牙裔;67.6%,白只有24.9%的人接受了肌酐和UACR筛查,56.5%接受了1次筛查测量,18.6%的人都没有收到。西班牙裔种族与缺乏筛查相关(相对风险[RR],1.16[95%CI,1.14-1.18])。相比之下,心力衰竭,外周动脉疾病,高血压与不一致的风险较低相关.在4215例CKD和蛋白尿患者中,3288(78.0%)接受了ACEI或ARB;194(4.6%),SGLT2抑制剂;和885(21.0%),都不是治疗。外周动脉疾病和较低的eGFR与缺乏CKD治疗有关,而利尿剂或他汀类药物处方和高血压与治疗相关。
    在这项T2D患者的队列研究中,不到1/4的患者接受了推荐的CKD筛查.在CKD和蛋白尿患者中,21.0%没有接受SGLT2抑制剂或ACEI或ARB,尽管有令人信服的迹象。患者水平的因素可以告知实施策略,以改善T2D患者的CKD筛查和治疗。
    UNASSIGNED: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is an often-asymptomatic complication of type 2 diabetes (T2D) that requires annual screening to diagnose. Patient-level factors linked to inadequate screening and treatment can inform implementation strategies to facilitate guideline-recommended CKD care.
    UNASSIGNED: To identify risk factors for nonconcordance with guideline-recommended CKD screening and treatment in patients with T2D.
    UNASSIGNED: This retrospective cohort study was performed at 20 health care systems contributing data to the US National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network. To evaluate concordance with CKD screening guidelines, adults with an outpatient clinician visit linked to T2D diagnosis between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2020, and without known CKD were included. A separate analysis reviewed prescription of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors in adults with CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] of 30-90 mL/min/1.73 m2 and urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio [UACR] of 200-5000 mg/g) and an outpatient clinician visit for T2D between October 1, 2019, and December 31, 2020. Data were analyzed from July 8, 2022, through June 22, 2023.
    UNASSIGNED: Demographics, lifestyle factors, comorbidities, medications, and laboratory results.
    UNASSIGNED: Screening required measurement of creatinine levels and UACR within 15 months of the index visit. Treatment reflected prescription of ACEIs or ARBs and SGLT2 inhibitors within 12 months before or 6 months following the index visit.
    UNASSIGNED: Concordance with CKD screening guidelines was assessed in 316 234 adults (median age, 59 [IQR, 50-67] years), of whom 51.5% were women; 21.7%, Black; 10.3%, Hispanic; and 67.6%, White. Only 24.9% received creatinine and UACR screening, 56.5% received 1 screening measurement, and 18.6% received neither. Hispanic ethnicity was associated with lack of screening (relative risk [RR], 1.16 [95% CI, 1.14-1.18]). In contrast, heart failure, peripheral arterial disease, and hypertension were associated with a lower risk of nonconcordance. In 4215 patients with CKD and albuminuria, 3288 (78.0%) received an ACEI or ARB; 194 (4.6%), an SGLT2 inhibitor; and 885 (21.0%), neither therapy. Peripheral arterial disease and lower eGFR were associated with lack of CKD treatment, while diuretic or statin prescription and hypertension were associated with treatment.
    UNASSIGNED: In this cohort study of patients with T2D, fewer than one-quarter received recommended CKD screening. In patients with CKD and albuminuria, 21.0% did not receive an SGLT2 inhibitor or an ACEI or an ARB, despite compelling indications. Patient-level factors may inform implementation strategies to improve CKD screening and treatment in people with T2D.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:临床指南对于协助卫生专业人员做出正确的临床决定至关重要。然而,手册的临床指南是不可用的,这增加了工作量。所以,需要基于移动的临床指南应用程序来提供实时信息访问。因此,本研究旨在评估卫生专业人员接受基于移动的临床指南应用的意愿,并验证统一的接受理论和技术利用模型.
    方法:在803名研究参与者中使用基于机构的横断面研究设计。根据结构方程模型参数估计标准,采用分层随机抽样确定样本量。使用Amos版本23软件进行分析。潜在变量项的内部一致性,以及收敛和发散的有效性,使用复合可靠性进行评估,AVE,和交叉加载矩阵。基于一组标准评估数据的模型适合度,它实现了。P值<0.05被认为用于评估所制定的假设。
    结果:努力预期和社会影响对卫生专业人员的态度有显著影响,路径系数为(β=0.61,P值<0.01),β=0.510,P值<0.01。预期业绩,便利条件,和态度对卫生专业人员接受基于移动的临床指南应用有显著影响,路径系数为(β=0.37,P值<0.001),(β=0.44,P值<0.001)和(β=0.57,P值<0.05)。努力预期和社会影响由态度介导,与卫生专业人员接受基于移动的临床指南应用有显著的部分关系,标准化估计系数为(β=0.22,P值=0.027),(β=0.19,P值=0.031)。所有潜在变量占卫生专业人员态度的57%,和态度的潜在变量占63%的个人接受基于移动的临床指南应用。
    结论:接受和使用技术模型的统一理论是评估个人接受基于移动的临床指南应用的良好模型。所以,加强卫生专业人员的态度,需要通过培训来普及计算机知识。基于用户需求的移动应用程序开发对于技术采用至关重要,人们的支持对于卫生专业人员接受和使用该应用程序也很重要。
    BACKGROUND: Clinical guidelines are crucial for assisting health professionals to make correct clinical decisions. However, manual clinical guidelines are not accessible, and this increases the workload. So, a mobile-based clinical guideline application is needed to provide real-time information access. Hence, this study aimed to assess health professionals\' intention to accept mobile-based clinical guideline applications and verify the unified theory of acceptance and technology utilization model.
    METHODS: Institutional-based cross-sectional study design was used among 803 study participants. The sample size was determined based on structural equation model parameter estimation criteria with stratified random sampling. Amos version 23 software was used for analysis. Internal consistency of latent variable items, and convergent and divergent validity, were evaluated using composite reliability, AVE, and a cross-loading matrix. Model fitness of the data was assessed based on a set of criteria, and it was achieved. P-value < 0.05 was considered for assessing the formulated hypothesis.
    RESULTS: Effort expectancy and social influence had a significant effect on health professionals\' attitudes, with path coefficients of (β = 0.61, P-value < 0.01), and (β = 0.510, P-value < 0.01) respectively. Performance expectancy, facilitating condition, and attitude had significant effects on health professionals\' acceptance of mobile-based clinical guideline applications with path coefficients of (β = 0.37, P-value < 0.001), (β = 0.44, P-value < 0.001) and (β = 0.57, P-value < 0.05) respectively. Effort expectancy and social influence were mediated by attitude and had a significant partial relationship with health professionals\' acceptance of mobile-based clinical guideline application with standardized estimation coefficients of (β = 0.22, P-value = 0.027), and (β = 0.19, P-value = 0.031) respectively. All the latent variables accounted for 57% of health professionals\' attitudes, and latent variables with attitudes accounted for 63% of individuals\' acceptance of mobile-based clinical guideline applications.
    CONCLUSIONS: The unified theory of acceptance and use of the technology model was a good model for assessing individuals\' acceptance of mobile-based clinical guidelines applications. So, enhancing health professionals\' attitudes, and computer literacy through training are needed. Mobile application development based on user requirements is critical for technology adoption, and people\'s support is also important for health professionals to accept and use the application.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    银屑病是一种慢性皮肤病,对患者的生活产生负面影响。整合福祉评估的整体方法可以改善疾病管理。由于没有关于牛皮癣幸福感的共识定义,我们的目标是就福祉定义及其组成部分达成多学科共识。对银屑病患者的文献回顾和咨询促进了针对医疗保健专业人员和银屑病患者的两轮Delphi问卷的设计。共有261名小组成员(银屑病患者占65.1%,34.9%的医疗保健专业人员)同意应整合幸福概念的维度和组成部分:情感维度(78.9%)[压力(83.9%),情绪障碍(85.1%),身体形象(83.9%),污名/羞耻(75.1%),自尊(77.4%)和应对/韧性(81.2%)],物理尺寸(82.0%)[睡眠质量(81.6%),疼痛/不适(80.8%),瘙痒(83.5%),皮外表现(82.8%),可见区域的病变(84.3%),功能区病变(85.8%),和性生活(78.2%)],社会维度(79.5%)[社会关系(80.8%),休闲/康乐活动(80.3%),来自家人/朋友(76.6%)和工作/学术生活(76.5%)的支持],和对疾病管理的满意度(78.5%)[治疗(78.2%),收到的信息(75.6%)和皮肤科医生提供的医疗服务(80.1%)]。这种幸福定义反映了患者的需求和担忧。因此,在牛皮癣中解决这些问题将优化管理,有助于更好的结果和恢复正常的病人的生活。
    Psoriasis is a chronic skin disease that negatively impacts on patient\'s life. A holistic approach integrating well-being assessment could improve disease management. Since a consensus definition of well-being in psoriasis is not available, we aim to achieve a multidisciplinary consensus on well-being definition and its components. A literature review and consultation with psoriasis patients facilitated the design of a two-round Delphi questionnaire targeting healthcare professionals and psoriasis patients. A total of 261 panellists (65.1% patients with psoriasis, 34.9% healthcare professionals) agreed on the dimensions and components that should integrate the concept of well-being: emotional dimension (78.9%) [stress (83.9%), mood disturbance (85.1%), body image (83.9%), stigma/shame (75.1%), self-esteem (77.4%) and coping/resilience (81.2%)], physical dimension (82.0%) [sleep quality (81.6%), pain/discomfort (80.8%), itching (83.5%), extracutaneous manifestations (82.8%), lesions in visible areas (84.3%), lesions in functional areas (85.8%), and sex life (78.2%)], social dimension (79.5%) [social relationships (80.8%), leisure/recreational activities (80.3%), support from family/friends (76.6%) and work/academic life (76.5%)], and satisfaction with disease management (78.5%) [treatment (78.2%), information received (75.6%) and medical care provided by the dermatologist (80.1%)]. This well-being definition reflects patients\' needs and concerns. Therefore, addressing them in psoriasis will optimise management, contributing to better outcomes and restoring normalcy to the patient\'s life.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尚未完成对探索增强术后恢复(ERAS)指南结果的证据的全面审查。
    为了评估ERAS指南是否与改善住院时间相关,医院再入院,并发症,和死亡率与常规手术治疗相比,并了解基于研究和患者因素的估计差异。
    MEDLINE,Embase,护理和相关健康文献的累积指数,和CochraneCentral从一开始就被搜索到2021年6月。
    标题,摘要,全文由两名独立审稿人筛选。符合条件的研究是随机临床试验,与对照组相比,检查了ERAS引导的手术,并报告了至少1个结果。
    使用标准化数据抽象表单对数据进行一式两份的抽象。该研究遵循了系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目。使用Cochrane偏差风险工具重复评估偏差风险。随机效应荟萃分析用于汇集每个结果的估计值,元回归确定了每个结果中异质性的来源。
    主要结果是住院时间,出院后30天内再次入院,术后30天并发症,和术后30天死亡率。
    在确定的12047个参考文献中,1493个全文进行了资格筛选,495人被纳入系统评价,和74个RCTs,9076名参与者被纳入荟萃分析.纳入的研究提供了来自21个国家和9个ERAS引导的外科手术的数据,其中15个(20.3%)具有低偏倚风险。ERAS合规性的平均值(SD)报告,结果,要素研究清单得分为13.5(2.3)。住院时间减少1.88天(95%CI,0.95-2.81天;I2=86.5%;P<.001),并发症风险降低(风险比,ERAS组0.71;95%CI,0.59-0.87;I2=78.6%;P<.001)。再入院和死亡率的风险并不显著。
    在此荟萃分析中,ERAS指南与住院时间减少和并发症相关。未来的研究应旨在改善ERAS的实施并增加指南的覆盖范围。
    UNASSIGNED: A comprehensive review of the evidence exploring the outcomes of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) guidelines has not been completed.
    UNASSIGNED: To evaluate if ERAS guidelines are associated with improved hospital length of stay, hospital readmission, complications, and mortality compared with usual surgical care, and to understand differences in estimates based on study and patient factors.
    UNASSIGNED: MEDLINE, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Cochrane Central were searched from inception until June 2021.
    UNASSIGNED: Titles, abstracts, and full-text articles were screened by 2 independent reviewers. Eligible studies were randomized clinical trials that examined ERAS-guided surgery compared with a control group and reported on at least 1 of the outcomes.
    UNASSIGNED: Data were abstracted in duplicate using a standardized data abstraction form. The study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Risk of bias was assessed in duplicate using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to pool estimates for each outcome, and meta-regression identified sources of heterogeneity within each outcome.
    UNASSIGNED: The primary outcomes were hospital length of stay, hospital readmission within 30 days of index discharge, 30-day postoperative complications, and 30-day postoperative mortality.
    UNASSIGNED: Of the 12 047 references identified, 1493 full texts were screened for eligibility, 495 were included in the systematic review, and 74 RCTs with 9076 participants were included in the meta-analysis. Included studies presented data from 21 countries and 9 ERAS-guided surgical procedures with 15 (20.3%) having a low risk of bias. The mean (SD) Reporting on ERAS Compliance, Outcomes, and Elements Research checklist score was 13.5 (2.3). Hospital length of stay decreased by 1.88 days (95% CI, 0.95-2.81 days; I2 = 86.5%; P < .001) and the risk of complications decreased (risk ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.59-0.87; I2 = 78.6%; P < .001) in the ERAS group. Risk of readmission and mortality were not significant.
    UNASSIGNED: In this meta-analysis, ERAS guidelines were associated with decreased hospital length of stay and complications. Future studies should aim to improve implementation of ERAS and increase the reach of the guidelines.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:在有TKA康复经验的荷兰物理治疗师中,探索并更深入地了解全膝关节置换术(TKA)患者的常规术前和术后物理治疗(PT)治疗。其次,评估物理治疗师对术后康复指南建议的依从性。
    方法:在这项横断面研究中,在线调查了在荷兰指定医院集水区的初级保健工作的物理治疗师。调查询问术前PT治疗方法,住院期间,手术后。对所有数据进行描述性分析。当教育和所有推荐的运动方式都在术后使用时,治疗师被认为完全遵守荷兰临床实践指南。
    结果:一百零三名治疗师参加了,代表58%的应答率。所有治疗师都进行了术后PT治疗,其中65人(63.1%)完全遵守指南。部分依从性主要是由于不使用有氧运动方式。此外,除了准则中建议的模式之外,采用了一系列PT干预措施.术前治疗有73名(70.9%)。这些73表明,只有中位数为20%(IQR10%-40%)的患者接受了术前PT。
    结论:这项研究显示,在有经验的物理治疗师中,TKA患者术后管理的指南建议得到了令人满意的遵守。有氧运动的使用频率较低或强度不适当。正确遵守关于有氧运动训练的指南建议可以导致更多的身体活跃的个体和重要的一般健康益处。
    OBJECTIVE: To explore and gain more insight into the usual preoperative and postoperative physical therapy (PT) treatment of patients with a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) among Dutch physical therapists experienced with TKA rehabilitation. Secondly, to evaluate physical therapists\' adherence to guideline recommendations for postoperative rehabilitation.
    METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, physical therapists working in primary care within a designated Dutch hospital\'s catchment area were surveyed online. The survey queried PT treatment approaches before surgery, during hospitalisation, and after surgery. All data were analysed descriptively. When both education and all recommended exercise modalities were used postoperatively, therapists were considered fully adherent with the Dutch clinical practice guideline.
    RESULTS: One hundred and three therapists participated, representing a response rate of 58%. Postoperative PT treatment was applied by all therapists, of which 65 (63.1%) were fully adherent to the guideline. Partial adherence was mainly due to not using the aerobic exercise modality. Furthermore, beyond the modalities recommended in the guideline, a range of PT interventions were used. Preoperative treatment was applied by 73 therapists (70.9%). These 73 indicated that only a median of 20% (IQR 10%-40%) of their patients received preoperative PT.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed satisfactory adherence to guideline recommendations on postoperative management of patients with a TKA among experienced physical therapists. Aerobic exercises were utilised less often or with inappropriate intensity. Correct adherence to guideline recommendations on aerobic exercise training can result in more physically active individuals and important general health benefits.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:我们假设在姑息治疗中,即使在常见的临床情况下,医生对药物的选择有很大的不同.因此,我们评估了医师对癌症疼痛和阿片类药物诱发的恶心和呕吐(OINV)的药物治疗选择的实践以及他们选择的理由.
    方法:与医生进行了一项在线调查,涵盖以下领域:i)癌症疼痛治疗:阿片类药物以外的非阿片类药物:药物选择ii)预防OINV:药物选择和应用方式。比较了当前有关癌症疼痛治疗和OINV预防的指南。
    结果:二百四十名欧洲医生对我们的调查做出了回应。i)除阿片类药物外还使用非阿片类药物治疗癌症疼痛:只有1.3%(n=3)的受访者从未使用过其他非阿片类药物。其他主要使用:二吡喃酮/安乃近(49.2%,n=118),对乙酰氨基酚/对乙酰氨基酚(34.2%,n=82),布洛芬/其他非甾体抗炎药(11.3%,n=27),特异性Cox2抑制剂(2.1%,n=5),阿司匹林(0.4%,n=1),没有答案(2.9%,n=7)。ii)预防OINV的止吐药:选择的药物是甲氧氯普胺(58.3%,n=140),氟哌啶醇(26.3%,n=63),5-HT3拮抗剂(9.6%,n=23),抗组胺药(1.3%,n=3)和其他(2.9%,n=7);没有答案(1.7%,n=4)。大多数受访者按需开出物质(59.6%,n=143),而其他(36.3%,n=87)为他们提供全天候的药物治疗。在这两个领域,大多数医师回答说,他们的选择并非基于随机对照试验(RCTs)的确凿证据.关于非阿片类药物是否用于癌症疼痛以及使用何种非阿片类药物的指南不一致,建议使用抗多巴胺能药物预防或治疗OINV。
    结论:医师在癌症疼痛和OINV的姑息治疗中的实践差异很大。受访者表示缺乏来自RCT的高质量的基于证据的信息。我们呼吁从方法学上高质量的随机对照试验中获得证据,以告知医生姑息治疗中常见症状的药物治疗的益处和危害。
    OBJECTIVE: We assumed that in Palliative Care, even in common clinical situations, the choice of drugs differs substantially between physicians. Therefore, we assessed the practice of pharmaceutical treatment choices of physicians for cancer pain and opioid-induced nausea and vomiting (OINV) and the rationale for their choices.
    METHODS: An online survey was conducted with physicians covering the following domains: i) Cancer pain therapy: non-opioids in addition to opioids: choice of drug ii) prevention of OINV: choice of drug and mode of application. Current guidelines concerning cancer pain therapy and prevention of OINV were compared.
    RESULTS: Two-hundred-forty European physicians responded to our survey. i) Use of non-opioids in addition to opioids for the treatment of cancer pain: Only 1.3% (n = 3) of respondents never used an additional non-opioid. Others mostly used: dipyrone/metamizole (49.2%, n = 118), paracetamol/acetaminophen (34.2%, n = 82), ibuprofen / other NSAIDs (11.3%, n = 27), specific Cox2-inhibitors (2.1%, n = 5), Aspirin (0.4%, n = 1), no answer (2.9%, n = 7). ii) Antiemetics to prevent OINV: The drugs of choice were metoclopramide (58.3%, n = 140), haloperidol (26.3%, n = 63), 5-HT3 antagonists (9.6%, n = 23), antihistamines (1.3%, n = 3) and other (2.9%, n = 7); no answer (1.7%, n = 4). Most respondents prescribed the substances on-demand (59.6%, n = 143) while others (36.3%, n = 87) provided them as around the clock medication. Over both domains, most physicians answered that their choices were not based on solid evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Guidelines were inconsistent regarding if and what non-opioid to use for cancer pain and recommend anti-dopaminergic drugs for prevention or treatment of OINV.
    CONCLUSIONS: Physician\'s practice in palliative care for the treatment of cancer pain and OINV differed substantially. Respondents expressed the lack of high-quality evidence- based information from RCTs. We call for evidence from methodologically high-quality RCTs to be available to inform physicians about the benefits and harms of pharmacological treatments for common symptoms in palliative care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号