BACKGROUND: Pharmacological methods, specifically sedatives, have gained popularity in managing the behavior of children during dental appointments.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare 1 m/kg intranasal dexmedetomidine, 0.3 mg/kg intranasal midazolam, and nitrous oxide in evaluating the level of sedation, behavior of the child, onset of sedation, physiologic signs, and adverse effects.
METHODS: In this cross-over trial, 15 children aged 6-8 years were randomized to receive intranasal atomized dexmedetomidine, intranasal atomized midazolam, and inhalation nitrous oxide at three separate visits. After administering the sedative agent, a single pulpectomy was performed during each appointment, and the outcomes were recorded. The washout period between each visit was 1 week.
RESULTS: All three sedative agents were equally effective in controlling overall behavior. Dexmedetomidine showed lower sedation level scores (agitated; score 9) than the other groups. There was a statistically significant difference in the onset of sedation, with dexmedetomidine having the longest onset of 36.2 ± 9.47 min. Coughing and sneezing were predominantly observed after administration of intranasal midazolam. Oxygen saturation levels were statistically lower in the intranasal midazolam group during local anesthesia administration and post-treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: 0.3 mg/kg intranasal midazolam is as effective as nitrous oxide sedation for controlling behavior and providing adequate sedation in pediatric dental patients. However, 1 m/kg dexmedetomidine did not provide the same level of sedation and had a significantly longer onset. 0.3 mg/kg intranasal midazolam is an effective alternative to nitrous oxide sedation in anxious children.

BACKGROUND: Sedation during flexible bronchoscopy (FB) should maintain an adequate respiratory drive, ensure maximum comfort for the patient, and warrant that the objectives of the procedure are achieved. Nevertheless, the optimal sedation method for FB has yet to be established. This study aimed to compare the standard recommended combination of midazolam-fentanyl (MF) with that of dexmedetomidine-ketamine (DK) for patient sedation during FB.
METHODS: Patients subjected to FB were randomly assigned to a DK (n = 25) and an MF group (n = 25). The primary outcome was the rate of critical desaturation events (arterial oxygen saturation < 80% with nasal oxygen supply 2 L/min). Secondary outcomes included sedation depth, hemodynamic complications, adverse events, and patient and bronchoscopist satisfaction.
RESULTS: The incidence rates of critical desaturation events were similar between the two groups (DK: 12% vs. MF: 28%, p = 0.289). DK achieved deeper maximum sedation levels (higher Ramsay - lower Riker scale; p < 0.001) and was associated with longer recovery times (p < 0.001). Both groups had comparable rates of hemodynamic and other complications. Patient satisfaction was similar between the two groups, but bronchoscopist satisfaction was higher with the DK combination (p = 0.033).
CONCLUSIONS: DK demonstrated a good safety profile in patients subjected to FB and achieved more profound sedation and better bronchoscopist satisfaction than the standard MF combination without increasing the rate of adverse events.

UNASSIGNED: Penile plication is commonly performed for Peyronie\'s disease under general or spinal anesthesia. Conscious sedation (CS) offers decreased anesthetic risks, cost-effectiveness, and the ability to perform the procedure in outpatient settings with shorter wait times. We sought to compare tolerability of penile plication under deep intravenous sedation (DIS) administered by anesthesiologists and nursing-administered CS (NACS).
UNASSIGNED: Tolerability for penile plication was prospectively evaluated, excluding revision surgeries and those with hourglass or hinge deformities. DIS included midazolam and ketamine with infusion of propofol and remifentanil. NACS consisted of midazolam and fentanyl. Baseline characteristics, procedural information, and patient- and surgeon-reported pain assessments were collected. Patients were administered a standardized tolerability questionnaire on follow-up.
UNASSIGNED: Forty patients were enrolled (23 DIS; 17 NACS) with similar baseline characteristics. Median curvature of the DIS cohort was 55° (interquartile range = 43.75-76.25) and 45° (interquartile range = 45-60) in NACS. There was a 100% success rate with no procedure abortion or conversion to general anesthetic. On follow-up, all patients had functional curvature (<20°), and 100% of patients in the DIS and NACS cohorts reported that they would recommend CS to others. Over 93% of patients in both cohorts would choose CS over general anesthetic in the future, with no differences in perioperative and postoperative pain between groups.
UNASSIGNED: Penile plication with CS, whether administered by an anesthesiologist or nursing, is well tolerated with no differences in pain or complications. This indicates that outpatient penile plication with trained nursing staff administering CS can safely reduce costs, risks, and wait times.

BACKGROUND: In this study, we compare the effects of ketamine and the combination of midazolam and morphine on the severity of depression and anxiety in mechanically ventilated patients after discharge from the intensive care unit (ICU).
METHODS: This randomized single-blind clinical trial included 50 patients who were candidates for craniotomy and postoperative mechanical ventilation in the ICU of 5 Azar Teaching Hospital in Gorgan City, North Iran, from 2021 to 2022. Patients were allocated to two groups by quadruple block randomization. In group A, 0.5 mg/kg of ketamine was infused over 15 minutes after craniotomy and then continued at a dose of 5 µ/kg/min during mechanical ventilation. In group B, midazolam was infused at a dose of 2-3 mg/hr and morphine at a dose of 3-5 mg/hr. After patients were discharged from the ICU, if their Glasgow Coma Scale scores were ≥14, Beck\'s anxiety and depression inventories were completed by a psychologist within 2 weeks, 2 months, and 6 months after discharge.
RESULTS: The mean scores of depression at 2 months (P=0.01) and 6 months (P=0.03) after discharge were significantly lower in the ketamine group than in the midazolam and morphine group. The mean anxiety scores were significantly lower in the ketamine group 2 weeks (P=0.006) and 6 months (P=0.002) after discharge.
CONCLUSIONS: Ketamine is an effective drug for preventing and treating anxiety and depression over the long term in patients discharged from the ICU. However, further larger volume studies are required to validate these results.

OBJECTIVE: Early clinical studies have indicated that the pharmacokinetics of Atuliflapon (AZD5718) are time and dose dependent. The reason(s) for these findings is(are) not fully understood, but pre-clinical profiling suggests that time-dependent CYP3A4 inhibition cannot be excluded. In clinical practice, Atuliflapon will be co-administered with CYP3A4 substrates; thus, it is important to determine the impact of Atuliflapon on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of CYP3A4 substrates. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of Atuliflapon on the pharmacokinetics of a sensitive CYP3A4 substrate, midazolam, and to explore if the time-/dose-dependent effect seen after repeated dosing could be an effect of change in CYP3A4 activity.
METHODS: Open-label, fixed-sequence study in healthy volunteers to assess the PK of midazolam alone and in combination with Atuliflapon. Fourteen healthy male subjects received single oral dose of midazolam 2 mg on days 1 and 7 and single oral doses of Atuliflapon (125 mg) from days 2 to 7. A physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was developed to assess this drug-drug interaction.
RESULTS: Mean midazolam values of maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the curve (AUC) to infinity were increased by 39% and 56%, respectively, when co-administered with Atuliflapon vs. midazolam alone. The PBPK model predicted a 27% and 44% increase in AUC and a 23% and 35% increase in Cmax of midazolam following its co-administrations with two predicted therapeutically relevant doses of Atuliflapon.
CONCLUSIONS: Atuliflapon is a weak inhibitor of CYP3A4; this was confirmed by the validated PBPK model. This weak inhibition is predicted to have a minor PK effect on CYP3A4 metabolized drugs.

BACKGROUND: Intramuscular (IM) midazolam is indicated for the treatment of status epilepticus. Administration must be efficient to rapidly terminate prolonged seizures and prevent complications. The objective of this study was to compare, in terms of relative bioavailability and bioequivalence, IM midazolam injection by needle-free auto-injector, in different settings, to IM midazolam injection by a conventional syringe and needle.
METHODS: In this open-label, randomized, four-period crossover study, healthy adults received single doses of midazolam (10 mg) under fasting conditions. The reference treatment (conventional syringe) was administered once, on bare skin in the thigh. The tested treatment (the needle-free auto-injector ZENEO®) was administered three times: on bare skin in the thigh, on bare skin in the ventrogluteal area, and through clothing in the thigh. Repeated plasma samples were collected to obtain 36-h pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles. Primary PK parameters were area under the plasma concentration-time curve, from time zero to the last measurable time point (AUC0-t) and from time zero to infinity (AUC0-∞), and the maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax).
RESULTS: Forty adults were enrolled and included in the PK analysis set. In all comparisons, the 90% confidence interval (CI) of the least-squares geometric mean ratios for AUC0-t and AUC0-∞ were within the bioequivalence range of 80-125%, with low intra-individual coefficients of variation (< 20.5% for all parameters in all comparisons). Bioequivalence was also met for Cmax in all comparisons except when comparing the tested treatment through clothing versus the reference treatment, where the 90% CI lower limit was slightly outside the bioequivalence range (78.8%). With all tested treatments Cmax was slightly lower, but early mean plasma concentrations (first 10 min post-dosing) were higher when compared to the reference treatment. In general, all treatments were well tolerated, with maximum sedation 0.5-1 h post-injection.
CONCLUSIONS: This study establishes that IM midazolam injection on bare skin in the thigh with the ZENEO® is bioequivalent to IM midazolam injection with a syringe and needle. An acceptable relative bioavailability, compatible with emergency practice, was also shown in multiple settings. Higher mean concentrations within the first 10 min with the ZENEO® device, and quicker two-step injection suggest a faster onset of action, and thereby an earlier seizure termination, thus preventing the occurrence of prolonged seizure and neurological complications.
UNASSIGNED: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05026567. Registration first posted August 30, 2021, first patient enrolled May 9, 2022.
Seizures require urgent treatment when they last longer than 5 min. Indeed, when prolonged, seizures can lead to damage to the brain, coma, and ultimately death. Midazolam injected in the muscle (i.e., intramuscular (IM) injection) has become the first-line treatment of choice for long-lasting seizures and is usually administered with a syringe and 30-mm needle. The ZENEO® needle-free auto-injector is an innovative, pre-filled, single-dose, disposable, ready-to-use, two-step device that could become an alternative method for midazolam IM administration. This study therefore compared midazolam IM injections with the ZENEO® auto-injector versus IM injections with a conventional syringe and needle. The ZENEO® auto-injector was tested in different conditions (on bare skin, through clothing, in the thigh, and in the hip) in healthy volunteers. The study showed, with a pharmacokinetic analysis (how much and how fast a drug is taken in the bloodstream), that midazolam absorption was similar in all tested conditions, indicating that the ZENEO® auto-injector is a suitable method for midazolam administration. In addition, the study showed that in the first 10 min of the injection, the amount of midazolam in the blood seemed to be higher when injections were performed with the ZENEO® auto-injector, suggesting that seizure treatment may start working sooner if injected with the device. This is particularly important and relevant in emergency situations and prehospital settings in order to prevent long-lasting seizures and irreversible damage to the brain (which can occur when a crisis lasts for 30 min) and ultimately improve the patient’s outcome.

BACKGROUND: Lumbar medial branch blocks (MBB) are some of the most commonly performed pain procedures in the United States. Diagnostic MBBs are performed to confirm if the generator of low back pain is the facet joint. However, with diagnostic injections, false positive blocks may occur.
OBJECTIVE:   Our prospective observational study aims to investigate the effects of midazolam sedation on patients\' perceived intensity of pain relief following lumbar MBB.
METHODS: This is a single-center multi-site prospective observational study registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04453449).
METHODS: The study was approved by the Henry Ford Health System Institutional Review Board (IRB) in June 2020 (IRB# 14010) and registered on clinicaltrials.gov in July 2020 (NCT04453449). This manuscript adheres to the applicable EQUATOR STROBE guidelines for an observational cohort study.
METHODS: Patients that underwent MBB without sedation were compared to sedated patients. Patients were asked to complete the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at baseline, one day after their diagnostic blocks, as well as 4 weeks and 8 weeks after their lumbar radiofrequency ablation (RFA). The primary outcome is the difference between baseline NRS pain scores and the lowest reported score in the 8 hours following MBB. For patients who proceed to RFA, the frequency of false positive blocks was evaluated. A patient was considered to have a false positive block when they failed to achieve 50% pain relief from RFA after 2 successful sequential MBBs.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the NRS pain score change between the sedated and non-sedated groups for diagnostic block one (P = 0.167) and diagnostic block 2 (P = 0.6145). There was no significant difference of false positive rates between non-sedation and sedation patients at 4-weeks post-RFA (P = 0.7178) and at 8-weeks post-RFA (P = 1.000).
CONCLUSIONS: Some of the limitations of this study include its nonrandomized design, patient self-reported pain scores, as well as the small variability in the injection technique of proceduralists and in the anatomical location of the injection site.
CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that midazolam did not change patients\' perceived intensity of pain following MBB, as well as false positive rates after RFA. Larger studies are required to draw definitive conclusions.

BACKGROUND: Midazolam is routinely used as preanesthetic medication in pediatric patients. Recently, dexmedetomidine has emerged as an alternative as a premedicant. We aimed to add more evidence about the efficacy and safety of two common routes of administration for pediatric premedication: oral midazolam versus intranasal dexmedetomidine.
METHODS: We systematically searched Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) involving patients ≤ 18 years old undergoing preanesthetic medication and comparing intranasal dexmedetomidine with oral midazolam. Risk Ratio (RR) and Mean Difference (MD) with 95% Confidence Intervals (95% CI) were computed using a random effects model. Trial-sequential analyses were performed to assess inconsistency.
RESULTS: Sixteen RCTs (1,239 patients) were included. Mean age was 5.5 years old, and most procedures were elective. There was no difference in satisfactory induction or mask acceptance (RR = 1.15, 95% CI 0.97-1.37; p = 0.11). There was a higher incidence of satisfactory separation from parents in the dexmedetomidine group (RR = 1.40; 95% CI 1.13-1.74; p = 0.002). Dexmedetomidine was also associated with a reduction in the incidence of emergence agitation (RR = 0.35; 95% CI 0.14-0.88; p = 0.02). Heart rate and mean arterial pressure were marginally lower in the dexmedetomidine group but without clinical repercussions.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with oral midazolam, intranasal dexmedetomidine demonstrated better separation from parents and lower incidence of emergence agitation in pediatric premedication, without a difference in satisfactory induction. Intranasal dexmedetomidine may be a safe and effective alternative to oral midazolam for premedication in pediatric patients.

Objective: This study aimed to survey the practice of palliative sedation in Portugal, where data on this subject were lacking. Methods: This was a prospective multicentric study that included all patients admitted to each team that agreed to participate. Patients were followed until death, discharge, or after 3 months of follow-up. Results: The study included 8 teams: 4 as palliative care units (PCU), 1 as a hospital palliative care team (HPCT), 2 as home care (HC), and 1 as HPCT and HC. Of the 361 patients enrolled, 52% were male, the median age was 76 years, and 285 (79%) had cancer. Continuous sedation was undergone by 49 (14%) patients: 26 (53%) were male, and the median age was 76. Most patients, 46 (94%), had an oncological diagnosis. Only in a minority of cases, the family, 16 (33%), or the patient, 5 (10%), participated in the decision to sedate. Delirium was the most frequent symptom leading to sedation. The medication most used was midazolam (65%). In the multivariable analysis, only age and the combined score were independently associated with sedation; patients <76 years and those with higher levels of suffering had a higher probability of being sedated. Conclusions: The practice of continuous palliative sedation in Portugal is within the range reported in other studies. One particularly relevant point was the low participation of patients and their families in the decision-making process. Each team must have a deep discussion on this aspect.

UNASSIGNED: Myringotomy with tympanostomy tube insertion (MTI) is a superficial surgical procedure used to prevent hearing loss in children with serous otitis media. Intravenous anesthesia, often ketamine, is preferred for this procedure because of its ability to induce sedation without compromising airway reflexes. However, ketamine alone may be insufficient and potentially lead to spontaneous movement during surgery. This study evaluated the effectiveness of midazolam and fentanyl as adjuvants to ketamine in reducing spontaneous movement during MTI and enhancing the quality of recovery.
UNASSIGNED: This study involved two groups of 30 patients each: one group received intravenous ketamine (1.5 mg/kg) with an equal volume of normal saline (K group), while the other received a combination of midazolam, fentanyl, and ketamine (0.05 mg/kg, 1 μg/kg, and 1.5 mg/kg, respectively; MFK group). We assessed side effects, intraoperative patient movement, surgeon satisfaction, and emergence agitation scores.
UNASSIGNED: The MFK group exhibited significantly lower scores for patient movement (p<0.01) and emergence agitation (p<0.01) and markedly higher surgeon satisfaction scores (p<0.01) than the K group.
UNASSIGNED: Administering a midazolam-fentanyl-ketamine combination effectively reduced spontaneous movement during surgery and emergence agitation during recovery without prolonging discharge times in children undergoing MTI.