Meningitis

脑膜炎
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:比较多种国际指南在疑似脑膜炎患者腰椎穿刺(LP)前选择头部CT的表现,专注于识别即时LP的潜在禁忌症。
    方法:回顾性研究,对2013年3月至2023年3月期间到急诊科就诊并在LP之前接受头部CT检查的196例疑似脑膜炎患者进行了研究。英国联合专家协会指南(英国),欧洲临床微生物学和传染病学会(ESCMID)和美国传染病学会(IDSA)指南通过交叉参考影像学标准与演示时的临床特征进行评估。评估了每个指南在CT脑移位病例中推荐神经影像学检查的敏感性,以及正常研究和偶然或虚假发现的数量。
    结果:2/196(1%)患者的CT异常,有脑移位的证据,而14/196(7%)在CT上有其他异常,无脑移位。英国,ESCMID和IDSA指南建议在10%进行成像,分别为14%和33%的病例。所有三个指南都建议在2/2(100%)的脑移位病例中进行LP前成像。IDSA指南建议与其他指南相比,更多的CT研究发现正常(英国和ESCMID指南分别为59vs16和24)和无脑移位的CT异常(分别为4vs1和2)。
    结论:英国,ESCMID和IDSA指南均可有效识别在LP之前受益于头部CT的小队列患者。遵循更具选择性的UK/ESCMID指南限制了正常研究的数量以及偶然或虚假的CT发现。
    OBJECTIVE: To compare the performance of multiple international guidelines in selecting patients for head CT prior to lumbar puncture (LP) in suspected meningitis, focusing on identification of potential contraindications to immediate LP.
    METHODS: Retrospective study of 196 patients with suspected meningitis presenting to an emergency department between March 2013 and March 2023 and undergoing head CT prior to LP. UK Joint Specialist Society Guidelines (UK), European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) and Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guidelines were evaluated by cross-referencing imaging criteria with clinical characteristics present at time of presentation. Sensitivity of each guideline for recommending neuroimaging in cases with brain shift on CT was evaluated, along with the number of normal studies and incidental or spurious findings.
    RESULTS: 2/196 (1%) patients had abnormal CTs with evidence of brain shift, while 14/196 (7%) had other abnormalities on CT without brain shift. UK, ESCMID and IDSA guidelines recommended imaging in 10%, 14% and 33% of cases respectively. All three guidelines recommended imaging pre-LP in 2/2 (100%) cases with brain shift. IDSA guidelines recommended more CT studies with normal findings (59 vs 16 and 24 for UK and ESCMID guidelines respectively) and CT abnormalities without brain shift (4 vs 1 and 2 respectively) than the other guidelines.
    CONCLUSIONS: UK, ESCMID and IDSA guidelines are all effective at identifying the small cohort of patients who benefit from a head CT prior to LP. Following the more selective UK/ESCMID guidelines limits the number of normal studies and incidental or spurious CT findings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    炭疽芽孢杆菌孢子,如果资源有限或使用多药耐药的炭疽芽孢杆菌菌株(HendricksKA,Wright我,阴影SV,etal.炭疽临床指南工作组。疾病控制和预防中心关于预防和治疗成人炭疽的专家小组会议。Emerg感染Dis2014;20:e130687;Meaney-DelmanD,拉斯穆森SA,BeigiRH,etal.孕妇炭疽病的预防和治疗。ObstetGynecol2013;122:885-900;布拉德利JS,孔雀G,KrugSE,etal.小儿炭疽临床管理。儿科2014;133:e1411-36)。具体来说,本报告更新了暴露后预防(PEP)和治疗中抗菌药物和抗毒素的使用,并基于对以下文献的系统评价:1)抗炭疽杆菌的体外抗菌药物活性;2)PEP和治疗的体内抗菌药物功效;3)PEP的体内和人抗毒素功效,治疗,或两者兼而有之;和4)抗微生物药物PEP和局部炭疽治疗后的人类生存,系统性炭疽,和炭疽脑膜炎.
    B炭疽菌株。此外,这些更新的指南包括关于诊断和治疗炭疽脑膜炎的特殊考虑的新建议,包括共病,社会,和炭疽脑膜炎的临床预测因子。先前发布的CDC指南和建议描述了炭疽患者的潜在有益的重症监护措施以及临床评估工具和程序。尚未更改且未在此更新中解决。此外,免疫实践咨询委员会关于使用炭疽疫苗的建议没有变化(BowerWA,SchifferJ,AtmarRL,etal.在美国使用炭疽疫苗:免疫实践咨询委员会的建议,2019.MMWR推荐代表2019;68[编号RR-4]:1-14)。卫生保健提供者可以使用本报告中更新的指南来预防和治疗炭疽,并指导应急准备官员和计划人员制定和更新炭疽杆菌大面积气溶胶释放计划。
    Bacillus anthracis spores if resources become limited or a multidrug-resistant B. anthracis strain is used (Hendricks KA, Wright ME, Shadomy SV, et al.; Workgroup on Anthrax Clinical Guidelines. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention expert panel meetings on prevention and treatment of anthrax in adults. Emerg Infect Dis 2014;20:e130687; Meaney-Delman D, Rasmussen SA, Beigi RH, et al. Prophylaxis and treatment of anthrax in pregnant women. Obstet Gynecol 2013;122:885-900; Bradley JS, Peacock G, Krug SE, et al. Pediatric anthrax clinical management. Pediatrics 2014;133:e1411-36). Specifically, this report updates antimicrobial drug and antitoxin use for both postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) and treatment from these previous guidelines best practices and is based on systematic reviews of the literature regarding 1) in vitro antimicrobial drug activity against B. anthracis; 2) in vivo antimicrobial drug efficacy for PEP and treatment; 3) in vivo and human antitoxin efficacy for PEP, treatment, or both; and 4) human survival after antimicrobial drug PEP and treatment of localized anthrax, systemic anthrax, and anthrax meningitis.
    B. anthracis strain. In addition, these updated guidelines include new recommendations regarding special considerations for the diagnosis and treatment of anthrax meningitis, including comorbid, social, and clinical predictors of anthrax meningitis. The previously published CDC guidelines and recommendations described potentially beneficial critical care measures and clinical assessment tools and procedures for persons with anthrax, which have not changed and are not addressed in this update. In addition, no changes were made to the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommendations for use of anthrax vaccine (Bower WA, Schiffer J, Atmar RL, et al. Use of anthrax vaccine in the United States: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, 2019. MMWR Recomm Rep 2019;68[No. RR-4]:1-14). The updated guidelines in this report can be used by health care providers to prevent and treat anthrax and guide emergency preparedness officials and planners as they develop and update plans for a wide-area aerosol release of B. anthracis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在过去的几十年中,社区获得性急性细菌性脑膜炎的发病率有所下降。然而,结局仍然很差,相当比例的患者无法存活,多达50%的幸存者有长期后遗症.这些指南是由DeutscheGesellschaftfürNeurologie(DGN)在ArbeitsgemeinschaftderWissenschataftlichenMedizinischenFachgesellschaften(AWMF)的指导下制定的,旨在指导医师对患有急性细菌性脑膜炎的成年患者进行诊断和治疗。
    结论:最重要的建议是:(i)在疑似急性细菌性脑膜炎的患者中,我们建议在临床检查后立即获得腰椎脑脊液(同时收集血清以确定脑脊液-血清葡萄糖指数和血液培养物)(在没有严重意识障碍的情况下,局灶性神经功能缺损,和/或新的癫痫发作)。(ii)接下来,我们建议静脉应用地塞米松和经验性抗生素。(iii)推荐的初始经验性抗生素方案由氨苄西林和a组3a头孢菌素组成(例如,头孢曲松)。(四)意识严重受损的病人,新发作的局灶性神经功能缺损(例如偏瘫)和/或新发生的癫痫发作的患者,我们建议在采血后立即开始使用地塞米松和抗生素;我们还建议-如果影像学检查结果未表明其他情况-在成像后直接采集腰椎CSF样本.(v)由于颅内和全身并发症的频繁发生,我们建议急性细菌性脑膜炎患者在疾病的初始阶段在重症监护病房接受治疗。在意识受损的情况下,我们建议在有治疗严重中枢神经系统疾病患者经验的重症监护病房进行.
    结论:德国S2k指南给出了最新的检查建议,成人急性细菌性脑膜炎的诊断和治疗。
    BACKGROUND: The incidence of community-acquired acute bacterial meningitis has decreased during the last decades. However, outcome remains poor with a significant proportion of patients not surviving and up to 50% of survivors suffering from long-term sequelae. These guidelines were developed by the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurologie (DGN) under guidance of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften (AWMF) to guide physicians through diagnostics and treatment of adult patients with acute bacterial meningitis.
    CONCLUSIONS: The most important recommendations are: (i) In patients with suspected acute bacterial meningitis, we recommend that lumbar cerebrospinal fluid (with simultaneous collection of serum to determine the cerebrospinal fluid-serum glucose index and blood cultures) is obtained immediately after the clinical examination (in the absence of severely impaired consciousness, focal neurological deficits, and/or new epileptic seizures). (ii) Next, we recommend application of dexamethasone and empiric antibiotics intravenously. (iii) The recommended initial empiric antibiotic regimen consists of ampicillin and a group 3a cephalosporin (e.g., ceftriaxone). (iv) In patients with severely impaired consciousness, new onset focal neurological deficits (e.g. hemiparesis) and/or patients with newly occurring epileptic seizures, we recommend that dexamethasone and antibiotics are started immediately after the collection of blood; we further recommend that -if the imaging findings do not indicate otherwise -a lumbar CSF sample is taken directly after imaging. (v) Due to the frequent occurrence of intracranial and systemic complications, we suggest that patients with acute bacterial meningitis are treated at an intensive care unit in the initial phase of the disease. In the case of impaired consciousness, we suggest that this is done at an intensive care unit with experience in the treatment of patients with severe CNS diseases.
    CONCLUSIONS: The German S2k-guidelines give up to date recommendations for workup, diagnostics and treatment in adult patients with acute bacterial meningitis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    Viral encephalitis (meningitis) is a common infectious disease of the central nervous system (CNS), which is an inflammatory disease caused by viruses invading the brain parenchyma and meninges. It is a global disease and a serious threat to human health as an acute and severe medical condition. CNS infections can be caused by a variety of viruses, including herpes viruses, enteroviruses, and arboviruses, etc. Identification and diagnosis of the pathogens remains a major clinical challenge. In order to standardize the application of nucleic acid and antibody tests of patients with viral encephalitis (meningitis), experts in the field of virology, infectious diseases, clinical medicine and laboratory testing in China reached the consensus after repeated discussions. The current consensus mainly consists of the domestic and foreign pathogen types, the detection techniques, the detection strategies and schemes for Chinese viral encephalitis, thereby providing a reference for the clinical diagnosis and disease prevention and control of viral encephalitis (meningitis).
    病毒性脑(膜)炎是常见的中枢神经系统感染性疾病,是病毒侵袭脑实质与脑膜导致的炎症性疾病。病毒性脑(膜)炎呈世界性分布,临床以急症和重症常见,严重威胁人类健康。多种病毒可导致中枢神经系统感染,包括疱疹病毒、肠道病毒和虫媒病毒等,病原体鉴定仍是病毒性脑(膜)炎在临床上的主要难题。为规范、合理地应用病原体诊断技术开展脑脊液的病毒核酸检测与抗体检测,由国内病毒学、传染病学、临床医学及医学检验等领域的专家组成的专家组,经反复讨论达成本共识,主要从国内外病毒性脑(膜)炎病原种类、检测技术及检测策略等方面进行阐述,并提出针对我国病毒性脑(膜)炎病原体的检测策略和方案,以期为病毒性脑(膜)炎的临床诊断以及疾病预防控制提供参考。.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    肺炎链球菌通常会引起中耳炎,鼻窦炎,肺炎,或脑膜炎;然而,这些较不常见的感染可发展为侵袭性肺炎球菌病(IPD).预防肺炎球菌疾病的疫苗接种显著减少了严重感染的并发症,包括肺炎,脑膜炎,IPD,有一定危险因素的患者。在这个案例研究中,我们描述了一名最初出现急性中耳炎(AOM)的患者出现播散性肺炎链球菌脑膜炎和菌血症的独特表现.由于患者的多种肥胖合并症,烟草使用,糖尿病前期,冠状动脉疾病,缺乏肺炎球菌疫苗接种,他们的AOM迅速发展到危及生命,侵袭性肺炎球菌感染,及时开始抗生素治疗成功。除了讨论患者的临床过程和治疗方案外,我们将回顾高危患者肺炎球菌疫苗接种指南的相关更新及其在预防严重疾病方面的功效。
    Streptococcus pneumoniae can commonly cause otitis media, sinusitis, pneumonia, or meningitis; however, these infections less frequently can develop into invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD). Vaccination for the prevention of pneumococcal disease has significantly decreased complications from severe infections, including pneumonia, meningitis, and IPD, in patients with certain risk factors. In this case study, we describe a unique presentation of disseminated S. pneumoniae meningitis and bacteremia in a patient who initially presented with acute otitis media (AOM). Due to the patient\'s multiple comorbidities of obesity, tobacco use, pre-diabetes, coronary artery disease, and lack of pneumococcal vaccination, their AOM rapidly progressed to life-threatening, an invasive pneumococcal infection which was successfully treated with timely initiation of antibiotics. In addition to discussing the patient\'s clinical course and treatment regimen, we will review pertinent updates to the pneumococcal vaccination guidelines for high-risk patients and their efficacy in preventing severe disease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:回顾21世纪初以来发表的关于耳部结核病临床数据和诊断模式的科学文献。
    方法:搜索Medline,2000-2020年期间的Cochrane和Embase数据库。英语文章的选择,法语和西班牙语致力于临床病例和系列文献,记录两位作者的听觉结核病的临床数据和诊断。根据SWiM指南进行分析。在记录临床和诊断数据的预先建立的文件中提取数据。
    结果:总计,173篇文章:分析了来自49个国家的163例病例报告(228例患者)和10个队列(177例患者)。男女性别比例为1.05,年龄从不到1个月到87岁不等。35.1%的病例涉及另一个部位的结核病。在19.7%的病例中,听觉受累是双边的。临床表现与中耳炎相对应(在41.4%和10.1%的病例中,先前的抗生素治疗和耳廓手术,分别)没有任何病理症状或体征。在32%的病例中看到了相关的严重局部并发症,周围性面神经麻痹和严重颅内并发症发生率分别为23.2%和13%,分别。诊断时间从不到1个月到384个月不等,在26.5%的病例报告中超过12个月,与严重的启示性局部并发症没有显着相关性(P=0.29)。结核分枝杆菌检测的发生率从耳廓分泌物中的记录病例的33.4%到息肉中的64.6%,肉芽肿,和/或活检。在案例报告中,58.3%的病例进行了确定性诊断,虽然它是基于另一个部位的参与和间接标准或其他10.1%和31.6%的治疗后的积极临床进展,分别。
    结论:耳炎进展不利时,必须始终考虑耳部结核性。最终诊断是基于多个耳廓样本部位,聚合酶链反应,和γ干扰素血液检测。
    OBJECTIVE: Review of the scientific literature dedicated to clinical data and diagnosis modalities for aural tuberculosis published since the start of the 21st century.
    METHODS: Search of the Medline, Cochrane and Embase databases for the period 2000-2020. Selection of articles in English, French and Spanish devoted to clinical cases and series documenting clinical data and diagnosis for aural tuberculosis of articles by two authors. Analysis performed according to SWiM guidelines. Extraction of data on pre-established files documenting clinical and diagnostic data.
    RESULTS: In total, 173 articles: 163 case reports (228 patients) and 10 cohorts (177 patients) from 49 countries were analyzed. Female/male sex ratio was 1.05, with ages ranging from less than 1 month to 87 years. Tuberculosis involved another site in 35.1% of cases. Aural involvement was bilateral in 19.7% of cases. Clinical presentation corresponded to otitis media (prior antibiotic treatment and auricular surgery in 41.4% and 10.1% of cases, respectively) without any pathognomonic symptoms or signs. Associated severe locoregional complications were seen in 32% of cases, with 23.2% and 13% incidence of peripheral facial palsy and severe intracranial complications, respectively. Time to diagnosis ranged from less than 1 month to 384 months, and was longer than 12 months in 26.5% of case reports, without significant correlation (P=0.29) with severe revelatory locoregional complications. Incidence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis detection ranged from 33.4% of documented cases in auricular secretions to 64.6% in polyps, granulomas, and/or biopsies. In the case reports, diagnosis with certainty was done in 58.3% of cases, while it was based on involvement of another site and on indirect criteria or positive clinical progression after treatment in the other 10.1% and 31.6%, respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: Aural tuberculous must always be considered in case of unfavorable progression of otitis. Definitive diagnosis is based on multiple auricular sample sites, polymerase chain reaction, and γ interferon blood assay.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:早发性败血症计算器(EOSC)减少了新生儿不必要的抗生素治疗。然而,其在识别早发性疾病(EOD)病例方面的表现尚不清楚.当应用于培养阳性的早发性败血症和脑膜炎的新生儿队列时,我们将EOSC与当前的荷兰和国家健康与护理卓越研究所(NICE)指南的敏感性进行了比较。
    方法:培养阳性无乳链球菌(GBS)和大肠杆菌(E.大肠杆菌)脓毒症和脑膜炎患者≤3天,胎龄≥34周,纳入了2018年1月1日至2021年31月1日在荷兰进行的一项前瞻性全国队列研究.通过治疗医生和微生物监测确定病例。主要结果是根据EOSC治疗的患者比例,荷兰人,和好的EOD预防指南。使用McNemar检验分析比例之间的差异。
    结果:我们包括81例GBS和7例大肠杆菌EOD病例。出生后4小时,EOSC建议对32名(36%)患者进行抗生素治疗,相比44(50%)的荷兰(p<0·01)和48(55%)的NICE指南(p<0·01)。EOSC最初建议对52%的患者进行常规护理,而荷兰和NICE指南则为31%和30%(p<0·01)。出生后24小时,在54例(61%)婴儿中,EOSC会推荐抗生素治疗,相比之下,荷兰的64例(73%)(p=0·02)和NICE指南的63例(72%)(p=0·06).
    结论:与荷兰和NICE指南相比,EOSC在识别EOD病例方面的敏感性较低,尤其是出生后。EOSC更多地依赖于临床症状,并以最初表现良好的EOD患者的后期抗生素治疗为代价,减少了对健康新生儿的过度治疗。
    背景:这项工作得到了荷兰卫生研究与发展组织(ZonMw;NWO-Vidi-Grant(授权号917·17·308);NWO-Vici-Grant(授权号918·19·627))的资助,学术医学中心(AMC创新冲动资助)和SteunEmma基金会资助。
    BACKGROUND: The early-onset sepsis calculator (EOSC) reduces unnecessary antibiotic treatment in newborns. However, its performance in identifying cases with early-onset disease (EOD) is unclear. We compared the sensitivity of the EOSC to the current Dutch and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines when applied to a cohort of newborns with culture-positive early-onset sepsis and meningitis.
    METHODS: Culture-positive Streptococcus agalactiae (GBS) and Escherichia coli (E. coli) sepsis and meningitis patients ≤3 days old with a gestational age ≥34 weeks, identified between 1/1/2018 and 31/1/2021 in a Dutch prospective nationwide cohort study were included. Cases were identified by treating physicians and microbiological surveillance. Primary outcome was the proportion of patients that would have been treated according to the EOSC, the Dutch, and the NICE EOD prevention guidelines. Differences between proportions were analysed using McNemar\'s test.
    RESULTS: We included 81 GBS and 7 E. coli EOD cases. At 4 h after birth, the EOSC would have recommended antibiotic treatment in 32 (36%) patients, compared to 44 (50%) by the Dutch (p<0·01) and 48 (55%) by the NICE guideline (p<0·01). The EOSC would have initially recommended routine care for 52% of patients compared to 31% and 30% for the Dutch and NICE guidelines (p<0·01). At 24 h after birth, the EOSC would have recommended antibiotic treatment in 54 (61%) infants compared to 64 (73%) by the Dutch (p = 0·02) and 63 (72%) by the NICE guidelines (p = 0·06).
    CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity of the EOSC in identifying cases of EOD is lower compared to both Dutch and NICE guidelines, especially directly after birth. The EOSC relies more on clinical symptoms and results in less overtreatment of healthy newborns at the cost of later antibiotic treatment in initially well-appearing EOD patients.
    BACKGROUND: This work was supported by grants received from Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw; NWO-Vidi-Grant (grant number 917·17·308); NWO-Vici-Grant (grant number 918·19·627)), the Academic Medical Centre (AMC Innovative Impulse Grant) and Steun Emma Foundation Grant.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    Systemic lupus erythematosus is an autoimmune disease that affects multiple organs and organ systems, subsequently requiring an elaborate regimen for management. We present the case of a 63-year-old female who developed unrelenting symptoms of drug-induced lupus, which persisted even after the offending agent was withdrawn, unmasking her underlying systemic lupus erythematosus. She continued to develop neuropsychiatric symptoms, including mania and hallucinations, which complicated the management of her disease. After exhausting the bank of anti-inflammatory and immunomodulators recommended by current guidelines, we found that a combination of rituximab infusions with thiothixene, an antipsychotic agent, significantly improved our patient\'s neuropsychiatric symptoms. Further research should be conducted to determine the efficacy of rituximab in the treatment of resistant lupus cerebritis, and to validate the use of thiothixene in the management of neuropsychiatric symptoms secondary to lupus.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: Tuberculous meningitis (TBM) represents a diagnostic and management challenge to clinicians. The \"Thwaites\' system\" and \"Lancet consensus scoring system\" are utilized to differentiate TBM from bacterial meningitis but their utility in subacute and chronic meningitis where TBM is an important consideration is unknown.
    METHODS: A multicenter retrospective study of adults with subacute and chronic meningitis, defined by symptoms greater than 5 days and less than 30 days for subacute meningitis (SAM) and greater than 30 days for chronic meningitis (CM). The \"Thwaites\' system\" and \"Lancet consensus scoring system\" scores and the diagnostic accuracy by sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve of receiver operating curve (AUC-ROC) were calculated. The \"Thwaites\' system\" and \"Lancet consensus scoring system\" suggest a high probability of TBM with scores ≤4, and with scores of ≥12, respectively.
    RESULTS: A total of 395 patients were identified; 313 (79.2%) had subacute and 82 (20.8%) with chronic meningitis. Patients with chronic meningitis were more likely caused by tuberculosis and had higher rates of HIV infection (P < 0.001). A total of 162 patients with TBM and 233 patients with non-TBM had unknown (140, 60.1%), fungal (41, 17.6%), viral (29, 12.4%), miscellaneous (16, 6.7%), and bacterial (7, 3.0%) etiologies. TMB patients were older and presented with lower Glasgow coma scores, lower CSF glucose and higher CSF protein (P < 0.001). Both criteria were able to distinguish TBM from bacterial meningitis; only the Lancet score was able to differentiate TBM from fungal, viral, and unknown etiologies even though significant overlap occurred between the etiologies (P < .001). Both criteria showed poor diagnostic accuracy to distinguish TBM from non-TBM etiologies (AUC-ROC was <. 5), but Lancet consensus scoring system was fair in diagnosing TBM (AUC-ROC was .738), sensitivity of 50%, and specificity of 89.3%.
    CONCLUSIONS: Both criteria can be helpful in distinguishing TBM from bacterial meningitis, but only the Lancet consensus scoring system can help differentiate TBM from meningitis caused by fungal, viral and unknown etiologies even though significant overlap occurs and the overall diagnostic accuracy of both criteria were either poor or fair.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    The Dutch fever without an apparent source (FWS) guidelines were published to timely recognize and treat serious infections. We determined the adherence to the Dutch FWS guidelines and the percentage of serious infections in infants younger than 3 months of age. Second, we identified which clinical criteria, diagnostic tests, and management were associated with nonadherence to the guidelines.
    A retrospective cohort study was performed in 2 Dutch teaching hospitals. We assessed the charts of all infants with FWS who presented at the emergency departments from September 30, 2017, to October 1, 2019. Diagnostic and therapeutic decisions were compared with the recommendations, as published in the Dutch guidelines. Infants were categorized into the nonadherence group in case 1 or more recommendations were not adhered to.
    Data on 231 infants were studied; 51.5% of the cases adhered to the Dutch guidelines and 16.0% suffered from a serious infection. The percentage of infants with a serious infection was higher in the adherence compared with the nonadherence group. We observed no relevant differences in clinical outcomes. Univariate regression analysis showed that an abnormal white blood cell count was associated with nonadherence (OR 0.4, P = 0.049). Not obtaining a urine and blood culture and not starting intravenous antibiotic treatment were the most frequent reasons for nonadherence to the guidelines.
    Our study indicates that there was nonadherence in a large proportion of FWS cases. The guidelines may need to be adjusted to increase adherence.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号