背景:在处方中使用电子系统被认为是克服纸张转录过程中的许多问题的最终解决方案,特别是随着冠状病毒的爆发需要比以前更多的关注。但是,尽管有许多优点,它的实施面临许多挑战和障碍。因此,本研究旨在回顾计算机化医嘱录入系统(CPOE)在降低用药错误和药物不良事件(ADE)相对风险方面的有效性.
方法:本研究是2021年进行的系统评价研究之一。在这项研究中,搜索关键词,如电子处方,患者安全,用药错误处方,药物相互作用,2000年至2020年10月在有效数据库中的原始文章,如ISIWebofSciencePubMedEmbase,Scopus和谷歌等搜索引擎已经完成。纳入的研究基于研究的主要目标,并在经过几个阶段的审查和质量评估后,基于纳入标准。事实上,文章选择的主要标准是在实施EMS前后,在评估或不评估相关危害(真实或潜在)的情况下,比较用药错误率的研究.
结果:在初步筛选后的110项选定研究中,由于它们的相关性,只有16篇文章被选中。在最后的研究中,存在显著的异质性。只有6项研究质量良好。在10项规定错误率的研究中,9份报告减少,但是可变分母阻止了荟萃分析。12项研究提供了系统性药物错误的具体例子。5例报告其发生轻微。在分析药物错误率影响的9例病例中,7例患者在13%至99%之间显示出显着的相对减少。分析了对潜在ADE的影响的六项研究中的四项显示出35%至98%的显着相对降低。分析ADE效果的四项研究中有两项显示相对减少30%至84%。
结论:最后,电子处方似乎可以降低药物错误和ADE的风险。然而,这些研究在设置方面有很大的不同,设计,质量和结果。需要更多的随机对照试验(RCT)来进一步改善健康信息学信息的证据。
BACKGROUND: The use of electronic systems in prescription is considered as the final solution to overcome the many problems of the paper transcription process, especially with the outbreak of Coronavirus needs more attention than before. But despite the many advantages, its implementation faces many challenges and obstacles. Therefore, the present study was conducted to
review the effectiveness of computerized physician order entry systems (CPOE) on relative risk reduction on medication error and adverse drug events (ADE).
METHODS: This study is one of the systematic
review studies that was conducted in 2021. In this study, searching for keywords such as E-Electronic Prescription, Patient safety, Medication Errors prescription, Drug Interactions, orginal articles from 2000 to October-2020 in the valid databases such as ISI web of Science PubMed Embase, Scopus and search engines like google was done. The included studies were based on the main objectives of the study and based on the inclusion criteria after several stages of
review and quality evaluation. In fact, the main criteria for selecting articles were studies that compared the rate of medication errors with or without assessing the associated harms (real or potential) before and after the implementation of EMS.
RESULTS: Out of 110 selected studies after initial screening, only 16 articles were selected due to their relevance. Among the final studies, there was a significant heterogeneity. Only 6 studies were of good quality. Of the 10 studies prescribing error rates, 9 reported reductions, but variable denominators prevented meta-analysis. Twelve studies provided specific examples of systemic drug errors. 5 cases reported their occurrence slightly. Out of 9 cases that analyzed the effects on drug error rate, 7 cases showed a significant relative reduction between 13 and 99%. Four of the six studies that analyzed the effects on potential ADEs showed a significant relative reduction of between 35 and 98%. Two of the four studies that analyzed the effect of ADEs showed a relative reduction of between 30 and 84%.
CONCLUSIONS: Finally, e-prescribing seems to reduce the risk of medication errors and ADE. However, the studies differed significantly in terms of setting, design, quality and results. More randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are needed to further improve the evidence of health informatics information.