Medication side effects

药物副作用
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    抗精神病药(AP)是治疗精神分裂症(SCZ)谱系障碍的基石。先前的研究表明,AP诱导的体重增加和/或血脂异常与精神症状的改善之间可能存在正相关。通常被称为“代谢阈值”。为了确定葡萄糖参数是否存在类似的关系,从开始到2022年6月,我们在6个数据库中进行了系统检索,查找了所有纵向研究,这些研究直接检查了接受AP治疗的SCZ患者中葡萄糖相关结局的变化与精神病理学变化之间的关系.我们确定了10项相关研究和一项考虑认知的额外研究。在大多数情况下,我们发现治疗后空腹血糖和胰岛素水平升高与临床改善相关.这些发现有助于现有文献,这些文献可能表明AP作用与代谢副作用之间的共同机制,并支持需要进行旨在探索SCZ中葡萄糖-精神病理学关系有效性的其他工作。
    Antipsychotics (APs) are the cornerstone of treatment for schizophrenia (SCZ) spectrum disorders. Previous research suggests that there may be a positive association between AP-induced weight gain and/or dyslipidemia and improvement in psychiatric symptoms, often referred to as a \"metabolic threshold\". To determine whether a similar relationship exists for glucose parameters, we conducted a systematic search in six databases from inception to June 2022 for all longitudinal studies that directly examined the relationship between changes in glucose-related outcomes and changes in psychopathology among patients with SCZ treated with APs. We identified 10 relevant studies and one additional study that considered cognition. In most cases, we found that increased levels of fasting glucose and insulin following treatment were associated with clinical improvement. These findings contribute to existing literature that could suggest a common mechanism between AP action and metabolic side effects and support a need for additional work aimed at exploring the validity of a glucose-psychopathology relation in SCZ.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在处方中使用电子系统被认为是克服纸张转录过程中的许多问题的最终解决方案,特别是随着冠状病毒的爆发需要比以前更多的关注。但是,尽管有许多优点,它的实施面临许多挑战和障碍。因此,本研究旨在回顾计算机化医嘱录入系统(CPOE)在降低用药错误和药物不良事件(ADE)相对风险方面的有效性.
    方法:本研究是2021年进行的系统评价研究之一。在这项研究中,搜索关键词,如电子处方,患者安全,用药错误处方,药物相互作用,2000年至2020年10月在有效数据库中的原始文章,如ISIWebofSciencePubMedEmbase,Scopus和谷歌等搜索引擎已经完成。纳入的研究基于研究的主要目标,并在经过几个阶段的审查和质量评估后,基于纳入标准。事实上,文章选择的主要标准是在实施EMS前后,在评估或不评估相关危害(真实或潜在)的情况下,比较用药错误率的研究.
    结果:在初步筛选后的110项选定研究中,由于它们的相关性,只有16篇文章被选中。在最后的研究中,存在显著的异质性。只有6项研究质量良好。在10项规定错误率的研究中,9份报告减少,但是可变分母阻止了荟萃分析。12项研究提供了系统性药物错误的具体例子。5例报告其发生轻微。在分析药物错误率影响的9例病例中,7例患者在13%至99%之间显示出显着的相对减少。分析了对潜在ADE的影响的六项研究中的四项显示出35%至98%的显着相对降低。分析ADE效果的四项研究中有两项显示相对减少30%至84%。
    结论:最后,电子处方似乎可以降低药物错误和ADE的风险。然而,这些研究在设置方面有很大的不同,设计,质量和结果。需要更多的随机对照试验(RCT)来进一步改善健康信息学信息的证据。
    BACKGROUND: The use of electronic systems in prescription is considered as the final solution to overcome the many problems of the paper transcription process, especially with the outbreak of Coronavirus needs more attention than before. But despite the many advantages, its implementation faces many challenges and obstacles. Therefore, the present study was conducted to review the effectiveness of computerized physician order entry systems (CPOE) on relative risk reduction on medication error and adverse drug events (ADE).
    METHODS: This study is one of the systematic review studies that was conducted in 2021. In this study, searching for keywords such as E-Electronic Prescription, Patient safety, Medication Errors prescription, Drug Interactions, orginal articles from 2000 to October-2020 in the valid databases such as ISI web of Science PubMed Embase, Scopus and search engines like google was done. The included studies were based on the main objectives of the study and based on the inclusion criteria after several stages of review and quality evaluation. In fact, the main criteria for selecting articles were studies that compared the rate of medication errors with or without assessing the associated harms (real or potential) before and after the implementation of EMS.
    RESULTS: Out of 110 selected studies after initial screening, only 16 articles were selected due to their relevance. Among the final studies, there was a significant heterogeneity. Only 6 studies were of good quality. Of the 10 studies prescribing error rates, 9 reported reductions, but variable denominators prevented meta-analysis. Twelve studies provided specific examples of systemic drug errors. 5 cases reported their occurrence slightly. Out of 9 cases that analyzed the effects on drug error rate, 7 cases showed a significant relative reduction between 13 and 99%. Four of the six studies that analyzed the effects on potential ADEs showed a significant relative reduction of between 35 and 98%. Two of the four studies that analyzed the effect of ADEs showed a relative reduction of between 30 and 84%.
    CONCLUSIONS: Finally, e-prescribing seems to reduce the risk of medication errors and ADE. However, the studies differed significantly in terms of setting, design, quality and results. More randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are needed to further improve the evidence of health informatics information.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    重度抑郁症(MDD)是全球残疾的主要原因,并与严重的持续性损害有关。MDD病理生理学的一个主要假设是单胺缺乏假设,这表明抑郁症是由5-羟色胺的消耗引起的。去甲肾上腺素,或者中枢神经系统的多巴胺.5-羟色胺是抑郁症病理生理学中研究最广泛的神经递质,研究表明,中枢5-羟色胺合成减少会导致有抑郁症风险的个体出现抑郁症状。选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)抑制5-羟色胺再摄取并随后增加突触中可用的5-羟色胺的量。SSRIs的常见副作用包括25岁以下患者的自杀率增加,性功能障碍,焦虑,头晕,体重增加,肠胃不适,和头痛。其他副作用包括延长QT间期,凝血病,和5-羟色胺综合征的风险,以及SSRI停药综合征。据报道,与SSRI使用相关的出血增加部位发生在上消化道,以及颅内。根据目前的文献,三项研究发现SSRIs与出血增加和/或围手术期风险增加无关,而其他人则证明SSRIs与围手术期使用风险增加相关。5-羟色胺再摄取的抑制可影响血小板聚集,因为血小板也表达5-羟色胺转运蛋白。SSRIs可导致血小板致密颗粒中5-羟色胺的储存减少。5-羟色胺的增加还可以增加胃酸的分泌,这增加了溃疡的风险。SSRIs联合NSAIDs也显示出上消化道出血的风险显著增加。一些研究表明,在住院患者中服用维生素K拮抗剂和SSRIs的组合时,出血风险从30%增加到70%。与SSRIs治疗的高患病率相关,与此类药物相关的出血风险值得进一步研究.
    Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is a major cause of disability worldwide and is associated with serious lasting impairment. A leading hypothesis of the pathophysiology of MDD is the monoamine deficiency hypothesis which suggests that depression is caused by depletion of serotonin, norepinephrine, or dopamine in the central nervous system. Serotonin is the most widely studied neurotransmitter in the pathophysiology of depression, with studies showing that reduced central serotonin synthesis leads to depressive symptoms in individuals at risk for depression. Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRI) inhibit serotonin reuptake and subsequently increase the amount of serotonin available in synapses. Common side effects of SSRIs include increased suicidality of patients under the age of 25, sexual dysfunction, anxiety, dizziness, weight gain, gastrointestinal distress, and headache. Other side effects include prolonging the QT interval, coagulopathy, and the risk of serotonin syndrome, as well as SSRI discontinuation syndrome. Sites of increased bleeding related to SSRI use have been reported to occur in the upper gastrointestinal tract, as well as intracranially. Based on the current literature, three studies have found that SSRIs are not associated with increased bleeding and/or increased perioperative risk, while others have demonstrated that SSRIs are associated with an increased risk in perioperative use. The inhibition of serotonin reuptake can affect platelet aggregation since platelets also express the serotonin transporter. SSRIs can result in decreased storage of serotonin in platelet dense granules. Increased serotonin can also increase gastric acid secretion, which increases the risk for ulceration. SSRIs in combination with NSAIDs also show a significantly increased risk of upper GI bleeding. Some studies show an increased bleeding risk from 30% to 70% when taking a combination of vitamin K antagonists and SSRIs in hospitalized patients. Related to the high prevalence of conditions that are treated with SSRIs, the bleeding risk associated with this class of medication merits further study.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Pharmacologically induced priapism is now the most common cause of priapism, with approximately 50% of drug-related priapism being attributed to antipsychotic usage. The majority of pharmacologic priapism is believed to result in ischemic priapism (low flow), which may lead to irreversible complications, such as erectile dysfunction. It is imperative that prescribing physicians be aware of potentially inciting medications.
    To identify medications, specifically antipsychotics, associated with priapism and prolonged erections and understand the rates and treatment of these side effects.
    A PubMed search of all articles available on the database relating to priapism, prolonged erections, and antipsychotics was performed.
    Various typical and atypical antipsychotic drugs (APDs) have been implicated in pharmacologically induced priapism. In addition to dopaminergic and serotoninergic receptors, APDs have affinities for a wide array of other receptors in the central nervous system, including histaminergic, noradrenergic, and cholinergic receptors. Although the exact mechanism is unknown, the most commonly proposed mechanism of priapism associated with APDs is α-adrenergic blockade in the corpora cavernosa of the penis. Priapism appears in only a small fraction of men using medications with α1-receptor-blocking properties, indicating differential sensitivities to the α-blocking effect among men, and/or additional risk factors that may contribute to the development of priapism. The best predictor for the subsequent development of priapism is a past history of having prolonged and painless erections. The acute management algorithm of APD-induced priapism is the same as for other causes of low-flow priapism.
    Clinicians should educate patients treated with antipsychotics about the potential for priapism and its sequelae including permanent erectile dysfunction. Appropriate patient education will raise awareness, encourage early reporting, and help reduce the long-term consequences associated with priapism through early intervention. Hwang T, Shah T,Sadeghi-NejadH. A Review of Antipsychotics and Priapism. Sex Med Rev 2021;9:464-471.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号