Marfan Syndrome

马凡氏综合征
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    诊断为马凡氏综合征或相关综合征的患者需要使用经胸超声心动图(TTE)和计算机断层扫描(CT)等成像技术进行频繁的主动脉监测。准确的主动脉测量至关重要,即使是轻微的扩大(>2毫米)往往需要手术干预。2022年ACC/AHA主动脉疾病诊断和管理指南包括更新的影像学建议。我们旨在将这些与2010年指南进行比较。
    这项回顾性研究涉及137例马凡综合征或相关疾病患者,接受TTE和ECG触发的CT。主动脉直径测量是根据2010年老指南(TTE:内边缘到内边缘,CT:外径)和新的2022指南(TTE:前缘到前缘,CT:内径)。Bland-Altman地块比较了测量差异。
    使用2022年指南显着减少了临床协议限制之外的差异,主动脉窦从49%降至26%,升主动脉从41%降至29%。根据2022年指南,主动脉窦的平均差异为-0.30mm,升主动脉的平均差异为+1.12mm。与2010年指南的-2.66毫米和+1.21毫米相比。
    这项研究首次表明,2022年ACC/AHA指南改善了Marfan综合征患者的ECG触发CT和TTE测量之间的一致性,对于预防危及生命的主动脉并发症至关重要。然而,差异>2毫米的频率仍然很高。
    准确的主动脉直径测量对于有致命主动脉并发症风险的患者至关重要。虽然2022年指南增强了成像模式之间的一致性,>2毫米的频繁差异持续,可能影响主动脉修复的决定。ECG触发的CT重复辐射暴露的风险,被认为是“黄金标准”,仍然是合理的。
    UNASSIGNED: Patients diagnosed with Marfan syndrome or a related syndrome require frequent aorta monitoring using imaging techniques like transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and computed tomography (CT). Accurate aortic measurement is crucial, as even slight enlargement (>2 mm) often necessitates surgical intervention. The 2022 ACC/AHA guideline for Aortic Disease Diagnosis and Management includes updated imaging recommendations. We aimed to compare these with the 2010 guideline.
    UNASSIGNED: This retrospective study involved 137 patients with Marfan syndrome or a related disorder, undergoing TTE and ECG-triggered CT. Aortic diameter measurements were taken based on the old 2010 guideline (TTE: inner edge to inner edge, CT: external diameter) and the new 2022 guideline (TTE: leading edge to leading edge, CT: internal diameter). Bland-Altman plots compared measurement differences.
    UNASSIGNED: Using the 2022 guideline significantly reduced differences outside the clinical agreement limit from 49% to 26% for the aortic sinus and from 41% to 29% for the ascending aorta. Mean differences were -0.30 mm for the aortic sinus and +1.12 mm for the ascending aorta using the 2022 guideline, compared to -2.66 mm and +1.21 mm using the 2010 guideline.
    UNASSIGNED: This study demonstrates for the first time that the 2022 ACC/AHA guideline improves concordance between ECG-triggered CT and TTE measurements in Marfan syndrome patients, crucial for preventing life-threatening aortic complications. However, the frequency of differences >2 mm remains high.
    UNASSIGNED: Accurate aortic diameter measurement is vital for patients at risk of fatal aortic complications. While the 2022 guideline enhances concordance between imaging modalities, frequent differences >2 mm persist, potentially impacting decisions on aortic repair. The risk of repeat radiation exposure from ECG-triggered CT, considered the \'gold standard\', continues to be justified.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    马凡氏综合征(MFS)由原纤维蛋白-1基因(FBN1)变异引起。FBN1的突变热点和/或完善的关键功能结构域包括半胱氨酸残基,钙结合共有序列,和与域间包装相关的氨基酸。以前的变异解释指南没有反映基因或相关疾病的特征。使用临床基因组资源(ClinGen)FBN1变异管理专家小组(VCEP),我们重新评估了报道为不确定显著性变异(VUS)的FBN1种系变异体.
    我们重新评估了161例MFS患者中报道的FBN1中的26例VUS。我们检查了人类基因组突变数据库中的变异,ClinVar,和VarSome数据库,并使用gnomAD数据库评估其等位基因频率。审查患者的临床信息。
    影响半胱氨酸的四个错义变体(c.460T>C,c.1006T>C,c.5330G>C,和c.8020T>C)被重新分类为可能的致病性,并被分配为PM1_strong或PM1。通过授予BA1(独立)将两个内含子变体重新分类为良性。四个错义变体被重新分类为可能的良性。BP5标准适用于具有疾病替代分子基础的病例。其中之一(c.7231G>A)与致病性从头COL3A1变体(c.198G>T,p.Gly633Val)。
    考虑到FBN1变体的高外显率和MFS的临床变异性,致病变异的检测很重要。ClinGenFBN1VCEP包含突变热点和/或建立良好的关键功能域,并专门针对MFS调整标准;因此,它不仅有利于鉴定致病性FBN1变异体,而且有利于将这些变异体与导致具有重叠临床特征的其他结缔组织疾病的变异体区分开来.
    UNASSIGNED: Marfan syndrome (MFS) is caused by fibrillin-1 gene (FBN1) variants. Mutational hotspots and/or well-established critical functional domains of FBN1 include cysteine residues, calcium-binding consensus sequences, and amino acids related to interdomain packaging. Previous guidelines for variant interpretation do not reflect the features of genes or related diseases. Using the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) FBN1 variant curation expert panel (VCEP), we re-evaluated FBN1 germline variants reported as variants of uncertain significance (VUSs).
    UNASSIGNED: We re-evaluated 26 VUSs in FBN1 reported in 161 patients with MFS. We checked the variants in the Human Genome Mutation Database, ClinVar, and VarSome databases and assessed their allele frequencies using the gnomAD database. Patients\' clinical information was reviewed.
    UNASSIGNED: Four missense variants affecting cysteines (c.460T>C, c.1006T>C, c.5330G>C, and c.8020T>C) were reclassified as likely pathogenic and were assigned PM1_strong or PM1. Two intronic variants were reclassified as benign by granting BA1 (stand-alone). Four missense variants were reclassified as likely benign. BP5 criteria were applied in cases with an alternate molecular basis for disease, one of which (c.7231G>A) was discovered alongside a pathogenic de novo COL3A1 variant (c.1988G>T, p.Gly633Val).
    UNASSIGNED: Considering the high penetrance of FBN1 variants and clinical variability of MFS, the detection of pathogenic variants is important. The ClinGen FBN1 VCEP encompasses mutational hotspots and/or well-established critical functional domains and adjusts the criteria specifically for MFS; therefore, it is beneficial not only for identifying pathogenic FBN1 variants but also for distinguishing these variants from those that cause other connective tissue disorders with overlapping clinical features.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Practice Guideline
    目的:“2022年ACC/AHA主动脉疾病诊断和管理指南”为指导临床医生的诊断提供了建议,遗传评估和家庭筛查,医学治疗,血管内和外科治疗,以及对主动脉疾病患者的多个临床表现子集的长期监测(即,无症状,症状稳定,和急性主动脉综合征)。
    方法:从2021年1月至2021年4月进行了全面的文献检索,包括研究,reviews,以及PubMed以英文发表的关于人类受试者的其他证据,EMBASE,Cochrane图书馆,CINHL完成,以及与本指南相关的其他选定数据库。其他相关研究,在指南编写过程中,发布到2022年6月,写作委员会也审议了,在适当的地方。
    先前发布的AHA/ACC关于胸主动脉疾病指南的建议,外周动脉疾病,和二叶主动脉瓣疾病已经更新了新的证据来指导临床医生。此外,针对主动脉疾病患者的综合护理提出了新的建议.强调了共同决策的作用,特别是在妊娠前和妊娠期间主动脉疾病患者的管理中。这也越来越强调机构介入量和多学科主动脉团队专业知识在主动脉疾病患者护理中的重要性。
    The \"2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease\" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the diagnosis, genetic evaluation and family screening, medical therapy, endovascular and surgical treatment, and long-term surveillance of patients with aortic disease across its multiple clinical presentation subsets (ie, asymptomatic, stable symptomatic, and acute aortic syndromes).
    A comprehensive literature search was conducted from January 2021 to April 2021, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINHL Complete, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through June 2022 during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee, where appropriate.
    Recommendations from previously published AHA/ACC guidelines on thoracic aortic disease, peripheral artery disease, and bicuspid aortic valve disease have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing comprehensive care for patients with aortic disease have been developed. There is added emphasis on the role of shared decision making, especially in the management of patients with aortic disease both before and during pregnancy. The is also an increased emphasis on the importance of institutional interventional volume and multidisciplinary aortic team expertise in the care of patients with aortic disease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:为了支持制定有关遗传性主动脉病变和动脉病变患者的临床实践指南,血管外科学会(SVS)的一个写作委员会委托进行了这项系统评价.
    方法:我们进行了系统评价,并在多个数据库中检索研究,以解决SVS指南委员会确定的关于评估和管理遗传性主动脉病变和动脉病变患者的六个问题。研究由成对的独立审稿人进行选择和评估。
    结果:本系统综述包括12项研究。我们没有确定关于遗传性主动脉病变患者的主动脉瘤腔内修复术的长期结局或有主动脉夹层或动脉瘤病史的孕妇的新主动脉事件的研究。一个小病例系列显示,在B型主动脉夹层移植修复后15个月(范围7-28个月),100%的生存率和100%的无主动脉介入生存率。在没有遗传性主动脉病变危险因素的主动脉瘤和夹层患者中,有36%的基因诊断为阳性。这些患者的死亡率为11%,中位随访时间为5个月.黑人患者30天死亡率低于白人患者(5.6%vs.9%;分别),但在主动脉夹层修复后30天,他们的总主动脉再介入率较高(47%vs.27%;分别)。30天时由于动脉瘤扩张和内漏引起的主动脉再介入治疗,Black患者高于White患者。在本系统评价中评估的所有结果中,证据的确定性被认为非常低。
    结论:现有证据表明,对于患有遗传性主动脉病变但长期随访有限的年轻患者,TEVAR治疗B型主动脉夹层后的高生存率。急性主动脉瘤和夹层患者的基因检测具有很高的产量。对于大多数有遗传性主动脉病变危险因素的患者,它是阳性的,对于所有其他患者,它在三分之一以上。并在15年内与新的主动脉事件相关.
    To support the development of clinical practice guidelines on the management of patients with genetic aortopathies and arteriopathies, a writing committee from the Society for Vascular Surgery has commissioned this systematic review.
    We conducted a systematic review and searched multiple databases for studies addressing six questions identified by the Society for Vascular Surgery guideline committee about evaluating and managing patients with genetic aortopathies and arteriopathies. Studies were selected and appraised by pairs of independent reviewers.
    We included 12 studies in this systematic review. We did not identify studies about the long-term outcomes of endovascular repair for aortic aneurysm in patients with heritable aortopathy or about new aortic events in pregnant women with a history of aortic dissection (AD) or aneurysm. A small case series demonstrated a 100% survival rate and 100% aortic intervention-free survival at 15 months (range, 7-28 months) after endograft repair for type B AD. A positive genetic diagnosis was discovered in 36% of patients with aortic aneurysms and dissections who had no risk factors for hereditary aortopathies, and these patients had a mortality rate of 11% at a median follow-up duration of 5 months. Black patients had lower 30-day mortality than White patients (5.6% vs 9.0%, respectively), but they had a higher overall aortic reintervention rate at 30 days after AD repair (47% vs 27%, respectively). Aortic reinterventions owing to aneurysmal expansion and endoleak at 30 days were higher in Black patients than White patients. The certainty of evidence was judged to be very low across all the outcomes evaluated in this systematic review.
    The available evidence suggests high survival after thoracic endovascular aortic repair for type B AD in young patients with heritable aortopathies, but with limited long-term follow-up. Genetic testing in patients with acute aortic aneurysms and dissections had a high yield. It was positive for most patients with risk factors for hereditary aortopathies and in more than one-third for all other patients, and was associated with new aortic events within 15 years.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Practice Guideline
    目的:“2022年ACC/AHA主动脉疾病诊断和管理指南”为指导临床医生的诊断提供了建议,遗传评估和家庭筛查,医学治疗,血管内和外科治疗,以及对主动脉疾病患者的多个临床表现子集的长期监测(即,无症状,症状稳定,和急性主动脉综合征)。
    方法:从2021年1月至2021年4月进行了全面的文献检索,包括研究,reviews,以及PubMed以英文发表的关于人类受试者的其他证据,EMBASE,Cochrane图书馆,CINHL完成,以及与本指南相关的其他选定数据库。其他相关研究,在指南编写过程中,发布到2022年6月,写作委员会也审议了,在适当的地方。
    UASSIGNED:先前发表的AHA/ACC关于胸主动脉疾病指南的建议,外周动脉疾病,和二叶主动脉瓣疾病已经更新了新的证据来指导临床医生。此外,针对主动脉疾病患者的综合护理提出了新的建议.强调了共同决策的作用,特别是在妊娠前和妊娠期间主动脉疾病患者的管理中。这也越来越强调机构介入量和多学科主动脉团队专业知识在主动脉疾病患者护理中的重要性。
    The \"2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease\" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the diagnosis, genetic evaluation and family screening, medical therapy, endovascular and surgical treatment, and long-term surveillance of patients with aortic disease across its multiple clinical presentation subsets (ie, asymptomatic, stable symptomatic, and acute aortic syndromes).
    A comprehensive literature search was conducted from January 2021 to April 2021, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINHL Complete, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through June 2022 during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee, where appropriate.
    Recommendations from previously published AHA/ACC guidelines on thoracic aortic disease, peripheral artery disease, and bicuspid aortic valve disease have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing comprehensive care for patients with aortic disease have been developed. There is added emphasis on the role of shared decision making, especially in the management of patients with aortic disease both before and during pregnancy. The is also an increased emphasis on the importance of institutional interventional volume and multidisciplinary aortic team expertise in the care of patients with aortic disease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:“2022年ACC/AHA主动脉疾病诊断和管理指南”为指导临床医生的诊断提供了建议,遗传评估和家庭筛查,医学治疗,血管内和外科治疗,以及对主动脉疾病患者的多个临床表现子集的长期监测(即,无症状,症状稳定,和急性主动脉综合征)。
    方法:从2021年1月至2021年4月进行了全面的文献检索,包括研究,reviews,以及PubMed以英文发表的关于人类受试者的其他证据,EMBASE,Cochrane图书馆,CINHL完成,以及与本指南相关的其他选定数据库。其他相关研究,在指南编写过程中,发布到2022年6月,写作委员会也审议了,在适当的地方。结构:先前发表的关于胸主动脉疾病的AHA/ACC指南的建议,外周动脉疾病,和二叶主动脉瓣疾病已经更新了新的证据来指导临床医生。此外,针对主动脉疾病患者的综合护理提出了新的建议.强调了共同决策的作用,特别是在妊娠前和妊娠期间主动脉疾病患者的管理中。这也越来越强调机构介入量和多学科主动脉团队专业知识在主动脉疾病患者护理中的重要性。
    The \"2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease\" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the diagnosis, genetic evaluation and family screening, medical therapy, endovascular and surgical treatment, and long-term surveillance of patients with aortic disease across its multiple clinical presentation subsets (ie, asymptomatic, stable symptomatic, and acute aortic syndromes).
    A comprehensive literature search was conducted from January 2021 to April 2021, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINHL Complete, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through June 2022 during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee, where appropriate. Structure: Recommendations from previously published AHA/ACC guidelines on thoracic aortic disease, peripheral artery disease, and bicuspid aortic valve disease have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing comprehensive care for patients with aortic disease have been developed. There is added emphasis on the role of shared decision making, especially in the management of patients with aortic disease both before and during pregnancy. The is also an increased emphasis on the importance of institutional interventional volume and multidisciplinary aortic team expertise in the care of patients with aortic disease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    下一代测序技术的引入大大增加了新遗传变体的识别,因此需要准确的变体解释。2015年,美国医学遗传学和基因组学学院和分子病理学协会提出了新的变异解释指南。基因特异性特征是,然而,不考虑,有时会导致不一致的变体解释。
    为了更统一地解释FBN1(原纤维蛋白-1)基因的变异,导致马凡氏综合症,我们为这个基因和疾病定制了这些指南。我们调整了28个一般标准中的15个,并根据这些调整后的指南,将实验室先前鉴定的713个FBN1变体分类为因果突变或意义不确定的变体。然后,我们比较了以前的方法与改编的美国医学遗传学和基因组学学院以及分子病理学协会标准之间的一致性。
    方法之间的一致性为86.4%(K-α,0.6).定制指南的应用导致不确定显著性的变体数量增加(14.5%至24.2%)。在缩减为可能良性或意义不确定的变体的85种变体中,59.7%是在完善的功能位点之外的错义变体。可用的临床或隔离数据,需要进一步分类这些类型的变体,在许多情况下,不足以帮助分类。
    我们的研究表明,变异的分类仍然具有挑战性,并且可能会随着时间的推移而变化。目前,需要更高水平的证据来将变异分类为致病性的。基因特异性指南可能有助于对变体进行更精确和统一的解释,以准确地支持临床决策。
    The introduction of next-generation sequencing techniques has substantially increased the identification of new genetic variants and hence the necessity of accurate variant interpretation. In 2015, the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology proposed new variant interpretation guidelines. Gene-specific characteristics were, however, not considered, sometimes leading to inconsistent variant interpretation.
    To allow a more uniform interpretation of variants in the FBN1 (fibrillin-1) gene, causing Marfan syndrome, we tailored these guidelines to this gene and disease. We adapted 15 of the 28 general criteria and classified 713 FBN1 variants previously identified in our laboratory as causal mutation or variant of uncertain significance according to these adapted guidelines. We then compared the agreement between previous methods and the adapted American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology criteria.
    Agreement between the methods was 86.4% (K-alpha, 0.6). Application of the tailored guidelines resulted in an increased number of variants of uncertain significance (14.5% to 24.2%). Of the 85 variants that were downscaled to likely benign or variant of uncertain significance, 59.7% were missense variants outside a well-established functional site. Available clinical- or segregation data, necessary to further classify these types of variants, were in many cases insufficient to aid the classification.
    Our study shows that classification of variants remains challenging and may change over time. Currently, a higher level of evidence is necessary to classify a variant as pathogenic. Gene-specific guidelines may be useful to allow a more precise and uniform interpretation of the variants to accurately support clinical decision-making.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Surgical aortic specimens are usually examined in Pathology Departments as a result of treatment of aneurysms or dissections. A number of diseases, genetic syndromes (Marfan syndrome, Loeys-Dietz syndrome, etc.), and vasculopathic aging processes involved in vascular injury can cause both distinct and nonspecific histopathologic changes with degeneration of the media as a common denominator. Terminology for these changes has varied over time leading to confusion and inconsistencies. This consensus document has established a revised, unified nomenclature for the variety of noninflammatory degenerative aortic histopathologies seen in such specimens. Older terms such as cystic medial necrosis and medionecrosis are replaced by more technically accurate terms such as mucoid extracellular matrix accumulation (MEMA), elastic fiber fragmentation and/or loss, and smooth muscle cell nuclei loss. A straightforward system of grading is presented to gauge the extent of medial degeneration and synoptic reporting tables are provided. Herein we present a standardized nomenclature that is accessible to general pathologists and useful for future publications describing these entities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    Marfan syndrome is a multi-system disorder of dominant inheritance in which the cardiovasculature, in particular the aorta, the eyes and the skeleton are affected. Diagnostic assessment and treatment of patients who are suspected of or have Marfan syndrome should preferably be done by multidisciplinary teams such as those found in specialised Marfan syndrome centres. The practice guideline is intended for all care givers involved with the recognition, diagnosis, consultations and the medicinal and surgical treatment of Marfan patients; it includes referral criteria and information on the referral process. A diagnosis of Marfan syndrome is based on international criteria in which aortic root dilatation and dissection, ectopia lentis, an affected first-degree family member and a pathogenic FBN1 mutation are the cardinal features. Alternative diagnoses are also included in the practice guideline. Recommendations are given for the monitoring and treatment of Marfan patients during pregnancy and delivery. Advice on lifestyle is mainly focussed on sports activities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号