This systematic review aimed to investigate the factors that may contribute to the development of OSA after orthognathic surgery in patients with skeletal class III. Electronic searches of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were conducted up to December 10, 2022. In total, 277 studies were retrieved and screened according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and 14 were finally selected. All studies were of medium quality (moderate risk of bias). The occurrence of OSA after orthognathic surgery in patients with class III skeletal relationships depends on surgical factors and patient self-factors. Surgical factors include surgery type, amount of maxillary and mandibular movement, and the patient\'s postoperative swelling. Patient self-factors include weight, age, gender, and hypertrophy of the soft palate, tonsils, and tongue. According to information in the 14 selected articles, the incidences of OSA after Le Fort I impaction and BSSO setback, BSSO setback, and Le Fort I advancement and BSSO setback were 19.2%, 8.57%, and 0.7%, respectively, mostly accompanied with greater amounts of mandibular recession. However, no clear evidence exists to confirm that orthognathic surgery is a causative factor for postoperative sleep breathing disorders in patients with mandibular prognathism. The wider upper airway in patients with class III skeletal might be the reason for the rare occurrence of OSA after surgery. In addition, obesity and advanced age may lead to sleep apnea after orthognathic surgery. Obese patients should be advised to lose weight preoperatively.

BACKGROUND: Small cell osteosarcoma is an extremely rare histopathological variant of conventional osteosarcoma. Due to nonspecific symptoms, most osteosarcomas of the jaws are misdiagnosed as periapical abscesses and mistreated by teeth extraction and drainage.
METHODS: We report, to our knowledge, the seventh case of small cell osteosarcoma in gnathic sites affecting the mandible of an old female with history of a large painful swelling related to the right mandibular molar area for 2 months. Cone-beam computed tomography scan showed an osteolytic lesion related to the lower molar area with involvement of the inferior alveolar nerve. An incisional biopsy was taken, and after histopathological examination and immunohistochemical staining, a diagnosis of small cell osteosarcoma was reached. Hemi-mandibulectomy was performed by a maxillofacial surgeon. No clinical evidence for recurrence was noted until manuscript writing.
CONCLUSIONS: Accurate diagnosis is very important, and general practitioners should be aware of this entity considering that small cell osteosarcoma has a poor prognosis when compared to conventional osteosarcoma.

暂无摘要。

This study was performed to present a single operator\'s experience of in-office (outside of a hospital setting) outpatient orthognathic surgery over a period of 12 years. A total of 254 surgeries were performed during this period. Average procedure times were comparable with published results from studies of similar material. The mean operating time for bimaxillary surgery (n = 21) was 3 hours and 11 minutes. Regarding single-jaw procedures, the mean operating time for Le Fort I osteotomy (n = 115) was 2 hours and 14 minutes and for bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (n = 118) was 2 hours and 1 minute. All patients were discharged from the office the same day, except one patient who was transported to the hospital after surgery due to an anaesthetic complication. This patient was discharged from the hospital later the same day. In this setting, outpatient orthognathic surgery is both safe and practical when careful attention is given to patient preparation and selection. Emergency phone contact with the surgeon in case of complications is important to avoid unnecessary hospitalization.

Several different maneuvers have been described for obtaining access to the distal cervical segment of the internal carotid artery or to a high carotid bifurcation. However there are different approaches to systematization of these techniques. The objective of this study is to review the techniques described and propose a practical protocol to support selection of the most appropriate technique for each case. The review is based on the results of database searches on PubMed Central, the Virtual Health Library (BVSalud), and SciELO for articles on the subject published in English or Portuguese from 1980 to 2021. Among the different maneuvers described, it appears reasonable that the first two steps should be to obtain access at the sternocleidomastoid muscle, followed by section or retraction of the digastric muscle posterior belly. If needed, temporary unilateral mandibular subluxation is an additional resource that is preferable to division of the styloid apparatus process, because of its lesser potential for morbidity. Even wider exposure can be obtained using mandibular osteotomies.

OBJECTIVE: Review QOL outcomes among patients undergoing segmental mandibulectomy and bony free flap reconstruction for ONJ.
METHODS: PubMed was searched for MeSH terms \"Quality of life,\" \"Osteonecrosis,\" \"Osteoradionecrosis,\" \"Bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis of the jaw,\" \"Free tissue flaps,\" and \"Mandibular reconstruction.\"
METHODS: English language studies with QOL outcomes data for patients undergoing free flap reconstruction for advanced ONJ were included. 197 records were initially screened; 18 full texts assessed; 10 full texts included. PRISMA guidelines were followed.
RESULTS: Ten studies were included in this systematic review: six retrospective, three retrospective with comparison groups, and one prospective. In studies with comparison groups, ONJ patients have worse self-reported QOL than the general population as well as head and neck cancer patients without ONJ. Nearly all patients with QOL measurements (220/235 patients) had ONJ from prior radiation. Segmental mandibulectomy and bony free flap improved overall QOL in over half of patients, as well as pain associated with ONJ in 70-75 % of patients. Surgery did not improve long-term effects of radiation such as chewing, swallowing, and salivary production. Donor site morbidity rarely affects QOL.
CONCLUSIONS: Osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) worsens quality-of-life, and advanced disease often requires segmental mandibulectomy and bony free flap reconstruction. Patients and surgeons may expect improvement in some, but not all, domains of patient-reported QOL by the use of segmental mandibulectomy and reconstruction for advanced ONJ.

BACKGROUND: Several mandibular defect classifications after oncological resection have been proposed with no universal acceptance among surgeons and prosthodontists. Established criteria for describing these mandibulectomy defects are lacking.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this systematic review was to analyze the classification systems of mandibular defects available in the scientific literature, provide a critical appraisal, and identify the criteria necessary for a universal description of mandibular discontinuity defects.
METHODS: An electronic search of the English language literature between 1971 and 2020 was performed on 2 electronic databases (PubMed and Cochrane Library). The search was conducted using MeSH terms and free text words: Mandible neoplasm AND Mandibular reconstruction OR Mandible resection OR Mandible defect AND classification, followed by the application of inclusion and exclusion criteria. Studies describing the classification of osteoradionecrosis of the mandible, mandibular fracture, impacted mandibular third molar, and mandibular endodontic or periodontal treatment were not included. The full texts of selected articles were reviewed in depth to provide a critical appraisal. The various descriptive factors of each classification system were tabulated to identify criteria suitable for the universal description of mandibular discontinuity defects.
RESULTS: The electronic search yielded a total of 239 titles and abstracts. Of these, 52 titles relevant to the review were identified by the 2 reviewers independently. Those studies that did not match the predetermined inclusion criteria and duplicates were excluded. By reviewing the 21 selected studies and applying exclusion criteria, 12 studies were selected for full-text reading. A manual search in the references of the selected publications was performed, which yielded 1 additional article that satisfied the inclusion criteria. Thus, a total of 13 full-text articles were included in the final review. After further qualitative analysis and tabulation of relevant information from selected classification systems, the 8 descriptive criteria and a pyramidal hierarchical chart were proposed that included the extent of bony defect, soft tissue defect, dental status, mandibular function, neurological status, condyle status, type of reconstruction, and combined resection.
CONCLUSIONS: The spectrum of patients with mandibulectomy defects following resection varies greatly. The question of the most ideal classification system remains unresolved. Eight different criteria for the description of mandibular discontinuity defects and the pyramidal hierarchical chart proposed will allow surgeons and prosthodontists to better communicate and conceptualize an individualized surgical and prosthetic treatment plan.

The aim of this systematic review was to provide a structured overview of three-dimensional airway volume changes in relation to various orthognathic surgeries. Clinical human studies performing pre- and postoperative three-dimensional airway volume assessments to investigate volumetric changes of the airway after orthognathic surgery were included. Pre-determined inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied in an extensive search of the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science electronic databases. The cut-off date was set to January 1, 2022. Forty-one articles reporting retrospective and prospective case-control and case series studies were included. All studies were determined to be of medium quality (moderate risk of bias). The included studies were categorized by type of intervention. Pre- and postoperative volumes were extracted from the available data, and volume changes as a percentage of the preoperative levels were calculated. Isolated mandibular setback surgery generally decreased the airway volume. Isolated maxillary or mandibular advancement, bimaxillary advancement, and surgically assisted maxillary expansion generally increased the airway volume in the total airway and oropharynx, among which the effect of bimaxillary advancement surgery appeared most significant. High heterogeneity exists in the terminology and definitions of the airway and its segments. A more uniform methodology for airway volume measurement is needed to provide an insight into the impact on the airway of specific types of surgical intervention. In conclusion, airway volumes are affected after orthognathic surgery, which may be of clinical significance, especially in patients who are predisposed to obstructive sleep apnoea.

Several systematic reviews have been published on the effects of mandibular surgery on condylar remodeling without reaching a consensus. The purpose of this systematic review of systematic reviews was to assess the impact of mandibular advancement or bimaxillary surgeries on condylar resorption. A literature search, using several electronic databases, was carried out by two reviewers independently. Article preselection was based on titles and abstracts, and final article selection based on full-text analysis of preselected studies. After final study selection, the quality of studies was assessed using the AMSTAR 2 tool. A decision algorithm was subsequently established to choose the best body of evidence. From an initial yield of 1\'848 articles, 23 systematic reviews were identified for further analysis, with ten studies being included in the final selection. Despite the generally low quality of the reviews, certain associations could be made: young patients, female patients, and those with a high mandibular plane angle are more prone to condylar resorption following mandibular advancement osteotomies, especially if anterior rotation of the mandible is performed during surgery. Patients undergoing bimaxillary surgery also appear to have a higher risk of developing condylar resorption. In conclusion, these results confirm the multi-factorial nature of condylar resorption, stressing the need for well-controlled prospective studies with long-term follow-up to clearly identify potential risk factors associated with orthognathic surgery.

The lip-split mandibulotomy (LSMA) is an access procedure that has been used in head and neck (H&N) surgery as an aid to surgical resection of inaccessible tumours of the postertior oral cavity and oropharynx. Anecdotal evidence suggests that it has significant morbidity. Voices of concern within the H&N surgical community suggest that it has been abandoned in favour of technological advances such as robotic surgery. We report here the first (to our knowledge) registered systematic review of its kind, documenting the safety and efficiency of LSMA in H&N surgery. We performed a PRISMA-guided systematic review (PROSPERO-registered) and identified reports using a search algorithm in MEDLINE/EMBASE. LSMA-related surgical complications were recorded using the Clavien-Dindo classification. Secondary outcomes included swallowing dysfunction, facial cosmesis, and patient satisfaction recorded in health-related quality of life questionnaires (HRQoL). From 125 studies identified, 54 met the inclusion criteria (3872 patients). The LSMA mortality rate was 0%; we did not identify a single case of perioperative death. The median rate of osteoradionecrosis was 5.4%, whereas fistula formation was 5.7%. Malunion was noted in 4.9%. Other complications (surgical site infection, plate exposure) were around 5%. There was significant between-study variation with regards to swallowing assessment tools, but overall there was no significant difference in outcomes. This was also the case for the HRQoL questionairres. LSMA is a safe procedure with an acceptable rate of complications, and should definitely remain in the armamentarium of H&N surgery.