Patient-centered care (PCC) is recognized as a standard in healthcare for determining high quality. Honoring patients\' values, experiences, needs, and preferences in devising, coordinating, and delivering care underscores the enhancement of the therapeutic rapport between patients and healthcare providers. Wound treatment involves a multi-stage process encompassing diagnostics and local wound dressing, which reduces the risk of infection through a coordinated interdisciplinary team. Within this team, nurses undertake specific professional functions and roles. The implementation of local therapy using innovative and scientifically substantiated methods may be hindered by a deficit of knowledge or inappropriate knowledge among staff and patients themselves. This study presents the challenges concerning the care of patients with chronic wounds treated using Lucilia sericata larvae, based on a review of the current scientific literature. A critical analysis of the literature spanning from 2002 to 2022 was conducted using the Medline, PubMed, Cochrane, and Termedia databases, employing keywords such as \"maggot debridement therapy\" in relation to acceptance and perception. As a result of the preliminary selection, 472 papers were identified, of which 12 publications were included in the development of this concept. The acquired data were organized and presented in the concluding section in the form of tables, accompanied by descriptions and references to individual studies. Negative psychological and somatic sensations were among the most prominent challenges among patients treated with Maggot Debridement Therapy (MDT). Pain related to peripheral ischemia or infection in this group of patients requires pain prophylaxis, including hyperalgesia and allodynia, in order to improve method tolerance. On the other hand, augmenting patients\' understanding of MDT diminishes negative emotions, reinforces positive behaviors, and mitigates anxiety levels. MDT constitutes an effective and safe method. Its widespread use for chronic wounds requires substantial knowledge among healthcare professionals and patient education, along with that of their caregivers, to develop a positive attitude.

UNASSIGNED: Co-occurrence of breast cancer and non-Hodgkin\'s lymphoma is a rare condition with diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. The coexistence of follicular lymphoma (FL) and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has not been described previously.
UNASSIGNED: A 46-year-old woman, already suffering a history of untreated, advanced-stage, high tumor burden FL, was admitted for a rapidly progressing right breast mass. Ultrasonography showed an 8.3 × 3.6 × 4.1 cm fungating mass in the right breast with enlarged lymph nodes (LNs) in bilateral axillae. PET-CT demonstrated increased 18F- FDG activity in right breast mass, LNs on both sides of the diaphragm, enlarged spleen, and bone marrow. Biopsy of the right breast mass revealed TNBC. The patient underwent neoadjuvant therapy with R-CHOP and achieved partial response of breast tumor. However, TNBC progressed after three cycles of R-CHOP. According to the next-generation sequencing (NGS) assay on breast mass showing a homologous recombination repair (HRR) deficiency (HRD) score of 72, the neoadjuvant regimen was changed to rituximab plus nab-paclitaxel and cisplatin (R-TP) and resulted in significant tumor regression. The patient then underwent right mastectomy with an axillary LN dissection. After the surgery, she was regularly monitored and given adjuvant therapy with R-TP and radiotherapy.
UNASSIGNED: The coexistence of FL and HRD-positive TNBC poses diagnostic and treatment challenges. Well-founded neoadjuvant strategy based on multidisciplinary team (MDT) discussion and NGS warranted a good outcome in this case.

BACKGROUND: MDT discussion is the gold standard for cancer care in the UK. With the incidence of cancer on the rise, demand for MDT discussion is increasing. The need for efficiency, whilst maintaining high standards, is therefore clear. Paper-based MDT quality assessment tools and discussion checklists may represent a practical method of monitoring and improving MDT practice. This reviews aims to describe and appraise these tools, as well as consider their value to quality improvement.
METHODS: Medline, EMBASE and PsycInfo were searched using pre-defined terms. The PRISMA model was followed throughout. Studies were included if they described the development of a relevant tool, or if an element of the methodology further informed tool quality assessment. To investigate efficacy, studies using a tool as a method of quality improvement in MDT practice were also included. Study quality was appraised using the COSMIN risk of bias checklist or the Newcastle-Ottawa scale, depending on study type.
RESULTS: The search returned 7930 results. 18 studies were included. In total 7 tools were identified. Overall, methodological quality in tool development was adequate to very good for assessed aspects of validity and reliability. Clinician feedback was positive. In one study, the introduction of a discussion checklist improved MDT ability to reach a decision from 82.2 to 92.7%. Improvement was also noted in the quality of information presented and the quality of teamwork.
CONCLUSIONS: Several tools for assessment and guidance of MDTs are available. Although limited, current evidence indicates sufficient rigour in their development and their potential for quality improvement.
BACKGROUND: PROSPERO ID: CRD42021234326 .

High-frequency equipment is characterized by ultrasound probes with frequencies of over 10 MHz. At higher frequencies, the wavelength decreases, which determines a lower penetration of the ultrasound beam so as to offer a better evaluation of the surface structures. This explains the growing interest in ultrasound in dermatology. This review examines the state of the art of high-frequency ultrasound (HFUS) in the assessment of skin cancer to ensure the high clinical approach and provide the best standard of evidence on which to base clinical and policy decisions.

This article presents a comparative review of the application of four contextualist therapies in the treatment of antisocial behavior and offending. The therapies reviewed are functional analytic psychotherapy (FAP), acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), dialectical behavior therapy (DBT), and mode deactivation therapy (MDT). A descriptive and comparative review was conducted through a search carried out in both general and specific databases related to each therapy. We included a total of 44 studies treating any type of antisocial behavior or offending. Results show that these interventions have been used to treat challenging behavioral patterns, inmates\' institutional behaviors, exhibitionism, at-risk adolescents\' aggressive conducts, and offending behaviors performed by juveniles who committed robbery and/or serious sexual offenses. The main conclusions are that the four therapies show very positive outcomes: Although FAP and ACT have been used more sparsely, DBT and MDT have been employed in a larger number of interventions and using more controlled comparative designs. The therapeutic components that seem to be relevant to understanding in a transversal way how changes in behavior are achieved are acceptance/validation of clients\' histories of neglect and abuse and clients\' commitment to behaving toward their valued directions in life.

OBJECTIVE: Dilatation of the pancreatic duct and common bile duct, known as double duct sign (DDS), suggests sinister pathology at the periampullary region. Non-jaundiced patients with incidental DDS and otherwise normal cross-sectional imaging present a diagnostic dilemma to the multidisciplinary team (MDT). The primary aim of this review was to assess the diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in detecting causal pathology in this patient population.
METHODS: A systematic literature search (Medline, EMBASE, Google Scholar, Cochrane database and PROSPERO) was performed to identify original studies that reported EUS findings in patients with incidental DDS. Primary outcome was detection of a periampullary tumour. Secondary outcome was detection of benign causal pathology. Meta-analysis was used to calculate an absolute measure (pooled proportion) of pathology detection.
RESULTS: Four studies (177 patients) were included. EUS detection rate for a periampullary tumour was 5% (95% CI, 0-10%) including both adenocarcinomas and adenomas. EUS detection rate for benign causal pathology was 22% (95% CI, 10-34%), the most common being chronic pancreatitis CONCLUSION: Non-jaundiced patients with incidental DDS on cross-sectional imaging have a 5% risk of a periampullary tumour that can be detected by EUS.

Multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTs) play an essential role in the management of patients with newly diagnosed and recurrent cancers, and often include review of pathology specimens that were initially assessed in external departments. Many studies have demonstrated a low but significant rate of diagnostic disagreement following such review but the pathological findings have seldom been detailed. We present a prospective 5-year study of all external cases reviewed at the Western Australian Gynaecological Oncology MDT focusing upon those cases with major diagnostic discordance likely to impact patient management. In total, 1275 cases were reviewed of which 132 (10.4%) were considered discordant including 48 (3.8%) with major discordance. Different interpretation of the presence and/or extent of tumour invasion accounted for a significant proportion of cases and in particular some adenocarcinoma and squamous carcinoma variants were initially reported to show only in situ or minimally invasive disease. Endometrial high-grade serous carcinoma was under-recognised and on occasion reassignment of tumour origin including metastasis to the gynaecological tract was facilitated by additional clinical information and supported by appropriate immunohistochemistry. This study supports the role of pathology review at MDTs and highlights problematic lesions that may merit a low threshold for additional opinion and ancillary studies.

BACKGROUND: Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy (MDT) is a treatment-based classification system founded on 3 core principles: classification into diagnostic syndromes, classification-based intervention, and appropriate application of force. Many randomized controlled trials have investigated the efficacy of MDT for low back pain; however, results have varied. The inconsistent delivery of MDT across trials may explain the different findings.
OBJECTIVE: To compare treatment effect sizes for pain or disability between trials that delivered MDT consistent with the core principles of the approach and trials that met some or none of these principles.
METHODS: In this systematic review, databases were searched from inception to June 2018 for studies that delivered MDT compared to nonpharmacological, conservative control interventions in patients with low back pain and reported outcomes of pain or disability. Studies were classified as \"adherent\" (meeting the core principles of MDT) or \"nonadherent\" (using some or none of the principles of MDT). Data were extracted by 2 independent reviewers. Meta-regression procedures were used to analyze the effect of delivery mode on clinical outcomes, adjusting for covariates of symptom duration (less than or greater than 3 months) and control intervention (minimal or active).
RESULTS: Studies classified as adherent to the MDT approach showed greater reductions in pain and disability of 15.0 (95% confidence interval: 7.3, 22.7) and 11.7 (95% confidence interval: 5.4, 18.0) points, respectively, on a 100-point scale compared to nonadherent trials.
CONCLUSIONS: This review provides preliminary evidence that treatment effects of MDT are greater when the core principles are followed.
METHODS: Therapy, level 1a. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2019;49(4):219-229. Epub 13 Feb 2019. doi:10.2519/jospt.2019.8734.