OBJECTIVE: Peripheral artery disease (PAD) severely impairs patient prognosis and quality of life (QOL). Although lipoprotein apheresis (LA) has been applied to patients with PAD and elevated serum atherogenic lipoproteins, we hypothesized that LA can be effective for treating PAD even in patients with controlled serum lipoproteins through pleiotropic anti-atherosclerotic effects beyond lipoprotein removal. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of LA in patients with treatment-resistant PAD and controlled serum lipoproteins focusing on QOL.
METHODS: In a single-arm prospective study, 30 patients with refractory PAD who had controlled serum lipoproteins underwent sequential LA sessions using dextran sulfate adsorption columns, aiming to complete 10 sessions. The ankle-brachial pressure index (ABI) and vascular QOL (VascuQOL) score were evaluated as the primary outcomes. Secondary outcomes included reactive hyperemia index (RHI) and biological antioxidant potential (BAP) as an endothelial function test and serum antioxidative-capacity evaluation, respectively.
RESULTS: ABI significantly increased after LA sessions (pre-treatment 0.60±0.09 vs. post-treatment 0.65±0.13, p=0.023). Total VascuQOL score (3.7±1.1 vs 4.6±1.1, p＜0.001) and RHI (1.70±0.74 vs 2.34±1.76, p=0.023) significantly improved after the LA sessions. BAP tended to increase after the LA sessions, and the change reached statistical significance 3 months after treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: ABI and QOL improved after a series of LA sessions in conventional treatment-resistant PAD patients with controlled serum lipoprotein levels. Increased antioxidative capacity and ameliorated endothelial function were observed after the LA treatment.

Aims: An abundance of epidemiological evidence demonstrates that elevated lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) represents a significant contributing risk factor towards the development of cardiovascular disease. In particular, raised Lp(a) may play a mechanistic role in patients with refractory angina. Studies have also shown a correlation between oxidised LDL (oxLDL) levels and atherosclerotic burden as well as rates of cardiovascular events. Antibodies against oxLDL (anti-oxLDL) are involved in the removal of oxLDL. Lipoprotein apheresis (LA), which removes lipoproteins using extra-corporeal processes, is an established means of reducing Lp(a), and thereby reduces cardiovascular events. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of LA on oxLDL and anti-oxLDL levels amongst those with refractory angina in the context of raised Lp(a). Methods: We performed a sub-study within a randomised controlled crossover trial involving 20 patients with refractory angina and raised Lp(a) > 500 mg/L, comparing the effect of three months of blinded weekly LA or sham, followed by crossover to the opposite study arm. We utilized enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) to quantify oxLDL and IgG/ IgM anti-oxLDL antibody levels at baseline and following three months of active LA or sham sessions. Results: Following three months of LA, there was a 30% reduction in oxLDL from 0.37 ± 0.06 to 0.26 ± 0.04 with a mean drop of -0.11 units (U) (95% CI -0.13, -0.09) compared to no significant change with sham therapy (p < 0.0001 between treatment arms). LA also led to a 22% reduction in levels of IgG and IgM anti-oxLDL, again with no significant change demonstrated during sham (p = 0.0036 and p = 0.012, respectively, between treatment arms). Conclusion: Amongst patients with refractory angina in the context of elevated Lp(a), LA significantly lowers levels of oxLDL and anti-oxLDL antibodies, representing potential mechanisms by which LA yields symptomatic and prognostic benefits in this patient cohort.

We evaluated the lipid-lowering (LL) effect of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors (PCSK9i) in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) treated with LL-drugs and lipoprotein apheresis (LA).
The PCSK9i treatment (evolocumab 420 mg/4 weeks, alirocumab 150 mg/2 weeks, or alirocumab 75 mg/2 weeks: 9, 6, and 2 patients, respectively) was initiated in patients with HeFH (n = 17; aged 35-69 years, 10 men, previously treated with statins + ezetimibe ± colesevelam and LA sessions for 2-12 years). A lipid profile was obtained before and immediately after the LA session and before, 1 and 2 months after switching to PCSK9i treatment. The duration of PCSK9i therapy ranged from 3 to 18 months.
Median total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and triglycerides (TG) levels before LA were 268, 198, 46, and 126 mg/dL, respectively, and decreased (at the end of the LA session) to 117, 50, 40, and 51 mg/dL, respectively (P < .001 for TC and P = .001 for all other comparisons). The median time-averaged LDL-C levels following LA were 155 (121, 176; median [25th, 75th percentile]) mg/dL. Median TC, LDL-C, and TG levels before PCSK9i therapy were 269, 190, and 127 mg/dL and decreased to 152, 100, and 95 mg/dL, respectively (P = .002, P < .002, and P < .03, respectively). Steady LDL-C levels with PCSK9i treatment were significantly lower compared with time-averaged LDL-C levels following LA (median value: 100 vs 155 mg/dL; P = .008). With PCSK9i, from 13 patients with CHD, 6 (46.1%) patients achieved LDL-C <70 mg/dL, and 2 patients (15.4%) achieved LDL-C <100 mg/dL. Lipoprotein apheresis was discontinued in all patients except for 2 who continued once monthly.
PCSK9i can reduce LDL-C more consistently over time compared with a transient decrease following LA in HeFH patients. PCSK9i therapy may reduce the frequency of LA. Larger trials are required to establish the clinical implications of PCSK9i in patients previously on LA.

Coronary artery disease (CAD) risk is greater with higher plasma lipoprotein(a)[Lp(a)] concentrations or smaller apoisoform size and putatively with increased cellular cholesterol loading capacity (CLC). The relationship between Lp(a) and CLC is not known. Information on Lp(a) polymorphisms in Italian patients is lacking.
The objective of this study was to determine relationships between Lp(a) and CLC, the impact of lipoprotein apheresis (LA), and describe the genetic profile of Lp(a).
We conducted a multicenter, observational study in Italian patients with hyperLp(a) and premature CAD with (n = 18)/without (n = 16) LA in which blood samples were analyzed for Lp(a) parameter and CLC. Genetic profiling of LPA was conducted in patient receiving LA.
Mean macrophage CLC of the pre-LA serum was significantly higher than that of normolipidemic controls (19.7 ± 0.9 μg/mg vs 16.01 ± 0.98 μg/mg of protein, respectively). After LA, serum macrophage CLC was markedly lower relative to preapheresis (16.1 ± 0.8 μg/mg protein; P = .003) and comparable with CLC of the normolipidemic serum. LA did not significantly affect average apo(a) isoform size distribution. No anthropometric or lipid parameters studied were related to serum CLC, but there was a relationship between CLC and the Lp(a) plasma concentration (P = .035). DNA analysis revealed a range of common genetic variants. Two rare, new variants were identified: LPA exon 21, c.3269C>G, p.Pro1090Arg, and rs41259144 p.Arg990Gln, c.2969G>A CONCLUSIONS: LA reduces serum Lp(a) and also reduces macrophage CLC. Novel genetic variants of the LPA gene were identified, and geographic variations were noted. The complexity of these polymorphisms means that genetic assessment is not a predictor of CAD risk in hyperLp(a).

A novel approach is required for standard therapy-resistant peripheral arterial disease (PAD). This is a single-center, single-arm, interventional study (LDL Apheresis-Mediated Endothelial Activation Therapy to Severe-Peripheral Artery Disease study), which aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lipoprotein apheresis (LA) with a dextran sulfate cellulose column in PAD with controlled serum cholesterol levels. The study participants have standard therapy-resistant PAD with controlled serum cholesterol levels. A total of 35 patients undergo 10 sessions of LA therapy. The ankle-brachial index and vascular quality of life questionnaire are assessed before and after the treatment period as primary outcomes. Registration of patients began in November 2015 and is planned to be concluded in October 2020.

Being rich in polyunsaturated fatty acids, flaxseed (Linum usitatissimum L.) is thought to be able to decrease lipid levels and dampen inflammation. In this pilot study, we aimed to determine whether flaxseed supplementation could improve the profiles of lipids and inflammatory mediators in patients with severe hyperlipidemia resistant to conventional lipid-lowering pharmacotherapy and requiring lipoprotein apheresis. To this end, six patients received, blindly-in addition to their normal lipoprotein apheresis regimen-a 10-week dietary supplementation with flaxseed (28 g/d) administered in biscuits. This was followed by a 10-week washed out-period and a 10-week supplementation phase with whole wheat placebo. Blood samples were collected at the end of each phase, before the lipoprotein apheresis session. The primary endpoint was the lipid profile and the secondary endpoints were the concentrations of inflammatory mediators and tolerability. Flaxseed supplementation was well-tolerated and resulted in a consistent and significant decrease in total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels. The median (and range) percentage decrease was 11.5% (0-18.8) and 7.3% (4.4-26.6), for cholesterol (p = 0.015) and LDL-C (p = 0.003), respectively. On the other hand, there was no significant effect of flaxseed on lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)), C-reactive protein (CRP), and interleukin 6 (IL-6) concentrations. These observations indicate that flaxseed can produce a cholesterol- and LDL-lowering effect in patients treated with lipoprotein apheresis. Thus, flaxseed supplementation may help to control cholesterol in this patient population. The flaxseed supplementation protocol applied may be of use for further adequately-powered studies to validate and extend our findings.

BACKGROUND: Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (hoFH) can cause severe atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) in early infancy. Diagnosis and initiation of effective lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) are recommended as early as possible to prevent ASCVD-related morbidity and mortality.
METHODS: The clinical courses of a pair of siblings with an identical hoFH genotype, who exhibited major similarities of their clinical phenotype were analyzed in a case-control fashion including the family.
RESULTS: The older sibling was diagnosed with hoFH at the age of 4. Untreated LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) was 17 mmol/L (660 mg/dL). LLT including lipoprotein apheresis (LA) was initiated and has been successful for 8 years now. A reduction of estimated cholesterol burden by 74% was achieved by LA and combined drug therapy including statins and ezetimibe. The efficacy of escalation of drug therapy was limited because the underlying LDL receptor (LDLR) mutation in the family resulted in substantially reduced receptor function. Treatment with proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 (PCSK9)-antibodies failed. His younger brother died at the age of 2 years shortly after the hoFH diagnosis of the elder sibling. Postmortem examination revealed advanced aortic root atheroma and aortic valve stenosis. In the older sibling, aortic valve stenosis and insufficiency were treated at the age of 9 years with mechanical aortic valve replacement.
CONCLUSIONS: LLT including LA should be initiated as early as possible following the diagnosis of hoFH with very high LDL-C levels. With the same genotype, the phenotype of hoFH can exhibit similar patterns but outcome is substantially related to treatment.

Background: Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) causes end stage renal disease (ESRD) in significant proportion of patients worldwide. Primary FSGS carries poor prognosis and management of FSGS patients, refractory to standard treatments or resistant to steroids, remains a major challenge. Lipoprotein apheresis is a therapeutic approach for drug resistant primary FSGS and post-renal transplant primary FSGS recurrence. Objectives: To examine the safety and probable benefit at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24-months following completion of apheresis treatment using Liposorber® LA-15 system in patients with nephrotic syndrome (NS), due to refractory primary FSGS or primary FSGS associated NS, in post renal transplant children. Material and Methods: Prospective, multicenter, single-arm intervention study using Liposorber® LA-15 system. Patients ≤21 years old with drug resistant or drug intolerant NS secondary to primary FSGS with glomerular filtration rate (GFR) ≥60 ml/min/1.73 m2 or post renal transplant patients ≤21 years old with primary FSGS associated NS were included in the study. Each patient had 12 dextran-sulfate plasma adsorption lipoprotein apheresis sessions over a period of 9 weeks. All patients were followed up at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24-months following completion of treatment. Results: Of 17 patients enrolled, six were excluded from the outcome analysis (protocol deviations). Of the remaining 11 patients, all but one have completed apheresis treatments. Three patients were lost to follow-up immediately after completion of apheresis and excluded from outcome analysis. At one-month follow-up, 1 of 7 patients (14.3%) attained partial remission of NS while 2 of 4 subjects (50%) and 2 of 3 subjects (66.7%) had partial/complete remission at 3- and 6-months follow-up, respectively. One of two patients followed up for 12 months had complete remission and one patient had partial remission of NS after 24 months. Improved or stable eGFR was noted in all patients over the follow-up period. Conclusion: The results of our multicenter study showed improvement in the response rates to steroid or immunosuppressive therapy and induced complete or partial remission of proteinuria in some of the patients with drug resistant primary FSGS. The main limitation of our study is the small number of subjects and high dropout rate.

Lipoprotein apheresis (LA) can effectively lower lipoproteins but is an invasive procedure.
The objective of this study was to evaluate whether evolocumab can reduce LA requirement in patients undergoing chronic LA.
Patients on regular weekly or every-2-week LA and moderate- to high-intensity statin (if tolerated) with pre-LA low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels ≥2.6 mmol/L (100 mg/dL) to ≤4.9 mmol/L (190 mg/dL) were randomized to continue the same LA frequency, or discontinue LA and receive evolocumab 140 mg every-2-weeks subcutaneously for 6 weeks. At week 6, all patients received only open-label evolocumab for 18 weeks. The primary endpoint was LA avoidance at the end of 6 weeks based on achieving pre-LA LDL-C <2.6 mmol/L at week 4.
Thirty-nine patients (mean [SD] age 62 [10] years, 59% male, 82% with familial hypercholesterolemia) were randomized (evolocumab, n = 19; LA, n = 20). At the end of 6 weeks, more patients receiving evolocumab avoided LA than those receiving LA (84% vs 10%; treatment difference, 74% [95% CI: 45, 87]; P < .0001). Thirty patients (77%) did not require LA at 24 weeks. Evolocumab reduced pre-LA LDL-C by 50% from the baseline to week 4 compared with a 3% increase in the LA arm. Pre-LA LDL-C <1.8 mmol/L (70 mg/dL) was achieved by 10 patients (53%) receiving evolocumab and none receiving LA (week 4). Safety was comparable between arms.
Evolocumab treatment significantly reduced LA requirement in patients undergoing chronic LA. In addition, >50% of patients achieved LDL-C <1.8 mmol/L on evolocumab alone, demonstrating that in patients with pre-LA LDL-C ≤4.9 mmol/L, evolocumab may replace LA.

Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (hoFH) is a rare inherited disorder characterized by extreme elevation of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, accelerated coronary artery disease, and premature death. Aggressive LDL-lowering therapies are important for survival, but these are not available worldwide.
The aim of the study was to compare and contrast cardiovascular outcomes and mortality of hoFH patients in 2 countries with disparate use of lipoprotein apheresis (LA) and modern therapies for lowering LDL cholesterol.
A retrospective study was undertaken comparing cardiovascular disease (CVD)-free survival and mortality in 44 hoFH patients who were treated with statins but not LA, from a center in Beijing, China, and 18 hoFH patients who were treated with LA and novel therapies from an early age, from a center in Rome, Italy.
CVD-free survival and survival were significantly reduced in Chinese patients compared with the Italian patients after 30 years of follow-up (log-rank P < .01). In a pooled analysis, cardiovascular survival was significantly increased with earlier age at treatment, longer duration of treatment, and lower on-treatment LDL cholesterol concentrations (P < .05). In addition, the probability of a CVD event and death were increased in patients that carried a null mutation in the LDLR or had elevated lipoprotein(a).
We show that coronary artery disease outcomes in patients with hoFH can be significantly improved with earlier and potent LDL cholesterol lowering with pharmacotherapies and LA. This has major implications for countries, such as China, where the models of care for hoFH remains underdeveloped.