The assessment of thermal burn depth remains challenging. Over the last decades, several optical systems were developed to determine burn depth. So far, only laser doppler imaging (LDI) has been shown to be reliable while others such as infrared thermography or spectrophotometric intracutaneous analysis have been less accurate. The aim of our study is to evaluate hyperspectral imaging (HSI) as a new optical device.
Patients suffering thermal trauma treated in a burn unit in Germany between November 2019 and September 2020 were included. Inclusion criteria were age ≥18 years, 2nd or 3rd degree thermal burns, written informed consent and presentation within 24 h after injury. Clinical assessment and hyperspectral imaging were performed 24, 48 and 72 h after the injury. Patients in whom secondary wound closure was complete within 21 days (group A) were compared to patients in whom secondary wound closure took more than 21 days or where skin grafting was indicated (group B). Demographic data and the primary parameters generated by HSI were documented. A Mann Whitney-U test was performed to compare the groups. A p-value below 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. The data generated using HSI were combined to create the HSI burn index (BI). Using a logistic regression and receiver operating characteristics curve (ROC) sensitivity and specificity of the BI were calculated. The trial was officially registered on DRKS (registration number: DRKS00022843).
Overall, 59 patients with burn wounds were eligible for inclusion. Ten patients were excluded because of a poor data quality. Group A comprised 36 patients with a mean age of 41.5 years and a mean burnt body surface area of 2.7%. In comparison, 13 patients were allocated to group B because of the need for a skin graft (n = 10) or protracted secondary wound closure lasting more than 21 days. The mean age of these patients was 46.8 years. They had a mean affected body surface area of 4.0%. 24, 48, and 72 h after trauma the BI was 1.0 ± 0.28, 1.2 ± 0.29 and 1.55 ± 0.27 in group A and 0.78 ± 0.14, 1.05 ± 0.23 and 1.23 ± 0.27 in group B. At every time point significant differences were demonstrated between the groups. At 24 h, ROC analysis demonstrated BI threshold of 0.95 (sensitivity 0.61/specificity 1.0), on the second day of 1.17 (sensitivity 0.51/specificity 0.81) and on the third day of 1.27 (sensitivity 0.92/specificity 0.71).
Changes in microcirculation within the first 72 h after thermal trauma were reflected by an increasing BI in both groups. After 72 h, the BI is able to predict the need for a skin graft with a sensitivity of 92% and a specificity of 71%.

BACKGROUND: Laser Doppler imaging (LDI) is the \'gold standard\' tool for the assessment of burn depth. However, it is costly. The FLIR ONE is a novel, mobile-attached, thermal imaging camera used to assess burn wound temperature. This study compares the FLIR ONE and LDI in assessing burn depth and predicting healing times.
METHODS: Forty-five adult patients with burn wounds, presenting at 1-5 days, were imaged with the FLIR ONE and LDI. Infected, chemical and electrical burns were excluded. Healing potential was determined by comparing wound and normal skin temperature for the FLIR ONE and blood flow changes with the LDI. Healing potential was categorised into wounds healing in less than and over 21 days. Pearson\'s test was used to determine the correlation between changes in wound temperature and healing potential.
RESULTS: Percent total body surface area (%TBSA) was in the range of 0.5-45. FLIR demonstrated a sensitivity of 66.67% and specificity of 76.67% in predicting healing within 21 days, while LDI demonstrated a sensitivity of 93.33% and specificity of 40%. The FLIR ONE showed a significant difference in the mean temperature changes between burns that healed in less than (0.1933 ± 0.3554) and over 21 days (-1 ± 0.4329) (P = 0.04904). Pearson\'s test showed a significant correlation between the difference in wound and normal skin temperature with healing times (P = 0.04517).
CONCLUSIONS: The inexpensive FLIR ONE shows a significant correlation between changes in wound temperature and healing times. It is useful in predicting healing within 21 days. However, evaporative cooling at the wound surface can lead to overprediction of healing times and overtreatment.
BACKGROUND: Background Laser Doppler imaging is currently the main tool for burn depth assessment. It works by analysing the blood flow in a burn wound. Based on these findings, it can predict the depth of the burn injury and predict if it will heal in less than or over 21 days. The main problem is that it is costly. The FLIR ONE is a novel, mobile-attached, thermal imaging camera. It can be used to assess burn depth by comparing the temperature of the burn wound to the surrounding normal skin. This information can then be used to predict healing times into less than and over 21 days. The issue being explored The usefulness of the FLIR ONE in assessing burn depth and predicting healing time when compared to the LDI. How was the work conducted? Forty-five adult patients who sustained a burn injury within the last five days were imaged with both the FLIR ONE and LDI. Those with infected, electrical or chemical burns were excluded. Healing potential was determined by comparing the temperature of the burn wound with normal skin for the FLIR ONE and by changes in wound blood flow with the LDI. Healing potential was categorised into wounds healing in less than and over 21 days. The correlation between the temperature changes of the burn wound and healing time was evaluated for the FLIR ONE. What we learned from the study This study was able to demonstrate that the FLIR ONE showed a significant correlation between the temperature difference between the burn wound and normal skin with healing times. When compared with the LDI, the FLIR ONE was useful in predicting if a burn wound will heal in less than 21 days. The FLIR ONE has advantages over the LDI, it is low cost, portable and produces instantaneous images. Ultimately, this developing technology may increase access to higher standard burn care in centres where LDI is not affordable.

BACKGROUND: Pulsed Dye Laser (PDL) is the treatment of choice of Port Wine Stains (PWS). Laser Doppler Imaging (LDI) has been used to evaluate the effectiveness of this treatment. In a previous study, we demonstrated that LDI allows an objective evaluation. The purpose of this study is to investigate if reducing the delay between two laser sessions could improve the clinical outcome.
METHODS: This prospective study was conducted from September 2015 to November 2017. Three Laser sessions were performed every month in twenty patients with PWS. The PWS response was assessed by LDI after each session and at the end of the third one. The present study was compared to the first one.
RESULTS: The LDI confirmed the efficacy of PDL treatment with an average blanching rate of 26.7 %. The response is statistically significant after each session. When we compare both studies, there is an average decrease in vascularization of 0.42 for the first study and 0.50 for the present one.
CONCLUSIONS: This study allows us to validate the use of LDI for the numerical evaluation of PDL effect on PWS in children. However, we cannot confirm that reducing the interval between laser sessions could improve therapeutic outcomes.
METHODS: Treatment Study Level II (Prospective Comparative Study).

Although postpartum sexual concerns are common, limited data exist on postpartum sexual response. Furthermore, the physiological process of vaginal birth may negatively impact genital response compared with unlabored cesarean section (C-section), but this hypothesis has yet to be tested.
To (i) compare genital and subjective sexual response and sexual concordance by mode of delivery with inclusion of a control group, (ii) compare groups on self-reported sexual function over the past month, (iii) examine the relationship between laboratory measurement of sexual response and self-reported sexual function, and (iv) investigate association between obstetrical factors and breastfeeding and between sexual response and self-reported sexual function.
3 groups of cisgender women were recruited from the community: primiparous women who delivered via vaginal birth within the past 2 years (VB group; n = 16), primiparous women who delivered via unlabored C-section within the past 2 years (CS group, n = 15), and age-matched nulliparous women (NP group, n = 18). Laser Doppler imaging was used to assess genital response while participants watched a neutral and erotic film.
The main outcome measures were change in flux units from neural to erotic video as a measure of genital response, subjective sexual arousal rated continuously throughout films, perceived genital response rated after films, and Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI).
Women in the VB group had significantly lower change in flux units than women in the CS (P = .005, d = 1.39) and NP (P < .001, d = 1.80) groups. Groups did not differ on their subjective indices of sexual response or in sexual concordance. Women in both postpartum groups reported lower FSFI scores than women in the NP group. No relationship was determined between FSFI scores and sexual response in the laboratory. Results suggested that genital trauma and breastfeeding may negatively impact FSFI scores, but they were not related to genital response or subjective sexual arousal as measured in the laboratory.
Results underscore the importance of balancing objective and subjective indices of sexual response and function, especially considering the biopsychosocial nature of postpartum sexuality.
The present study is the first to apply modern sexual psychophysiological methodology to the study of postpartum sexuality. Cross-sectional methodology limits the ability to make causal inferences, and the strict inclusion criteria limits generalizability.
Physiological changes as a result of labor and delivery may have a detrimental impact on genital response; however, these physiological differences may not impact women\'s subjective experience of postpartum sexuality. Cappell J, Bouchard KN, Chamberlain SM, et al. Is Mode of Delivery Associated With Sexual Response? A Pilot Study of Genital and Subjective Sexual Arousal in Primiparous Women With Vaginal or Cesarean Section Births. J Sex Med 2020; 17:257-272.

The accurate assessment of burn depth is challenging but crucial for surgical excision and tissue preservation. Laser Doppler Imaging (LDI) has gained increasing acceptance as a tool to aid depth assessment but its adoption is hampered by high costs, long scan times and limited portability. Thermal imaging is touted as a suitable alternative however few comparison studies have been done.
Sixteen burn patients with 52 regions of interests were analysed. Burn depth was determined using four methods LDI, thermal imaging, photographic and real-time clinical evaluation at day 1 and day 3. LDI flux and Delta T values were used for the prediction of outcomes (wound closure in <21 days). Photographic clinical evaluation of burn depth was performed by 4 blinded burn surgeons.
Accuracy of assessment methods were greater on post burn day 3 compared to day 0. Accuracies of LDI on post burn day 0 and 3 were 80.8% and 92.3% compared to 55.8% and 71.2% for thermal imaging and 62.5% and 71.6% for photographic clinical assessment. Real-time clinical examination had an accuracy of 88.5%. Thermal imaging scan times were significantly faster compared to LDI.
LDI outperforms thermal imaging in terms of diagnostic accuracy of burn depth likely due to the susceptibility of thermal imaging to environmental factors.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to monitor blood perfusion dynamics of port wine stains (PWS) during vascular targeted photodynamic therapy (V-PDT) with laser Doppler imaging (LDI).
METHODS: The PWS lesions of 30 facial PWS patients received V-PDT, while the normal skins on the forearm of 5 healthy subjects were treated as light-only controls for comparison. Furthermore, two different PWS lesions in the same individual from each of 3 PWS patients successively received laser irradiation only and V-PDT, respectively. LDI was used to monitor intraoperative blood perfusion dynamics.
RESULTS: During V-PDT, the blood perfusion (278±96 PU) in PWS lesions for 31 of 33 PWS patients significantly increased after the initiation of V-PDT treatment, then reached a peak (638±105 PU) within 10min, followed by a slow decrease to a relatively lower level (515±100 PU). Furthermore, the time for reaching peak and the subsequent magnitude of decrease in blood perfusion varied with different patients. For light-only controls, an initial perfusion peak at 3min followed by a nadir and a secondary increase were found not only in normal skin, but also in PWS lesions.
CONCLUSIONS: The preliminary results showed that the LDI permits non-invasive monitoring blood perfusion changes of PWS lesions during V-PDT. There was a clear trend in blood perfusion responses during V-PDT and laser irradiation. The blood perfusion changes during treatment were due to V-PDT effects as well as local temperature increase induced by laser irradiation.

BACKGROUND: Studies comparing contemporary silver dressings in burns are scarce.
METHODS: In a prospective, randomized, controlled study, counting 50 patients/research group, we compared two frequently used silver dressings, Acticoat™ and Aquacel(®) Ag, in the management of partial thickness burns with a predicted healing time between 7 and 21 days as assessed by laser Doppler imaging between 48 and 72h after burn. Variables investigated were related to baseline research group characteristics, wound healing, bacteriology, economics, nurse, and patient experience.
RESULTS: Both research groups were comparably composed taking into account gender, age and burn characteristics. Similar results were obtained as to healing time and bacterial control with both silver dressings. A statistically significant difference in favor of the Aquacel(®) Ag dressing was found for average ease of use (p<0.001), average ease of application (p=0.001), patient pain (p<0.001), patient comfort with the dressing (p=0.017), silver staining (p<0.001), and cost effectiveness (p<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Both silver dressings resulted in comparable healing times and bacterial control but the Aquacel(®) Ag dressing significantly increased comfort for patients as well as nurses and was significantly more cost-effective than the Acticoat™ dressing for the given indication.