Right sided posterior diaphragmatic hernias are a rare diagnosis, especially in adult populations. This patient presented with right thoracic pain for 20 years before investigation. Imaging has provided an accurate diagnosis in this case. Repair can be done safely laparoscopically.

Morgagni hernia (MH), also known as a retrosternal or parasternal hernia, is a rare type of congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) characterized by a defect in the anterior diaphragm. Patients with late-diagnosed MH typically present with vague gastrointestinal or respiratory symptoms. In some instances, MH is incidentally identified through chest X-rays performed for other reasons, such as foreign body ingestion, as illustrated in our presented case. We present a case of a delayed congenital diaphragmatic hernia of the Morgagni type in a two-year-old boy with a history of foreign body ingestion and severe abdominal pain. Diagnostic imaging, including chest radiograph and computed tomography (CT) scan, confirmed the diaphragmatic defect. Surgical repair, performed laparoscopically, resulted in an uncomplicated postoperative course and a favorable long-term outcome.

Femoral hernias have a high incarceration rate, often necessitating urgent surgical intervention. In this report, we present a safe and reproducible laparoscopic technique for incarcerated femoral hernias with bowel involvement, including repair. Between December 2022 and May 2023, three female patients with incarcerated femoral hernias underwent urgent laparoscopic surgery. All patients presented with abdominal pain and were diagnosed with small bowel incarceration using computed tomography. Under laparoscopy, we confirmed intestinal incarceration and performed a standard transabdominal preperitoneal approach to identify the hernia defects. The iliopubic tract on the abdominal side of the hernia defect was carefully dissected using an energy device to enlarge the hernia orifice. A spontaneous reduction of the incarcerated intestine was achieved. After confirming the absence of bowel perforation, mesh was placed to repair the hernia. Following peritoneal closure, the affected part of the intestine was extracorporeally resected and anastomosed. We performed this technique on three patients, all of whom were later discharged without complications. In conclusion, for incarcerated femoral hernias with bowel obstruction, laparoscopic partial division of the iliopubic tract enables an easy, safe, and reproducible approach to incarceration release and subsequent hernia repair.

We report a case of a Morgagni hernia repaired by primary closure with an extra-abdominal suture. Moreover, we reviewed cases of laparoscopically repaired Morgagni hernia, in which the size of the hernia defect was known, to establish a size criterion for mesh utilization. An 87-year-old woman presented to our hospital with right upper abdominal pain and vomiting. She had no history of abdominal surgery or trauma. Chest radiography and computed tomography (CT) revealed a Morgagni hernia, with the stomach and transverse colon herniated into the right chest cavity. Initially, an endoscopic repair was performed for the herniated stomach due to her age, which was successful. However, she had a recurrence 2 days later, prompting us to perform a semi-emergent laparoscopic surgery. Laparoscopic examination revealed a Morgagni defect, with the omentum, transverse colon, and stomach herniated, with the stomach reduced by pneumoperitoneum. Fortunately, the herniated organs could be easily relocated into the abdomen with no adhesions. The hernia defect measured 6 x 3 cm. We performed primary closure with an extra-abdominal suture. No sac resection was performed. The operation lasted 98 min. Oral intake was initiated on postoperative day 1, and the patient was discharged on postoperative day 3 without complications. Chest radiography and CT scans at 1 month postoperatively showed no recurrence, and the patient remained asymptomatic at the 9-month follow-up examination. According to our review findings, primary closure is an efficient method for small hernia defects (rule of thumb: width, <4 cm; length, <7 cm).

暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: Ventral hernia repair underwent various developments in the previous decade. Laparoscopic primary ventral hernia repair may be an alternative to open repair since it prevents large abdominal incisions. However, whether laparoscopy improves clinical outcomes has not been systematically assessed.
OBJECTIVE: The aim is to compare the clinical outcomes of the laparoscopic versus open approach of primary ventral hernias.
METHODS: A systematic search of MEDLINE (PubMed), Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was conducted in February 2023. All randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopy with the open approach in patients with a primary ventral hernia were included. A fixed-effects meta-analysis of risk ratios was performed for hernia recurrence, local infection, wound dehiscence, and local seroma. Meta-analysis for weighted mean differences was performed for postoperative pain, duration of surgery, length of hospital stay, and time until return to work.
RESULTS: Nine studies were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. The overall hernia recurrence was twice less likely to occur in laparoscopy (RR = 0.49; 95%CI = 0.32-0.74; p < 0.001; I2 = 29%). Local infection (RR = 0.30; 95%CI = 0.19-0.49; p < 0.001; I2 = 0%), wound dehiscence (RR = 0.08; 95%CI = 0.02-0.32; p < 0.001; I2 = 0%), and local seroma (RR = 0.34; 95%CI = 0.19-0.59; p < 0.001; I2 = 14%) were also significantly less likely in patients undergoing laparoscopy. Severe heterogeneity was obtained when pooling data on postoperative pain, duration of surgery, length of hospital stay, and time until return to work.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of available studies are controversial and have a high risk of bias, small sample sizes, and no well-defined protocols. However, the laparoscopic approach seems associated with a lower frequency of hernia recurrence, local infection, wound dehiscence, and local seroma.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to perform a meta-analysis comparing the short-term and long-term outcomes in laparoscopic groin hernia repair with or without preservation of the uterine round ligament (URL) in females.
METHODS: We searched several databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and and CNKI databases. This meta-analysis included randomized clinical trials, and retrospective comparative studies regarding preservation or division of the URL in laparoscopic groin hernia repair in females. Outcomes of interest were age, BMI, type of hernia, type of surgery, operating time, estimated blood loss, time of hospitalization, seroma, concomitant injury, mesh infection, recurrence, uterine prolapse, foreign body sensation, chronic pain, and pregnancy. Meta-analyses and trial sequential analysis were performed with Review Manager v5.3 and TSA software, respectively.
RESULTS: Of 192 potentially eligible articles, 9 studies with 1104 participants met the eligibility criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. There were no significant difference in age (MD-6.58, 95% CI - 13.41 to 0.24; P = 0.06), BMI (MD 0.05, 95%CI - 0.31 to 0.40; P = 0.81), blood loss (MD-0.04, 95% CI - 0.75 to 0.66; P = 0.90), time of hospitalization (MD-0.22, 95% CI-1.13 to 0.69; P = 0.64), seroma (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.41 to 1.24; P = 0.23), concomitant injury (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.01 to 8.24; P = 0.68), mesh infection (OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.01 to 2.61; P = 0.18), recurrence (OR 1.13, 95% CI 0.18 to 7.25; P = 0.90), uterine prolapse(OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.07 to 6.94; P = 0.77), foreign body sensation (OR 1.95, 95% CI 0.53 to 7.23; P = 0.32) and chronic pain(OR 1.03 95% CI 0.4 to 2.69; P = 0.95). However, this meta-analysis demonstrated a statistically significant difference in operating time (MD 6.62, 95% CI 2.20 to 11.04; P = 0.0003) between the preservation group and division group. Trial sequential analysis showed that the cumulative Z value of the operating time crossed the traditional boundary value and the TSA boundary value in the third study, and the cumulative sample size had reached the required information size (RIS), indicating that the current conclusion was stable.
CONCLUSIONS: In summary, laparoscopic groin hernia repair in women with the preservation of the round uterine ligament requires a longer operating time, but there was no advantage in short-term or long-term complications, and there was no clear evidence on whether it causes infertility and uterine prolapse.

A Morgagni hernia is a congenital diaphragmatic hernia that is rarely diagnosed in adults, and the technique for its repair has not yet been standardized. This review will give an overview of the different laparoscopic methods reported by other authors, highlighting the key points indicating a good repair to help standardize the technique. A systematic review of the available articles on PubMed was conducted according to PRISMA 2020 by two authors independently in May 2022. Only articles written in English were included. A total of 180 case reports of laparoscopic Morgagni\'s hernia repair procedures were found; direct repair was performed in 59 patients, mesh was used in 119 patients, and mesh was not used in 2 patients. The hernia sac was removed in 71 patients, and the defect was closed before mesh placement in 49 patients. Nonabsorbable, dual or biologic mesh was used. The mean operative time was 92.65 min for direct repair and 84.11 min for mesh repair. One recurrence was reported in the direct repair series. The optimal method of repair has not yet been identified. The laparoscopic approach is associated to fewer complications and facilitates a faster recovery than the open approach. Several manoeuvres have been reported to help surgeons, who are not trained in laparoscopic knotting, perform extracorporeal knotting. Mesh should be placed when tension is too high after a direct repair or when primary closure cannot be achieved.

Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair is increasingly performed worldwide and expected to be superior to conventional open repair regarding hospital stay and quality of life (QoL). The INCisional Hernia-Trial was designed to test this hypothesis.
A multicenter parallel randomized controlled open-label trial with a superiority design was conducted in six hospitals in the Netherlands. Patients with primary or recurrent incisional hernias were randomized by computer-guided block-randomization to undergo either conventional open or laparoscopic repair. Primary endpoint was postoperative length of hospital stay in days. Secondary endpoints included QoL, complications, and recurrences. Patients were followed up for at least 5 years.
Hundred-and-two patients were recruited and randomized. In total, 88 patients underwent surgery and were included in the intention-to-treat analysis (44 in the open group, 44 in the laparoscopic group). Mean age was 59.5 years, gender division was equal, and BMI was 28.8 kg/m. The trial was concluded early for futility after an unplanned interim analysis, which showed that the hypothesis needed to be rejected. There was no difference in primary outcome: length of hospital stay was 3 (range 1-36) days in the open group and 3 (range 1-12) days in the laparoscopic group (p = 0.481). There were no significant between-group differences in QoL questionnaires on the short and long term. Satisfaction was impaired in the open group. Overall recurrence rate was 19%, of which 16% in the open and 23% in the laparoscopic group (p = 0.25) at a mean follow-up of 6.6 years.
In a randomized controlled trial, short- and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic incisional hernia repair were not superior to open surgery. The persisting high recurrence rates, reduced QoL, and suboptimal satisfaction warrant the need for patient\'s expectation management in the preoperative process and individualized surgical management.
Netherlands Trial Register NTR2808.

OBJECTIVE: The advantage of using the single-port technique over the conventional two-port approach is uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of a single-port laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (SLPEC) using a modified needle grasper in children and compare the results to those of two-port laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (TLPEC).
METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis of SLPEC and TLPEC surgery from February 2016 to June 2021 was conducted at our institution. Pediatric patients underwent SLPEC using the modified needle grasper to complete the high ligation of the hernia sac, while operations in the conventional two-port group only used regular laparoscopic instruments. A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used to reduce selection bias.
RESULTS: Of 1320 patients, 1169 were included in the single-port/two-port crude evaluation, with 930 in the PSM cohort (465 patients/arm). Among 1:1 matched patients, the operation time for single-port patients vs. two-port patients were 11.28 ± 3.98 vs. 15.47 ± 4.54 min for unilateral repair and 16.86 ± 4.59 vs. 20.40 ± 4.29 min for bilateral repair (p < .05). Cosmetic results did not differ between the SLPEC and TLPEC groups (0% vs. 0.7%, p = 0.249). The recurrence rates were comparable between the two groups (0.6% vs. 1.1%, p = 0.725). Moreover, the differences in surgical site infection (SSI), testicular atrophy, open conversion and postoperative hydrocele occurrence were insignificant between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort study, the modified needle grasper is a safe and feasible instrument for SLPEC, and SLPEC using the needle grasper has a shorter operation time than TLPEC.