Intrastromal antibiotic injections are a type of treatment that can be very useful in bacterial keratitis refractory to topical antibiotics. We present the case of a 44-year-old woman with an infiltrate in a laser in situ keratomiuleusis (LASIK) flap and growth of Achromobacter xylosoxidans, who was treated with topical ceftazidime for 1 month. However, after discontinuation of the antibiotic, there was a worsening with growth of the same germ. Topical treatment was reintroduced and, due to suspicion of germ reservoir, it was decided to give three cycles of intrastromal ceftazidime injections, the last one also with moxifloxacin, with good results. After 4 months asymptomatic and without treatment at the moment, no signs of recurrence have been observed. This case supports the usefulness of intraestromal injections in refractory cases to the topical medication.

UNASSIGNED: To describe a case of bilateral interface fluid formation 2 years after laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery caused by the side effect of amantadine.
UNASSIGNED: A 47-year-old male patient with a history of Parkinson\'s disease treated with amantadine who had uneventful LASIK surgery in both eyes 2 years ago, presented with a decline in vision over the past 6 weeks. Results: Best corrected vision was 20/200 and 20/400 in the right and left eye respectively. Intraocular pressures were measured within the normal range. Biomicroscopic exam showed bilateral corneal edema. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) revealed fluid accumulation within the LASIK flap interface in both corneas. The patient\'s corneal edema and fluid in the interface began to gradually resolve, and vision improved 2 weeks after discontinuing amantadine.
UNASSIGNED: Although there is no previous report, it is possible that amantadine may cause interface fluid formation in patients with LASIK surgery.

Epithelial ingrowth is a rare condition that is generally seen after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and has been reported in the literature in a small number of cases after small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) surgery. \"Epithelial inoculation\" should also be considered in patients presenting with decreased vision and an appearance similar to epithelial ingrowth in the early period after SMILE surgery. A 23-year-old woman presented to our clinic with a request for refractive surgery. Her manifest refractions were -7.50 -1.00 x 180° in the right eye and -7.25 -1.00 x 150° in the left eye, and best corrected distance visual acuity was 10/10 in both eyes. The SMILE procedure was performed with the Visumax femtosecond laser (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG). Slit-lamp examination at postoperative 1 week revealed a small grayish-white intrastromal opacity resembling epithelial ingrowth in the central optic axis of the right eye. Irrigation of the interface was performed with balanced salt solution using an irrigation cannula and the epithelial cluster was removed. The patient remained clinically stable 6 months after surgery and has experienced no recurrence. When epithelial inoculation is observed early after SMILE surgery, immediate irrigation of the interface appears to be an effective and safe treatment.

The prevalence of high myopia is rising globally. In addition to an increased risk of retinal detachment, high myopia is associated with earlier cataract formation. Patients with myopia are also often more motivated to become spectacle-independent after a lens procedure. However, the use of multifocal intraocular lens (MfIOL) remains controversial for patients with extreme myopia, which is classified as patients with an axial length >28 mm. Here, we present the case of a 64-year-old patient with visually significant cataract and extreme axial myopia >31 mm in both eyes who desired to be spectacle-independent. A preoperative workup revealed a normal macula with peripheral lattice degeneration. On optical coherence tomography, the macula had a normal fovea contour without the presence of a staphyloma. A thorough peripheral examination was performed by a retina specialist which required no prophylactic treatment. Pentacam analysis demonstrated a low spherical aberration and minimal ectasia risk. Cataract surgery was uneventful with a 5 mm laser capsulotomy centered over the visual axis with the placement of a trifocal intraocular lens. Two months after the cataract surgery, the remaining refractive error was corrected with a laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis enhancement. The patient achieved an uncorrected distance visual acuity of 20/15- and uncorrected near visual acuity of J1+ in both eyes. Overall, this case report and review aims to highlight important preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative techniques to improve patient outcomes with MfIOL in patients with extreme myopia.

UNASSIGNED: To present a case of late-onset interface fluid syndrome (IFS) and a literature review on this rare clinical entity.
UNASSIGNED: IFS is an uncommon complication of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). Although generally appearing in the early postoperative period, IFS has been reported even years after LASIK.
UNASSIGNED: A case report of IFS manifesting 19 years after uneventful LASIK, which prompted a literature search for similar, late-onset cases in MEDLINE PubMed. This article reports on a case of IFS appearing 19 years after LASIK surgery, including extensive patient history and analytical presentation of clinical findings, ancillary testing, and short-term follow-up. Furthermore, a literature search for similar cases was performed on MEDLINE, focusing on the etiology and management of late-onset IFS.
UNASSIGNED: Through thorough ancillary testing, the interface fluid was attributed to elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) arising from primary open-angle glaucoma. Antiglaucoma drops resulted in complete fluid regression. A narrative review was conducted based on the 29 case reports that were recovered from the literature search.
UNASSIGNED: IFS represents an uncommon complication that could appear years after LASIK. Careful clinical examination and anterior segment optical coherence tomography promote early diagnosis. Similar cases may manifest due to elevated IOP of variable etiology or as a result of endothelial dysfunction. Depending on the etiology, IOP control or keratoplasty may resolve the condition.

UNASSIGNED: To report a case of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) for the management of post-laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) interface fluid syndrome (IFS) secondary to failed Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) graft, and to provide a literature review on endothelial keratoplasty (EK) for this indication.
UNASSIGNED: A 52-year-old patient presented with LASIK interface fluid accumulation and a non-functioning primary DSAEK graft. Past ophthalmic history was relevant for: (1) phakic intraocular lens (PIOL) implantation with later refinement by LASIK; (2) combined PIOL explantation and refractive lens exchange due to accelerated endothelial cell loss (ECL); (3) primary DSAEK due to corneal decompensation.A secondary EK graft (DMEK) was performed, and the patient was prospectively followed for 6 months (M6). DMEK surgery was uneventful, without postoperative graft detachment. Corneal clearing and resolution of interface fluid accumulation occurred during the first postoperative month. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improved from 20/800 Snellen to 20/25 Snellen at 3-month follow-up, remaining stable at M6. Due to a persistent rise in intraocular pressure (IOP), the patient underwent uneventful non-penetrating deep sclerectomy 2 months after DMEK, with controlled IOP and without accelerated ECL.
UNASSIGNED: DMEK is feasible, effective, and safe in the management of IFS in cases where corneal endothelial failure plays a major role, even in complex eyes with previous EK grafts. Aggressive postoperative IOP control is warranted to decrease the risk of interface fluid recurrence and damage to the optic nerve. Studies with larger patient numbers are encouraged to ascertain the role of EK for this indication.

BACKGROUND: Transient dry eye symptoms have been reported following laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). Very rarely, patients may present with debilitating symptoms of dry eye syndrome (DES) with limited or no evidence of ocular surface disease. These patients are diagnosed with a form of DES known as neuropathic corneal pain (NCP).
METHODS: This study is a retrospective medical record review of a case series of 18 patients who developed NCP post-LASIK over the years 1996-2021. All patients who developed severe ocular pain following LASIK consistent with NCP were included. Patients with severe ocular pain who had evidence of severe ocular surface disease or other ophthalmic etiology to explain their debilitating symptoms were not included.
RESULTS: The average age of patients in our study was 39.5 years. The majority of our patients were female (72.2%) and of Caucasian ancestry (83.3%). The average onset of symptoms was 9.6 months post-LASIK. Patients had past medical histories significant for neuropsychiatric conditions (50%), functional pain syndromes (22.2%), autoimmune diseases (33.3%), and hypothyroidism (27.8%), and the occurrence of these was higher than the national prevalence of these diseases. Symptoms were consistent with the severity and characteristics defining NCP. Treatment was multimodal, involved topical and systemic therapies, and was unique to each patient. Overall, the majority of patients had clinical improvement in symptoms following treatment with regular follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Although rare, the 26-year prevalence of NCP post-LASIK in our study was roughly 1 in 900 cases. The mean time to onset after surgery was delayed at 9.6 months. Certain risk factors such as neuropsychiatric conditions, history of functional pain syndromes, history of autoimmune conditions, and hypothyroidism may predispose patients to the development of this condition. Patients benefited from proper diagnosis and a multimodal approach to treatment.

UNASSIGNED: To describe in detail the technique used and results of disruption of ingrown epithelium via Nd:YAG laser (DIEYAG) after LASIK treatment and enhancement.
UNASSIGNED: Epithelial ingrowth following laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) enhancement has the potential to cause significant refractive error and discomfort when allowed to progress. This retrospective case series following seven eyes after LASIK enhancement and one eye with flap trauma, assessed the effectiveness and safety of the disruption of ingrown epithelium via Nd:YAG laser. In all cases, we found that the progression of ingrown epithelium was eliminated. Using best spectacle corrected visual acuity and topography as our main outcome measures, we found that refractive error and visual disturbance caused by ingrowth stabilized or improved, with no subsequent complications identified.
UNASSIGNED: The disruption of ingrown epithelium via Nd:YAG laser offers a safe and effective alternative to other treatments for epithelial ingrowth after LASIK treatment and enhancement.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether manifest refractive astigmatism (RA) or anterior corneal astigmatism (CA) is the best value for excimer laser programming in cases of ocular residual astigmatism (ORA).
METHODS: Patients who had undergone LASIK surgery with a disagreement between manifest refractive and corneal cylinder (ocular residual astigmatism ORA)>0.75 D were included retrospectively in this study. We calculated target induced astigmatism vector (TIA), surgically induced astigmatism vector (SIA), difference vector between the astigmatism correction programmed in the excimer laser and refractive astigmatism (DVRA), difference vector between the astigmatism correction programmed in the excimer laser and corneal astigmatism (DVCA) and difference vector between TIA and SIA (DV), by the Alpins method. Vectorial differences between DV and DVRA, and between DV and DVCA, were then calculated to determine whether RA or CA was closest to the ideal cylinder for laser programming.
RESULTS: Of a total of 104 eyes undergoing LASIK, 22 eyes of 12 patients (21.1%) had an ORA>0.75 D and were included. Mean ORA was 0.9±0.2 D and mean postoperative subjective cylinder was 0.45 D. The DV-DVRA difference vector was 0.57±0.2 D, and the DV-DVCA difference vector was 0.86±0.4 D (P=0.02). RA was closer than CA to the ideal astigmatism correction.
CONCLUSIONS: In cases of discrepancy between manifest astigmatism and corneal astigmatism, correction of manifest refractive astigmatism seems to give a better refractive result.

A 24-year-old female underwent small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for myopic astigmatism OU. In the left eye, cap-lenticular adhesion along with tearing of the cap occurred, resulting in a gaped incision and transverse striae involving the visual axis on the first post op day. Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) was 20/32. The case was managed with interface wash and stretching of the cap, in order to iron out the striae. Post intervention, the UDVA improved to 20/20, striae resolved, and interface remained clear through a follow-up of nine months, suggesting that cap striae in SMILE may be similarly managed as the flap striae in laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), resulting in satisfactory visual outcomes.