亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)是一个全球性的公共卫生问题,对数百万妇女的身心健康造成严重影响。司法系统主要通过刑事司法系统在应对IPV方面发挥着关键作用,家庭法,和/或儿童福利司法管辖区。然而,与法律系统互动的受害者/幸存者报告负面经历。奖学金研究不足的领域是司法行为者了解IPV对受害者/幸存者的心理健康影响以及他们如何在实践中应用这些知识的程度。这项范围审查旨在确定和综合现有的学者对司法行为者对IPV对女性幸存者的心理健康影响的理解。我们搜索了10个数据库(Medline,Scopus,PubMed,PsycINFO,EMBASE,Westlaw,HeinOnline,Cochrane图书馆,和JoannaBriggs图书馆数据库),用于2000年至2023年之间发表的研究。共有27项研究纳入审查。我们确定了五个主要主题,包括:对幸存者经历的认识,司法行为者知识的差距,了解犯罪者的战术和危险因素,披露心理健康问题,培训,和指导。审查强调了司法行为者对这一问题的理解方面的重大差距,并建议了提高司法行为者对IPV的认识和理解的战略。调查结果可用于证明未来的研究,以更好地了解司法行为者的培训和发展需求,以提高他们对IPV的动态和影响的认识,并提出政策和实践建议,以建设司法工作人员的能力。
Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a global public health issue that has grave physical and mental health consequences for millions of women. The judicial system plays a critical role in responding to IPV principally through the criminal justice system, family law, and/or child welfare jurisdictions. However, victims/survivors who interact with the legal system report negative experiences. An under-researched area of scholarship is the degree to which judicial actors understand the mental health impacts of IPV on victims/survivors and how they apply that knowledge in practice. This scoping
review aimed to identify and synthesize existing scholarship on judicial actors\' understanding of the mental health impacts of IPV on women survivors. We searched 10 databases (Medline, Scopus, PubMed, PsycINFO, EMBASE, Westlaw, HeinOnline, the Cochrane Library, and the Joanna Briggs Library databases) for studies published between 2000 and 2023. A total of 27 studies were included in the
review. We identified five main themes, including: awareness of survivors\' experiences, gap in judicial actors\' knowledge, understanding of perpetrator tactics and risk factors, disclosing mental health problems, training, and guidance. The
review highlights significant gaps in judicial actors\' understanding of this issue and recommends strategies to increase the awareness and understanding of IPV among judicial actors. The findings can be used to justify future research to better understand the training and development needs of judicial actors to improve their level of awareness of the dynamics and impact of IPV and to make policy and practice recommendations to build the capacity of the judicial workforce.