大众媒体可能会通过加强常见的陈规定型观念来增加对有心理健康问题的人的污名。因此,媒体专业人员代表了反污名干预的目标群体。本文旨在回顾有关大众媒体专业人士的反污名干预措施的可用文献,寻求澄清什么样的干预措施被发现有效地减少大众媒体专业人员的心理健康污名。
六个电子数据库(MEDLINE,PsycINFO,Embase,Cochrane审查图书馆和Cochrane中央控制试验登记册,WebofScience,和应用社会科学指数和摘要)在2017年3月之前进行了系统搜索,以研究针对大众媒体专业人员的反污名干预措施。结果:共发现27项针对媒体专业人士的反污名干预研究。审查的文章分为3类:媒体监测项目/报告指南(n=23),教育记者的干预措施(n=2),和教育新闻专业学生的干预措施(n=2)。总的来说,对媒体专业人士的反污名干预似乎对改善报道风格有一些影响,因此,对有精神健康问题的人提供了更平衡的描述:最有希望的干预措施是基于接触的教育方法和权威机构提供的指导方针。
促进和传播针对记者的基于接触的教育干预措施,并在新闻专业学生的培训课程中包括有关心理健康主题的特定模块,这应该是有用的。然而,由于该领域的研究受到一些限制,需要开展高质量的研究,探索反污名干预对媒体专业人士的长期影响.
The mass media may increase stigma against people with mental health problems by reinforcing common stereotypes. Media professionals thus represent a target group for antistigma interventions. This paper aims to
review available literature on antistigma interventions for mass media professionals, seeking to clarify what kind of interventions have been found to be effective in reducing mental health stigma among mass media professionals.
Six electronic databases (MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase, Cochrane Reviews Library and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts) were systematically searched through March 2017 for studies addressing antistigma interventions on mass media professionals. Results: A total of 27 studies on antistigma interventions targeted to media professionals were found. Reviewed articles were classified into 3 categories: media-monitoring projects/reporting guidelines ( n = 23), interventions for educating journalists ( n = 2), and interventions for educating
journalism students ( n = 2). Overall, antistigma interventions for media professionals seem to have some effect in improving reporting style, thus providing a more balanced portrayal of people with mental health problems: the most promising interventions are contact-based educational approaches and the provision of guidelines by authoritative institutions.
It should be useful to promote and disseminate contact-based educational interventions targeted to journalists and to include specific modules on mental health topics in the training curricula of
journalism students. However, as research in the field suffers from several limitations, high-quality studies exploring the long-term effect of antistigma interventions for media professionals are needed.