Intratumoral immunotherapy

肿瘤内免疫治疗
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:放疗(RT)与免疫检查点阻断(ICB)协同作用。肿瘤微环境中的CD1c(BDCA-1)/CD141(BDCA-3)髓样树突状细胞(myDC)在启动效应T细胞反应和对ICB的反应中是必不可少的。
    方法:在这项II期临床试验中,抗PD-1ICB预处理的寡转移患者(肿瘤无关者)接受了白细胞去除术,然后分离CD1c(BDCA-1)+/CD141(BDCA-3)+myDC.在低分割立体定向体RT(3×8Gy)之后,患者被随机分组(3:1).分别,在手臂A(立即治疗),肿瘤内(IT)ipilimumab(10mg)和avelumab(40mg)联合静脉(IV)pembrolizumab(200mg),然后IT注射myDC;随后,继续静脉注射派姆单抗和ITipilimumab/avelumab(q3W)。在B臂(当代控制臂)中,患者接受静脉注射pembrolizumab,有可能在进展中交叉。主要终点是1年无进展生存率(PFS)。次要终点是安全性,可行性,客观反应率,PFS,总生存率(OS)。
    结果:13例患者(A组10例,八种非小细胞肺癌,和五个黑色素瘤)被登记。两个病人交叉。A臂的一年PFS率为10%,B臂为0%。一名患者获得了稳定的疾病作为最佳反应。在B臂,一名患者获得了SD。中位PFS和OS分别为21.8周(A组)和24.9周(B组),和62.7对57.9周,分别。医源性气胸是唯一的3级治疗相关不良事件。
    结论:SBRT和派姆单抗联合或不联合ITavelumab/ipilimumab和ITmyDC在寡转移患者中是安全可行的,具有临床意义的肿瘤反应率。然而,该研究未能达到主要终点.
    背景:临床试验:NCT04571632(2020年8月9日)。
    2019-003668-32。注册日期:2019年12月17日,2021年3月1:6日,2022年2月2:4日。
    BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy (RT) synergizes with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). CD1c(BDCA-1)+/CD141(BDCA-3)+ myeloid dendritic cells (myDC) in the tumor microenvironment are indispensable at initiating effector T-cell responses and response to ICB.
    METHODS: In this phase II clinical trial, anti-PD-1 ICB pretreated oligometastatic patients (tumor agnostic) underwent a leukapheresis followed by isolation of CD1c(BDCA-1)+/CD141(BDCA-3)+ myDC. Following hypofractionated stereotactic body RT (3 × 8 Gy), patients were randomized (3:1). Respectively, in arm A (immediate treatment), intratumoral (IT) ipilimumab (10 mg) and avelumab (40 mg) combined with intravenous (IV) pembrolizumab (200 mg) were administered followed by IT injection of myDC; subsequently, IV pembrolizumab and IT ipilimumab/avelumab were continued (q3W). In arm B (contemporary control arm), patients received IV pembrolizumab, with possibility to cross-over at progression. Primary endpoint was 1-year progression-free survival rate (PFS). Secondary endpoints were safety, feasibility, objective response rate, PFS, and overall survival (OS).
    RESULTS: Thirteen patients (10 in arm A, eight non-small cell lung cancer, and five melanoma) were enrolled. Two patients crossed over. One-year PFS rate was 10% in arm A and 0% in arm B. Two patients in arm A obtained a partial response, and one patient obtained a stable disease as best response. In arm B, one patient obtained a SD. Median PFS and OS were 21.8 weeks (arm A) versus 24.9 (arm B), and 62.7 versus 57.9 weeks, respectively. An iatrogenic pneumothorax was the only grade 3 treatment-related adverse event.
    CONCLUSIONS: SBRT and pembrolizumab with or without IT avelumab/ipilimumab and IT myDC in oligometastatic patients are safe and feasible with a clinically meaningful tumor response rate. However, the study failed to reach its primary endpoint.
    BACKGROUND: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04571632 (09 AUG 2020).
    UNASSIGNED: 2019-003668-32. Date of registration: 17 DEC 2019, amendment 1: 6 MAR 2021, amendment 2: 4 FEB 2022.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial, Phase I
    日本血凝病毒(HVJ;仙台病毒)是具有细胞融合活性的RNA病毒。HVJ-包膜(HVJ-E)是UV照射的HVJ颗粒,其失去病毒复制和蛋白质合成活性,但保留细胞融合活性。我们最近报道了HVJ-E对几种类型的肿瘤具有抗肿瘤作用。这里,我们描述了在晚期黑色素瘤患者中进行的首次人类I/IIa期研究的结果,接受HVJ-E的瘤内给药主要目的是评估HVJ-E的安全性和耐受性,次要目的是检查客观的肿瘤反应和抗肿瘤免疫。纳入6例IIIC或IV期进行性恶性黑色素瘤皮肤或淋巴转移患者。患者分为两组(每组3例),并接受低剂量和高剂量的HVJ-E。六名患者中有五名完成了4周的随访评估;一名患者因进行性疾病而停止治疗。在6个注射靶病变中的3个(50%)中观察到完全或部分反应,15个(47%)非注射靶病变中的7个,21个目标病变中的10个(48%)。观察到抗肿瘤免疫的诱导:自然杀伤细胞的激活,外周血中干扰素-γ水平显著升高,以及细胞毒性T细胞浸润到注射和未注射的肿瘤病变中。因此,晚期黑色素瘤患者瘤内注射HVJ-E显示出安全性和耐受性,并具有抗肿瘤免疫介导的肿瘤局部消退。结果表明,HVJ-E可能是晚期黑色素瘤患者的一种新的治疗方法。
    Hemagglutinating virus of Japan (HVJ; Sendai virus) is an RNA virus that has cell fusion activity. HVJ-envelope (HVJ-E) is a UV-irradiated HVJ particle that loses viral replication and protein synthesis activity but retains cell fusion activity. We recently reported that HVJ-E has antitumor effects on several types of tumors. Here, we describe the results of a first-in-human phase I/IIa study in patients with advanced melanoma, receiving intratumoral administration of HVJ-E. The primary aim was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of HVJ-E, and the secondary aim was to examine the objective tumor response and antitumor immunity. Six patients with stage IIIC or IV progressive malignant melanoma with skin or lymph metastasis were enrolled. Patients were separated into two groups (n = 3 each) and received low and high doses of HVJ-E. Five of the six patients completed 4 weeks of follow-up evaluation; one patient discontinued treatment owing to progressive disease. Complete or partial responses were observed in 3 of 6 (50%) injected target lesions, 7 of 15 (47%) noninjected target lesions, and 10 of 21 (48%) target lesions. Induction of antitumor immunity was observed: activation of natural killer cells, a marked increase in interferon-γ levels in the peripheral blood, and infiltration of cytotoxic T cells into both injected and noninjected tumor lesions. Thus, intratumoral injection of HVJ-E in advanced melanoma patients showed safety and tolerability with local regression of the tumor mediated by antitumor immunity. The results suggest that HVJ-E might be a new treatment approach in patients with advanced melanoma.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号