Targeting interleukin-23 (IL-23) is an important therapeutic strategy for Crohn\'s disease (CD).
This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of selective IL-23p19 and IL-12/23p40 inhibitors in patients with moderate-to-severe CD.
MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane library (CENTRAL) were searched from inception to May 24, 2023, for randomized, placebo- or active comparator-controlled induction and/or maintenance trials of selective IL-23p19 and IL-12/23p40 inhibitors in pediatric and adult patients with CD. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients in clinical remission. Secondary outcomes were clinical response, endoscopic remission, endoscopic response, and safety. Data were pooled using a random-effects model. Risk of bias and certainty of evidence were assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool and the GRADE criteria, respectively.
Eighteen trials (n = 5561) were included. Most studies were rated as low risk of bias. Targeting IL-23 was significantly superior to placebo for inducing clinical (risk ratio [RR] = 1.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.58-2.21) and endoscopic (RR = 3.20, 95%CI 2.17-4.70) remission and maintaining clinical remission (RR = 1.39, 95%CI 1.10-1.77) (GRADE high certainty evidence for all outcomes). Subgroup analysis showed that targeting IL-23 was superior to placebo for inducing clinical remission in biologic-naïve (RR = 2.20, 95%CI 1.46-3.32, I2 = 0%, p = 0.39) and biologic-experienced patients (RR = 1.82, 95%CI 1.27-2.60, I2 = 56.5%, p = 0.01). Targeting IL-23 was associated with a decreased risk of serious adverse events in induction (RR = 0.55, 95%CI 0.44-0.73) and maintenance (RR = 0.72, 95%CI 0.53-0.98) trials compared to placebo (high certainty evidence).
Targeting IL-23 is effective and safe for inducing and maintaining clinical and endoscopic remission in patients with moderate-to-severe CD.

The approved biologics targeting interleukin (IL)-23 p19 for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, including guselkumab, tildrakizumab, and risankizumab, have generally favorable safety profiles. The aim of the current review is to describe in detail the safety of these selective inhibitors. A literature search was performed using PubMed from inception to 1 November 2022, to identify clinical trials and real-world evidence publications using the keywords \"guselkumab,\" \"tildrakizumab,\" and \"risankizumab.\" Overall, the most common adverse events (AEs) associated with IL-23 p19 inhibitors in clinical trials were nasopharyngitis, headache, and upper respiratory tract infections. Rates of serious AEs and AEs of interest, including serious infections, nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC), malignancies excluding NMSC, major adverse cardiovascular events, and serious hypersensitivity reactions, were not increased with long-term use in clinical trials. Selectively targeting IL-23 p19 was also not associated with elevated risk of opportunistic infections, tuberculosis reactivation, oral candidiasis, or inflammatory bowel disease. Results from real-world studies were similar, supporting the safe long-term use of these biologics in a wider population of patients with psoriasis, including older patients, patients for whom multiple biologics failed, and those with comorbidities such as obesity, metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular disease, dyslipidemia, diabetes, hypertension, and psoriatic arthritis. This review is limited by the lack of direct comparisons among therapeutic agents due to differences among study designs and safety data reporting methods. In conclusion, the favorable safety profiles of IL-23 p19 inhibitors support their long-term use in the management of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

Data are needed to inform the positioning of biologic therapy in the treatment of moderate-to-severe Crohn\'s disease, both first line and after previous biologic exposure. We aimed to assess the comparative efficacy and safety of biologics in patients with Crohn\'s disease.
We did a systematic review and network meta-analysis of phase 2 and phase 3 randomised controlled trials done in adults (≥18 years) with moderate-to-severe Crohn\'s disease (Crohn\'s Disease Activity Index [CDAI] 220-450) treated with tumour necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists, anti-integrin, anti-interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-23p40, or anti-IL23p19 agents, either alone or in combination with immunosuppressants, as their first-line biologic or after previous biologic exposure, compared with placebo or an active comparator. The minimum duration of therapy was 14 days for trials reporting induction of remission in active disease and 22 weeks in trials reporting maintenance of remission. We searched Medline, EMBASE, the Cochrane CENTRAL Register of Controlled Trials, conference proceedings, trial registries, and unpublished data from inception to June 3, 2021, without any language restrictions. Summary estimates of the primary and secondary outcomes were extracted from the published reports; individual patient-level data were not sought. The primary endpoint was induction of clinical remission in patients with active disease (CDAI <150) and maintenance of remission in patients with response to induction therapy, with data extracted from published reports. A network meta-analysis with multivariate consistency model random-effects meta-regression was done, with rankings based on surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values.
The search strategy yielded 18 382 citations, of which 31 trials were eligible for inclusion. On the basis of 15 randomised controlled trials including 2931 biologic-naive patients, infliximab monotherapy (odds ratio [OR] 4·53 [95% CI 1·49-13·79]), infliximab combined with azathioprine (7·49 [2·04-27·49]), adalimumab (3·01 [1·25-7·27]), and ustekinumab (2·63 [1·10-6·28]) were associated with significantly higher odds of inducing remission compared to certolizumab pegol (all moderate confidence); infliximab and azathioprine combination therapy was also associated with significantly higher odds of inducing remission than vedolizumab (3·76 [1·01-14·03]; low confidence). On the basis of ten randomised controlled trials including 2479 patients with previous biologic exposure, adalimumab after loss of response to infliximab (OR 2·82 [95% CI 1·20-6·62]; low confidence), and risankizumab (2·10 [1·12-3·92]; moderate confidence), were associated with higher odds of inducing remission than vedolizumab. No differences between active interventions were observed in maintenance trials. Most trials were at low or uncertain risk of bias.
Although biologic treatment choices in patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn\'s disease must be individualised for each patient, this analysis suggests that either infliximab with azathioprine or adalimumab might be preferred as a first-line therapy, and adalimumab (after infliximab loss of response) or risankizumab might be preferred as a second-line therapy, for induction of clinical remission.
None.

BACKGROUND: Complete lesion clearance is important to patients with psoriasis.
OBJECTIVE: To conduct a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of biologic agents available for psoriasis in Japan, using mixed-treatment comparisons.
METHODS: MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched to identify randomized clinical trials (placebo-controlled or head-to-head) of infliximab, adalimumab, ustekinumab, secukinumab, ixekizumab, brodalumab, risankizumab or guselkumab in adult patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis published in English between 01 January 2000 and 31 August 2019. We assessed the proportion of patients who achieved a 100 %, 90 % and 75 % reduction in their Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score (PASI100, PASI90 and PASI75) at 10, 12 or 16 weeks after starting biologic treatment, using contrast-based network meta-analysis methods and risk difference (RD). Probabilities of rank and surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) were also estimated.
RESULTS: Data were pooled from 41 trials in 19,248 patients. All biologics were significantly more effective than placebo for PASI100, PASI90 and PASI75. The RD for PASI100 for brodalumab vs ixekizumab was 0.05 (95 % Confidence intervals [CI] -0.02, 0.11), brodalumab vs risankizumab was 0.04 (95 %CI -0.03, 0.11), and risankizumab vs ixekizumab was -0.01 (95 %CI -0.08, 0.06). The SUCRA for PASI100 and PASI90 achievement was 96.8 % and 86.8 %, respectively, for brodalumab, 82.6 % and 90.3 %, respectively for risankizumab, and 78.3 %, 80.9 %, respectively, for ixekizumab.
CONCLUSIONS: Of the biologics assessed, brodalumab, ixekizumab and risankizumab were the greatest rates of PASI90 and PASI100 achievement, and a higher probability of being most effective in the induction phase, compared with the other biologics.

Psoriasis is a common, chronic, immune-mediated, inflammatory disorder with significant skin manifestations and substantial burden on quality of life. Interleukin-23 is a key regulator of different effector cytokines and plays a cardinal role in the pathogenesis of psoriasis. The monoclonal antibody, risankizumab, inhibits this key cytokine and thus prevents the downstream inflammatory cascade. This article aims to review our current understanding of risankizumab through the analysis of the various clinical trials.

OBJECTIVE: Interleukin(IL)-23 is a key cytokine in the pathogenesis of psoriasis, this meta-analysis was to analyze the efficacy and safety of IL-23p19 blockers in patients with plaque psoriasis.
METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed to collect double-blind randomized controlled trials(RCTs). The pooled relative risk(RR) with 95% confidence interval(CI) was calculated. All analyses were conducted with intention-to-treat basis.
RESULTS: A total of 13 studies contained 5155 plaque psoriasis patients were included in our meta-analysis. The results indicated that IL-23p19 blockers had better efficacy than placebo for Psoriasis Area Severity Index score reductions from baseline of 75% or more (PASI75) (RR = 11.47, P < 0.001) and static Physician\'s Global Assessment score of 0 or 1(sPGA0/1) (RR = 11.32, P < 0.001). IL-23p19 blockers have similar safety with placebo about the incidence of adverse events(AEs) (RR = 1.22, P = 0.096) and serious adverse events(SAEs) (RR = 2.93, P = 0.965), but IL-23p19 blockers carried an increased incidence rate of infections (RR = 1.39, P < 0.001). While compared with adalimumab and ustekinumab, IL-23p19 blockers were more effective and had the similar tolerance. Among three IL-23p19 blockers, guselkumab was the most efficacious treatments, and risankizumab was better tolerated than the others.
CONCLUSIONS: The IL-23p19 blockers have excellent efficacy and great safety in plaque psoriasis patients, but long-term safety remains to be determined.

New generation biologics, including interleukin (IL)-17 and IL-23 inhibitors, have delivered higher rates of skin clearance than older treatments in head-to-head studies. However, studies comparing these new biologics directly to one another are limited.
To compare the short-term efficacy of available (or imminently available) biologic and non-biologic systemic therapies for treating patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.
A systematic review was undertaken to identify randomised controlled trials evaluating biologic treatments, apremilast and dimethyl fumarate. MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched from the 1st January 2000 to 22nd November 2018. A Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) using a random-effects multinomial likelihood model with probit link and meta-regression to adjust for cross-trial variation in placebo responses compared the efficacy of interventions at inducing different levels of Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) response during the induction period. A range of sensitivity analyses was undertaken.
Seventy-seven trials (34,816 patients) were included in the NMA. The base-case analysis showed that all active treatments were superior to placebo. IL-17 inhibitors, guselkumab and risankizumab were found to be more efficacious than tildrakizumab, ustekinumab, all TNF inhibitors and non-biologic systemic treatments at inducing all levels of PASI response. In addition, brodalumab, ixekizumab and risankizumab were significantly more efficacious than secukinumab; no significant difference was found in the comparison with guselkumab. The greatest benefit of brodalumab, ixekizumab, guselkumab, and risankizumab was seen for PASI 90 and PASI 100 response. Results were consistent across all analyses.
In the NMA brodalumab, ixekizumab, risankizumab and guselkumab showed the highest levels of short-term efficacy. There were differences in efficacy between treatments within the same class. Longer-term analyses are needed to understand differences between these drugs beyond induction in what is a life-long condition.

The effect and safety of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting the interleukin-23 (IL-23) p19 subunit for treatment of psoriasis has not previously been systematically evaluated. To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) (including Phase I-III trials) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of these mAbs for treatment of psoriasis. The databases of PubMed, Baidu Scholar, and Cochrane Library of Clinical Trials were searched from inception of the databases to January 1st, 2018. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager Software version 5.3 (RevMan 5.3). Nine RCTs with a total of 2,478 subjects met our inclusion criteria. A significant increase in PASI 75 (RR: 11.65; 95% CI: 9.01-15.06), PASI 90 (RR: 21.74; 95% CI: 14.28-33.10), PASI 100 (RR: 31.56; 95% CI: 14.66-67.96), PGA 0/1 (OR: 23.21; 95% CI: 14.61-36.89), and DLQI 0/1 (RR: 10.29; 95% CI: 7.52-14.09) was identified for anti-IL-23p19 mAb vs. placebo, and PASI 75 (RR: 1.25; 95% CI: 1.18-1.32), PASI 90 (OR: 2.56; 95% CI: 2.13-3.09), PASI 100 (OR: 2.38, 95% CI: 1.89-2.99), and DLQI 0/1 (RR: 1.33; 95% CI: 1.20-1.47) vs. tumour necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists for the treatment of psoriasis. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in adverse events between placebo and TNF antagonists. Anti-IL-23p19 mAbs are effective with acceptable safety as therapy for psoriasis, and may be superior to TNF antagonists. More RCTs with a larger sample size are required to verify the current findings.

Tildrakizumab, an inhibitor of the p19 subunit of interleukin (IL)-23, was recently Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved for patients with moderate to severe psoriasis. This article will review the phase II and III clinical trial data of tildrakizumab.
A PubMed search from January 2000 to September 2018 was done with the search terms tildrakizumab, guselkumab, risankizumab, p19, interleukin-23, and psoriasis.
Articles discussing phase II and III clinical trial data for tildrakizumab were selected.
In phase II and phase III trials, tildrakizumab was safe and efficacious compared with placebo and etanercept. More patients achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75 receiving tildrakizumab (200 mg, 62%-74%; 100 mg, 61%-66%; 25 mg, 64%; 5 mg, 33%) compared with placebo (4%-6%, P < 0.0001) and etanercept (48%, P = 0.01). More patients achieved Physician Global Assessment (PGA) response of \"clear\" or \"minimal\" receiving tildrakizumab (200 mg, 59%; 100 mg, 55%-58%) than the placebo group (4%-7%, P < 0.0001). 59% of patients who received tildrakizumab 200 mg achieved a PGA response of \"clear\" or \"minimal\" compared with etanercept (48%, P = 0.0031). The most common adverse effect was infection. Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice: Tildrakizumab is a new, FDA-approved, physician-administered biological therapy for patients with moderate to severe psoriasis. It appears to be efficacious and safe so far.
Tildrakizumab is efficacious and safe for the treatment of patients with moderate to severe psoriasis. IL-23/p19 inhibitors are a promising class of biological therapy.

Psoriasis (PsO) is an inflammatory disorder characterized by proliferation of keratinocytes, and it may be associated with a systemic inflammatory articular disorder, psoriatic arthritis (PsA). The presentations of PsO and PsA are heterogeneous, and our understanding of pathogenesis has led to a better understanding of the role of the interleukin (IL)-23/T-helper 17 (Th17) axis. Areas covered: Ustekinumab is a monoclonal antibody against IL-12 and IL-23. The pathogenesis of PsO and PsA is a multifactorial process involving genetic, environmental, and lifestyle factors. IL-23 signaling and activation of Th17 cells leads to a self-perpetuating inflammatory loop resulting in continuous keratinocyte proliferation and synovitis. Treatment options are varied, ranging from topical therapy to injection of targeted biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs). Evidence on the use of ustekinumab in the management of PsO is strong, but it is not as impressive in management of PsA. Expert opinion: IL-12/23 inhibition appears to be a good first-line option for plaque PsO, but efficacy in PsA does not compare favorably to IL-17 inhibition. In general, poorer responses to therapy with any bDMARD in PsA cohorts highlight psoriatic disease heterogeneity. Until new knowledge can remedy the failure of monotherapy, synergistic methods may have to be explored, including combination biologic therapy.