Indigenous

土著
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    高胆固醇血症是一种常见病,其特征是低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)水平升高,动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)的风险增加。土著居民的ASCVD比率不成比例,然而,高胆固醇血症对这一负担的影响程度尚不清楚.
    本研究旨在评估高胆固醇血症的患病率,严重的高胆固醇血症,和加拿大土著居民的家族性高胆固醇血症(FH),美国,澳大利亚,和新西兰。
    我们搜索了MEDLINE,EMBASE,WebofScience,本地健康数据库,Cochrane中央控制试验登记册,和Cochrane系统评价数据库,用于报告土著居民高胆固醇血症和LDL-C升高的同行评审研究。包括用于分类高胆固醇血症的所有诊断标准。使用随机效应模型计算合并患病率和95%CI。
    没有研究报告FH的患病率,有一项研究报告了土著人群中严重高胆固醇血症的患病率。使用LDL-C临界值≥3.5mmol/L(135mg/dL),高胆固醇血症的合并患病率为28.9%或〜1/3至1/4(95%CI:22.4%-36.4%)和12.6%(95%CI:7.7%-19.9%)。北美土著人口的合并患病率为24.3%(95%CI:17.1%-33.3%),而澳大利亚为40.0%(95%CI:31.3%-49.3%)。Meta回归显示糖尿病对患病率有显著影响(P=0.022)。
    高胆固醇血症在土著社区普遍存在,可能导致这些人群面临的ASCVD高负担。在世界各地的土著居民中,对FH和严重的高胆固醇血症的研究不足。
    UNASSIGNED: Hypercholesterolemia is a common condition characterized by elevated levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and increased risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Indigenous populations experience disproportionate rates of ASCVD, however, the extent to which hypercholesterolemia contributes to this burden is unknown.
    UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of hypercholesterolemia, severe hypercholesterolemia, and familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) in Indigenous populations in Canada, the United States, Australia, and New Zealand.
    UNASSIGNED: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Native Health Database, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for peer-reviewed studies reporting on hypercholesterolemia and elevated LDL-C in Indigenous populations. All diagnostic criteria used to classify hypercholesterolemia were included. Pooled prevalence and 95% CIs were calculated using a random-effects model.
    UNASSIGNED: There were no studies reporting the prevalence of FH and one study reporting the prevalence of severe hypercholesterolemia in Indigenous populations. The pooled prevalence of hypercholesterolemia was 28.9% or ∼1 in 3 to 1 in 4 individuals (95% CI: 22.4%-36.4%) and 12.6% (95% CI: 7.7%-19.9%) using an LDL-C cutoff of ≥3.5 mmol/L (135 mg/dL). The pooled prevalence in Indigenous populations in North America was 24.3% (95% CI: 17.1%-33.3%) compared with 40.0% (95% CI: 31.3%-49.3%) in Australia. Meta-regression showed diabetes had a significant effect on prevalence (P = 0.022).
    UNASSIGNED: Hypercholesterolemia is prevalent in Indigenous communities and may contribute to the high burden of ASCVD these populations face. There is insufficient research on FH and severe hypercholesterolemia in Indigenous populations worldwide.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究的目的是评估全球土著和部落人群中丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)暴露和感染的患病率。
    方法:系统评价和荟萃分析。
    方法:我们系统地检索了书目数据库和灰色文献(1/01/2000-16/06/2022)。总体上综合了患病率估计,世界卫生组织地区和HCV风险组。对于比较人群的研究,对患病率比率进行了估计和汇总.
    结果:纳入了92项研究。全球范围内,在一般土著和部落人口中,HCV抗体(HCVAb)的中位患病率为1.3%(四分位数范围[IQR]:0.3-3.8%,I2=98.5%),HCVRNA为0.4%(IQR:0-1.3%,I2=96.1%)。西太平洋区域的患病率最高(HCVAb:中位数:3.0%[IQR:0.4-11.9%],HCVRNA:中位数5.6%[IQR:2.0-8.8%])。注射药物的人的患病率最高(HCVAb:中位数:59.5%,IQR:51.5-67.6%,I2=96.6%;和HCVRNA:中位数:29.4%,IQR:21.8-35.2%,I2=97.2%)。对于一般人群(患病率=0.91;95%CI:0.56,1.49)或关键风险组,HCVAb患病率与土著/部落状态之间没有关联。
    结论:来自西太平洋区域的土著和部落民族以及公认的高危人群的HCV患病率较高。HCV患病率与土著/部落身份无关。然而,这篇综述受到成分研究的异质性和低质量的限制,土著/部落地位的不同定义,区域数据差距,以及对慢性感染(HCVRNA)的有限研究。需要针对土著和部落人民的HCV流行病学提供全面的质量证据,以制定预防和治疗干预措施,以使这些人群在消除努力中不会落后。
    OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to estimate prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) exposure and infection among Indigenous and tribal populations globally.
    METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
    METHODS: We systematically searched bibliographic databases and grey literature (1/01/2000-16/06/2022). Prevalence estimates were synthesised overall, by World Health Organization region and HCV-risk group. For studies with comparator populations, prevalence ratios were estimated and pooled.
    RESULTS: Ninety-two studies were included. Globally, among general Indigenous and tribal populations, the median prevalence of HCV antibody (HCV Ab) was 1.3% (interquartile range [IQR]: 0.3-3.8%, I2 = 98.5%) and HCV RNA was 0.4% (IQR: 0-1.3%, I2 = 96.1%). The Western Pacific Region had the highest prevalence (HCV Ab: median: 3.0% [IQR: 0.4-11.9%], HCV RNA: median 5.6% [IQR: 2.0-8.8%]). Prevalence was highest in people who injected drugs (HCV Ab: median: 59.5%, IQR: 51.5-67.6%, I2 = 96.6%; and HCV RNA: median: 29.4%, IQR: 21.8-35.2%, I2 = 97.2%). There was no association between HCV Ab prevalence and Indigenous/tribal status for general populations (prevalence ratio = 0.91; 95% CI: 0.56, 1.49) or key risk groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: Indigenous and tribal peoples from the Western Pacific Region and recognised at-risk sub-populations had higher HCV prevalence. HCV prevalence showed no association with Indigenous/tribal status. However, this review was limited by heterogeneity and poor quality of constituent studies, varying definitions of Indigenous/tribal status, regional data gaps, and limited studies on chronic infection (HCV RNA). Comprehensive quality evidence on HCV epidemiology in Indigenous and tribal peoples is needed to tailor preventive and treatment interventions so these populations are not left behind in elimination efforts.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    由于欧洲殖民,澳大利亚原住民的心理健康问题发生率过高,西方循证治疗在改善这种情况方面非常无效。文化治疗方式是由维多利亚州原住民儿童和社区机构开发的一种文化特定的康复和福祉实践框架,侧重于基于文化的实践,创伤意识,和自决。尽管人们广泛认识到这些元素在土著康复和福祉计划中的重要性,其可衡量的经验影响目前尚不清楚。本文总结了系统范围审查的结果,以确定已发布的文化治疗方法知识库以及可以为未来评估提供信息的知识空白。与来自澳大利亚的土著参与者一起应用文化治疗方式的项目的42项研究,加拿大,新西兰,和美利坚合众国是从文献检索中确定的。基于文化治疗方式的服务有助于康复和健康,因为它们创造了安全,加强文化联系,发展赋权并提供释放情感的机会,并增加社会和精神支持。由于审查旨在确定已发表的文化治疗方法的证据基础,其他有效的方法可能被忽视了。建立文化治疗方法的证据基础,服务设计必须清楚地描述目标群体,该程序是否由原住民提供,服务提供中使用的文化治疗方法的过程,以及它们如何与西方方法融合在一起。研究工作也可以富有成效地侧重于确定或构建文化上适当的成果衡量标准。
    Aboriginal Australians experience disproportionately high rates of mental health problems as the result of European colonisation, and Western evidence-based treatment has been strikingly ineffective in improving the situation. Cultural Therapeutic Ways is a culturally specific healing and wellbeing practice framework developed by the Victorian Aboriginal Child and Community Agency that focuses on culturally based practices, trauma awareness, and self-determination. Despite wide recognition of the importance of these elements in Indigenous healing and wellbeing programs, its measurable empirical impact is currently unclear. This paper summarises findings from a systematic scoping review to ascertain the published knowledge base for Cultural Therapeutic Ways and the gaps in knowledge that can inform future evaluation. Forty-two studies of programs that applied Cultural Therapeutic Ways with Indigenous participants from Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United States of America were identified from the literature search. Services based on Cultural Therapeutic Ways contributed to healing and wellbeing because they create safety, strengthen cultural connections, develop empowerment and provide opportunities to release emotion, and increase social and spiritual support. As the review set out to determine the published evidence base for Cultural Therapeutic Ways, other effective approaches may have been overlooked. To develop the evidence base for Cultural Therapeutic Ways, service design must clearly describe target groups, whether the program is delivered by Aboriginal people, the processes of Cultural Therapeutic Ways utilised in service delivery, and how they are blended with Western approaches. Research efforts could also productively be focused on identifying or constructing culturally appropriate outcome measures.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    与非原住民人群相比,原住民人群的结直肠癌(CRC)生存率较差。虽然世界各地的第一民族人口是不同的,歧视和压迫的共同经历导致了持续的健康不平等。CRC筛查提高生存率,然而,原住民人群的筛查率描述不佳。这项研究旨在确定全球原住民人群中CRC筛查的参与率。
    对PubMed进行了系统的文献检索,Embase,科克伦图书馆,CINAHL,MEDLINE,灰色文学,国家注册管理机构和诊所试验.gov.从开始日期到2024年2月18日搜索了所有来源。如果研究报告了成人(≥18岁)原住民人群的CRC筛查率,则纳入研究。如果有足够的数据,我们的目标是进行荟萃分析。使用JoannaBriggs研究所(JBI)评估工具评估论文质量。这项研究在PROSPERO注册,CRD42020210181。
    文献检索确定了1723项可能符合条件的已发表研究。审查后,包括57项研究,50来自美国(US),澳大利亚的其余研究,Aotearoa新西兰(NZ),加拿大,多米尼加和危地马拉。此外,纳入了来自澳大利亚和新西兰国家计划的11份非索引报告。没有足够的数据进行荟萃分析,因此进行了系统回顾和叙事综合。CRC筛查定义各不相同,包括粪便筛查,乙状结肠镜检查和结肠镜检查。美国原住民的筛查率在4.0%至79.2%之间,澳大利亚报告10.6-35.2%,新西兰18.4-49%,加拿大22.4-53.4%,危地马拉2.2%和多米尼加4.2%。55项研究被评估为中等或高质量,2项被评估为低质量。
    我们的研究结果表明,在第一民族人群中,CRC筛查参与率存在很大差异。在直接比较组和纵向结果中缺乏筛查数据。需要对筛查数据进行分类,以更好地理解和解决《儿童权利公约》第一民族的结果不平等。
    无。
    UNASSIGNED: First Nations populations have poorer colorectal cancer (CRC) survival compared to non-First Nations populations. Whilst First Nations populations across the world are distinct, shared experiences of discrimination and oppression contribute to persistent health inequities. CRC screening improves survival, however screening rates in First Nations populations are poorly described. This study seeks to define participation rates in CRC screening in First Nations populations worldwide.
    UNASSIGNED: A systematic literature search was conducted of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, MEDLINE, grey literature, national registries and ClinicalTrials.gov. All sources were searched from their inception date to 18 February 2024. Studies were included if they reported CRC screening rates in adult (≥18 years) First Nations populations. We aimed to undertake a meta-analysis if there were sufficient data. Quality of papers were assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) appraisal tool. The study was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42020210181.
    UNASSIGNED: The literature search identified 1723 potentially eligible published studies. After review, 57 studies were included, 50 from the United States (US), with the remaining studies from Australia, Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ), Canada, Dominica and Guatemala. Additionally, eleven non-indexed reports from national programs in Australia and NZ were included. There were insufficient data to undertake meta-analysis, therefore a systematic review and narrative synthesis were conducted. CRC screening definitions varied, and included stool-based screening, sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy. US First Nations screening rates ranged between 4.0 and 79.2%, Australia reported 10.6-35.2%, NZ 18.4-49%, Canada 22.4-53.4%, Guatemala 2.2% and Dominica 4.2%. Fifty-five studies were assessed as moderate or high quality and two as low quality.
    UNASSIGNED: Our findings suggested that there is wide variation in CRC screening participation rates across First Nations populations. Screening data are lacking in direct comparator groups and longitudinal outcomes. Disaggregation of screening data are required to better understand and address First Nations CRC outcome inequities.
    UNASSIGNED: None.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    家庭暴力是一个复杂的问题,严重影响健康和福祉。尽管普遍呼吁提供综合家庭暴力服务,综合方法差异很大,实施挑战仍然存在。本范围审查探讨了如何在国际和Aotearoa新西兰文献中概念化提供家庭暴力服务的综合方法。
    遵循从文献中确定的记录范围审查过程,在复杂性理论的帮助下,绘制了综合家庭暴力服务交付中系统代理之间的动态相互作用。我们分析了纳入研究的特点,涉案人员,它们是如何相互作用的,以及它们之间整合的方法和机制。
    包括72份已发布的报告。最常见的互动发生在警察和儿童保护等法定机构之间。虽然医疗保健服务提供者被纳入55项研究,他们的参与往往是外围的。定性分析阐明了以系统为中心的服务提供影响的三大途径,以人为本,或以土著为中心的世界观。
    提供家庭暴力服务的综合方法变化很大。尽管有强烈的假设认为集成可以提高安全性,健康,以及寻求护理者的福祉,大多数研究没有包括这种影响的证据.通过考虑世界观如何表征服务提供,可以深入了解为什么随着时间的推移,集成具有挑战性。
    UNASSIGNED: Violence within families is a complex problem which significantly impacts health and wellbeing. Despite the ubiquitous call for integrated family violence service delivery, integrated approaches vary significantly and challenges to implementation remain. This scoping review explored how integrated approaches to family violence service delivery are conceptualised within international and Aotearoa New Zealand literature.
    UNASSIGNED: Following a documented scoping review process identified from literature, dynamic interplay between system agents within integrated family violence service delivery were mapped with the assistance of a complexity theory lens. We analysed characteristics of included studies, agents involved, how they interacted and the methods and mechanisms of integration among them.
    UNASSIGNED: Seventy-two published reports were included. The most common interactions occurred between statutory agencies such as police and child protection. While health care service providers were included within 55 studies, their engagement was often peripheral. Qualitative analysis elucidated three broad pathways to service delivery impact underpinned by systems-centred, person-centred, or Indigenous-centred worldviews.
    UNASSIGNED: Integrated approaches to family violence service delivery are highly variable. Despite a strong assumption that integration leads to improved safety, health, and wellbeing for care-seekers, most studies did not include evidence of such impact. Consideration of how worldviews characterise service provision provides insight into why integration has proven challenging over time.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:死亡的主要原因,冠状动脉疾病(CAD)通常需要冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)等侵入性手术.土著和非土著澳大利亚人的心血管结果各不相同;然而,缺乏对这些差异的全面了解。
    方法:为了比较土著和非土著澳大利亚人的PCI和CABG结果,我们进行了系统评价和荟萃分析.包括10项回顾性观察研究,这些研究检查了死亡率,心血管事件,合并症,和手术成功率。搜索了2014年至2024年的数据库,直接比较澳大利亚土著和非土著人口的研究是纳入标准之一。
    结果:手术后30天内,接受PCI的澳大利亚土著居民合并症发生率较高,长期死亡率和MACE风险较高.同样,CABG术后土著患者的长期死亡率更高.文化安全,社会经济因素,以及影响治疗延误和获得护理的区域因素,所有受影响的差异。对于30天的死亡率,汇总分析显示比值比为1.04(95%CI0.78,1.40),表明没有有意义的差异。不利事件的总赔率比为1.07(95%CI0.86,1.33),这意味着土著群体和没有土著群体之间没有统计学上的显著差异。
    结论:土著澳大利亚人在PCI和CABG手术后的心血管结局仍然更差,即使程序成功率相似。确保土著群体获得公平的心血管结果,针对潜在风险因素的靶向治疗,增加获得文化上适当的护理的机会,减少医疗保健障碍至关重要。
    BACKGROUND: A major cause of death, coronary artery disease (CAD) often necessitates invasive procedures like coronary bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Cardiovascular outcomes vary between indigenous and non-indigenous Australian people; however, comprehensive knowledge of these differences is absent.
    METHODS: To compare PCI and CABG results between indigenous and non-indigenous Australians, a systematic review and meta-analysis were carried out. Included were 10 retrospective observational studies that examined mortality, cardiovascular events, comorbidities, and operative success rates. Databases spanning 2014 to 2024 were searched, and research that directly compared Australia\'s indigenous and non-indigenous populations was among the inclusion criteria.
    RESULTS: Within 30 days of surgery, indigenous Australians receiving PCI had greater rates of comorbidities and were at higher risk of long-term mortality and MACE. Similarly, there was a greater long-term death rate among indigenous patients following CABG. Cultural safety, socioeconomic factors, and regional factors affecting treatment delays and access to care all affected disparities. For 30-day mortality, the pooled analysis shows an odds ratio of 1.04 (95% CI 0.78, 1.40), indicating no meaningful difference. The total odds ratio for unfavorable occurrences is 1.07 (95% CI 0.86, 1.33), meaning there is no statistically significant difference between Indigenous groups and those that are not.
    CONCLUSIONS: Indigenous Australians continue to have worse cardiovascular outcomes after PCI and CABG procedures, even with similar procedural success rates. To ensure equitable cardiovascular outcomes for indigenous groups, targeted therapies targeting underlying risk factors, increased access to culturally appropriate care, and decreased obstacles to healthcare access are critical.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:综合国际文献,以确定维持护理种族主义的机制,并了解有助于设计和实施反种族主义行为的因素,以告知新西兰奥特罗阿的护理。
    方法:进行了综合文献综述,整合土著Kaupapa毛利人的方法,以确保文化和哲学的镜头。
    方法:发表的同行评审文献,2011年1月至2023年7月之间的采购。在1296篇文章中,16个符合纳入标准,4个通过引文链接确定。总的来说,包括20篇文章。约翰霍普金斯研究证据工具被应用,提取的发现,并利用土著Kaupapa毛利人原则完成了主题分析。
    方法:数据库,包括CINAHL,Scopus,PubMed和澳大利亚/新西兰参考中心,在2023年7月进行了搜索。
    结果:确定了两个关键主题:(1)殖民地对变化的积极抵抗;(2)转型,有远见的,积极的护理。
    结论:护士处于有利地位,可以面对在健康和教育系统中维持种族主义的结构,但通常是维持现状的参与者。反种族主义行为可以成为护士重新想象的一种机制,重新定义和转变护理,领导力,和护理教育开始消除种族主义。
    这项综合审查遵循了2020年系统审查和荟萃分析首选报告(PRISMA)方法。
    没有患者或公众捐款。
    种族主义在护理和医疗保健系统中仍然普遍存在。有必要实施反种族主义的实践和抵制的政策,解构,在验证土著价值观的同时拆除权力和种族主义,信仰和实践。这对于提供公平的医疗保健至关重要。
    结论:这篇综合综述介绍了土著和种族统计护士和学者的生活现实和知识,与护理盟友一起告知反种族主义的实践。这些证据表明,现在是时候步行挑战种族主义的殖民系统和过程了。
    OBJECTIVE: To synthesise international literature to identify mechanisms that maintain racism in nursing and understand the factors that contribute to designing and implementing anti-racist praxis to inform nursing in Aotearoa New Zealand.
    METHODS: An integrative literature review was undertaken, integrating Indigenous Kaupapa Māori methodologies to ensure a cultural and philosophical lens.
    METHODS: Peer-reviewed literature published, between January 2011 and July 2023 were sourced. Of 1296 articles, 16 met the inclusion criteria and 4 were identified via citation chaining. In total, 20 articles were included. The Johns Hopkins Research Evidence Tool was applied, findings extracted, and thematic analysis completed utilising Indigenous Kaupapa Māori principles.
    METHODS: Databases, including CINAHL, Scopus, PubMed and Aus/NZ Reference Centre, were searched in July 2023.
    RESULTS: Two key themes were identified: (1) colonial active resistance to change; and (2) transformational, visionary, and proactive nursing.
    CONCLUSIONS: Nurses are well-positioned to confront the structures that maintain racism in health and education systems but are often actors in maintaining status quo. Anti-racist praxis can be a mechanism for nurses to reimagine, redefine and transform nursing care, leadership, and nursing education to begin to eradicate racism.
    UNASSIGNED: This integrative review adhered to the 2020 Preferred Reporting for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) method.
    UNASSIGNED: No patient or public contribution.
    UNASSIGNED: Racism remains prevalent in nursing and the healthcare system. It is necessary to implement anti-racist praxis and policies that resist, deconstruct, and dismantle power and racism while validating Indigenous values, beliefs and practices. This is vital to deliver equitable health care.
    CONCLUSIONS: This integrative review presents lived realities and knowledge of Indigenous and racially minoritised nurses and scholars, alongside nursing allies to inform anti-racist praxis. This evidence signifies that it is time to walk the walk to challenge the colonising systems and processes that hold racism in place.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管经过数十年的研究,酒精在土著人民中的作用差异很大,而且是陈规定型观念持续存在的背景。本文提供了有关土著社区酒精文献的最新叙事综述,强调自2017年以来发表的最新研究。
    我们研究了有关酒精使用率的公开文献,包括禁欲;风险和保护因素;治疗;和恢复,以及与土著社区进行酒精预防和干预工作的未来方向。
    基于证据的酒精使用预防,干预,并概述了与土著社区的恢复战略。为研究人员提供了建议,健康提供者,和公共政策倡导者,以解决和更好地了解酒精使用,治疗,预防,和土著人民的恢复。具体建议包括使用基于社区的参与性研究策略和减少伤害的方法来预防和治疗土著社区的酒精使用问题。未来的研究需要阐明酒精使用障碍的复原力和恢复机制,以及土著人民对酒精使用观念的可能转变。
    UNASSIGNED: The role of alcohol varies considerably among Indigenous Peoples and is the backdrop of persistent stereotypes despite decades of research. This paper provides an updated narrative review on the alcohol literature among Indigenous communities, highlighting recent studies published since 2017.
    UNASSIGNED: We examined published literature involving alcohol use rates, including abstinence; risk and protective factors; treatment; and recovery, as well as future directions for alcohol prevention and intervention efforts with Indigenous communities.
    UNASSIGNED: Evidence-based alcohol use prevention, intervention, and recovery strategies with Indigenous communities are outlined. Recommendations are provided for researchers, health providers, and public policy advocates to address and better understand alcohol use, treatment, prevention, and recovery among Indigenous Peoples. Specific recommendations include using community-based participatory research strategies and harm reduction approaches to prevent and treat alcohol use problems with Indigenous communities. Future research is needed to elucidate mechanisms of resilience and recovery from Alcohol Use Disorder and possible shifts in perceptions of alcohol use for Indigenous Peoples.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    土著人民的过度监禁及其对个人和社区健康的影响在加拿大和美国日益引起关注。在加拿大联邦经营的疗养院是为被监禁和以前被监禁的土著人民重新融入社区并支持他们的疗养院提供支持服务的一个例子。然而,有必要综合调查这些方案的研究。我们报告了以以下研究问题为指导的范围审查协议:关于加拿大和美国被监禁和以前被监禁的土著人民可获得的文化知情计划和服务的知识是什么?该范围审查将遵循JoannaBriggs研究所发布的指南以及用于范围审查的系统审查和荟萃分析扩展的首选报告项目。这项审查将只确定以土著存在和知识方式为指导的方案,以便为土著社区和我们的社区伙伴提供最好的服务。这项审查的结果将支持制定必要的方案,以了解和解决被监禁和以前被监禁的土著人民的不同需求。
    The overincarceration of Indigenous peoples and its impacts on individual and community health is a growing concern across Canada and the United States. Federally run Healing Lodges in Canada are an example of support services for incarcerated and previously incarcerated Indigenous peoples to reintegrate into community and support their healing journey. However, there is a need to synthesise research which investigates these programmes. We report a protocol for a scoping review that is guided by the following research question: What is known about culturally informed programmes and services available to incarcerated and previously incarcerated Indigenous peoples in Canada and the US? This scoping review will follow guidelines published by the Joanna Briggs Institute and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews. This review will only identify programmes that are guided by Indigenous ways of being and knowing in order to best serve Indigenous communities and our community partners. The results of this review will support the development of programmes that are necessary for understanding and addressing the diverse needs of incarcerated and previously incarcerated Indigenous peoples.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项范围审查的目的是确定在美国(美国)的联邦粮食援助计划的可及性和可接受性在土著人民中得到评估的程度,并总结一下目前已知的情况。发现了12份出版物,审查了土著人民对一个或多个联邦粮食援助计划的可及性或可接受性方面,包括补充营养援助计划(SNAP)和/或印度储备食品分配计划(FDPIR)(n=8),妇女特别补充营养计划,婴儿,和儿童(WIC)(n=3),和国家学校午餐计划(NSLP)(n=1)。没有发现出版物包括商品补充食品计划(CSFP)或儿童和成人护理食品计划(CACFP)。出版物的时间从1990年到2023年不等,所有出版物都报道了农村人口的调查结果,三个还包括城市环境。程序可访问性因程序类型和地理位置而异。路况,交通通道,电话和互联网连接,食品商店的总数被确定为农村地区SNAP和WIC福利赎回的主要障碍。程序的可接受性归因于诸如被部落管理,提供文化敏感的服务,提供具有文化意义的食物。由于这些原因,与SNAP和NSLP相比,FDPIR和WIC更频繁地被描述为可接受。然而,SNAP有时被描述为比其他援助计划更可接受,因为它允许参与者自主决定购买哪些食物以及何时购买。总的来说,在美国,人们很少关注联邦食品援助计划的可及性和可接受性,需要更多的研究来了解和改善这些优先人群的参与经验和健康轨迹。
    The purpose of this scoping review was to determine the extent to which accessibility and acceptability of federal food assistance programs in the United States have been evaluated among indigenous peoples and to summarize what is currently known. Twelve publications were found that examine aspects of accessibility or acceptability by indigenous peoples of 1 or more federal food assistance programs, including the supplemental nutrition assistance program (SNAP) and/or the Food Distribution Program on Indian Reservations (n = 8), the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, infants, and children (WIC) (n = 3), and the national school lunch program (n = 1). No publications were found to include the commodity supplemental food program or the child and adult care food program. Publications ranged in time from 1990-2023, and all reported on findings from rural populations, whereas 3 also included urban settings. Program accessibility varied by program type and geographic location. Road conditions, transportation access, telephone and internet connectivity, and an overall number of food stores were identified as key access barriers to SNAP and WIC benefit redemption in rural areas. Program acceptability was attributed to factors such as being tribally administered, providing culturally sensitive services, and offering foods of cultural significance. For these reasons, Food Distribution Program on Indian Reservations and WIC were more frequently described as acceptable compared to SNAP and national school lunch programs. However, SNAP was occasionally described as more acceptable than other assistance programs because it allows participants autonomy to decide which foods to purchase and when. Overall, little attention has been paid to the accessibility and acceptability of federal food assistance programs among indigenous peoples in the United States. More research is needed to understand and improve the participation experiences and health trajectories of these priority populations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号