Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) demonstrate unique advantages in the treatment of lung cancer and are widely used in the era of immunotherapy. However, ICIs can cause adverse reactions. Hematological toxicities induced by immunotherapy are relatively rare. Agranulocytosis, a rare hematologic adverse event associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors, has received limited attention in terms of treatment and patient demographics. Herein, we report the case of a 68-year-old male with non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC) who received two cycles of programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) antibody sintilimab immunotherapy combined with albumin-bound paclitaxel and carboplatin chemotherapy and one cycle of sintilimab monotherapy. He was diagnosed with grade 4 neutropenia and sepsis (with symptoms of fever and chills) after the first two cycles of treatment. Teicoplanin was promptly initiated as antimicrobial therapy. The patient presented with sudden high fever and developed agranulocytosis on the day of the third cycle of treatment initiation, characterized by an absolute neutrophil count of 0.0×109/L. The patient was treated with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor but did not show improvement. He was then treated with corticosteroids, and absolute neutrophil counts gradually returned to normal levels. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of sintilimab-induced agranulocytosis in a patient with NSCLC. Sintilimab-induced severe neutropenia or agranulocytosis is a rare side effect that should be distinguished from chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and treated promptly with appropriate therapies; otherwise, the condition may worsen.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become extensively utilized in the early-stage treatment of various cancers, offering additional therapeutic possibilities for patients with advanced cancer. However, certain patient populations are susceptible to experiencing toxic adverse effects from ICIs, such as thyrotoxicosis, rashes, among others. Specifically, ICIDM, induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors, exhibits characteristics similar to insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus, T1DM). ICIDM is characterized by a rapid onset and may coincide with severe ketoacidosis. Despite a favorable response to insulin therapy, patients typically require lifelong insulin dependence. After discussing the autoimmune adverse effects and the specifics of ICIs-induced diabetes mellitus (ICIDM), it is important to note that certain patient populations are particularly susceptible to experiencing toxic adverse effects from ICIs. Specifically, ICIDM, which is triggered by immune checkpoint inhibitors, mirrors the characteristics of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus, T1DM). This article conducts an in-depth analysis of the literature to explore the pathogenesis, disease progression, and treatment strategies applicable to diabetes induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIDM).

UNASSIGNED: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are increasingly used in the first-line treatment of malignant tumors. There is increasing recognition of their cardiotoxicity and, in particular, their potential to lead to myocarditis. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) can quantify pathological changes, such as myocardial edema and fibrosis. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine the evidence for the roles of CMR in predicting prognosis in ICI-associated myocarditis.
UNASSIGNED: PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched until October 2023 for published works investigating the relationship between CMR parameters and adverse events in patients with ICI-associated myocarditis. The analysis included studies reporting the incidence of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), T1 values, T2 values, and CMR-derived left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Odds ratios (OR) and weighted mean differences (WMD) were combined for binary and continuous data, respectively. Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies.
UNASSIGNED: Five cohort studies were included (average age 65-68 years; 25.4% female). Of these, four studies were included in the meta-analysis of LGE-related findings. Patients with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) had a higher incidence of LGE compared with patients without MACE (OR = 4.18, 95% CI: 1.72-10.19, p = 0.002). A meta-analysis, incorporating data from two studies, showed that patients who developed MACE exhibited significantly higher T1 value (WMD = 36.16 ms, 95% CI: 21.43-50.89, p < 0.001) and lower LVEF (WMD = - 8.00%, 95% CI: -13.60 to -2.40, p = 0.005). Notably, T2 value (WMD = -0.23 ms, 95% CI: -1.86 to -1.39, p = 0.779) was not associated with MACE in patients with ICI-related myocarditis.
UNASSIGNED: LGE, T1 value, and LVEF measured by CMR imaging have potential prognostic value for long-term adverse events in patients with ICI-related myocarditis.

BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy in combination with chemotherapy has been approved as an initial treatment strategy for unresectable advanced gastric cancer (GC). However, the efficacy of adding immunotherapy to perioperative chemotherapy in locally advanced resectable gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GC/GEJC) remains uncertain. Therefore, a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed to compare the effectiveness of perioperative immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in patients with locally advanced resectable GC/GEJC.
METHODS: A comprehensive search of online databases was conducted to identify RCTs published until November 30, 2023. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated for primary outcomes, including R0 resection rate, D2 lymphadenectomy, pathologic complete response (pCR), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs).
RESULTS: A total of 2718 patients from five RCTs (six reports) were included in the analysis. The pooled ORs of R0 resection rate and D2 lymphadenectomy demonstrated that combination therapy with ICIs showed no significant difference compared to chemotherapy alone. However, the addition of ICIs significantly improved pCR rates (OR = 3.43, 95 % CI 2.61-4.50, p < 0.0001). There were no significant differences observed in the incidence of any grade TRAEs and grade 3-4 TRAEs. However, ICIs combination therapy was associated with significantly higher incidences of any grade irAEs (OR = 4.03, 95 % CI: 2.70-6.00, p < 0.0001), as well as grade 3-4 irAEs (OR = 4.51, 95 % CI: 2.27-8.97, p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: This study represents the first meta-analysis to demonstrate that perioperative combination therapy with ICIs yields superior pCR rates for patients with locally advanced GC/GEJC compared to chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: There is little evidence on the safety, efficacy, and survival benefit of restarting immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in patients with cancer after discontinuation due to immune-related adverse events (irAEs) or progressive disease (PD). Here, we performed a meta-analysis to elucidate the possible benefits of ICI rechallenge in patients with cancer.
METHODS: Systematic searches were conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. The objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and incidence of irAEs were the outcomes of interest.
RESULTS: Thirty-six studies involving 2026 patients were analyzed. ICI rechallenge was associated with a lower incidence of all-grade (OR, 0.05; 95%CI, 0.02-0.13, P < .05) and high-grade irAEs (OR, 0.37; 95%CI, 0.21-0.64, P < .05) when compared with initial ICI treatment. Though no significant difference was observed between rechallenge and initial treatment regarding ORR (OR, 0.69; 95%CI, 0.39-1.20, P = .29) and DCR (OR, 0.85; 95%CI, 0.51-1.40, P = 0.52), patients receiving rechallenge had improved PFS (HR, 0.56; 95%CI, 0.43-0.73, P < .05) and OS (HR, 0.55; 95%CI, 0.43-0.72, P < .05) than those who discontinued ICI therapy permanently. Subgroup analysis revealed that for patients who stopped initial ICI treatment because of irAEs, rechallenge showed similar safety and efficacy with initial treatment, while for patients who discontinued ICI treatment due to PD, rechallenge caused a significant increase in the incidence of high-grade irAEs (OR, 4.97; 95%CI, 1.98-12.5, P < .05) and a decrease in ORR (OR, 0.48; 95%CI, 0.24-0.95, P < .05).
CONCLUSIONS: ICI rechallenge is generally an active and feasible strategy that is associated with relative safety, similar efficacy, and improved survival outcomes. Rechallenge should be considered individually with circumspection, and randomized controlled trials are required to confirm these findings.

Treating non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has gained increased importance in recent years due to the high mortality rate and dismal five-year survival rate. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are a promising approach with exceptional outcomes in NSCLC thanks to the antigenic nature of cells. Conversely, immune system over-stimulation with ICI is a double-edged sword that can lead to various negative effects ranging from mild to life-threatening. This review explores current breakthroughs in nanoparticle-based ICI and their limitations. The PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science were examined for relevant publications. Thirty-eight trials (N = 16,781) were included in the analyses. The mixed effects analyses on quantifying the treatment effect contributed significantly to the subgroups within studies for ICI treatment effect. Models confirmed ICI\'s higher impact on treatment effectivity and the decrease in respondents\' mortality compared to conventional treatment regiments. ICI might be used as first-line therapy due to their proven effectiveness and safety profile.

The management of advanced bladder carcinoma involves a multidisciplinary approach, but the prognosis remains poor for many patients. The immune system plays a crucial role in this disease, influencing both tumor development and response to treatment, and exploiting the immune system against the tumor can be a valuable strategy to destroy neoplastic cells. This is the biological principle underlying Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) use and, more recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), like PD-1 (programmed death-1)/PD-L1 (programmed death-ligand 1) inhibitors. In fact, one of the best studied immune checkpoints is represented by the PD-1/PD-L1 axis, which is a well-known immune escape system adopted by neoplastic bladder cells. PD-L1 expression has been associated with a higher pathologic stage and has shown prognostic value in bladder carcinoma. Interestingly, high-grade bladder cancers tend to express higher levels of PD-1 and PD-L1, suggesting a potential role of such an axis in mediating disease progression. Immunotherapy with PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors has therefore emerged as a valuable treatment option and has shown efficacy in advanced bladder cancer patients, with high PD-L1 expression levels associated with better treatment responses. Our review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the role of PD-L1 in advanced bladder cancer, focusing on its implications for treatment decisions and the prediction of treatment response. Overall, our work aims to contribute to the understanding of PD-L1 as a predictive biomarker and highlight its role in shaping therapeutic approaches for advanced bladder cancer.

CAR-T cell therapy offers a promising way for prolonged cancer remission, specifically in the case of blood cancers. However, its application in the treatment of solid tumors still faces many limitations. This review paper provides a comprehensive overview of the challenges and strategies associated with CAR-T cell therapy for solid tumors, with a focus on gynecological cancer. This study discusses the limitations of CAR-T therapy for solid tumor treatment, such as T cell exhaustion, stromal barrier, and antigen shedding. Additionally, it addresses possible approaches to increase CAR-T efficacy in solid tumors, including combination therapies with checkpoint inhibitors and chemotherapy, as well as the novel approach of combining CAR-T with oncolytic virotherapy. Given the lack of comprehensive research on CAR-T combination therapies for treating gynecological cancers, this review aims to provide insights into the current landscape of combination therapies for solid tumors and highlight the potential of such an approach in gynecology.

Due to its rapid progression to advanced stages and highly metastatic properties, gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most aggressive malignancies and the fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. The metastatic process includes local invasion, metastasis initiation, migration with colonisation at distant sites, and evasion of the immune response. Tumour growth involves the activation of inhibitory signals associated with the immune response, also known as immune checkpoints, including PD-1/PD-L1 (programmed death 1/programmed death ligand 1), CTLA-4 (cytotoxic T cell antigen 4), TIGIT (T cell immunoreceptor with Ig and ITIM domains), and others. Immune checkpoint molecules (ICPMs) are proteins that modulate the innate and adaptive immune responses. While their expression is prominent on immune cells, mainly antigen-presenting cells (APC) and other types of cells, they are also expressed on tumour cells. The engagement of the receptor by the ligand is crucial for inhibiting or stimulating the immune cell, which is an extremely important aspect of cancer immunotherapy. This narrative review explores immunotherapy, focusing on ICPMs and immune checkpoint inhibitors in GC. We also summarise the current clinical trials that are evaluating ICPMs as a target for GC treatment.

Recent studies indicate that a higher body mass index (BMI) might correlate with improved responses to melanoma treatment, especially with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), despite the general association of obesity with an increased risk of cancer and higher mortality rates. This review examines the paradoxical relationship between BMI and clinical outcomes in melanoma patients by exploring molecular links, the efficacy of immunotherapy, and patient survival outcomes. Our comprehensive literature search across the PubMed and Embase databases revealed a consistent pattern: increased BMI is associated with a better prognosis in melanoma patients undergoing ICI treatment. This \"obesity paradox\" might be explained by the metabolic and immunological changes in obesity, which could enhance the effectiveness of immunotherapy in treating melanoma. The findings highlight the complexity of the interactions between obesity and melanoma, suggesting that adipose tissue may modulate the immune response and treatment sensitivity favorably. Our review highlights the need for personalized treatment strategies that consider the metabolic profiles of patients and calls for further research to validate BMI as a prognostic factor in clinical settings. This nuanced approach to the obesity paradox in melanoma could significantly impact treatment planning and patient management.