We compared 6 new interferon-γ release assays (IGRAs; hereafter index tests: QFT-Plus, QFT-Plus CLIA, QIAreach, Wantai TB-IGRA, Standard E TB-Feron, and T-SPOT.TB/T-Cell Select) with World Health Organization (WHO)-endorsed tests for tuberculosis infection (hereafter reference tests).
Data sources (1 January 2007-18 August 2021) were Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and manufacturers\' data. Cross-sectional and cohort studies comparing the diagnostic performance of index and reference tests were selected. The primary outcomes of interest were the pooled differences in sensitivity and specificity between index and reference tests. The certainty of evidence (CoE) was summarized using the GRADE approach.
Eighty-seven studies were included (44 evaluated the QFT-Plus, 4 QFT-Plus CLIA, 3 QIAreach, 26 TB-IGRA, 10 TB-Feron [1 assessing the QFT-Plus], and 1 T-SPOT.TB/T-Cell Select). Compared to the QFT-GIT, QFT Plus\'s sensitivity was 0.1 percentage points lower (95% confidence interval [CI], -2.8 to 2.6; CoE: moderate), and its specificity 0.9 percentage points lower (95% CI, -1.0 to -.9; CoE: moderate). Compared to QFT-GIT, TB-IGRA\'s sensitivity was 3.0 percentage points higher (95% CI, -.2 to 6.2; CoE: very low), and its specificity 2.6 percentage points lower (95% CI, -4.2 to -1.0; CoE: low). Agreement between the QFT-Plus CLIA and QIAreach with QFT-Plus was excellent (pooled κ statistics of 0.86 [95% CI, .78 to .94; CoE: low]; and 0.96 [95% CI, .92 to 1.00; CoE: low], respectively). The pooled κ statistic comparing the TB-Feron and the QFT-Plus or QFT-GIT was 0.85 (95% CI, .79 to .92; CoE: low).
The QFT-Plus and the TB-IGRA have very similar sensitivity and specificity as WHO-approved IGRAs.

The number of studies which evaluated interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs) results after anti-tuberculosis (TB) treatment has been rapidly increasing. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential use of IGRAs (QFT-GIT, T-SPOT.TB, QFT-Plus) in assessing the response to anti-TB treatment. We searched all studies in English language published from 1 October 2011 to 18 November 2018 in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus. Our search included the term \"tuberculosis treatment AND interferon-γ release assay\". We included studies evaluating the performance of commercial IGRAs (including QFT-GIT, T-SPOT.TB and QFT-Plus) before and after the anti-TB treatment. We performed subgroup analysis based on the age (children, adults), type of TB (active, latent, active and latent, and contacts exposed to MDR defined as MDR LTBI), type of IGRAs (QFT-GIT and T-SPOT.TB), and follow-up interval (2, 3, 4, 6, 9 months). Of the 18 included studies, 12 used QFT-GIT for assessment of IGRA performance after therapy, 1 used T-SPOT.TB, and 3 used both QFT-GIT and T-SPOT.TB. Since then, only two studies have assessed the QFT-Plus performance during therapy. According to the results of the meta-analysis, the pooled rate of positive IGRAs (QFT-GIT and T-SPOT.TB) following anti-TB therapy was estimated at 76% [95% CI 70-81%] and no difference was found compared to the pooled positive rate of IGRAs before initiation of therapy which was 76% [95% CI 60-89%]. The subgroup analysis showed that the pooled rate of positive IGRAs (QFT-GIT and T-SPOT.TB) after anti-TB therapy was significantly higher in monitoring active TB subjects [80% (95% CI 74-88%)] than LTBI [71% (95% CI 70-81%)]. Available data are now sufficient to suggest that monitoring changes in the IGRAs (QFT-GIT and T-SPOT.TB) response during anti-TB treatment may have limited use in evaluating the effectiveness of treatment, while the monitoring changes in QFT-Plus during anti-tubercular treatment are recommended to determine treatment efficacy or for treatment monitoring. Further research is needed to establish the efficacy of this new assay as marker on a larger scale for treatment monitoring.

BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis (TB) is considered as a serious complication for organ transplant recipients; therefore, the detection and appropriate treatment of latent infection are recommended for preventing active TB infections in the future. The objective of this review is to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies assessing the prevalence of latent TB infection (LTBI) in transplant candidates.
METHODS: Electronic databases, including MEDLINE (via PubMed), SCOPUS were searched until 30 June 2017. The prevalence of LTBI was estimated using the random effects meta-analysis. Heterogeneity was evaluated by subgroup analysis. Data were analyzed by STATA version 14.
RESULTS: The pooled prevalence of LTBI based on tuberculin skin test (TST) in different transplant types was as follows: liver 24% (14%-33%, 95% CI), lung 22% (18%-26%), renal 21% (16%-27%, 95% CI) and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) 14% (9%-19%). The prevalence of LTBI based on Interferon Gamma Release Assay (IGRA) tests in renal transplant candidates was 31% (95% CI; 25-37%), which was much higher than the prevalence of LTBI in liver transplant candidates (25%, 95% CI; 17-33%) and HCT transplant candidates (13%, 95% CI; 10-16%) and there was statistically significant differences between them. The pooled prevalence of indeterminate results based on IGRAs test in different transplant types was as follows: renal 6% (4%-8%, 95% CI) and liver 12% (2%-21%, 95% CI). Subgroup analysis revealed that there were statistically significant differences between the overall prevalence of indeterminate results by using IGRA tests in liver transplant candidates (12%, 95% CI; 2-21%) and renal transplant candidates (6%, 95% CI; 4-8%). The pooled prevalence of post-transplant TB was 2% (1%-2%, 95% CI) and its occurrence was more common in renal recipients (4% (2%-7%, 95% CI)) than in the liver transplant patients (1% (0%-2%, 95% CI)). The prevalence of LTBI in the subgroup (i.e. the patients\' mean age was <50 years) was significantly higher than the prevalence of LTBI by using TST/IGRAs in the other subgroup (i.e. the patients\' mean age was ≥50 years).
CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests fair overall agreement between IGRAs and TST in patients requiring liver and HCT transplantation, while a superiority of IGRAs over TST in patients requiring renal transplantation was seen.

BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis (TB) is a global public health problem, causing morbidity and mortality in adults and children. The most reliable diagnostic tools currently available are the in vivo Tuberculin Skin Test (TST) and the ex vivo Interferon-γ release assays (IGRAs). Several clinical, radiological, and bacteriological features make the detection of active (overt disease) TB in children difficult. Although recently developed immunological assays such as QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-IT) and T-SPOT®.TB are commonly used to identify active TB in adults, different evidence is required for diagnosis in children. The purpose of this study was to reassess the sensitivity and specificity of IGRAs in detecting microbiologically confirmed active TB in immunocompetent children.
METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting on the diagnostic accuracy of tests for TB in immunocompetent children aged 0-18 years, with confirmation by positive M. tuberculosis cultures, were undertaken. Electronic databases were searched up to September 2015 and study quality assessment was performed using QUADAS-2.
RESULTS: Fifteen studies were included in our meta-analysis. Results showed that there were no significant differences in sensitivity between TST (88.2%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 79.4-94.2%), QFT-IT (89.6%, 95% CI 79.7-95.7%) and T SPOT (88.5%, 95% CI 80.4-94.1%). However, both QFT-IT (95.4%, 95% CI 93.8-96.6%) and T-SPOT (96.8%, 95% CI 94.2-98.5%) have significantly higher specificity than TST (86.3%, 95% CI 83.9-88.6%).
CONCLUSIONS: QFT-IT and T-SPOT have higher specificity than TST for detecting active TB cases in immunocompetent children.