BACKGROUND: Aberrations in blood phosphate (Pi) levels, whether presenting as hypo- or hyperphosphatemia, appear to be associated with clinical complications and adverse outcomes in patients admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU). However, the prevalence of Pi disorders and the association with subsequent factors and organ failures leading to death in ICU patients are poorly described. Despite endeavors to understand the etiology and treatment of low Pi levels from systematic reviews and meta-analyses, the literature lacks comprehensive guidance for managing hypophosphatemia. Hyperphosphatemia, on the other hand, appears to be associated with higher mortality among critically ill patients, yet its prevalence among ICU patients, particularly following phosphate repletion, remains unknown. The present study aims to investigate the prevalence of Pi abnormalities upon ICU admission and their incidence during the first week of ICU stay, the factors associated with Pi alterations, and the effect of phosphate repletion on the normalization of Pi levels, and its associations with clinical outcomes.
METHODS: This multicentre, prospective, non-interventional cohort study will include at least 1000 consecutive adult ICU patients (≥18 years) as part B of the GUTPHOS study. Sites are eligible if an anticipated minimal inclusion of 50 eligible patients during eight weeks from January 2024 until June 2024 and daily phosphate measurements during the first seven days of ICU stay are expected. All consecutive adult patients admitted to a participating ICU during the recruitment period, lasting up to eight weeks, or up to 120 patients if enrollment reaches that limit earlier, will be included. Study parameters include study site characteristics, patient demographics, daily assessment of Pi levels, Pi-related treatment, feeding details, renal replacement therapy details, the incidence of refeeding-associated hypophosphatemia and administered medication (during the first seven calendar days of ICU stay). There will be a follow-up period of a maximum of 90 days to document 28- and 90-day all-cause mortality as the primary outcome. Multiple logistic regression will be used to assess independent associations with mortality in addition to Receiver Operating Characteristics curves to identify cut-off Pi values associated with mortality and overcorrection. Linear mixed models will be conducted to assess Pi treatment effects. Subgroup analyses will be performed based on Pi abnormalities observed during ICU admission, categorized as normo-, hypo-, hyper-, or mixed, along with its severity (mild, moderate, or severe).
CONCLUSIONS: The GUTPHOS study will be the first multicentre, prospective observational cohort study to investigate the prevalence, management practices, and consequent outcomes associated with Pi abnormalities during the first week of ICU admission. Its results may bridge the current evidence gap in repletion protocols while establishing the groundwork for a subsequent randomized controlled trial.
BACKGROUND: NCT05909722.

UNASSIGNED: COPD patients frequently have abnormal serum phosphorus levels. The objective of this study was to examine the correlation between serum phosphorus levels with hospital and 90-day mortality in critically ill patients with COPD.
UNASSIGNED: The MIMIC IV database was used for this retrospective cohort analysis. We extracted demographics, vital signs, laboratory tests, comorbidity, antibiotic usage, ventilation and scoring systems within the first 24 hours of ICU admission. Restricted cubic splines and multivariate cox regression analysis models were used to evaluate the connection between serum phosphorus with hospital and 90-day mortality. We assessed and classified various factors including gender, age, renal disease, severe liver disease, the utilization of antibiotics and congestive heart failure.
UNASSIGNED: We included a total of 3611 patients with COPD, with a median age of 70.7 years. After adjusting for all other factors, we observed a significant positive association between serum phosphate levels with both hospital mortality (HR 1.19, 95% CI: 1.07-1.31, p<0.001) and 90-day mortality (HR 1.15, 95% CI: 1.06-1.24, p<0.001). Compared to the medium group (Q2 ≥3.15, <4.0), the adjusted hazard ratios for hospital mortality were 1.47 (95% CI: 1.08-2, p=0.013), and 1.31 (95% CI: 1.06-1.61, p=0.013) for 90-day mortality in the high group (Q3≥4.0). Hospital mortality decreased at serum phosphate levels below 3.8 mg/dl (HR 0.664, 95% CI: 0.468-0.943, p=0.022), but increased for both hospital (HR 1.312, 95% CI: 1.141-1.509, p<0.001) and 90-day mortality (HR 1.236, 95% CI: 1.102-1.386, p<0.001) when levels were above 3.8 mg/dl. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses yielded consistent results.
UNASSIGNED: In critical ill COPD patients, this study demonstrated a non-linear association between serum phosphate levels and both hospital and 90-day mortality. Notably, there was an inflection point at 3.8 mg/dl, indicating a significant shift in outcomes. Future prospective research is necessary to validate this correlation.

What is this summary about?This is a summary of an article that was published in the medical journal Kidney360 describing results from the NORMALIZE study. The NORMALIZE study looked at how well tenapanor tablets reduced higher-than-normal levels of phosphate in the blood of persons with kidney disease who are on maintenance dialysis. These persons are unable to keep their blood phosphate levels in a normal range, and high levels of phosphate can contribute to several serious health consequences.Tenapanor is approved as an add-on treatment for high levels of phosphate in the blood of adults with chronic kidney disease who are on maintenance dialysis and whose disease does not respond adequately to treatment with phosphate binders or who are not able to take phosphate binders. In earlier clinical studies, tenapanor was studied alone or studied together with phosphate binders. In a 1-year clinical study called PHREEDOM, researchers learned that when tenapanor was used alone, it lowered blood phosphate levels, and treated patients experienced acceptable safety and tolerability as determined by the doctors running the study. In the NORMALIZE study, adult patients took a 30-mg tenapanor tablet twice a day, either alone or with sevelamer, for up to 18 months after they completed the PHREEDOM study.What were the main conclusions reported by the researchers?The researchers found that one-third of patients taking tenapanor, either alone or with sevelamer, achieved normal blood phosphate levels. This is an improvement from the current standard of care with sevelamer alone to reduce blood phosphate levels. As seen in the earlier studies of tenapanor, the most common adverse event experienced by patients was softer or loose stools. No new safety concerns were reported in the NORMALIZE study.What are the key takeaways?The researchers concluded that tenapanor, used alone or combined with sevelamer, can be used long-term by adult patients receiving maintenance dialysis to reduce the phosphate levels in their blood to within the normal range. Patients who take tenapanor may experience softer or loose stools.This summary was developed by the authors to help adult patients with chronic kidney disease receiving dialysis, and their family members and/or caregivers, better understand the effects of taking tenapanor.[Box: see text]Link to original article here.

What is this summary about?This summary provides a review of the OPTIMIZE study, the results of which were published in Kidney360 in February 2024. The OPTIMIZE study looked at how well tenapanor tablets work to treat patients receiving dialysis who have high levels of phosphate in their blood, a condition called hyperphosphatemia. In the OPTIMIZE study, researchers wanted to understand if tenapanor would decrease phosphate levels in the blood to the target range. They also tested different ways of starting tenapanor treatment in patients.In the human body, kidneys are organs that filter blood and remove waste products. In chronic kidney disease, sometimes referred to as CKD, a patient’s kidneys do not work as well at filtering their blood and removing waste products. This can allow phosphate to build up in the blood. Phosphate levels may remain high despite patients receiving treatment such as dialysis, using pills that keep phosphate in the intestines (called phosphate binders) to prevent phosphate from being absorbed into the blood, and eating a low-phosphate diet. Phosphate levels may remain high despite these treatments because they can be difficult to follow. Most people receiving dialysis take 7–8 phosphate binder pills every day, and over half of those people have reported skipping at least one dose in the past month. Additionally, low-phosphate diets can be difficult to follow and people often struggle to meet their other nutritional needs.What are the key takeaways?Tenapanor used in combination with phosphate binders led to lower phosphate levels in the blood with the use of fewer phosphate-lowering pills. Tenapanor also lowered phosphate levels in patients who were not previously on phosphate binders but needed phosphate-lowering treatment.What were the main conclusions reported by the researchers?Tenapanor can help patients receiving dialysis better control their hyperphosphatemia.[Box: see text]Link to original article here.

暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: Data is limited on the prevalence of hypophosphatemia in general hospitalized patients, and its association with length of hospital stay (LOS) and mortality remained unclear. We aimed to investigate the prevalence of admission phosphate abnormality and the association between serum phosphate level and length of hospital stay and all-cause mortality in adult patients.
METHODS: This was a multi-center retrospective study based on real-world data. Participants were classified into five groups according to serum phosphate level (inorganic phosphorus, iP) within 48 h after admission: G1, iP < 0.64 mmol/L; G2, iP 0.64-0.8 mmol/L; G3, iP 0.8-1.16 mmol/L; G4, iP 1.16-1.45 mmol/L; and G5, iP ≥ 1.45 mmol/L, respectively. Both LOS and in-hospital mortality were considered as outcomes. Clinical information, including age, sex, primary diagnosis, co-morbidity, and phosphate-metabolism related parameters, were also abstracted from medical records.
RESULTS: A total number of 23,479 adult patients (14,073 males and 9,406 females, aged 57.7 ± 16.8 y) were included in the study. The prevalence of hypophosphatemia was 4.74%. An \"L-shaped\" non-linear association was determined between serum phosphate level and LOS and the inflection point was 1.16 mmol/L in serum phosphate level. Compared with patients in G4, patients in G1, G2 or G3 were significantly associated with longer LOS after full adjustment of covariates. Each 0.1 mmol/L decrease in serum phosphate level to the left side of the inflection point led to 0.64 days increase in LOS [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.46, 0.81; p for trend < 0.001]. But there was no association between serum phosphate and LOS where serum levels of phosphate ≥ 1.16 mmol/L. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that adjusted all-cause in-hospital mortality was 3.08-fold greater in patients in G1 than those in G4 (95% CI: 1.52, 6.25; p for trend = 0.001). Similarly, no significant association with either LOS or mortality were found in patients in G5, comparing with G4.
CONCLUSIONS: Hypophosphatemia, but not hyperphosphatemia, was associated with LOS and all-cause mortality in adult inpatients. It is meaningful to monitor serum levels of phosphate to facilitate early diagnosis and intervention.

OBJECTIVE: Hyperphosphatemia is a common complication in patients with kidney failure, despite the use of phosphate binders. Vitamin B3, either in the form of niacin or niacinamide (NAM), shows potential as \"add-on\" treatment to reduce serum phosphate concentrations in this population. NAM seems to lack many of the side effects that are observed with niacin. The aim of this study was to investigate whether NAM is an effective and acceptable treatment in reducing serum phosphate concentrations in patients with kidney failure.
METHODS: DiaNia was a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized crossover trial, comparing NAM (250-500 mg/day) to placebo as \"add-on\" treatment to an individual treatment with approved phosphate binders for 12 weeks in patients receiving hemodialysis. The primary outcome was serum phosphate concentrations, and the secondary outcomes were platelet counts as well as drop-outs due to side effects. Data were analyzed using both per-protocol and intention-to-treat analyses.
RESULTS: Mean age of the per-protocol population (n = 26) was 63.6 ± 17.2 years and 53.8% were men. NAM treatment significantly reduced serum phosphate with 0.59 mg/dL (p = .03). Linear mixed-effects models demonstrated superiority of 12 weeks NAM over 12 weeks placebo with a between-treatment difference of 0.77 mg/dL (95% CI 0.010, 1.43; P = .03). Similar results, although not significant, were found in the intention-to-treat population. We found no between-treatment differences in platelet counts and during the NAM treatment we observed 3 drop-outs due to side effects (8.6%).
CONCLUSIONS: NAM is effective in reducing serum phosphate concentrations in patients with kidney failure receiving hemodialysis. In addition, NAM is well-tolerated and seems not to increase the risk of thrombocytopenia. Thus, NAM can be valuable as \"add-on\" treatment to combat hyperphosphatemia in patients with kidney failure. However, more research in larger populations is needed to confirm this.

BACKGROUND: The clinical benefits of aspirin in patients undergoing hemodialysis remain unclear.
METHODS: The secondary analysis of the LANDMARK trial investigated whether aspirin use was associated with cardiovascular events (CVEs) and all-cause mortality was performed. A total of 2135 patients at risk for vascular calcification were analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards model with propensity score matching.
RESULTS: The risk of CVEs was comparable between participants with aspirin use at baseline and those without at baseline, between participants with aspirin use during the study period and those without during the study period, and between participants with new aspirin prescription and those without aspirin use during the study period.
CONCLUSIONS: Aspirin use was not significantly associated with a lower risk of CVEs in participants undergoing hemodialysis patients at risk of vascular calcification.

暂无摘要。

UNASSIGNED: The efficacy and safety of tenapanor has not been confirmed in Chinese end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients with hyperphosphatemia on haemodialysis (HD).
UNASSIGNED: This was a randomised, double blind, phase 3 trial conducted at 26 dialysis facilities in China (https://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx; CTR20202588). After a 3-week washout, adults with ESRD on HD with hyperphosphatemia were randomised (1:1) using an interactive web response system to oral tenapanor 30 mg twice a day or placebo for 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change in mean serum phosphorous level from baseline to the endpoint visit (day 29 or last serum phosphorus measurement). Efficacy was analysed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of the study drug.
UNASSIGNED: Between 5 March 2021 and 8 June 2022, 77 patients received tenapanor and 73 received placebo. Tenapanor treatment (n = 75) resulted in a significantly greater least squares (LS) mean reduction in serum phosphate at the endpoint visit versus placebo (n = 72): LS mean difference -1.17 mg/dl (95% CI -1.694 to -0.654, P < .001). More patients receiving tenapanor achieved a serum phosphorous level <5.5 mg/dl at the endpoint visit (44.6% versus 10.1%). The most common treatment-related adverse event was diarrhoea [tenapanor 28.6% (22/77), placebo 2.7% (2/73)], which was mostly mild and led to treatment discontinuation in two patients receiving tenapanor.
UNASSIGNED: Tenapanor significantly reduced the serum phosphorous level versus placebo in Chinese ESRD patients on HD and was generally well tolerated.