BACKGROUND: Oxygen is frequently prescribed in neurocritical care units. Avoiding hypoxaemia is a key objective in patients with acute brain injury (ABI). However, several studies suggest that hyperoxaemia may also be related to higher mortality and poor neurological outcomes in these patients. The evidence in this direction is still controversial due to the limited number of prospective studies, the lack of a common definition for hyperoxaemia, the heterogeneity in experimental designs and the different causes of ABI. To explore the correlation between hyperoxaemia and poor neurological outcomes and mortality in hospitalised adult patients with ABI, we will conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies and RCTs.
METHODS: The systematic review methods have been defined according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and follow the PRISMA-Protocols structure. Studies published until June 2024 will be identified in the electronic databases MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature and ClinicalTrials.gov. Retrieved records will be independently screened by four authors working in pairs, and the selected variables will be extracted from studies reporting data on the effect of \'hyperoxaemia\' versus \'no hyperoxaemia on neurological outcomes and mortality in hospitalised patients with ABI. We will use covariate-adjusted ORs as outcome measures when reported since they account for potential cofounders and provide a more accurate estimate of the association between hyperoxaemia and outcomes; when not available, we will use univariate ORs. If the study presents the results as relative risks, it will be considered equivalent to the OR as long as the prevalence of the condition is close to 10%. Pooled estimates of both outcomes will be calculated applying random-effects meta-analysis. Interstudy heterogeneity will be assessed using the I2 statistic; risk of bias will be assessed through Risk Of Bias In Non-Randomised Studies of Interventions, Newcastle-Ottawa or RoB2 tools. Depending on data availability, we plan to conduct subgroup analyses by ABI type (traumatic brain injury, postcardiac arrest, subarachnoid haemorrhage, intracerebral haemorrhage and ischaemic stroke), arterial partial pressure of oxygen values, study quality, study time, neurological scores and other selected clinical variables of interest.
BACKGROUND: Specific ethics approval consent is not required as this is a review of previously published anonymised data. Results of the study will be shared with the scientific community via publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presentation at relevant conferences and workshops. It will also be shared key stakeholders, such as national or international health authorities, healthcare professionals and the general population, via scientific outreach journals and research institutes\' newsletters.

OBJECTIVE: We conducted a meta-analysis to determine the effect of hyperoxia on muscle sympathetic nerve activity in healthy individuals and those with cardio-metabolic diseases.
METHODS: A comprehensive search of electronic databases was performed until August 2022. All study designs (except reviews) were included: population (humans; apparently healthy or with at least one chronic disease); exposures (muscle sympathetic nerve activity during hyperoxia or hyperbaria); comparators (hyperoxia or hyperbaria vs. normoxia); and outcomes (muscle sympathetic nerve activity, heart rate, blood pressure, minute ventilation). Forty-nine studies were ultimately included in the meta-analysis.
RESULTS: In healthy individuals, hyperoxia had no effect on sympathetic burst frequency (mean difference [MD] - 1.07 bursts/min; 95% confidence interval [CI] - 2.17, 0.04bursts/min; P = 0.06), burst incidence (MD 0.27 bursts/100 heartbeats [hb]; 95% CI - 2.10, 2.64 bursts/100 hb; P = 0.82), burst amplitude (P = 0.85), or total activity (P = 0.31). In those with chronic diseases, hyperoxia decreased burst frequency (MD - 5.57 bursts/min; 95% CI - 7.48, - 3.67 bursts/min; P < 0.001) and burst incidence (MD - 4.44 bursts/100 hb; 95% CI - 7.94, - 0.94 bursts/100 hb; P = 0.01), but had no effect on burst amplitude (P = 0.36) or total activity (P = 0.90). Our meta-regression analyses identified an inverse relationship between normoxic burst frequency and change in burst frequency with hyperoxia. In both groups, hyperoxia decreased heart rate but had no effect on any measure of blood pressure.
CONCLUSIONS: Hyperoxia does not change sympathetic activity in healthy humans. Conversely, in those with chronic diseases, hyperoxia decreases sympathetic activity. Regardless of disease status, resting sympathetic burst frequency predicts the degree of change in burst frequency, with larger decreases for those with higher resting activity.

暂无摘要。

The detrimental effects of hyperoxia exposure have been well-described in patients admitted to intensive care units. However, data evaluating the effects of short-term, early hyperoxia exposure in patients intubated in the prehospital setting or emergency department (ED) have not been systematically reviewed.
Our aim was to quantify and describe the existing literature examining the clinical outcomes in ED patients exposed to hyperoxia within the first 24 h of mechanical ventilation.
This review was performed in concordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines for scoping reviews. Two rounds of review using Rayyan QCRI software were performed for title and abstract screening and full-text search. Of the 2739 articles, 27 articles were retrieved after initial screening, of which 5 articles were excluded during the full-text screening, leaving 22 articles for final review and data extraction.
Of 22 selected publications, 9 described patients with traumatic brain injury, 6 with cardiac arrest, 3 with multisystem trauma, 1 with stroke, 2 with septic shock, and 1 was heterogeneous. Three studies were randomized controlled trials. The available data have widely heterogeneous definitions of hyperoxia exposure, outcomes, and included populations, limiting conclusions.
There is a paucity of data that examined the effects of severe hyperoxia exposure in the acute, post-intubation phase of the prehospital and ED settings. Further research with standardized definitions is needed to provide more detailed guidance regarding early oxygen titration in intubated patients.

Preterm birth is a public health priority worldwide, with approximately 15 million premature babies born each year. Oxygen supplementation is one of the most common interventions for preterm infants. However, prolonged oxygen inhalation at supraphysiological concentrations can lead to the development of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). In addition to lifelong pulmonary sequelae, clinical evidence suggests that BPD is associated with adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes, such as motor impairment, cognitive impairment, and behavioral deficits, severely affecting the quality of life of preterm infants. However, the mechanisms underlying the combination of neurodevelopmental impairment with BPD remain unclear. Therefore, in recent years, attention has also been focused on the effects of hyperoxia on brain development in preterm infants. In this review, we outline the pathophysiological mechanisms of brain injury caused by developmental hyperoxia exposure in current animal models and briefly describe the pharmacological therapies that may be applicable to the associated brain injury. Overall, more studies are needed to assess the effects of hyperoxia on the immature brain, particularly combined analyses of the lungs and brain in the same experimental setting, to elucidate the potential causes of combined neurodevelopmental impairment in BPD.

Supplemental oxygen is a standard therapeutic intervention for critically ill patients such as patients suffering from cardiac arrest, myocardial ischemia, traumatic brain injury, and stroke. However, the optimal oxygenation targets remain elusive owing to the paucity and inconsistencies in the relevant literature. A comprehensive analysis of the available scientific evidence was performed to establish the relative efficacy of the lower and higher oxygenation targets. A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, MEDLINE, and Scopus databases from 2010 to 2023. Further, Google Scholar was also searched. Studies evaluating the efficacy of oxygenation targets and the associated clinical outcomes were included. Studies that included participants with hyperbaric oxygen therapy, chronic respiratory diseases, or extracorporeal life support were excluded. The literature search was performed by two blinded reviewers. A total of 19 studies were included in this systemic review, including 72,176 participants. A total of 14 randomized control trials were included. A total of 12 studies investigated the efficacy of lower and higher oxygenation targets in ICU-admitted patients, and seven were assessed in patients with acute myocardial infarction and stroke. For ICU patients, the evidence was conflicting, with some studies showing the efficacy of conservative oxygen therapy while others reported no difference. Overall, nine studies concluded that lower oxygen targets are favorable. However, most studies (n=4) in stroke and myocardial infarction patients showed no difference in lower or higher oxygenation targets whereas only two supported lower oxygenation targets. Available evidence suggests that lower oxygenation targets result in either improved or equivalent clinical outcomes compared with higher oxygenation targets.

BACKGROUND: In septic patients, hyperoxia may help with its bactericidal effects, but it may cause systemic impairments. The role of hyperoxia and the appropriate oxygen target in these patients is unknown. The aim of this systematic review was to summarize the available literature.
METHODS: We conducted a systematic search screening PubMed and Cochrane Library. Studies on adult patients with sepsis or septic shock and admitted to ICU addressing the topic of hyperoxia were included and described.
RESULTS: We included 12 studies, for a total of 15.782 included patients. Five studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or analyses from RCTs, three were prospective observational studies, and four were retrospective observational studies. The definition of hyperoxia was heterogeneous across the included studies. Mortality was the most frequent outcome: six studies showed an increased rate or risk of mortality with hyperoxia, three found no differences, and one a protective effect of hyperoxia. At the critical appraisal assessment stage, no major methodological flaws were detected, except for a single-center, pilot study, with a lack of adjustment for confounders and imbalance between the groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The optimum range of oxygen level able to minimize risks and provide benefits in patients with sepsis or septic shock seems still unknown. Clinical equipoise between hyperoxia and normoxia is uncertain as conflicting evidence exists. Further studies should aim at identifying the best range of oxygenation and its optimal duration, investigating how effects of different levels of oxygen may vary according to identified pathogens, source of infection, and prescribed antibiotics in critically ill patients with sepsis and septic shock.

This systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression examined the effect of acute normobaric hyperoxic breathing on cognition in healthy humans. 23 studies were included providing 76 effect estimates (EE). Hyperoxic breathing improved memory accuracy (22 EEs; g = 0.34) and speed (9 EEs; g = 0.59), attention accuracy (7 EEs; g = 0.59) and speed (7 EEs; g = 0.51), reaction speed (8 EEs; g = 0.82), crystallised intelligence (7 EEs; g = 0.73), executive function (6 EEs; g = 0.88) and information processing (10 EEs; g = 0.62). However, the overall quality of evidence was low (average Rosendal score of 47%) and there was a large range of study heterogeneity, with prediction intervals often crossing 0; therefore, reducing the reliability of the magnitude of these favourable effects. Oxygen percentage, 100% compared with 22-99% oxygen, temporal position of administration to task performance, and study quality did not influence the overall weighted mean effects for most cognitive domains. Altogether, despite beneficial results, further high quality research is required prior to recommending hyperoxic breathing to enhance cognition.

Military pilots risk their lives during training and operations. Advancements in aerospace engineering, flight profiles, and mission demands may require the pilot to test the safe limits of their physiology. Monitoring pilot physiology (e.g. heart rate, oximetry, and respiration) inflight is in consideration by several nations to inform pilots of reduced performance capacity and guide future developments in aircraft and life-support system design. Numerous challenges, however, prevent the immediate operationalisation of physiological monitoring sensors, particularly their unreliability in the aerospace environment and incompatibility with pilot clothing and protective equipment. Human performance and behaviour are also highly variable and measuring these in controlled laboratory settings do not mirror the real-world conditions pilots must endure. Misleading or erroneous predictive models are unacceptable as these could compromise mission success and lose operator trust. This narrative review provides an overview of considerations for integrating physiological monitoring systems within the military aviation environment.Practitioner summary: Advancements in military technology can conflictingly enhance and compromise pilot safety and performance. We summarise some of the opportunities, limitations, and risks of integrating physiological monitoring systems within military aviation. Our intent is to catalyse further research and technological development.Abbreviations: AGS: anti-gravity suit; AGSM: anti-gravity straining manoeuvre; A-LOC: almost loss of consciousness; CBF: cerebral blood flow; ECG: electrocardiogram; EEG: electroencephalogram; fNIRS: functional near-infrared spectroscopy; G-forces: gravitational forces; G-LOC: gravity-induced loss of consciousness; HR: heart rate; HRV: heart rate variability; LSS: life-support system; NATO: North Atlantic Treaty Organisation; PE: Physiological Episode; PCO2: partial pressure of carbon dioxide; PO2: partial pressure of oxygen; OBOGS: on board oxygen generating systems; SpO2: peripheral blood haemoglobin-oxygen saturation; STANAG: North Atlantic Treaty Organisation Standardisation Agreement; UPE: Unexplained Physiological Episode; WBV: whole body vibration.

Main pulmonary vascular diseases (PVD) with precapillary pulmonary hypertension (PH) are pulmonary arterial and chronic thromboembolic PH. Guidelines recommend supplemental oxygen therapy (SOT) for severely hypoxemic patients with PH, but evidence is scarce. The authors performed a systematic review and where possible meta-analyses on the effects of SOT on hemodynamics and exercise performance in patients with PVD. In PVD, short-term SOT significantly improved mean pulmonary artery pressure and exercise performance. There is growing evidence on the benefit of long-term SOT for selected patients with PVD regarding exercise capacity and maybe even survival.