OBJECTIVE: The trochlea is of great importance for the stability of the elbow and its fixation in low transcondylar fractures of the distal humerus is especially challenging. The aim of this study was to determine the optimal trochlea fixation in double plate osteosynthesis of intraarticular distal humerus fractures.
METHODS: A low transcondylar, C3-type distal humerus fracture was created in 20 fresh-frozen human cadaveric humeri. The samples were then randomly divided into two groups of 10 specimens each. Double plate osteosynthesis was performed in both groups. In group A, the two most distal screws of the lateral plate were inserted into the trochlea fragment. In group B, these screws did not extend into the trochlea. Displacement under cyclic loading and ultimate failure loads were determined for all specimens.
RESULTS: Group A showed significantly less displacement under cyclic loading in each measurement interval (0.92 mm vs. 1.53 mm after 100 cycles, p = 0 0.006; 1.10 mm vs. 1.84 mm after 1000 cycles, p = 0.007; 1.18 mm vs. 1.98 mm after 2000 cycles, p = 0.008). The ultimate failure load was significantly higher in group A than in group B (345.61 ± 120.389 N vs. 238.42 ± 131.61 N, p = 0.037).
CONCLUSIONS: Fixation of the trochlea with interdigitating screws in double plate osteosynthesis of low-condylar type C distal humerus fractures results in superior construct stability.
METHODS: not applicable (biomechanical).

BACKGROUND: Our experience with the surgical flip-dislocation of the bicolumnar (SFDB) approach for type AO 13C3 humeral fractures indicates that this surgical approach can be performed safely and effectively in appropriately selected patients. We aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of the SFDB approach without olecranon osteotomy (OO) for type AO 13C3 distal humeral fractures.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 65 cases of type AO 13C3 distal humeral fractures treated between April 2008 and July 2018; 33 patients were treated with the SFDB approach, and the remaining were treated with OO. Propensity score matching was used to control for sex, age, and the American Society of Anesthesiology score. Elbow pain, range of motion, stability, and function were assessed using the Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire. Clinical complications, reoperation rates, and radiographic results were compared between the groups.
RESULTS: Operative time and blood loss were significantly lower in the SFDB group than in the OO group (P = 0.001, P = 0.002, respectively). At the final follow-up, the mean postoperative MEPI did not significantly differ between the groups (P = 0.628). According to Morrey\'s criteria, a typical functional range of elbow motion was achieved in 12 and 15 patients in the SFDB and OO groups, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The SFDB approach achieves superior exposure of the articular surface without injury to the extensor mechanism in type 13C3 articular surface fracture treatment. This approach also results in good early functional recovery and clinical outcomes, with a low risk of complications.

OBJECTIVE: Lateral humeral condyle fractures account for 12% to 17% of all distal humerus fractures in children, and usually occur as an isolated injury or are associated with radial neck and/or proximal ulna fractures. The presentation with a concomitant dislocation of the elbow is rare. Therefore, literature on young patients with this uncommon combination is sparse and mostly limited to case reports and small case series. The aim of the present study is to identify the best treatment strategy for this injury, recognize potential risk factors for the development of complications, and identify predictors of outcome.
METHODS: This is a multicenter retrospective review of electronic and written medical records for skeletally immature patients who were diagnosed with a lateral condyle fracture of the humerus associated with elbow dislocation (ED). Data recorded included patient demographics, fracture classification, direction of the dislocation, treatment strategy, time to union, elbow range of motion, complications, and additional procedures. The modified Flynn criteria were used to determine the outcomes.
RESULTS: We identified 23 patients who presented to 3 institutions with a concomitant lateral humeral condyle fractures and an ED. The mean age at the time of injury was 8.7 years (range: 6 to 13 y). The median time from injury to surgery was 1 day (interquartile range: 0.5, minimum to maximum: 0 to 29 d). The median follow-up was 24 weeks (interquartile range: 16, minimum to maximum: 4 to 120 wk). The injury occurred more commonly in males (79%) with Weiss type 3 fractures. The direction of the dislocation was posterior or posteromedial in most cases. Open reduction through a modified Kocher lateral approach and fixation with either Kirschner wires (N = 12) or cannulated screws (N = 9) was the preferred method of treatment. Eight patients (34.8%) developed complications, including persistent elbow stiffness (N = 5), elbow instability (N = 1), and avascular necrosis (N = 2). There were no cases of delayed union, nonunion, malunion, heterotopic ossification, neurological injury, or hardware failure. Patients treated with casting or Kirschner wire fixation had a significantly increased rate of elbow stiffness compared with screw fixation (50%, 25%, and 11%, respectively, P = 0.015). According to Flynn\'s criteria, 65% of the patients had good or excellent outcomes, and 35% had poor.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study demonstrate a higher than previously described rate of complications in children with lateral condyle humerus fracture associated with ED, including persistent elbow stiffness, avascular necrosis, and chronic elbow instability, leading to unsatisfactory clinical outcomes in over one-third of the cases. Our findings suggest that the internal fixation with screws, combined with a shorter postoperative immobilization period (2 wk) may lead to improved clinical outcomes.
METHODS: Level III-therapeutic, case series.

BACKGROUND: Semiconstrained total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) is an established treatment for elderly patients with distal humeral fractures not amenable to stable internal fixation (unreconstructable). In recent years, there has been increasing interest in elbow hemiarthroplasty (EHA), a treatment option which does not entail restrictions on weight-bearing as opposed to TEA. These 2 treatments have not been compared in a randomized controlled trial (RCT). The aim of this study was to compare the functional outcome of EHA and TEA for the treatment of unreconstructable distal humeral fractures in elderly patients.
METHODS: This was a multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT). Patients were included between January 2011 and November 2019 at one of 3 participating hospitals. The inclusion criteria were an unreconstructable distal humeral fracture, age ≥60 years and independent living. The final follow-up took place after ≥2 years. The primary outcome measure was the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score. Secondary outcome measures were the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), the EQ-5D index, range of motion (flexion, extension, pronation, and supination) and grip strength.
RESULTS: Forty patients were randomized to TEA (n = 20) and EHA (n = 20). Five patients died before completing the final follow-up, leaving 18 EHA and 17 TEA patients for analysis. There were 31 women. The mean age was 74.0 (SD, 8.5) years in the EHA group and 76.9 (SD, 7.6) in the TEA group (P = .30). The mean DASH score was 21.6 points in the EHA group and 27.2 in the TEA group (P = .39), a difference of -5.6 points (95% CI: -18.6 to 7.5). There were no differences between treatment with EHA and TEA for the mean values of the MEPS (85.0 vs. 88.2, P = .59), EQ-5D index (0.92 vs. 0.86, P = .13), extension (29° vs. 29°, P = .98), flexion (126° vs. 136°, P = .05), arc of flexion-extension (97° vs. 107°, P = .25), supination (81° vs. 75°, P = .13), pronation (78° vs. 74°, P = .16) or grip strength (17.5 kg vs. 17.2 kg, P = .89). There were 6 adverse events in each treatment group.
CONCLUSIONS: In this RCT, both elbow hemiarthroplasty (EHA) and total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) resulted in a good and similar functional outcome for unreconstructable distal humeral fractures in elderly patients at a minimum of 2 years of follow-up.

BACKGROUND: The indication for minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) may include articular fractures depending on the fracture pattern. The goal of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of the MIPO technique for extra- and intra-articular distal humeral fractures.
METHODS: The feasibility of the MIPO technique was assessed on 8 cadaveric elbows and 2 clinical cases. The four surgical approaches tested included a 20-mm ulnar incision, a 20-mm dorsoradial incision, and two incisions for olecranon osteotomy (A and B). Surgical incision A was 40 mm on the osteotomy level of the olecranon, and surgical incision B was an extension of the radial incision toward the osteotomy of the olecranon (80 mm). The four approaches were tested on 4 extra-articular (AO 13 A3) fractures and 4 intra-articular (AO 13 C3) fractures.
RESULTS: Reduction and plate fixation of all distal humeral fractures (8 cadaveric) with and without osteotomy was feasible. However, when using approach B, the soft tissue tension is reduced due to the wider incision. Nevertheless, both approaches A and B showed the same adequate intra-articular fracture control and reduction.
CONCLUSIONS: The MIPO technique for reduction and plate fixation in distal humeral fractures is feasible.
METHODS: As a feasibility study, this study cannot be clearly classified into a level of evidence. It corresponds most closely to level IV.

BACKGROUND: Iatrogenic injury to the radial nerve is a risk in surgical treatment for extraarticular fractures of the middle and distal third of the humerus. We aimed to investigate the safety, feasibility and advantages of minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO) via an anteromedial approach in the treatment of middle and middle-distal humeral fractures and to evaluate proximity to neurovascular structures.
METHODS: In 2016, 13 adult cadaver arms were used to simulate a minimally invasive surgical approach to the anteromedial humerus followed by fixation with a locking compression plate (LCP), and several sets of anatomical data were measured to clarify the possible risk of iatrogenic vascular and nerve injury in this surgical approach. Then, a case series study of 12 patients with humeral fractures who were treated with this surgical approach was conducted between 2017 and 2020.
RESULTS: The average humeral length was 29.22 ± 1.62 cm, the average width of the medial epicondyle of the humerus was 1.31 ± 0.17 cm, and the average distance from the vertex of the medial epicondyle to the median nerve was 2.96 ± 1.62 cm. Furthermore, the safe area for distal humeral screw placement was 6.28 ± 0.39 cm, and the average distance from the tip of the distal end of the screw in the medial epicondyle to the ulnar nerve was 1.7 ± 1.25 mm. None of the 12 patients had nerve damage or an incisional infection after the operation.
CONCLUSIONS: The new approach was performed as described, and no cases of iatrogenic nerve palsy occurred. This approach can be used as an alternative for the treatment of extraarticular fractures of the middle and distal thirds of the humerus.
METHODS: Level IV, therapeutic study.

OBJECTIVE: Olecranon osteotomy and paratricipital approaches were widely used in the treatment of type C distal humerus fracture but some disadvantages exist, so a combined medial and lateral approach was designed. The objective of this study was to investigate and compare the clinical outcomes of combined medial and lateral approach with the paratricipital approach in open reduction and internal fixation of type C distal humerus fractures.
METHODS: From May 2018 to April 2020, 37 patients with type C distal humerus fracture who accepted open reduction and internal fixation in our hospital were enrolled in this study. All cases were randomly divided into two groups according to the surgical approach: combined medial and lateral approach group (19 cases), paratricipital approach group (18 cases). All of the patients received open reduction and double vertical plates fixation. The operation and follow-up indexes, including operation time, blood loss, incision length, triceps muscle strength, flexion-extension arc of elbow and forearm rotation arc, were recorded and compared. Caja score was used to assess the quality of fractures reduction. Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) was used to evaluate the elbow function in the follow-up. Complications such as incision infection, ulnar nerve injury, degenerative osteoarthritis, and heterotopic ossification were analyzed.
RESULTS: The differences in age, gender, and AO classification of fractures between two groups were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). The sum of medial and lateral incision length of combined approach group was longer than the midline incision of paratricipital approach group (15.4 ± 0.8 vs. 14.6 ± 0.8, p < 0.05), but there was no significant difference in operation time (103.5 ± 10.2 vs. 106.0 ± 8.8, p > 0.05), blood loss (71.3 ± 24.5 vs. 72.8 ± 24.6, p > 0.05), and Caja score (16.05 ± 5.67 vs. 15.56 ± 5.66, p > 0.05). During the follow-up, the MEPS of combined approach group was higher than that of paratricipital approach group at 3 months postoperatively (80.5 ± 5.7 vs. 68.9 ± 8.1, p < 0.05), but there was no significant difference in MEPS at 6 months postoperatively (83.9 ± 6.6 vs. 79.7 ± 7.0, p > 0.05) and at the last follow-up (86.8 ± 7.1 vs. 86.9 ± 7.7, p > 0.05) between the two groups. There was no significant difference in triceps muscle strength (p > 0.05), flexion-extension arc (126.8 ± 5.3 vs. 128.9 ± 6.0, p > 0.05), and forearm rotation arc (163.2 ± 5.3 vs. 163.6 ± 4.8, p > 0.05) at the last follow-up. Although the incidence of complication of combined approach group (15.8%) was lower than that of paratricipital approach group (22.2%), the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The combined medial and lateral approach was an effective and safe way of open reduction and internal fixation for type C distal humerus fractures. Compared with the paratricipital approach, the combined medial and lateral approach could restore the elbow function more quickly postoperatively, and the long-term results were comparable.

BACKGROUND: Double-plating methods are popular, with perpendicular and parallel plate methods being widely used surgical method for the rigid fixation of distal humeral fracture (DHF). However, which plate method is better for DHF remains controversial. The aim of this study was to compare patient outcomes including the incidences of complications and reoperation between the two plate methods.
METHODS: We extracted 383 patients with DHF undergoing surgery between 2011 and 2020 from our multicenter database, which is named TRON. We divided the subjects into two groups: perpendicular plating group (Group A) and parallel plating group (Group B). To adjust for baseline differences between the groups, patients were matched for age, sex, olecranon osteotomy, AO type, and type of injury. We assessed the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) at 3 and 6 months and the last follow-up month as the clinical outcome. We investigated the incidences of complications and reoperations in both groups.
RESULTS: After matching, each group comprised 50 patients. There was no significant difference between Group A versus Group B in MEPS score at each time point. The incidence of implant removal in Group B was higher than that in Group A (26.5% vs 50%, p = 0.023).
CONCLUSIONS: Although there were no significant differences in clinical outcomes or complications between the two groups, the incidence of implant removal was higher in Group B than in Group A. In the parallel plate technique, where the plates have to be placed in areas with thin subcutaneous soft tissue, the incidence of implant removal might be high due to the discomfort caused by the implant.

To determine the demographic characteristics and clinical and radiologic results of low transcondylar fractures and compare them with those of other types of distal humerus fractures using multicenter data and to suggest an optimal method for their treatment.
Retrospective cohort study.
Tertiary-care university hospital.
Between 2009 and 2019, 581 patients who underwent surgery for distal humerus fractures (OTA/AO classification A1 to C3) were enrolled at 7 university-affiliated hospitals.
Internal fixation of low transcondylar fractures.
Demographic characteristics, including sex, age, mechanism of injury, fixation methods, and complications, were compared between low transcondylar (group A) and other distal humerus (group B) fractures. Clinical outcomes assessed included pain, stability, and range of motion. Radiographs obtained at the latest follow-up were assessed for union, delayed union, nonunion, and implant failure.
Mean age was 62.1 ± 19.1 (range, 20-95) years, and it was higher in group A (n = 100) than in group B (n = 376). Patients in group A were predominantly women. Low-energy trauma, such as that from a simple fall, was the most common cause of fracture in group A. Both column fixation, including parallel and orthogonal double plating, was performed more commonly in group A than in group B (87.4% vs. 66.4%, P < 0.001). The nonunion rate was higher in group A, but the difference was not significant. The incidence of ulnar nerve-related symptoms was higher in group A after surgery (6.3% vs. 2.0%, P = 0.003). No significant difference in clinical outcomes was found between the groups.
Low transcondylar fractures occurred more frequently than other distal humerus fractures in older female patients and accounted for 21% of distal humerus fractures. The incidence of ulnar nerve-related symptoms was higher in patients with low transcondylar fractures after surgery. Clinical outcomes were not inferior in patients with low transcondylar fractures. The nonunion rate in patients with low transcondylar fractures treated with double plating was 3.6%.
Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

There is no \"gold standard\" for the type of plate to be used for distal extra-articular humeral fractures; the most used is plating of each column. The objective was to evaluate the short-term clinical and radiological results of a Y- anatomical and innovative locking plate (YALP).
The hypothesis is: this anatomical and innovative locking plate will produce satisfactory and reliable results on extra-articular distal humerus fracture superior to double plate fixation.
In a retrospective observational multicenter study, all patients with a distal humerus fracture type 13 A2.2 according to AO classification fixed with a new Y-plate (YALP) were compared to the results of double plate fixation for the same type of fracture. With a follow-up of more than 12 months, the objective and subjective clinical elbow criteria as well as the overall function of the upper limb and radiological assessment were collected.
With an average follow up of 24±11 months, 26 patients met the inclusion criteria and received a YALP and 24 patients received double plate. All patients whose fracture had healed except one were pain-free (mean VAS 0.3±0.6). All patients had good subjective results (mean SEV 96%±4). Elbow function was excellent (mean total MEPS 96±4) with normal triceps strength (23/24 patients had a triceps strength graded 5/5 and one patient 4/5) and range of motion (flexion 139±8, extension -7±8 and pronosupination greater than 155 degrees). The operating time was shorter in the YALP group (84 ± 23minutes versus 97 ± 28minutes, p=0.03). The double plate group had more complications; the overall complication rate was significantly higher (p=0.02) in the double 90-degree plate group (12/24, 50%) with four nonunions, four symptomatic ulnar nerves, three hardware removals for pain and one radial nerve injury versus 5/26 complications (19%, p=0.02) in the Y-plate group: one iliac graft for nonunion, 1 plate removal due to functional discomfort, 1 twisted YALP, 1 broke interfragmentary screw and one symptomatic ulnar nerve. DASH, SEV, MEPS scores and flexion-extension range were better in the YALP group.
YALP produces satisfactory results in supracondylar fractures of the distal humerus. The results of YALP appear to be better than the results with two 90° plates for the same fracture type with a shorter operative time and easier management of fractures with proximal diaphyseal extension.
III; case control study.