Hospitals, Low-Volume

医院,低音量
  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:尽管缺乏临床数据,荷兰政府正在考虑将每个中心的最小年手术量从20例增加到50例晚期卵巢癌(OC)的细胞减灭术(CRS)。这项研究旨在评估这种增加是否有必要。
    方法:这项基于人群的研究包括2019年至2022年间在18家荷兰医院注册的FIGO阶段IIB-IVBOC的所有CRS。短期结果包括CRS的结果,逗留时间,严重并发症,30天死亡率,辅助化疗的时间,和教科书的结果。患者按年度数量进行分层:低数量(9家医院,<25),中等容量(四家医院,29-37),和高容量(五家医院,54-84).描述性统计和多水平逻辑回归用于评估手术量和结果的(病例组合调整)关联。
    结果:共包括1646个间期CRS(iCRS)和789个主要CRS(pCRS)。在iCRS队列中未发现手术体积与不同结果之间的关联。在pCRS队列中,高容量与完全CRS发生率增加相关(aOR1.9,95%-CI1.2-3.1,p=0.010).此外,大容量与严重并发症发生率增加(aOR2.3,1.1-4.6,95%-CI1.3-4.2,p=0.022)和住院时间延长(aOR2.3,95%-CI1.3-4.2,p=0.005)相关.30天死亡率,辅助化疗的时间,在pCRS队列中,教科书结局与手术量无关.亚组分析(FIGO-IIIC-IVB期)显示相似的结果。各种病例组合因素显著影响结果,保证病例混合调整。
    结论:我们的分析不支持对晚期OC进一步集中iCRS。高容量与较高的完整pCRS相关,建议在这些医院中选择更准确的选择或采取更积极的方法。较高的完成率是以较高的严重并发症和长期入院为代价的。
    Despite lacking clinical data, the Dutch government is considering increasing the minimum annual surgical volume per center from twenty to fifty cytoreductive surgeries (CRS) for advanced-stage ovarian cancer (OC). This study aims to evaluate whether this increase is warranted.
    This population-based study included all CRS for FIGO-stage IIB-IVB OC registered in eighteen Dutch hospitals between 2019 and 2022. Short-term outcomes included result of CRS, length of stay, severe complications, 30-day mortality, time to adjuvant chemotherapy, and textbook outcome. Patients were stratified by annual volume: low-volume (nine hospitals, <25), medium-volume (four hospitals, 29-37), and high-volume (five hospitals, 54-84). Descriptive statistics and multilevel logistic regressions were used to assess the (case-mix adjusted) associations of surgical volume and outcomes.
    A total of 1646 interval CRS (iCRS) and 789 primary CRS (pCRS) were included. No associations were found between surgical volume and different outcomes in the iCRS cohort. In the pCRS cohort, high-volume was associated with increased complete CRS rates (aOR 1.9, 95%-CI 1.2-3.1, p = 0.010). Furthermore, high-volume was associated with increased severe complication rates (aOR 2.3, 1.1-4.6, 95%-CI 1.3-4.2, p = 0.022) and prolonged length of stay (aOR 2.3, 95%-CI 1.3-4.2, p = 0.005). 30-day mortality, time to adjuvant chemotherapy, and textbook outcome were not associated with surgical volume in the pCRS cohort. Subgroup analyses (FIGO-stage IIIC-IVB) showed similar results. Various case-mix factors significantly impacted outcomes, warranting case-mix adjustment.
    Our analyses do not support further centralization of iCRS for advanced-stage OC. High-volume was associated with higher complete pCRS, suggesting either a more accurate selection in these hospitals or a more aggressive approach. The higher completeness rates were at the expense of higher severe complications and prolonged admissions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在肿瘤细胞减灭术(CRS)治疗结直肠腹膜转移(CRPM)的基础上,以奥沙利铂为基础的腹腔热化疗(HIPEC)在PRODIGE7试验(P7)中未显示任何生存益处。本研究旨在调查CRPM患者单独使用CRS后的围手术期结局是否由医院容量介导,并确定P7对分别使用CRS和CRS/HIPEC治疗的CRPM患者的法国实践的影响。
    方法:通过国家医学数据库收集了法国2013年至2020年间仅接受CRS治疗的CRPM患者的数据。该研究使用了影响我们先前研究确定的90天术后死亡率(POM)的年度CRS单独病例量的临界值,以定义低容量(LV)HIPEC和高容量(HV)HIPEC中心。围手术期结果比较无HIPEC,LV-HIPEC,和HV-HIPEC中心。使用Cochrane-Armitage检验分析了年份和HIPEC比率之间的趋势。
    结果:分析了来自4159个程序的数据。与HV-HIPEC中心相比,在非HIPEC和LV-HIPEC中心治疗的患者年龄较大(p<0.0001),并且Elixhauser合并症指数较高(p<0.0001),手术复杂性较低(p<0.0001)。而主要发病率(MM)率在组间没有差异(p=0.79),HV-HIPEC中心的90天POM低于无HIPEC和LV-HIPEC中心(5.4%vs15%和13.3%;p<0.0001),较低的抢救失败(FTR)(p<0.0001)。P7后,癌症中心的CRS/HIPEC率急剧下降(p<0.001),而仅接受CRS治疗的患者仍转诊至专家中心。
    结论:单独集中CRS可以改善患者选择以及FTR和POM。P7后,CRS/HIPEC主要在癌症中心下降,对提交专家中心的单独CRS病例数量没有任何影响。
    BACKGROUND: Addition of oxaliplatin-based hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) to cytoreductive surgery (CRS) in the treatment of peritoneal metastases of colorectal origin (CRPM) did not show any survival benefit in the PRODIGE 7 trial (P7). This study aimed to investigate whether perioperative outcomes after CRS alone for CRPM patients is mediated by hospital volume and to determine the effect of P7 on French practice for CRPM patients treated respectively with CRS alone and CRS/HIPEC.
    METHODS: Data from CRPM patients treated with CRS alone between 2013 and 2020 in France were collected through a national medical database. The study used a cutoff value of the annual CRS-alone caseload affecting the 90-day postoperative mortality (POM) determined from our previous study to define low-volume (LV) HIPEC and high-volume (HV) HIPEC centers. Perioperative outcomes were compared between no-HIPEC, LV-HIPEC, and HV-HIPEC centers. The trend between years and HIPEC rates was analyzed using the Cochrane-Armitage test.
    RESULTS: Data from 4159 procedures were analyzed. The patients treated in no-HIPEC and LV-HIPEC centers were older compared with HV-HIPEC centers (p < 0.0001) and had a higher Elixhauser comorbidity index (p < 0.0001) and less complex surgery (p < 0.0001). Whereas the major morbidity (MM) rate did not differ between groups (p = 0.79), the 90-day POM was lower in HV-HIPEC centers than in no-HIPEC and LV-HIPEC centers (5.4% vs 15% and 13.3%; p < 0.0001), with lower failure-to-rescue (FTR) (p < 0.0001). After P7, the CRS/HIPEC rate decreased drastically in Cancer centers (p < 0.001), whereas patients treated with CRS alone are still referred to expert centers.
    CONCLUSIONS: Centralization of CRS alone should improve patient selection as well as FTR and POM. After P7, CRS/HIPEC decreased mostly in Cancer centers, without any impact on the number of CRS-alone cases referred to expert centers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:尽管医学治疗的发展,近50%的克罗恩病(CD)患者在其一生中接受手术。一些研究提出了回肠结肠切除术(ICR)后术后发病率(POM)的一些危险因素。然而,手术住院量对CD中POM的影响尚未得到广泛研究。这项研究旨在评估CDICR后手术医院容量对POM的影响。
    方法:在法国数据库中确定了2013年至2022年在法国接受ICR的所有CD患者,信息系统化方案。使用卡方自动交互检测器,我们确定了高手术量中心(≥6ICR/年)和低手术量中心(<6ICR/年)的分界值.主要结果是住院期间主要POM的评估。根据手术容量中心评估POM。使用Elixhauser合并症指数(ECI)对患者的合并症进行分类。
    结果:共确定了4,205名患者,与低手术量中心(9.1%)相比,高手术量中心(6.2%)住院期间的主要POM显著降低(p=0.0004).经过多变量分析,与主要POM相关的独立因素是手术住院量(P=0.024),男性(P=0.029),ECI≥1(P<0.001),和少量POM(P<0.001)。
    结论:CD的ICR后的主要POM与外科医院容量密切相关。CD手术的集中化是可取的,尤其是有严重合并症的患者。
    OBJECTIVE: Despite the development of medical therapy, nearly 50% of patients with Crohn\'s disease [CD] undergo surgery during their lifetime. Several studies have suggested some risk factors for postoperative morbidity [POM] after ileocolic resection [ICR]. However, the impact of surgical hospital volume on POM in CD has not been extensively studied. This study aimed to assess the impact of surgical hospital volume on POM after ICR for CD.
    METHODS: All patients with CD who underwent ICR in France between 2013 and 2022 were identified in the French Database, Programme de Médicalisation des Systèmes d\'Information. Using the Chi-square automatic interaction detector, we determined the cut-off value to split high-surgical-volume [≥6 ICRs/year] and low-surgical-volume centres [<6 ICRs/year]. The primary outcome was the evaluation of major POM during hospitalization. POM was evaluated according to the surgical volume centre. The Elixhauser comorbidity index [ECI] was used to categorize the comorbidities of patients.
    RESULTS: A total of 4205 patients were identified, and the major POM during hospitalization was significantly [p = 0.0004] lower in the high-surgical-volume [6.2%] compared to low-surgical-volume centres [9.1%]. After multivariate analysis, independent factors associated with major POM were surgical hospital volume [p = 0.024], male sex [p = 0.029], ECI ≥ 1 [p < 0.001], and minor POM [p < 0.001].
    CONCLUSIONS: Major POM after ICR for CD is closely associated with surgical hospital volume. Centralization of surgery for CD is desirable, especially in patients with major comorbidities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:手术集中化的概念对于特定的外科手术越来越被接受。
    目的:本研究的目的是评估手术体积与手术小肠(SI)神经内分泌肿瘤(NET)切除结果之间的关系。
    方法:我们进行了一项回顾性全国研究,纳入了2019年至2021年接受SI-NET切除术的患者。大批量中心(hvC)被定义为每年进行五次以上SI-NET切除的中心。通过比较切除的淋巴结(LN)的数量作为主要终点,在hvCs和低容量中心(lvCs)之间评估手术切除的质量。
    结果:共有157名患者在33个中心接受了手术:90名患者在4个hvCs中,67名患者在29个lvCs中。腹腔镜手术在hvCs中更常见(85.6%与59.7%;p<0.001),右半结肠切除术(64.4%vs.38.8%;p<0.001),而在lvCs中,有18%的患者进行了限制性回肠结肠切除术,而在hvCs中没有。整个SI长度的双数字触诊(95.6%与34.3%,p<0.001),胆囊切除术(93.3%vs.14.9%;p<0.001),和肠系膜肿块切除术(70%vs.35.8%;p<0.001)在hvCs中更常见。切除≥8个LN的患者比例明显更高(96.3%vs.65.1%;p<0.001)在HVC中与LVC相比,切除≥12LN的患者比例(87.8%vs.52.4%)。此外,与lvC组相比,hvC组具有多个SI-NETs的患者人数更高(43.3%vs.25.4%),这些患者的肿瘤数量(中位数为7vs.2;p<0.001)。
    结论:最佳SI-NET切除在hvCs中明显更常见。建议将SI-NET的外科护理集中。
    BACKGROUND: The concept of surgical centralization is becoming more and more accepted for specific surgical procedures.
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between procedure volume and the outcomes of surgical small intestine (SI) neuroendocrine tumor (NET) resections.
    METHODS: We conducted a retrospective national study that included patients who underwent SI-NET resection between 2019 and 2021. A high-volume center (hvC) was defined as a center that performed more than five SI-NET resections per year. The quality of the surgical resections was evaluated between hvCs and low-volume centers (lvCs) by comparing the number of resected lymph nodes (LNs) as the primary endpoint.
    RESULTS: A total of 157 patients underwent surgery in 33 centers: 90 patients in four hvCs and 67 patients in 29 lvCs. Laparotomy was more often performed in hvCs (85.6% vs. 59.7%; p < 0.001), as was right hemicolectomy (64.4% vs. 38.8%; p < 0.001), whereas limited ileocolic resection was performed in 18% of patients in lvCs versus none in hvCs. A bi-digital palpation of the entire SI length (95.6% vs. 34.3%, p < 0.001), a cholecystectomy (93.3% vs. 14.9%; p < 0.001), and a mesenteric mass resection (70% vs. 35.8%; p < 0.001) were more often performed in hvCs. The proportion of patients with ≥8 LNs resected was significantly higher (96.3% vs. 65.1%; p < 0.001) in hvCs compared with lvCs, as was the proportion of patients with ≥12 LNs resected (87.8% vs. 52.4%). Furthermore, the number of patients with multiple SI-NETs was higher in the hvC group compared with the lvC group (43.3% vs. 25.4%), as were the number of tumors in those patients (median of 7 vs. 2; p < 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: Optimal SI-NET resection was significantly more often performed in hvCs. Centralization of surgical care of SI-NETs is recommended.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:在国家层面评估与食管穿孔(EP)治疗相关的结局,并确定90天死亡率(90dM)的预测因素,救援失败(FTR),和主要发病率(MM,Clavien-Dindo3-4)。
    背景:EP仍然是一种具有挑战性的临床急症。以前的基于人群的研究显示,发病率为90dM,高达38.8%,但已经过时或规模较小。
    方法:从法国医学管理数据库(2012-2021年)中提取了入院的EP患者的数据。病因学,管理策略,并分析了短期和长期结果。使用“卡方自动交互检测器”方法确定影响FTR的年度EP管理案件量的截止值。采用随机效应logistic回归模型评估90dM的独立预测因子,FTR,嗯。
    结果:在4765例EP患者中,90dM和FTR率分别为28.0%和19.4%,分别。两者在研究期间保持稳定。EP是自发的68.2%,因为19.7%的食管癌,医源性内镜检查后占7.3%,以及由于异物摄入占4.7%。主要管理包括手术(n=1447,30.4%),内窥镜检查(n=590,12.4%),隔离排水(n=336,7.0%),保守管理(n=2392,50.2%)。经过多变量分析,除了年龄和合并症,食管癌可预测90dM和FTR。每年管理≥8EP的年度阈值与90dM和FTR率降低有关。在法国,只有一些大学医院满足了这个条件。此外,尽管MMs增加,但初次手术与90dDM和FTR较低相关.
    结论:我们为将EP转诊至具有多学科专业知识的高容量中心提供了证据。手术仍然是EP的有效治疗方法。
    To evaluate outcomes associated with esophageal perforation (EP) management at a national level and determine predictive factors of 90-day mortality (90dM), failure-to-rescue (FTR), and major morbidity (MM, Clavien-Dindo 3-4).
    EP remains a challenging clinical emergency. Previous population-based studies showed rates of 90dM up to 38.8% but were outdated or small-sized.
    Data from patients admitted to hospitals with EP were extracted from the French medico-administrative database (2012-2021). Etiology, management strategies, and short and long-term outcomes were analyzed. A cutoff value of the annual EP management caseload affecting FTR was determined using the \"Chi-squared Automatic Interaction Detector\" method. Random effects logistic regression model was performed to assess independent predictors of 90dM, FTR, and MM.
    Among 4765 patients with EP, 90dM and FTR rates were 28.0% and 19.4%, respectively. Both remained stable during the study period. EP was spontaneous in 68.2%, due to esophageal cancer in 19.7%, iatrogenic postendoscopy in 7.3%, and due to foreign body ingestion in 4.7%. Primary management consisted of surgery (n = 1447,30.4%), endoscopy (n = 590,12.4%), isolated drainage (n = 336,7.0%), and conservative management (n = 2392,50.2%). After multivariate analysis, besides age and comorbidity, esophageal cancer was predictive of both 90dM and FTR. An annual threshold of ≥8 EP managed annually was associated with a reduced 90dM and FTR rate. In France, only some university hospitals fulfilled this condition. Furthermore, primary surgery was associated with a lower 90dDM and FTR rate despite an increase in MM.
    We provide evidence for the referral of EP to high-volume centers with multidisciplinary expertise. Surgery remains an effective treatment for EP.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:这项全国性的回顾性研究旨在评估医院容量和肝移植活动对肝脏手术后死亡率和抢救失败的影响。
    方法:这是一项使用全国数据库对2011年至2019年间接受肝切除术的患者进行的回顾性研究。计算了医院内死亡率下降的手术活动阈值。医院分为高容量和低容量中心。主要结局是院内死亡率和抢救失败。
    结果:在39286例患者中,住院死亡率为2.8%。住院死亡率下降的活动量阈值为25例肝切除术。高容量中心(每年切除超过25次)术后并发症较多,但院内死亡率较低(2.6对3%;P<0.001)和抢救失败(5对6.3%;P<0.001),特别是与特定并发症(肝功能衰竭,胆道并发症,血管并发症)(5.5%对7.6%;P<0.001)。肝移植活动对这些结果没有影响。
    结论:从每年超过25例的肝切除术中,住院死亡率和抢救失败率下降.在高容量中心,特定术后并发症的管理似乎更好。
    This nationwide retrospective study was undertaken to evaluate impact of hospital volume and influence of liver transplantation activity on postoperative mortality and failure to rescue after liver surgery.
    This was a retrospective study of patients who underwent liver resection between 2011 and 2019 using a nationwide database. A threshold of surgical activities from which in-hospital mortality declines was calculated. Hospitals were divided into high- and low-volume centres. Main outcomes were in-hospital mortality and failure to rescue.
    Among 39 286 patients included, the in-hospital mortality rate was 2.8 per cent. The activity volume threshold from which in-hospital mortality declined was 25 hepatectomies. High-volume centres (more than 25 resections per year) had more postoperative complications but a lower rate of in-hospital mortality (2.6 versus 3 per cent; P < 0.001) and failure to rescue (5 versus 6.3 per cent; P < 0.001), in particular related to specific complications (liver failure, biliary complications, vascular complications) (5.5 versus 7.6 per cent; P < 0.001). Liver transplantation activity did not have an impact on these outcomes.
    From more than 25 liver resections per year, rates of in-hospital mortality and failure to rescue declined. Management of specific postoperative complications appeared to be better in high-volume centres.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:肾上腺切除术是罕见的异质性手术。尽管最近的欧洲指南提倡肾上腺切除术的最低年度病例数(每位外科医生6例),该手术的体积-结局关系的证据仍然有限.
    方法:使用医院账单数据对2009年至2017年德国所有肾上腺切除术进行回顾性分析。医院被分为大约相等患者量的三个三分位数。
    方法:描述性,单变量,并应用多变量分析来确定可能的容量-结果关系(并发症,并发症管理,和死亡率)。
    结果:包括大约17040例原发性肾上腺切除术。最常见的诊断是良性肾上腺肿瘤(n=8,213,48.2%)和肾上腺外恶性肿瘤的肾上腺转移(n=3582,21.0%)。6132家小批量医院的切除数量与23家大批量医院的切除数量相同(中位手术/医院/3年与31年相比,P<.001)。在高容量医院中并发症较少(在低容量医院中为23.1%,在高容量医院中为17.3%,P<.001)。最常见的并发症是出血2027例(11.9%),死亡率为4.6%(94例)。总体内部死亡率为0.7%(n=126)。年龄,恶性肿瘤,伴随的切除,并发症,开放手术与内部死亡率相关.在单变量分析中,高容量医院的手术死亡率较低(OR:0.47,P<.001).在多变量模型中,趋势保持不变(OR:0.59,P=.104)。关于抢救失败(并发症死亡),在高容量医院中,死亡率有降低的趋势.
    结论:德国医院每年肾上腺切除术的病例量差异很大。我们的发现表明,尽管致命的并发症很少见,但在高容量中心进行手术对患者预后有利。
    OBJECTIVE: Adrenal resections are rare procedures of a heterogeneous nature. While recent European guidelines advocate a minimum annual caseload for adrenalectomies (6 per surgeon), evidence for a volume-outcome relationship for this surgery remains limited.
    METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all adrenal resections in Germany between 2009 and 2017 using hospital billing data was performed. Hospitals were grouped into three tertiles of approximately equal patient volume.
    METHODS: Descriptive, univariate, and multivariate analyses were applied to identify a possible volume-outcome relationship (complications, complication management, and mortality).
    RESULTS: Around 17 040 primary adrenal resections were included. Benign adrenal tumors (n = 8,213, 48.2%) and adrenal metastases of extra-adrenal malignancies (n = 3582, 21.0%) were the most common diagnoses. Six hundred and thirty-two low-volume hospitals performed an equal number of resections as 23 high-volume hospitals (median surgeries/hospital/year 3 versus 31, P < .001). Complications were less frequent in high-volume hospitals (23.1% in low-volume hospitals versus 17.3% in high-volume hospitals, P < .001). The most common complication was bleeding in 2027 cases (11.9%) with a mortality of 4.6% (94 patients). Overall in-house mortality was 0.7% (n = 126). Age, malignancy, an accompanying resection, complications, and open surgery were associated with in-house mortality. In univariate analysis, surgery in high-volume hospitals was associated with lower mortality (OR: 0.47, P < .001). In a multivariate model, the tendency remained equal (OR: 0.59, P = .104). Regarding failure to rescue (death in case of complications), there was a trend toward lower mortality in high-volume hospitals.
    CONCLUSIONS: The annual caseload of adrenal resections varies considerably among German hospitals. Our findings suggest that surgery in high-volume centers is advantageous for patient outcomes although fatal complications are rare.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:食管癌手术结果受益于更高的医院容量。尽管有证据,国家卫生保健的组织往往是复杂的,取决于各种因素。这项基于人群的研究的体积结果支持了比利时关于食管切除术集中的国家卫生政策措施。
    方法:比利时癌症登记处(BCR)数据库与癌症治疗的管理数据相关联。所有在2008-2018年接受手术切除的比利时新诊断食管癌患者均被分配到进行手术的医院。该研究评估了医院容量与90天死亡率和5年总生存率的关系。将平均年医院切除量分类为低(LV,<6),中等(MV,6-19),或高(HV,≥20),并在回归模型中作为连续协变量。
    结果:该研究包括79家医院的4156名手术患者(2家HV医院[占所有手术的37%],12家MV医院[占所有手术的30%],和65家LV医院[占所有手术的33%])。HV医院的调整后90天死亡率低于LV医院(比值比[OR],0.37;95%CI,0.21-0.65;p=0.001)。病例组合调整后的5年生存率在HV优于LV(风险比[HR],0.43;95%CI,0.31-0.60;p<0.001)。连续模型显示了较低的90天死亡率(OR,0.40;95%CI,0.23-0.71;p=0.002)和优越的5年生存率(HR,0.45;95%CI,0.33-0.63;p<0.001)在每年切除40例或更多的医院中。
    结论:来自BCR的基于人群的数据证实了食管切除的体积与结果之间的强烈关联。在年切除量为20或更多的中心中,5年生存率的提高主要是由于实现了90天的高死亡率。这些发现支持比利时食管切除术的集中化。
    BACKGROUND: Esophageal cancer surgery outcomes benefit from higher hospital volumes. Despite the evidence, organization of national health care often is complex and depends on various factors. The volume-outcome results of this population-based study supported national health policy measures regarding concentration of esophageal resections in Belgium.
    METHODS: The Belgian Cancer Registry (BCR) database was linked to administrative data on cancer treatment. All Belgian patients with newly diagnosed esophageal cancer in 2008-2018 undergoing resection were allocated to the hospital at which surgery was performed. The study assessed hospital volume association with 90-day mortality and 5-year overall survival, classifying average annual hospital volume of resections as low (LV, <6), medium (MV, 6-19), or high (HV, ≥20) and as a continuous covariate in the regression models.
    RESULTS: The study included 4156 patients who had surgery in 79 hospitals (2 HV hospitals [37% of all surgeries], 12 MV hospitals [30% of all surgeries], and 65 LV hospitals [33% of all surgeries]). Adjusted 90-day mortality in HV hospitals was lower than in LV hospitals (odds ratio [OR], 0.37; 95% CI, 0.21-0.65; p = 0.001). Case-mix adjusted 5-year survival was superior in HV versus LV (hazard ratio [HR], 0.43; 95% CI, 0.31-0.60; p < 0.001). The continuous model demonstrated a lower 90-day mortality (OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.23-0.71; p = 0.002) and a superior 5-year survival (HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.33-0.63; p < 0.001) in hospitals with volumes of 40 or more resections annually.
    CONCLUSIONS: Population-based data from the BCR confirmed a strong volume-outcome association for esophageal resections. Improved 5-year survival in centers with annual volumes of 20 or more resections was driven mainly by the achievement of superior 90-day mortality. These findings supported centralization of esophageal resections in Belgium.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号