OBJECTIVE: To understand the sophisticated nature of coming to consensus when diagnosing complex melanocytic lesions among a panel of experienced dermatopathologists.
METHODS: A total of 240 melanocytic lesions were assessed independently by three experienced dermatopathologists with their diagnoses mapped into one of five Melanocytic Pathology Assessment Tool and Hierarchy for Diagnosis (MPATH-DX) categories: (I) nevus/mild atypia, (II) moderate atypia, (III) severe atypia/melanoma in situ, (IV) T1a invasive melanoma and (V) ≥ T1b invasive melanoma. The dermatopathologists then discussed the cases, using a modified Delphi method to facilitated consensus building for cases with discordant diagnoses.
RESULTS: For most cases, a majority of interpretations (two or three of three) agreed with the consensus diagnosis in 95% of Category I, 64% of Category II, 84% of Category III, 88% for Category IV and 100% of Category V cases. Disagreements were typically due to diagnostic threshold differences (64.5%), differing contents on slides even though the slides were sequential cuts (18.5%), and missed findings (15.3%). Disagreements were resolved via discussion of histopathologic features and their significance while reviewing the slides using a multi-headed microscope, considering treatment recommendations, citing existing literature, reviewing additional slides for a case, and choosing a provisional/borderline diagnosis to capture diverse opinions. All experienced pathologists participating in this study reported that the process of coming to consensus was challenging for borderline cases and may have represented compromise rather than consensus. They also reported the process changed their approaches to diagnosing complex melanocytic lesions.
CONCLUSIONS: The most frequent reason for disagreement of experienced dermatopathologists was differences in diagnostic thresholds related to observer viewpoints. A range of approaches was needed to come to consensus, and this may guide pathology groups who do not currently hold consensus conferences.

The 2009 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on handling and staging of radical prostatectomy specimens issued recommendations for standardization of pathology reporting of radical prostatectomy specimens. The conference addressed specimen handling, T2 substaging, prostate cancer volume, extraprostatic extension, lymphovascular invasion, seminal vesicle invasion, lymph node metastases and surgical margins. This review summarizes the conclusions and recommendations resulting from the consensus process.

The 2009 International Society of Urological Pathology Consensus Conference in Boston made recommendations regarding the standardization of pathology reporting of radical prostatectomy specimens. Issues relating to the handling and processing of radical prostatectomy specimens were coordinated by working group 1. Most uropathologists followed similar procedures for fixation of radical prostatectomy specimens, with 51% of respondents transporting tissue in formalin. There was also consensus that the prostate weight without the seminal vesicles should be recorded. There was consensus that the surface of the prostate should be painted. It was agreed that both the prostate apex and base should be examined by the cone method with sagittal sectioning of the tissue sample. There was consensus that the gland should be fully fixed before sectioning. Both partial and complete embedding of prostates was considered to be acceptable as long as the method of partial embedding is stated. No consensus was determined regarding the necessity of weighing and measuring the length of the seminal vesicles, the preparation of whole mounts rather than standardized blocks and the methodology for sampling of fresh tissue for research purposes, and it was agreed that these should be left to the discretion of the working pathologist.

The term gastrointestinal neuromuscular disease describes a clinically heterogeneous group of disorders of children and adults in which symptoms are presumed or proven to arise as a result of neuromuscular, including interstitial cell of Cajal, dysfunction. Such disorders commonly have impaired motor activity, i.e. slowed or obstructed transit with radiological evidence of transient or persistent visceral dilatation. Whilst sensorimotor abnormalities have been demonstrated by a variety of methods in these conditions, standards for histopathological reporting remain relatively neglected. Significant differences in methodologies and expertise continue to confound the reliable delineation of normality and specificity of particular pathological changes for disease. Such issues require urgent clarification to standardize acquisition and handling of tissue specimens, interpretation of findings and make informed decisions on risk-benefit of full-thickness tissue biopsy of bowel or other diagnostic procedures. Such information will also allow increased certainty of diagnosis, facilitating factual discussion between patients and caregivers, as well as giving prognostic and therapeutic information. The following report, produced by an international working group, using established consensus methodology, presents proposed guidelines on histological techniques and reporting for adult and paediatric gastrointestinal neuromuscular pathology. The report addresses the main areas of histopathological practice as confronted by the pathologist, including suction rectal biopsy and full-thickness tissue obtained with diagnostic or therapeutic intent. For each, indications, safe acquisition of tissue, histological techniques, reporting and referral recommendations are presented.

The bone marrow examination is an essential investigation for the diagnosis and management of many disorders of the blood and bone marrow. The aspirate and trephine biopsy specimens are complementary and when both are obtained, they provide a comprehensive evaluation of the bone marrow. The final interpretation requires the integration of peripheral blood, bone marrow aspirate and trephine biopsy findings, together with the results of supplementary tests such as immunophenotyping, cytogenetic analysis and molecular genetic studies as appropriate, in the context of clinical and other diagnostic findings. Methods for the preparation, processing and reporting of bone marrow aspirates and trephine biopsy specimens can vary considerably. These differences may result in inconsistencies in disease diagnosis or classification that may affect treatment and clinical outcomes. In recognition of the need for standardization in this area, an international Working Party for the Standardization of Bone Marrow Specimens and Reports was formed by the International Council for Standardization in Hematology (ICSH) to prepare a set of guidelines based on preferred best practices. The guidelines were discussed at the ICSH General Assemblies and reviewed by an international panel of experts to achieve further consensus.

Estrogen receptor (ER) alpha is a well-established independent prognostic factor in breast cancer whose presence determines the clinical implications of adjuvant endocrine therapy. A second receptor, ERb has been described, and a number of studies have examined its expression in breast tissue. However elucidation of the role played by ERb has been hampered by published immunohistochemical studies employing a variety of protocols and scoring systems such that inter-laboratory comparisons are difficult. Here we present a multi-centre study designed to critically evaluate inter-laboratory differences in methodology. Six UK and Irish centres participated in this study. A small series of breast cancers were stained using centre-specific laboratory protocols and scored using both centrespecific and standard scoring protocols. There was generally poor agreement as to what constituted a positive or negative case when centre-specific scoring systems were used with less than half of all cases in agreement. Concordance was improved when a standard scoring system was used but varied according to threshold for positivity employed and primary antibody. Our results emphasise the need for further studies addressing the role of ERb to be based on a wider consensus on criteria for positivity. Ideally this should be based on calibration against clinical outcome.

暂无摘要。

Knowledge of HER2 status is a prerequisite when considering a patient\'s eligibility for Herceptin (trastuzumab) therapy. Accurate assessment of HER2 status is essential to ensure that all patients who may benefit from Herceptin are correctly identified. There are several assays available to determine HER2 status: the most common in routine clinical practice are immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Various factors can affect the results achieved with these assays, including the assay antibody/probe, the methodology and the experience of personnel. Many countries have implemented national testing guidelines in an attempt to standardize testing procedures and make results more accurate. These guidelines vary in the level of detail and the number of recommendations. This review looks at areas of consensus between the different national testing guidelines and highlights where errors may arise during the testing procedure. The key point underlined by this review is that whatever method is used to test for HER2 status, the technology must be validated first, and there must be regular internal and external quality control and quality assurance procedures.

In this review, we summarise the patterns of bone marrow involvement by small B-cell lymphomas. Both our own experience and the literature reports on the subject show that each subtype of lymphoma can be recognised from a distinct combination of a suggestive growth pattern and a particular cytological composition. A predominantly paratrabecular infiltrate composed of centrocytes is characteristic of follicle centre cell lymphoma. In mantle cell lymphoma, prominent intertrabecular nodules, each consisting of a monotonous proliferation of small to intermediate-sized lymphoid cells with an irregular nucleus, are the most frequent finding. Marginal zone cell lymphoma displays similar intertrabecular nodules, but the infiltrates are rather loose and polymorphic, whereas the lymphoid cells exhibit monocytoid features. Diffuse infiltrates composed of small lymphocytes with clumped chromatin, of plasma cells with Dutcher bodies and of mast cells are observed in most cases of lymphoplasmacytoid lymphoma/immunocytoma. Although chronic lymphocytic leukaemia / small lymphocytic lymphoma can present with a comparable pattern of bone marrow involvement, an interstitial infiltrate of small lymphoid cells is usually observed. A comparable interstitial pattern also prevails in hairy cell leukaemia. This lymphoma subtype, however, can be readily identified by the abundant clear cytoplasm of the neoplastic cells, erythrocyte extravasation and associated abnormalities in the haematopoietic series.

Tumor classification, grading and staging of malignant tumors of the cervix and corpus uteri should be done according to the rules of the WHO fascicle of 1994 and the TNM manual of 1997, respectively. With these lines taking into account, the surgical pathology report will include the most important prognostic factors, which in part are also of therapeutic relevance, i.e. localization of the lesion, depth of invasion and distant tumor manifestation. Yet, gross inspection and preparation are the prerequisites of the quality of the histopathological statement. Accurate documentation of tumor extension, depth of invasion into the cervical stroma and/or the myometrium and distance to the resection lines at the vaginal cuff and the parametrium needs to be given in centimeters, first by eye, than controlled by histopathology. The tumor extension of cervical carcinomas should be given in three dimensions, including the depth of invasion into the cervical wall. It is also mandatory to document the number and size of lymph nodes with metastatic involvement compared to the total number of nodes which are discovered in parametral, pelvioperitoneal and paraaortal sites. Most of what has been outlined for the surgical pathology report of hysterectomy specimens is also pertinent to conisations, by whatever method these are performed (cold knife, laser or loop). For appropriate documentation of the localization of the lesion, horizontal expansion of the dysplastic lesion and recognition of microinvasion it is sufficient to dissect the conisation specimen clockwise and to cut the various paraffin blocks in serial sections.