High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU)

高强度聚焦超声 (HIFU)
  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    药物诱发的震颤是锂的常见副作用,约有25%的患者发生。停止犯罪药物可能很困难,许多药物引起的震颤的药物治疗是无效的。在有限的病例报告中,深部脑刺激(DBS)已被证明可以有效减少药物引起的震颤,然而,这仍然是一种侵入性的治疗选择。MR引导聚焦超声(MRgFUS)丘脑切开术是FDA批准的原发性震颤(ET)的非侵入性治疗方法。据我们所知,MRgFUS丘脑切开术从未被报道用于治疗药物诱发的震颤。这里,我们介绍了一个左撇子55岁的男人,医学难治性锂引起的双侧上肢震颤。患者接受MRgFUS丘脑切开术,靶向丘脑的右腹中间核(VIM)以治疗左手。在MRgFUS之后,他的左手震颤几乎完全消失了。没有副作用。在90天的随访中,患者继续显示优异的震颤控制,并且保持无副作用。此病例证明MRgFUS丘脑切开术是治疗药物引起的震颤的可能的新治疗选择。
    Drug-induced tremor is a common side effect of lithium with an occurrence of approximately 25% of patients. Cessation of the offending drug can be difficult, and many medical treatments for drug-induced tremor are ineffective. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been shown in a limited number of case reports to effectively reduce drug-induced tremor, however, which remains an invasive therapeutic option. MR-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) thalamotomy is an FDA-approved non-invasive treatment for essential tremor (ET). To the best of our knowledge, MRgFUS thalamotomy has never been reported to treat drug-induced tremor. Here, we present a case of a left-handed 55-year-old man with a progressive, medically refractory lithium-induced tremor of the bilateral upper extremities. The patient underwent MRgFUS thalamotomy targeting the right ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM) of the thalamus to treat the left hand. There was almost complete resolution of his left-hand tremor immediately following MRgFUS. There were no side effects. The patient continues to show excellent tremor control at 90-day follow-up and remains free from side effects. This case demonstrates MRgFUS thalamotomy as a possible novel treatment option to treat drug-induced tremor.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    纤维瘤病(DF)是一种局部侵袭性肿瘤,其特征是肿瘤细胞周围浸润和远处转移障碍。本系统评价了热消融治疗DF肿瘤的疗效和安全性。
    使用PubMed进行了文献检索,WebofScience,科克伦图书馆,和Embase从2000年1月1日至2022年11月12日。系统审查和荟萃分析(PRISMA)的首选报告项目用于指导文献选择。纳入标准如下:(I)患者病理诊断为侵袭性纤维瘤病,(二)患者接受热消融治疗,(III)关注治疗效果和安全性。同时,排除标准如下:(I)增生性瘢痕患者队列,加德纳纤维瘤,或结节性筋膜炎;(二)会议摘要,reviews,病例报告,给编辑的信,注释,或社论;(III)患者人数<5;(IV)体外或动物实验;(V)非英语文章。使用具有随机效应模型的逆方差方法来获得合并数据。进行亚组分析以确定治疗因素。进行Egger测试以评估发表偏倚的风险。
    在文献选择之后,在23项研究中鉴定出694例DF肿瘤。就模态而言,13项研究使用冷冻消融,9项研究使用高强度聚焦超声(HIFU),1项研究采用微波消融(MWA)。合并症状缓解率为90%[95%置信区间(CI):80-97%],HIFU为100%(95%CI:85-100%),冷冻消融为87%(95%CI:74-97%),MWA为89%(95%CI)。合并的主要并发症发生率为3%(95%CI:1-7%),每种模式的HIFU=2%(95%CI:0-6%),冷冻消融=4%(95%CI:1-8%),MWA=11%,超声=6%(95%CI:1-13%),计算机断层扫描(CT)=2%(95%CI:0-7%),磁共振成像(MRI)=3%(95%CI:0-14%)。合并非灌注体积率(NPVR)为76%(95%CI:71-81%),每种模式的HIFU=77%(95%CI:71-85%),冷冻消融=74%(95%CI:69-79%),超声=75%(95%CI:67-83%),CT=76%(95%CI:67-87%),MRI=78%(95%CI:70-87%)。合并的局部控制率为88%(95%CI:79-94%),每种方式的控制率如下:HIFU=99%(95%CI:96-100%),冷冻消融=80%(95%CI:68-90%),MWA=78%。在主要并发症发生率(P=0.77)和NPVR之间的成像引导模式(P=0.40)差异无统计学意义。消融技术之间的症状缓解率(P=0.32)和主要并发症发生率(P=0.61)也没有差异;然而,消融技术之间的局部控制率差异有统计学意义(P=0.01)。
    成像引导热消融治疗有助于症状缓解,持续时间超过6个月,DF肿瘤的主要并发症发生率低。
    UNASSIGNED: Desmoid-type fibromatosis (DF) is a locally aggressive tumor characterized by peripheral infiltration of neoplastic cells and remote metastasis disability. This systematic review examined the efficacy and safety of thermal ablative therapy for DF tumors.
    UNASSIGNED: A literature search was conducted using PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase from January 1, 2000, to November 12, 2022. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement was used to guide literature selection. The inclusion criteria were the following: (I) the patients were diagnosed with aggressive fibromatosis pathologically, (II) the patients were treated by thermal ablations, and (III) a focus on treatment efficacy and safety. Meanwhile, the exclusion criteria were the following: (I) cohorts of patients with hypertrophic scar, Gardner fibroma, or nodular fasciitis; (II) conference abstracts, reviews, case reports, letters to editors, comments, or editorials; (III) number of patients <5; (IV) in vitro or animal experiments; and (V) non-English language articles. The inverse variance method with a random effects model was used to obtain the pooled data. Subgroup analyses were performed to identify treatment factors. Egger test was conducted to assess the risk of publication bias.
    UNASSIGNED: After literature selection, 694 DF tumors were identified in 23 studies. In terms of modality, 13 studies used cryoablation, 9 studies used high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), and 1 study used microwave ablation (MWA). The pooled symptom relief rate was 90% [95% confidence interval (CI): 80-97%], with that for HIFU being 100% (95% CI: 85-100%), that for cryoablation being 87% (95% CI: 74-97%), and that MWA being 89% (95% CI). The pooled major complication rate was 3% (95% CI: 1-7%), and that for each modality was as follows: HIFU =2% (95% CI: 0-6%), cryoablation =4% (95% CI: 1-8%), MWA =11%, ultrasound =6% (95% CI: 1-13%), computed tomography (CT) =2% (95% CI: 0-7%), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) =3% (95% CI: 0-14%). The pooled nonperfused volume rate (NPVR) was 76% (95% CI: 71-81%), and that for each modality was as follows: HIFU =77% (95% CI: 71-85%), cryoablation =74% (95% CI: 69-79%), ultrasound =75% (95% CI: 67-83%), CT =76% (95% CI: 67-87%), and MRI =78% (95% CI: 70-87%). The pooled local control rate was 88% (95% CI: 79-94%) and that for each modality was as follows: HIFU =99% (95% CI: 96-100%), cryoablation =80% (95% CI: 68-90%), and MWA =78%. The differences in major complication rate (P=0.77) and NPVR between imaging-guided modalities (P=0.40) were not significant, nor were the differences in symptom relief rate (P=0.32) and major complication rate (P=0.61) between ablative techniques; however, the differences in local control rate (P=0.01) were significant between ablative techniques.
    UNASSIGNED: Imaging-guided thermal ablative therapies contribute to symptom relief with a duration of more than 6 months and a low major complication rate of DF tumors.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:如今,世界各地都介绍了许多人体造型装置和方法。本叙述性审查的目的是更新和分类有关这些方法和设备的现有证据。
    方法:我们搜索了包括PubMed、科克伦,和谷歌学者的11个基本关键词,包括冷冻脂解,高强度聚焦超声(HIFU),冲击波,低水平激光治疗(LLLT),射频(RF),电容电阻电传输(TECAR),高强度聚焦电磁(HIFEM),肌电刺激(EMS),羧基疗法,综合疗法,和针灸及其缩写,除了肥胖,超重,脂肪团,皮下脂肪,和身体轮廓。
    结果:在11个主要主题中总共使用了193个参考文献。
    结论:为了帮助医生在不同方法中找到最佳证据,数据总结为11个主题。此外,FDA批准的设备,每个部分描述了副作用和常用方案.
    方法:本期刊要求作者39为每篇文章分配一定程度的证据。对于这些循证医学评级的完整40个描述,41请参阅目录或在线42对作者的说明www。springer.com/00266.
    BACKGROUND: Nowadays, a lot of body contouring devices and methods are introduced all over the world. The object of the present narrative review was to update and classify existing evidence on these methods and devices.
    METHODS: We searched databases including PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar for 11 essential keywords, including cryolipolysis, high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), shock wave, low-level laser therapy (LLLT), radiofrequency (RF), capacitive resistive electrical transfer (TECAR), high-intensity focused electromagnetic (HIFEM), electromyostimulation (EMS), carboxytherapy, mesotherapy, and acupuncture and their abbreviations, in addition to obesity, overweight, cellulite, subcutaneous fat, and body contouring.
    RESULTS: Totally 193 references were used in 11 main topics.
    CONCLUSIONS: In order to help physicians with finding the best evidence in different methods, the data were summarised in 11 topics. Furthermore, FDA-approved devices, side effects and common protocols were described in each section.
    METHODS: This journal requires that authors 39 assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full 40 description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, 41 please refer to the Table of Contents or the online 42 Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    背景:高强度聚焦超声(HIFU)是一种侵入性较小的选择,压缩,良性甲状腺结节。
    方法:使用预定义的纳入标准,对2000年至2021年使用HIFU治疗良性甲状腺结节的5名以上参与者进行了观察性研究。主要结果是对HIFU有效性的估计。
    结果:在回顾的158项研究中,共纳入8篇文献,共297例患者和300个结节。治疗后1至24个月,HIFU显著减少结节体积(加权平均差[WMD],47.68,95%置信区间[CI],34.13-59.66,p<0.0001),并取得了有利的成功率(风险比[RR],1.49,95%CI,1.15-1.84,p<0.001),体积减少50%。
    结论:HIFU似乎是可行的,安全,甲状腺良性结节患者的有效治疗方式。未来的研究,包括随机对照试验,需要确定治疗优化,和患者选择以确定这种新疗法的潜在作用。
    BACKGROUND: High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is a less invasive option offered for the treatment of large, compressive, benign thyroid nodules.
    METHODS: Observational studies of more than five participants using HIFU in the management of benign thyroid nodules from 2000 to 2021 were identified using predefined inclusion criteria. The primary outcome was an estimate of the effectiveness of HIFU.
    RESULTS: Out of 158 studies reviewed, 8 articles were included with 297 patients and 300 nodules. HIFU significantly reduced nodule volume from 1 to 24 months following therapy (weighted mean difference [WMD], 47.68, 95 % confidence interval [CI], 34.13-59.66, p < 0.0001) and achieved favorable success rates (risk ratio [RR], 1.49, 95 % CI, 1.15-1.84, p < 0.001) for 50 % volume reduction.
    CONCLUSIONS: HIFU appears to be a feasible, safe, and effective treatment modality for patients with benign thyroid nodules. Future research, including randomized controlled trials, is needed to determine therapy optimization, and patient selection to identify the potential role of this new therapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Review
    高强度聚焦超声(HIFU)是子宫腺肌病的非侵入性治疗方法。妊娠期间子宫破裂是HIFU治疗后罕见的不良事件,因为HIFU治疗导致组织凝固性坏死。
    我们报道了一例34岁女性子宫破裂的病例。该妇女在计划外怀孕前八个月接受了子宫腺肌病的HIFU治疗。她在怀孕期间受到密切监测,产前过程顺利。在38周零2天的胎龄时,由于无法解释的腹痛,进行了紧急下段剖宫产术。胎儿分娩后,在HIFU治疗区域观察到2×2cm的浆膜破裂。
    HIFU后妊娠期间子宫破裂是一种罕见的不良事件,然而,在整个怀孕期间需要注意,以防意外的子宫破裂。
    High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is a non-invasive treatment of adenomyosis. Uterine rupture during pregnancy is a rare adverse event after HIFU treatment, because HIFU treatment results in tissue coagulative necrosis.
    We reported a case of uterine rupture in a 34-year-old woman. The woman had HIFU treatment for adenomyosis eight months before unplanned pregnancy. She was closely monitored during the pregnancy and the antenatal course was uneventful. At the gestational age of 38 weeks and 2 days, an emergency lower segment cesarean section was performed because of inexplainable abdominal pain. After delivery of the fetus, a 2 × 2 cm serous membrane rupture was observed in the HIFU treatment area.
    Uterine rupture during pregnancy after HIFU is a rare adverse event, however, attention is required during the whole pregnancy in case of unexpected uterine rupture.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    囊性子宫腺肌病是一种罕见的子宫腺肌病,主要见于年轻女性,通常以严重的痛经为特征。年轻女性的生活质量和生殖功能可能受到误诊和延误治疗的影响。目前,没有普遍的指导方针和共识。我们报告了2例接受高强度聚焦超声(HIFU)消融治疗的青少年囊性子宫腺肌病患者。在第一种情况下,磁共振成像(MRI)显示子宫内囊性肿块2.0cm×3.1cm×2.4cm。在她接受HIFU治疗后,她的骨盆MRI显示肿块大小为1.1×2.4厘米,痛经症状逐渐消失。在第二种情况下,盆腔MRI显示子宫内有5.1cm×3.3cm×4.7cm的囊性肿块。在她接受HIFU和GnRH-a治疗的四个连续周期的联合治疗后,病灶缩小1.2cm×1.4cm×1.6cm,没有痛经。同时,该报告回顾了过去十年来14例青少年囊性子宫腺肌病。HIFU或HIFU联合药物治疗青少年囊性子宫腺肌病安全有效,但未来可能需要多中心和前瞻性研究来验证这一点.
    Cystic adenomyosis is a rare type of uterine adenomyosis, mainly seen in young women, which is often characterized by severe dysmenorrhea. The quality of life and reproductive function of young women could be affected by misdiagnosis and delayed treatment. At present, there are no universal guidelines and consensus. We report two cases of patients with cystic adenomyosis in juveniles treated with high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation. In the first case, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) indicated a cystic mass of 2.0 cm × 3.1 cm × 2.4 cm in the uterus. After she underwent HIFU treatment, her pelvic MRI showed a mass of 1.1 × 2.4 cm in size, and her dysmenorrhea symptoms gradually disappeared. In the second case, a pelvic MRI indicated a 5.1 cm × 3.3 cm × 4.7 cm cystic mass in the uterus. After she underwent HIFU and combined four consecutive cycles of GnRH-a treatment, the lesion shrunk 1.2 cm ×1.4 cm × 1.6 cm, without dysmenorrhea. Simultaneously, the report reviewed 14 cases of juvenile cystic adenomyosis over the last ten years. HIFU or HIFU-combined drugs were safe and effective in treating juvenile cystic adenomyosis, but multicenter and prospective studies may be necessary to validate this in the future.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    作为一种软组织非侵入性消融技术,高强度聚焦超声(HIFU)已广泛应用于多种临床疾病的治疗。然而,传统的HIFU,基于热效应,具有较高的局部工作温度,这可能会对周围组织造成热损伤并降低治疗效果。基于HIFU的空化效应,组织切片可以机械地破坏靶病变中的细胞。本文旨在解释组织学损伤的机制,临床评价和临床应用动物模型的研究进展,并分析其优势和局限性。
    从PubMed数据库检索了2006年1月至2022年3月发布的文献。我们回顾了这些文章,从机制方面检查组织切片,动物实验,临床试验,优势,缺点,和优化。
    组织碎石术是一种非侵入性的,非电离,非热消融技术。肝肿瘤的临床应用已取得重大进展,良性前列腺增生,主动脉瓣钙化狭窄。I期临床试验已经证明了组织碎石术治疗这些疾病的安全性和有效性。需要更多的研究来评估和优化其疗效和安全性,并充分探索其作用机制,病理和免疫效应,以及治疗后身体的短期和长期反应。
    组织碎石术在消融治疗中具有广阔的应用前景,在未来进行更多的临床试验后将使患者受益。
    UNASSIGNED: As a soft-tissue noninvasive ablation technology, high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) has been widely used to treat many clinical diseases. However, traditional HIFU, based on thermal effects, has a high local working temperature, which may cause thermal damage to surrounding tissues and reduce the therapeutic effect. Based on the cavitation effect of HIFU, histotripsy can mechanically destroy the cells in the target lesion. This paper aims to explain the mechanism of histotripsy, summarize the research progress of animal models for clinical evaluation and clinical application, and analyze the advantages and limitations of histotripsy.
    UNASSIGNED: Literature published from January 2006 to March 2022 was retrieved from the PubMed database. We reviewed these articles to examine histotripsy from the aspects of the mechanism, animal experiments, clinical trials, advantages, disadvantages, and optimization.
    UNASSIGNED: Histotripsy is a noninvasive, nonionizing, nonthermal ablation technique. The clinical application of histotripsy has made significant progress in the treatment of liver tumors, benign prostatic hyperplasia, and aortic valve calcification stenosis. Phase I clinical trials have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of histotripsy in the treatment of these diseases. More research is needed to evaluate and optimize its efficacy and safety and to fully explore its mechanism of action, pathological and immunological effects, and the short-term and long-term reactions of the body after treatment.
    UNASSIGNED: Histotripsy has broad application prospects in ablation therapy and will benefit patients after more clinical trials are conducted in the future.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    高强度聚焦超声(HIFU)和经动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)已被证明可有效治疗肝癌等恶性肿瘤。近年来,HIFU与TACE的结合经常被报道,但研究人员尚未就这种治疗方式的有效性和安全性达成统一结论.
    中国国家知识基础设施(CNKI),中国生物医学文献数据库,科克伦图书馆,MEDLINE,使用术语“随机对照试验(RCT)”搜索Embase数据库,“肝癌”,“经动脉化疗栓塞”,\"TACE\",“高强度聚焦超声”,\"HIFU\",“HIFU与TACE结合”,和“功效分析”。根据PICOS原则纳入研究,根据《Cochrane干预措施系统评价手册》,在随机对照试验中评估偏倚风险.RevMan5.3和Stata13用于荟萃分析。
    本研究包括6项随机对照试验,总样本量为488项。在这些研究中,图5描述了一种随机分配(RA)方法,4描述了分配序列隐藏,4使用盲法分配研究对象。荟萃分析结果显示,1年[比值比(OR)=3.13,95%CI:1.92,5.11,P<0.00001],2年(OR=3.38,95%CI:1.71,6.66,P=0.0004),5年生存率(OR=2.15,95%CI:1.02,4.55,P=0.04)接受HIFUTACE治疗的患者明显优于单独接受TACE治疗的患者。HIFU+TACE治疗患者的总有效率(TER)(OR=3.61,95%CI:2.14,6.08,P<0.00001)明显优于单纯TACE治疗患者。与单独的TACE相比,HIFU联合TACE可显著降低术后不良反应发生率(OR=0.57,95%CI:0.34,9.96,P=0.03)。
    本研究采用Meta分析,发现与单独的TACE相比,HIFU联合TACE治疗LC有较好的疗效,较高的预后和生存率,不良反应发生率较低。然而,由于研究的样本量有限,研究结果存在偏倚的风险.
    UNASSIGNED: High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) have been shown to be effective in the treatment of malignant tumors such as hepatocellular carcinoma. In recent years, HIFU combined with TACE has been frequently reported, but researchers have not yet reached a uniform conclusion on the efficacy and safety of this treatment modality.
    UNASSIGNED: The Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), China Biomedical Literature Database, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and Embase databases were searched using the terms \"randomized controlled trial (RCT)\", \"liver cancer\", \"transarterial chemoembolization\", \"TACE\", \"high intensity focused ultrasound\", \"HIFU\", \"HIFU combined with TACE\", and \"efficacy analysis\". Studies were included in accordance with the PICOS principle, and risk of bias was assessed in randomized controlled trials in accordance with the Cochrane Manual for Systematic Evaluation of Interventions. Rev Man 5.3 and Stata 13 were employed for meta-analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: Six randomized controlled trials with a total sample size of 488 were included in this study. Of these studies, 5 described a random allocation (RA) method, 4 described allocation sequence concealment, and 4 used a blind method for the allocation of study subjects. The results of the meta-analysis showed that the 1-year [odds ratio (OR) =3.13, 95% CI: 1.92, 5.11, P<0.00001], 2-year (OR =3.38, 95% CI: 1.71, 6.66, P=0.0004), and 5-year (OR =2.15, 95% CI: 1.02, 4.55, P=0.04) survival rates (SRs) of patients treated with HIFU + TACE were significantly better than those of patients treated with TACE alone. The total effective rate (TER) of patients treated with HIFU + TACE (OR =3.61, 95% CI: 2.14, 6.08, P<0.00001) was significantly better than that of patients treated with TACE alone. Compared with TACE alone, HIFU combined with TACE significantly reduced the incidence of postoperative adverse reactions (OR= 0.57, 95% CI: 0.34, 9.96, P=0.03).
    UNASSIGNED: Meta-analysis was adopted in this study, and it was found that compared with TACE alone, HIFU combined with TACE in the treatment of LC had better efficacy, higher prognosis and survival rate, and lower incidence of adverse reactions. However, due to the limited sample size of the study, there was some risk of bias in the findings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: It was reported that high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) of cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) can locally inactivate pregnancy tissue. Uterine artery embolization (UAE) can achieve good results for CSP too. To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of HIFU and UAE in the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP), we conducted this research.
    METHODS: Multiple databases were used to search for relevant studies and articles related to HIFU, UAE, and CSP. The selected literature were retrospectively evaluated using Review Manager 5.2. In addition, forest plots, sensitivity analysis, and bias analysis were conducted for the included literature.
    RESULTS: Finally, 8 related studies met the inclusion criteria. There were no significant differences in postoperative adverse reactions and hospitalization time between the HIFU group and the UAE group. However, the normalization time of serum beta human chorionic gonadotropin (B-HCG) in the HIFU group was higher than that in the UAE group [MD =1.16, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.09, 2.22, P=0.03, I2=93%], and the hospitalization cost in the HIFU group was significantly lower than that in the UAE group (MD =-8.81, 95% CI, -12.64, -4.97, P<0.00001, I2=99%).
    CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that HIFU and UAE have the same curative effect in the treatment of CSP, but HIFU has lower cost and fewer complications. These results supported that compared with UAE, HIFU is a better choice for CSP patients with long gestational age, large gestational sac diameter and high HCG level.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is usually accompanied by liver cirrhosis, which makes treatment of this disease challenging. Liver transplantation theoretically provides an ultimate solution to the disease, but the maximal surgical stress and the scarcity of liver graft make this treatment option impossible for some patients. In an ideal situation, a treatment that is safe and effective should provide a better outcome for patients with the dilemma.
    UNASSIGNED: This article aims to give a comprehensive review of various types of loco-ablative treatment for HCC.
    UNASSIGNED: Loco-ablative treatment bridges the gap between surgical resection and transarterial chemotherapy. Various types of ablative therapy have their unique ability, and evidence-based outcome analysis is the most important key to assisting clinicians to choose the most suitable treatment modality for their patients.
    UNASSIGNED: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has a relatively longer history and more evidence to support its effectiveness. Microwave ablation (MWA) is gaining momentum because of its shorter ablation time and consistent ablation zone. High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation is a relatively new technology that provides non-invasive treatment for patients with HCC. It has been carried out at centers of excellence and it is a safe and effective treatment option for selected patients with HCC and liver cirrhosis.
    UNASSIGNED: Selective use of different loco-ablative therapies will enhance clinicians\' treatment options for treatment of HCC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号