BACKGROUND: To improve diagnostic precision in pediatric vertigo, particularly in Vestibular Migraine of Childhood (VMC), probable VMC (pVMC), Recurrent Vertigo of Childhood (RVC), and unspecified categories, by delineating clinical characteristics and prevalence to refine diagnostics and treatments.
METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 102 pediatric patients (five to 18 years; 46 females, 56 males) at the Dizziness Center of the Otolaryngology Department in a tertiary-level hospital from January 2019 to December 2023. Patients were classified into VMC, pVMC, RVC, and indeterminate groups. Evaluations included audiometry and vestibular tests (video head impulse test [vHIT] or caloric testing), conducted in the audiology unit and vestibular testing laboratory. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS 20.0.
RESULTS: Diagnoses were 8.8% VMC, 31.4% pVMC, 51.0% RVC, and 8.8% indeterminate. Nausea and vomiting were common in VMC and pVMC; cochlear symptoms like tinnitus and hearing loss predominated in VMC. Although vestibular testing showed no significant group differences, VMC had more vHIT abnormalities and RVC had more caloric test anomalies.
CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the need for comprehensive diagnostics in pediatric vestibular disorders, revealing unique and overlapping traits across VMC, pVMC, and RVC. Insights call for further research to refine diagnostic criteria and improve treatment methods.

OBJECTIVE: Idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSHL) can cause acute damage not only to the auditory function, but also to the vestibular function in addition to damage to the hearing function. The aim of this study was to perform vestibular assessment using caloric test and video head impulse test in patients with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss. In addition, to evaluate the relationship of dizziness with vestibular tests and post-treatment responses of vestibular tests.
METHODS: This is an observational, longitudinal and prospective study, including patients diagnosed with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing. Patients were divided into two groups according to the presence of vestibular complaints at presentation: Group 1: Patients with vestibular complaints, Group 2: Patients without vestibular complaints. All subjects underwent pure tone audiometry (PTA) testing, cold caloric test and video head impulse test (vHIT) during their admission and on the 10th day, 3rd month, and 1st year of their follow-up outpatient clinic controls. A unilateral weakness (UW) in the caloric test response was quantified according to the Jongkees formula.
RESULTS: A positive and significant relationship was found between the degree of hearing loss according to the ASHA criteria pre-treatment and the level of improvement created according to Siegel criteria at the 10th day, 3rd month, 1st year after treatment (respectively p = 0.001, p = 0.001, p < 0.001). When both short-term and long-term results were evaluated after treatment, a positive improvement in the degree of hearing loss was observed. A statistically significant difference was observed between Groups 1 and 2 when the pre-treatment, at 10 days, 3 months and 1 year after treatment the caloric test UW value was compared (respectively p = 0.020, p = 0.004, p = 0.004, p = 0.004). A statistically significant difference was observed between Groups 1 and 2 when the pre-treatment, at 10 days, 3 months and 1 year after treatment vHIT lateral canal VOR value was compared (respectively p = 0.000, p = 0.001, p = 0.000, p = 0.004). When both short-term and long-term results were evaluated after treatment, a positive improvement was observed in both caloric test results and lateral vHIT VOR values. Pre-treatment, post-treatment 10th day, 3rd month, 1st year vHIT anterior and posterior canal VOR values were found to be VOR˃0.8 in all patients. No difference was observed in anterior and posterior canal VOR values.
CONCLUSIONS: Vertigo in patients with ISSHL \"as objectively confirmed through caloric testing and vHIT\" can be considered a sign of severe cochlear damage. Our study demonstrated a significantly increased risk of vestibular affect in patients with ISSHL, especially in the presence of vertigo. Thus, we conclude that the focus in ISSHL should not only be on the cochlea but also on the vestibular system.

UNASSIGNED: To compare vestibular outcomes in cochlear implant (CI) surgery, between robotic-assisted insertion of the electrodes versus manual insertion.
UNASSIGNED: We performed a monocentric retrospective study. From March 2021, the robotic system RobOtol© was used for all CI cases. We compared this robotic-assisted insertion group with a manual insertion group of patients who received a CI between July 2020 and March 2021. Primary objective was vestibular outcome. We used objective vestibular function tests: caloric testing, Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential (VEMP), and Video Head Impulse Test (VHIT). Secondary objectives were postoperative complications including patient-reported postoperative vertigo.
UNASSIGNED: We found no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of caloric testing, VEMP or VHIT outcomes. In patient-reported outcomes, there was significantly more vertigo in the manual insertion group compared with robotic-assisted insertion.
UNASSIGNED: It is hypothesized that a non-traumatic insertion would cause less vestibular dysfunction postoperatively. Larger prospective studies are required to determine whether robotic-assisted CI insertion has a significant impact on vestibular outcomes in CI surgery.

Objective:This study aims to compare the examination results of the vestibular evoked myogenic potential（VEMP） and video head impulse testing（vHIT） in patients with vestibular neuritis（VN）, thus exploring the methods to distinguish superior and inferior vestibular nerve damages in VN patients, and their feasibility. Methods:A total of 25 patients with unilateral VN treated in the Otology Department of the First Hospital of Qinhuangdao from May 2018 to July 2021 were recruited. They were respectively tested for ocular VEMP（oVEMP）, cervical VEMP（cVEMP） and vHIT, and the examination results were analyzed. Results:Examination results of oVEMP showed that 96%（24/25） patients had one-ear abnormalities with the amplitude decline or no waveform introduced, and 4%（1/25） patient had no waveform introduced of both ears. The overall abnormal rate examined by oVEMP was 100%（26/26）. Examination results of cVEMP showed that 36%（9/25） patients had one-ear abnormalities with the amplitude decline or no waveform introduced, and 4%（1/25） patients had no waveform introduced of both ears. The overall abnormal rate examined by cVEMP was 40%（10/25）, and 60%（15/25） patients had normal waveforms of both ears. Examination results of vHIT showed that 100%（25/25） patients had semicircular canal gain decline of one side, 92%（23/25） had anterior Semicircular canal decline of one side, and 36%（9/25） had posterior semicircular canal decline of one side. VEMP and vHIT results were compared. Examination results of VEMP showed that 60%（15/25） VN patients had superior vestibular nerve damage, and 40%（10/25） had both superior and inferior vestibular nerve damages. Examination results of vHIT showed that 64%（16/25） VN patients had superior vestibular nerve damage, and 36%（9/25） had both superior and inferior vestibular nerve damages. There was no significant difference in the ratio of VN patients with superior and inferior vestibular nerve damages examined by VEMP or vHIT（χ²=0.085, P>0.05）. The matching ratio of VEMP and vHIT results was 80%（20/25）, and the non-matching ratio was 20%（5/25）. Conclusion:Consistent results obtained from both VEMP and vHIT can preliminarily identify the type of vestibular nerve damage. If their results are not consistent, it is recommended not to identify the scope of the vestibular nerve damage.
目的：对比前庭神经炎患者前庭诱发肌源性电位技术（vestibular evoked myogenic potential，VEMP）与视频头脉冲技术（video head impulse test，vHIT）测试结果，探讨前庭神经炎患者前庭上下神经损伤的区分方法与可行性。 方法：2018年5月-2021年7月在秦皇岛市第一医院耳科就诊的25例单侧前庭神经炎患者，分别给予oVEMP、cVEMP和vHIT测试，并对数据进行分析。 结果：oVEMP：24例（96%）患者一侧异常（振幅下降或未引出波形）；1例（4%）患者双侧波形未引出，总异常率为100%（26/26）；cVEMP：9例（36%）患者一侧异常（振幅下降或未引出波形）；1例（4%）患者双侧波形未引出，总异常率为40%（10/25）；15例（60%）患者双侧波形正常。vHIT：25例（100%）患者存在一侧水平半规管增益下降；23例（92%）患者存在一侧前半规管增益下降；9例（36%）患者存在一侧后半规管增益下降。VEMP与vHIT对比：根据VEMP的测试结果，25例前庭神经炎患者前庭上神经损伤占60%（15/25），前庭上下神经均损伤占40%（10/25）；根据vHIT的测试结果，26例前庭神经炎患者前庭上神经损伤占64%（16/25），前庭上下神经均损伤占36%（9/25）；两种测试方法的前庭神经炎前庭上下神经损伤比例差异无统计学意义（χ²=0.085，P>0.05）。VEMP与vHIT结果匹配的比例为80%（20/25），不匹配的比例为20%（5/25）。 结论：当VEMP与vHIT结果相符时可以初步确定前庭神经损伤类型，不相符时建议不细分前庭上下神经损伤范围。.

OBJECTIVE: In case of an acute unilateral vestibulopathy (UVP), compensatory strategies such as restoration and adaptation will lead to a decrease in intensity of the symptoms. Although measurements of compensatory strategies are available, currently, an overview taking the different strategies into account is lacking. The objectives of this study are to explore compensatory strategies and to investigate the association between compensatory strategies and patient characteristics.
METHODS: Restoration was objectified by the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) gain on the video head impulse test, and adaptation-consisting of visual, multisensory, and behavioral substitution-was objectified by the Visual Vertigo Analog Scale (VVAS), Antwerp Vestibular Compensation Index (AVeCI), and Perez and Rey score (PR score), respectively. Adequate restoration and adaptation levels were interpreted as follows: VOR gain > 0.80, VVAS ≤ 40%, AVeCI > 0 and PR score ≤ 55.
RESULTS: Sixty-two UVP patients, 34 men and 28 women, were included with an average age of 52.1 ± 17.3 years. At 10.5 ± 1.4 weeks after onset, 41.9% of the UVP patients reached adequate restoration levels and 58.1-86.9% reached adequate adaptation levels. Furthermore, significant associations were found between (1) restoration status and UVP etiology [Odds Ratio (OR) with 95% CI: 4.167 {1.353;12.828}] and balance performance (OR: 4.400 {1.258;15.386}), (2) visual sensory substitution status and perceived handicap (OR: 8.144 {1.644;40.395}), anxiety (OR: 10.000 {1.579;63.316}) and depression (OR: 16.667 {2.726;101.896}), and (3) behavioral substitution status and balance performance (OR: 4.143 {1.341;12.798}).
CONCLUSIONS: UVP patients with adequate compensatory strategies presented with better balance performance, lower perceived handicap, and lower anxiety and depression scores.

Video head impulse test (vHIT) and videonystagmography (VNG) provide significant benefits in evaluating benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) and determining the semicircular canal localization of the otoconia.
This study aimed to investigate the relationship between vestibular-ocular reflex (VOR) gains measured via vHIT and the slow-phase velocity (SPV) of nystagmus in patients with the posterior semicircular canal (PSCC)-BPPV.
Sixty-two patients were included in this study and divided into the study (n = 32, patients with isolated PSCC-BPPV) and control (n = 30, age- and sex-matched healthy individuals) groups. While VOR gains were measured with vHIT in both groups and compared between groups, the SPV values of nystagmus observed during the Dix-Hallpike maneuver in the study group were recorded using VNG and compared with the VOR gains of the study group.
There were significant differences in posterior canal VOR gains between the study and control groups (p < 0.001 and p < 0.01, respectively). Although the affected PSCC had decreased VOR gains versus the control group, it was still within the normal range. However, there was no significant relationship between the VOR gains of the affected PSCC and the SPV of the nystagmus.
vHIT can help detect semicircular canal dysfunction in patients with PSCC-BPPV. The SPV values of nystagmus on VNG during the Dix-Hallpike maneuver do not correlate with the level of VOR gain.

BACKGROUND: The suppression head impulse test is a new paradigm of the head impulse test, recently introduced for clinical use. The aim of this study was to assess the importance of the suppression head impulse paradigm in evaluating vestibular function.
METHODS: This comparative study was conducted from June 2020 to June 2022. The ears of the participants were divided into 2 groups: (i) ears with vestibular weakness and (ii) healthy controls. All participants underwent video head impulse tests at the time of presentation with both conventional head impulse paradigm and suppression head impulse paradigm, performed by the same examiner. The results of the 2 tests were compared, and the correlation between the corresponding parameters obtained (vestibulo-ocular reflex gain and saccades) was examined.
RESULTS: Ninety-five participants were included in the study (190 ears) with a mean age of 42.2 ± 12.6 years. Forty-six ears had vestibular weakness, and 144 were healthy controls. The suppression head impulse paradigm test showed a significantly lower vestibulo-ocular reflex gain than the head impulse paradigm in both groups. A positive correlation emerged between the vestibulo-ocular reflex gain measured with both paradigms. Regarding the saccades, a negative correlation was observed between the overt saccades latency and amplitude measured with both paradigms.
CONCLUSIONS: The new suppression head impulse paradigm complements the head impulse paradigm for a better evaluation of the vestibular function. The inconsistency of covert saccades in suppression head impulse paradigm makes it superior to head impulse paradigm in measuring vestibulo-ocular reflex gain, especially in patients with vestibular loss.

Current clinical practice considers the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) gain as registered by the video head impulse test (vHIT) as the primary measure for semicircular canal function, while the role of the re-fixation saccades (RSs) is still under evaluation. The goal of the study was to appraise the added benefit of RS towards the improvement of vHIT diagnostic accuracy in cases of suspected left horizontal semicircular canal dysfunction.
The vHIT recordings of 40 patients with left-sided horizontal VOR gains <0.8 were retrospectively evaluated for the presence of RS. The study groups included 20 patients with a final diagnosis of left horizontal semicircular canal dysfunction and 20 patients for whom vestibular dysfunction was ruled out.
Gain values >0.72 were found in all patients with no vestibular disease and in 4 (20%) patients having vestibulopathy. Significantly higher average left-sided RS velocity and frequency were found among the vestibular patients. VOR gain <0.72 was found to be highly specific for the diagnosis of vestibular dysfunction. However, for gain values in the range of 0.72-0.79, the presence of RS with frequency >80% largely improved vHIT diagnostic accuracy.
Although VOR gain <0.8 is considered to reflect dysfunction, a significant false-positive rate for left-sided horizontal vHIT was found for gains in the range of 0.72-0.79. The presence of RS with frequency >80% could improve vHIT diagnostic ability in these patients.

UNASSIGNED: Although dizziness is a common symptom after vaccination, the mechanism, and prognosis are not well understood.
UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to investigate patients with dizziness after COVID-19 vaccination by analyzing objective information.
UNASSIGNED: A retrospective study of patients who visited the outpatient clinics of two institutes with a complaint of dizziness occurring within 72 h after a COVID-19 vaccination.
UNASSIGNED: In most cases, patients experienced only a single event of dizziness, and the subjective symptom was relieved after a few weeks. All patients decreased gain of vestibular ocular reflex (VOR). The vestibular function test results showed signs of central vestibulopathy in some cases. We separated patients into two groups; the direction-fixed nystagmus (DFN) group and the direction-changing nystagmus (DCN) group. All patients showed decreased gain on the rotational chair test (RCT). The DFN group showed an 80% decrease in video head impulse test (vHIT) gain, whereas the DCN group only showed a decrease of 25%. In RCT, 66% of the DFN group showed asymmetry compared to 20% showing asymmetry in the DCN group.
UNASSIGNED: The patients who suffered from dizziness after the COVID-19 vaccination exhibited decreased VOR gain and in some cases signs of central vestibulopathy.

Gentamicin is a widely used aminoglycoside with ototoxicity as a known adverse effect. Because of the difficulty in clinical recognition, the prevalence of gentamicin ototoxicity in practice is thought to be higher than reported. This study aimed to prospectively assess the effect of gentamicin on vestibular function and whether ototoxicity is underrecognized.
Single-center, prospective, nonblinded trial.
Inpatient tertiary hospital setting followed by vestibular outpatient clinic review.
Forty-eight patients undergoing a urologic procedure were recruited, with 24 and 17 patients having one or two follow-up tests, respectively, after initial gentamicin administration.
Single dose of gentamicin during a urologic procedure.
Gains for the vestibuloocular reflex (VOR) were measured using the video head impulse test before receiving gentamicin and at two other timepoints after gentamicin. The gains in VOR were then compared with previous testing sessions to determine if there was a deterioration after gentamicin use.
Before receiving gentamicin, the gains for horizontal VOR were measured for 48 patients. The gains were measured a second time for 24 patients at varying durations postgentamicin (1-56 d) and a third time for 17 patients (14-152 d) postgentamicin. The mean VOR gain for Timepoints 1, 2, and 3 were 0.72 ± 0.13, 0.75 ± 0.16, and 0.79 ± 0.18, respectively. Linear-mixed model with repeated-measure analysis revealed no significant difference in VOR gain between Timepoints 1 and 2 ( p = 0.19).
There was no significant effect observed on mean VOR gain decrement after a single dose of gentamicin.