UNASSIGNED: A disadvantage of using hamstring tendon autograft consisting of the semitendinosus and gracilis tendons for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is pain from tendon harvesting and persistent hamstring weakness. In the tendon-sparing all-inside technique, a quadrupled semitendinosus graft and adjustable-loop cortical fixation are suggested to give less postoperative flexion deficits while displaying overall similar clinical results to the traditional hamstring technique. However, there are a limited number of high-quality studies comparing these techniques with inconsistent results.
UNASSIGNED: To investigate differences between the all-inside (quadrupled semitendinosus) and traditional hamstring (double-stranded semitendinosus and gracilis) technique regarding (1) self-reported function, (2) hamstring strength, and (3) knee laxity.
UNASSIGNED: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 98 patients were randomized to either the all-inside or the traditional hamstring technique. Perioperatively, duration of surgery and graft size were obtained. The International Knee Documentation Committee 2000 Subjective Knee Form score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Tegner Activity Scale score, knee laxity (KT-1000 arthrometer side-to-side difference and pivot shift), range of motion, isokinetic knee strength, and hop test score were collected preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively. Return-to-sport readiness was evaluated 9 months postoperatively.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 89 patients completed 2-year follow-up, 45 patients with the all-inside technique and 44 patients with the traditional hamstring technique. There were no significant differences between groups in any of the outcome measures 2 years after surgery, but there was a tendency in the all-inside group toward having increased anterior translation (mean, 3.6 mm vs 2.7 mm), a higher number of revision surgeries (5 patients vs 2 patients), and more patients having +1 and +2 pivot-shift values (29 vs 18 patients) when compared with the traditional group.
UNASSIGNED: The all-inside technique yields equivalent results to the traditional hamstring technique 2 years after surgery and should be considered a reliable technique to use for ACL reconstruction. Sparing the gracilis tendon does not lead to less persistent hamstring weakness. Long-term follow-up is needed to further determine whether the tendency of increased anterior translation seen at 2 years postoperatively will lead to a higher risk of graft failure.

UNASSIGNED: There is still debate regarding the association between arthrometric knee laxity measurements and subjective knee outcome and revision surgery after primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).
UNASSIGNED: To assess whether arthrometric knee laxity (measured with the KT-1000 arthrometer) 6 months after primary ACLR was associated with the 1-, 2-, and 5-year subjective knee outcomes or revision ACLR at a 5-year follow-up.
UNASSIGNED: Cohort study, Level of evidence 3.
UNASSIGNED: Patients who underwent primary ACLR with a hamstring tendon autograft at the authors\' institution between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2017, with no concomitant ligamentous injuries, were identified. Anterior knee laxity (KT-1000 arthrometer, 134 N) was assessed 6 months postoperatively. The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) was collected preoperatively and 1, 2, and 5 years postoperatively. Patients who underwent revision ACLR at any institution in the country within 5 years of primary surgery were identified through the Swedish National Knee Ligament Registry.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 4697 patients (54.3% male) with available KT-1000 arthrometer measurements were included (normal: side-to-side [STS] ≤2 mm, 3015 [64.2%]; nearly normal: STS 3-5 mm, 1446 [30.8%]; abnormal: STS >5 mm, 236 [5.0%]). The only significant difference in subjective knee outcome between the groups was for the KOOS Symptoms subscale at the 1-year follow-up (STS ≤2 mm, 79.9 ± 16.2; STS 3-5 mm, 82.5 ± 14.8; STS >5 mm, 85.1 ± 14.2; P < .001). No other significant differences between the groups were found preoperatively or at 1, 2, or 5 years postoperatively for any of the KOOS subscales. The hazard for revision ACLR within 5 years of the primary surgery was significantly higher for the groups with an STS of 3 to 5 mm (6.6%; 95/1446) (hazard ratio [HR], 1.42; 95% CI, 1.07-1.87; P = .01) and an STS >5 mm (11.4%; 27/236) (HR, 2.61; 95% CI, 1.69-4.03; P < .001) compared with the group with an STS ≤2 mm (3.8%; 116/3015).
UNASSIGNED: A high grade of postoperative knee laxity (STS 3-5 mm and STS >5 mm) 6 months after primary ACLR was associated with an increased hazard of revision ACLR within 5 years, but it was not associated with an inferior subjective knee outcome.

The Stability Study was a multicenter, pragmatic, parallel groups, randomized clinical trial comparing hamstring tendon autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with or without the addition of lateral extra-articular tenodesis in young patients at high risk of graft failure. Having recruited 618 patients with a 5% loss to follow up, we were able to demonstrate a clinically and statistically significant reduction in clinical failure and graft rupture at 2 years postoperative. No differences in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were demonstrated between groups; however, patients who experienced an adverse event had significantly worse PROs than those who did not.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the regeneration of semitendinosus and gracilis tendons from two different graft harvesting techniques, which are the stump preservation and conventional graft harvesting techniques. We hypothesised that the stump preservation graft harvesting technique, which preserved the distal attachment of tendons at their insertion, would facilitate anatomical regeneration to the pes anserinus.
METHODS: This is a prospective, randomised, double-blinded study whereby thirty consecutive patients who underwent single bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with ipsilateral semitendinosus and gracilis autografts were recruited. The patients were randomly assigned to the stump preservation group (14 patients) or conventional group (16 patients). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation was performed preoperatively and at six months post-operatively.
RESULTS: At 6-month follow-up, MRI evaluations showed a higher percentage of insertion of regenerated semitendinosus and gracilis at the pes anserinus in the stump preservation group (75.0%) than that in the conventional group (68.8%). There was a significantly higher proximal shift of the musculotendinous junction of semitendinosus (5.70 ​cm versus 3.36 ​cm, p ​= ​0.029) and gracilis (5.28 ​cm versus 3.16 ​cm, p ​= ​0.045) in the conventional group post-operatively.
CONCLUSIONS: The stump preservation technique yields a higher percentage of anatomical insertion of regenerated tendons and a lesser amount of proximal shift of the musculotendinous junction.
METHODS: III - Prospective study with up to two negative criteria.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the forces on a medial collateral ligament (MCL) reconstruction (MCLR) relative to the valgus alignment of the knee.
METHODS: Eight fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees were subjected to dynamic valgus loading at 400 N using a custom-made kinematics rig. After resection of the superficial medial collateral ligament, a single-bundle MCLR with a hamstring tendon autograft was performed. A medial opening wedge distal femoral osteotomy was performed and fixed with an external fixator to gradually adjust the alignment in 5° increments from 0° to 10° valgus. For each degree of valgus deformity, the resulting forces acting on the MCLR were measured through a force sensor and captured in 15° increments from 0° to 60° of knee flexion.
RESULTS: Irrespective of the degree of knee flexion, increasing valgus malalignment resulted in significantly increased forces acting on the MCLR compared to neutral alignment (p < 0.05). Dynamic loading at 5° valgus resulted in increased forces on the MCLR at all flexion angles ranging between 16.2 N and 18.5 N (p < 0.05 from 0° to 30°; p < 0.01 from 45° to 60°). A 10° valgus malalignment further increased the forces on the MCLR at all flexion angles ranging between 29.4 N and 40.0 N (p < 0.01 from 0° to 45°, p < 0.05 at 60°).
CONCLUSIONS: Valgus malalignment of the knee caused increased forces acting on the reconstructed MCL. In cases of chronic medial instabilities accompanied by a valgus deformity ≥ 5°, a realigning osteotomy should be considered concomitantly to the MCLR to protect the graft and potentially reduce graft failures.
METHODS: Level III.

The distal semitendinosus tendon is commonly harvested for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, inducing substantial morbidity at the knee. The aim of this study was to probe how morphological changes of the semitendinosus muscle after harvest of its distal tendon for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction affects knee flexion strength and whether the knee flexor synergists can compensate for the knee flexion weakness. Ten participants 8-18 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with an ipsilateral distal semitendinosus tendon autograft performed isometric knee flexion strength testing (15°, 45°, 60°, and 90°; 0° = knee extension) positioned prone on an isokinetic dynamometer. Morphological parameters extracted from magnetic resonance images were used to inform a musculoskeletal model. Knee flexion moments estimated by the model were then compared with those measured experimentally at each knee angle position. A statistically significant between-leg difference in experimentally-measured maximal isometric strength was found at 60° and 90°, but not 15° or 45°, of knee flexion. The musculoskeletal model matched the between-leg differences observed in experimental knee flexion moments at 15° and 45° but did not well estimate between-leg differences with a more flexed knee, particularly at 90°. Further, the knee flexor synergists could not physiologically compensate for weakness in deep knee flexion. These results suggest additional factors other than knee flexor muscle morphology play a role in knee flexion weakness following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a distal semitendinosus tendon graft and thus more work at neural and microscopic levels is required for informing treatment and rehabilitation in this demographic.

OBJECTIVE: Theoretically, short semitendinosus grafts result in less pain and morbidity while providing greater knee flexion strength and sparing the gracilis tendon. They often require the use of blind bone tunnels as well as fixation at both ends of the graft with suspensory cortical buttons. The \"Tape Locking Screw\" (TLS) system is another option. There are few studies comparing ACL reconstruction with a short graft using the 4-strand semitendinosus graft (ST4-TLS) technique with that of the semitendinosus-gracilis (STG) procedure. This study was designed: (1) to compare the retear rate following these two technics after 2years of follow-up, (2) to compare the clinical scores, complications and return to sport times between the two procedures Q1, Q2.
OBJECTIVE: Our hypothesis was that there would be no differences in retear rates between the two techniques.
METHODS: This single center case control study included 290 patients who underwent STG reconstruction that were paired by propensity score matching to 299 patients who underwent ST4-TLS reconstruction. The main evaluation criterion was the retear rate 2years after surgery. Secondary criteria were the two-year postoperative complication rate, the time to return to sport, to pivot sports and to running, as well as the complication rates and clinical scores 6months, 1year and 2years after surgery.
RESULTS: At the final follow-up, the overall retear rate in our series of ACL ligament reconstruction was 6.0% (36/596). There was no difference in retear rates between the groups 2years after ligament reconstruction [ST4-TLS: 6.7% (20/299) vs. STG: 5.4% (16/297); p=0.47]. The postoperative KOOS symptom score and the Tegner score were found to be better in the STG group at 1year (81 vs. 78, p=0.008) and 2years (5.64 vs. 5.10, p=0.016), respectively, representing the minimally clinically important difference (MCID) for the latter. No difference was found in the other clinical scores 6months, 1year or 2years after surgery. There was no significant difference in the return to sport [TLS: 93.0% (164/299) vs. STG: 93.0% (158/297) p=0.99] or the complication rate [TLS: 8.7% (26/299) vs. STG: 7.4% (22/297) p=0.89] between the groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The ST4-TLS ACL ligament reconstruction technique was found to be as reliable as the standard STG procedure 2years after surgery for the retear rate and the return to sport, although the results of certain postoperative clinical scores seem to be lower.
METHODS: III; case control study.

Altered semitendinosus (ST) morphology and distal tendon insertion following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) may reduce knee flexion torque generating capacity of the hamstrings via impaired ST force generation and/or moment arm. This study used a computational musculoskeletal model to simulate mechanical consequences of tendon harvest for ACLR on ST function by modeling changes in ST muscle tendon insertion point, moment arm, and torque generating capacity across a physiological range of motion. Simulated ST function was then compared between ACLR and uninjured contralateral limbs. Magnetic resonance imaging from 18 individuals with unilateral history of ACLR involving a hamstring autograft was used to analyse bilateral hamstring muscle (ST, semimembranosus, bicep femoris long head and short head) morphology and distal ST tendon insertion. The ACLR cohort was sub-grouped into those with and without ST regeneration. For each participant with ST regeneration (n = 7), a personalized musculoskeletal model was created including postoperative remodeling of ST using OpenSim 4.1. Knee flexion and internal rotation moment arms and torque generating capacities of hamstrings were evaluated. Bilateral differences were calculated with an asymmetry index (%) ([unaffected limb-affected limb]/[unaffected limb + affected limb]*100%). Smaller moment arms or knee torques within injured compared to uninjured contralateral limbs were considered a deficit. Compared to uninjured contralateral limbs, ACLR limbs with tendon regeneration (n = 7) had minor reductions in knee flexion (5.80% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 3.97-7.62]) and internal rotation (4.92% [95% CI = 2.77-7.07]) moment arms. Decoupled from muscle morphology, altered ST moment arms in ACLR limbs with tendon regeneration resulted in negligible deficits in knee flexion (1.20% [95% CI = 0.34-2.06]) and internal rotation (0.24% [95% CI = 0.22-0.26]) torque generating capacity compared to uninjured contralateral limbs. Coupled with muscle morphology, ACLR limbs with tendon regeneration had substantial deficits in knee flexion (19.32% [95% CI = 18.35-20.28]) and internal rotation (15.49% [95% CI = 14.56-16.41]) torques compared to uninjured contralateral limbs. Personalized musculoskeletal models with measures of ST distal insertion and muscle morphology provided unique insights into post-ACLR ST and hamstring function. Deficits in knee flexor and internal rotation moment arms and torque generating capacities were evident in those with ACLR even when tendon regeneration occurred. Future studies may wish to implement this framework in personalized musculoskeletal models following ACLR to better understand individual muscle function for injury prevention and treatment evaluation.

UNASSIGNED: Numerous graft options are available when undertaking anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR), although a lack of high-quality evidence exists comparing quadriceps (QT) and hamstring (HT) autografts.
UNASSIGNED: To investigate patient outcomes in patients undergoing HT versus QT ACLR.
UNASSIGNED: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.
UNASSIGNED: After recruitment and randomization, 112 patients (HT = 55; QT = 57) underwent ACLR. Patients were assessed pre- and postoperatively (6 weeks and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months), with a range of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), graft laxity (KT-1000 arthrometer; primary outcome variable), active knee flexion and extension range of motion (ROM), peak isokinetic knee extensor and flexor strength, and a 6-hop performance battery. Limb symmetry indices (LSIs) were calculated for strength and hop measures. Secondary procedures, ACL retears, and contralateral ACL tears were reported.
UNASSIGNED: All PROMs and knee ROM measures significantly improved (P < .0001), and no other group differences (P > .05) were observed-apart from the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI) score, which was significantly better in the HT group at 3 (P = .008), 6 (P = .010), and 12 (P = .014) months. No significant changes were observed in side-to-side laxity from 6 to 24 months (P = .105), and no group differences were observed (P = .487) at 6 (HT mean, 1.2; QT mean, 1.3), 12 (HT mean, 1.1; QT mean, 1.3), and 24 (HT mean, 1.1; QT mean, 1.2) months. While the HT group demonstrated significantly greater (P < .05) quadriceps strength LSIs at 6 and 12 months, the QT group showed significantly greater (P < .05) hamstring strength LSIs at 6, 12, and 24 months. The HT group showed significantly greater (P < .05) LSIs for the single horizontal (6 months), lateral (6 and 12 months), and medial (6 months) hop tests for distance. Up until 24 months, 1 patient (QT at 22 months) had a retear, with 2 contralateral ACL tears (QT at 19 months; HT at 23 months). Secondary procedures included 5 in the HT group (manipulation under anesthesia, notch debridement, meniscal repair, and knee arthroscopy for scar tissue) and 6 in the QT group (notch debridement, meniscal repair, knee arthroscopy for scar tissue, tibial tubercle transfer, and osteochondral autologous transplantation).
UNASSIGNED: Apart from the ACL-RSI, the 2 autograft groups compared well for PROMs, knee ROM, and laxity. However, greater hamstring strength LSIs were observed for the QT cohort, with greater quadriceps strength (and hop test) LSIs in the HT cohort. The longer-term review will continue to evaluate return to sports and later-stage reinjury between the 2 graft constructs.
UNASSIGNED: ACTRN12618001520224p (Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry).

OBJECTIVE: A machine learning-based anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) revision prediction model has been developed using Norwegian Knee Ligament Register (NKLR) data, but lacks external validation outside Scandinavia. This study aimed to assess the external validity of the NKLR model (https://swastvedt.shinyapps.io/calculator_rev/) using the STABILITY 1 randomized clinical trial (RCT) data set. The hypothesis was that model performance would be similar.
METHODS: The NKLR Cox Lasso model was selected for external validation owing to its superior performance in the original study. STABILITY 1 patients with all five predictors required by the Cox Lasso model were included. The STABILITY 1 RCT was a prospective study which randomized patients to receive either a hamstring tendon autograft (HT) alone or HT plus a lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET). Since all patients in the STABILITY 1 trial received HT ± LET, three configurations were tested: 1: all patients coded as HT, 2: HT + LET group coded as bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autograft, 3: HT + LET group coded as unknown/other graft choice. Model performance was assessed via concordance and calibration.
RESULTS: In total, 591/618 (95.6%) STABILITY 1 patients were eligible for inclusion, with 39 undergoing revisions within 2 years (6.6%). Model performance was best when patients receiving HT + LET were coded as BPTB. Concordance was similar to the original NKLR prediction model for 1- and 2-year revision prediction (STABILITY: 0.71; NKLR: 0.68-0.69). Concordance 95% confidence interval (CI) ranged from 0.63 to 0.79. The model was well calibrated for 1-year prediction while the 2-year prediction demonstrated evidence of miscalibration.
CONCLUSIONS: When patients in STABILITY 1 who received HT + LET were coded as BPTB in the NKLR prediction model, concordance was similar to the index study. However, due to a wide 95% CI, the true performance of the prediction model with this Canadian and European cohort is unclear and a larger data set is required to definitively determine the external validity. Further, better calibration for 1-year predictions aligns with general prediction modelling challenges over longer periods. While not a large enough sample size to elicit the true accuracy and external validity of the prediction model when applied to North American patients, this analysis provides more support for the notion that HT plus LET performs similarly to BPTB reconstruction. In addition, despite the wide confidence interval, this study suggests optimism regarding the accuracy of the model when applied outside of Scandinavia.
METHODS: Level 3, cohort study.