Growth monitoring

生长监测
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究的首要目的是使用从5岁以下健康儿童中常规收集的数据来评估挪威的生长监测指南。我们分析了生长状态(年龄大小)和变化(百分位数交叉)的标准。
    纵向数据来自Bergen生长研究1(BGS1)中2130名儿童的健康婴儿诊所的电子健康记录(EHR)。长度测量,体重,长度的重量,将体重指数(BMI)和头围转换为z评分,并与世界卫生组织(WHO)的生长标准和国家生长参考进行比较.
    使用世界卫生组织的增长标准,在出生时的所有特征和所有年龄段的长度方面,超过2SD的儿童比例通常高于预期的2.3%。跨越百分位数通道在生命的头两年很常见,特别是长度/高度。到了五岁,37.9%的儿童被确定为关于长度/身高的随访,头围为33%,身长/BMI高的为13.6%。
    超出图表正常限制的儿童比例高于预期,并且发现了惊人的大量儿童有关头围长度或生长的规则。这表明有必要修订挪威目前的增长监测准则。
    UNASSIGNED: The overarching aim of this study was to evaluate the Norwegian guidelines for growth monitoring using routinely collected data from healthy children up to five years of age. We analysed criteria for both status (size for age) and change (centile crossing) in growth.
    UNASSIGNED: Longitudinal data were obtained from the electronic health record (EHR) at the well-baby clinic for 2130 children included in the Bergen growth study 1 (BGS1). Measurements of length, weight, weight-for-length, body mass index (BMI) and head circumference were converted to z-scores and compared with the World Health Organization (WHO) growth standards and the national growth reference.
    UNASSIGNED: Using the WHO growth standard, the proportion of children above +2SD was generally higher than the expected 2.3% for all traits at birth and for length at all ages. Crossing percentile channels was common during the first two years of life, particularly for length/height. By the age of five years, 37.9% of the children had been identified for follow-up regarding length/height, 33% for head circumference and 13.6% for high weight-for-length/BMI.
    UNASSIGNED: The proportion of children beyond the normal limits of the charts is higher than expected, and a surprisingly large number of children were identified for rules concerning length or growth in head circumference. This suggests the need for a revision of the current guidelines for growth monitoring in Norway.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    远程营养不良应用程序(R-MAPP)是在COVID-19大流行期间开发的,旨在为在社区工作的医疗保健专业人员(HCP)提供支持,以完成远程营养评估,并为营养保健提供实际指导。这项研究的目的是将R-MAPP修改为适合儿童的版本,儿科远程营养不良应用(Pedi-R-MAPP),并提供一种结构化的方法来完成以营养为重点的评估,作为技术支持护理服务(TECS)咨询的一部分。
    完成了十步过程:1)修改成人R-MAPP的权限,2)文献检索告知Pedi-R-MAPP内容,3)Pedi-R-MAPP草案,4)使用TECS对HCP实践的国际调查,5)邀请营养专家参与改良的Delphi过程,6)第一次利益相关者会议,以商定工具的目的/草案,7)第一轮在线调查,8)从调查中删除共识的声明,9)针对未达成共识的声明的第二轮在线调查,以及10)第二次利益相关者会议,最终确定了Pedi-R-MAPP营养意识工具。
    由463个HCP完成的国际调查,55%的儿科医生,38%的营养师,7%的护士/其他人。当HCP被要求回顾过去12个月时,营养师(n=110)报告说,每10个预约中有5.7±10.6个是亲自完成的;相比之下,儿科医生(n=182)报告每10个预约中有7.5±7.0个是亲自完成的(p<0.0001),其余的作为TECS咨询完成。总的来说,确定并使用了74篇文章来开发Pedi-R-MAPP,其中包括使用交通信号灯系统的颜色编码建议;绿色,琥珀色,红色和紫色。18名参与者同意参加Delphi共识,并完成了两轮修改后的Delphi调查。在第一次会议上就拟议工具的目的和草案各节达成了协议。在第一轮在线调查中,86%(n=89/104)的声明达成共识,而在第二轮中,12.5%(n=13/104)的陈述没有达成共识。在第二次专家会议上,对有争议的陈述进行讨论,直到达成协议并最终确定Pedi-R-MAPP。
    使用改良的德尔菲共识开发了Pedi-R-MAPP营养意识工具。该工具旨在通过提供一种结构化的方法来完成以营养为重点的远程评估,从而支持COVID-19大流行快速跟踪的技术转型,以及确定随访的频率以及可能需要亲自评估的儿童。
    The Remote Malnutrition Application (R-MAPP) was developed during the COVID-19 pandemic to provide support for health care professionals (HCPs) working in the community to complete remote nutritional assessments, and provide practical guidance for nutritional care. The aim of this study was to modify the R-MAPP into a version suitable for children, Pediatric Remote Malnutrition Application (Pedi-R-MAPP), and provide a structured approach to completing a nutrition focused assessment as part of a technology enabled care service (TECS) consultation.
    A ten-step process was completed: 1) permission to modify adult R-MAPP, 2) literature search to inform the Pedi-R-MAPP content, 3) Pedi-R-MAPP draft, 4) international survey of HCP practice using TECS, 5) nutrition experts invited to participate in a modified Delphi process, 6) first stakeholder meeting to agree purpose/draft of the tool, 7) round-one online survey, 8) statements with consensus removed from survey, 9) round-two online survey for statements with no consensus and 10) second stakeholder meeting with finalisation of the Pedi-R-MAPP nutrition awareness tool.
    The international survey completed by 463 HCPs, 55% paediatricians, 38% dietitians, 7% nurses/others. When HCPs were asked to look back over the last 12 months, dietitians (n = 110) reported that 5.7 ± 10.6 out of every 10 appointments were completed in person; compared to paediatricians (n = 182) who reported 7.5 ± 7.0 out of every 10 appointments to be in person (p < 0.0001), with the remainder completed as TECS consultations. Overall, 74 articles were identified and used to develop the Pedi-R-MAPP which included colour-coded advice using a traffic light system; green, amber, red and purple. Eighteen participants agreed to participate in the Delphi consensus and completed both rounds of the modified Delphi survey. Agreement was reached at the first meeting on the purpose and draft sections of the proposed tool. In round-one of the online survey, 86% (n = 89/104) of statements reached consensus, whereas in round-two 12.5% (n = 13/104) of statements reached no consensus. At the second expert meeting, contested statements were discussed until agreement was reached and the Pedi-R-MAPP could be finalised.
    The Pedi-R-MAPP nutrition awareness tool was developed using a modified Delphi consensus. This tool aims to support the technological transformation fast-tracked by the COVID-19 pandemic by providing a structured approach to completing a remote nutrition focused assessment, as well as identifying the frequency of follow up along with those children who may require in-person assessment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号