Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor

粒细胞集落刺激因子
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:推荐用于横纹肌肉瘤(RMS)和尤文肉瘤(ES)患者的化疗方案具有骨髓抑制性,可降低中性粒细胞绝对计数(ANC),并随后增加发热性中性粒细胞减少(FN)的风险。然而,只有少数研究关注粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)药物在RMS和ES的儿科和青少年患者中的疗效和安全性.我们的目的是研究mecapegfilgrastim的疗效和安全性,pegfilgrastim的生物仿制药,预防儿童和青少年RMS或ES患者的FN。
    方法:在这个单臂中,单中心,前瞻性研究,患有RMS或ES的儿科和青少年患者被纳入接受VAC(长春新碱,环磷酰胺,放线菌素)方案或VDC(长春新碱,环磷酰胺,多柔比星)方案,为期3周,然后用美卡皮非格司亭(100μg/kg,最大6毫克)在完成化疗后24小时给予。主要终点是FN的发生率。次要终点包括4级中性粒细胞减少症的发生率,ANC的持续时间≤0.5×109/L,化疗延迟或减少的发生率,使用抗生素,和安全概况。
    结果:总计,30人中的2人(6.7%,95%CI:0.82-22.07)患者在第一周期化疗后出现FN。八(26.7%,95%CI:12.28-45.89)患者在接受预防性mecapegfilgrastim后出现4级中性粒细胞减少症。8例患者发生ANC≤0.5×109/L,中位病程4.5天;6名患者在第7天达到其ANC水平的最低点,其中5名患者在第10天恢复。没有剂量减少,延迟,或报告停止化疗。21名(70.0%)患者在治疗期间接受了抗生素治疗。在0-5年和13-18年组没有患者经历FN,6-12年组2例患者发生FN。两个病人,6名患者,并且在0-5年内没有患者经历过4级中性粒细胞减少症,6-12年,和13-18岁组,分别。
    结论:Mecapegfilgrastim在RMS或ES的儿科和青少年患者中显示出可接受的疗效和安全性。需要进一步的大样本量随机研究。
    背景:该临床试验已在Chictr.org注册。cn(没有ChiCTR1900022249)。2019年3月31日注册。
    BACKGROUND: The chemotherapy regimens recommended for both rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) and Ewing sarcoma (ES) patients are myelosuppressive and can reduce the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) and subsequently increase the risk of febrile neutropenia (FN). However, only a few studies have focused on the efficacy and safety of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) drugs in pediatric and adolescent patients with RMS and ES. Our objective was to investigate the efficacy and safety of mecapegfilgrastim, a biosimilar of pegfilgrastim, in prophylaxis of FN for pediatric and adolescent patients with RMS or ES.
    METHODS: In this single-arm, single-center, prospective study, pediatric and adolescent patients with RMS or ES were enrolled to receive either VAC (vincristine, cyclophosphamide, dactinomycin) regimen or VDC (vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin) regimen in a 3-week cycle, followed by treatment with mecapegfilgrastim (100 μg/kg, maximum 6 mg) given at 24 h after completing chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was the incidence rate of FN. Secondary endpoints included the incidence rate of grade 4 neutropenia, duration of ANC ≤ 0.5 × 109/L, incidence rate of chemotherapy delay or reduction, use of antibiotics, and safety profile.
    RESULTS: In total, 2 of the 30 (6.7%, 95% CI: 0.82-22.07) patients experienced FN after the first cycle of chemotherapy. Eight (26.7%, 95% CI: 12.28-45.89) patients experienced grade 4 neutropenia after receiving prophylactic mecapegfilgrastim. Eight patients experienced ANC ≤ 0.5 × 109/L with a median duration of 4.5 days; among them, 6 patients reached the lowest point of their ANC level on day 7, and 5 of them recovered by day 10. No dose reductions, delays, or discontinuation of chemotherapy was reported. Twenty-one (70.0%) patients received antibiotics during the treatment period. No patient experienced FN in the 0-5 years and the 13-18 years groups, and 2 patients experienced FN in the 6-12 years group. Two patients, 6 patients, and no patient experienced grade 4 neutropenia in the 0-5 years, 6-12 years, and 13-18 years groups, respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: Mecapegfilgrastim showed acceptable efficacy and safety profile in pediatric and adolescent patients with RMS or ES. Further randomized studies with large sample size are warranted.
    BACKGROUND: This clinical trial was registered at Chictr.org.cn (No.ChiCTR1900022249). Registered on March 31, 2019.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:反复植入失败(RIF)是指在多次体外受精(IVF)治疗后,高质量胚胎无法成功植入的情况。本研究的目的是探讨宫内粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)和富血小板血浆(PRP)对RIF患者妊娠率的影响。
    方法:本随机临床试验研究在Rasht的Mehr医学研究所IVF中心进行。伊朗,从2020年到2022年。该研究由200名经历过多个失败周期的个体组成。这些患者被随机分为两组:在胚胎移植(ET)前至少48小时,子宫内输注1mlG-CSF和子宫内输注1ml自体PRP。比较各组的植入率,化学,临床,和持续怀孕。
    结果:接受PRP的患者的植入率明显更高(P=0.016)。PRP组的化学妊娠率明显高于G-CSF组(P=0.003)。与G-CSF组(P=0.02)相比,PRP组的临床妊娠率和持续妊娠率均显着较高(P=0.001)。
    结论:在RIF患者中,通过宫内输注使用PRP比G-CSF更成功地提高了妊娠率和活产率。
    BACKGROUND: Repeated implantation failure (RIF) refers to the condition where high quality embryos are unable to successfully implant after multiple cycles of in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment. The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of intrauterine granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) on pregnancy rate in patients with RIF.
    METHODS: The present randomised clinical trial study was conducted at the IVF Centre of Mehr Medical Institute in Rasht, Iran, from 2020 to 2022. The research consisted of 200 individuals who had experienced multiple failed cycles. These patients were randomised into two groups: intrauterine infusion of 1 ml of G-CSF and intrauterine infusion of 1 ml autologous PRP at least 48 hours before embryo transfer (ET). The groups were compared in terms of implantation rate, and chemical, clinical, and ongoing pregnancy.
    RESULTS: The implantation rate was significantly higher in patients who received PRP (P=0.016). Chemical pregnancy in the PRP group was significantly higher than G-CSF group (P=0.003). Both clinical pregnancy and ongoing pregnancy rates were significantly higher in the PRP group (P=0.001) compared to the G-CSF group (P=0.02).
    CONCLUSIONS: The utilisation of PRP via intrauterine infusion is considerably more successful than G-CSF in enhancing pregnancy and live birth rates among patients with RIF.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:本研究旨在探讨聚乙二醇化重组人粒细胞集落刺激因子(PEG-rhG-CSF)对宫颈癌同步放化疗患者中性粒细胞减少症的初步预防效果和安全性。
    方法:在此前瞻性中,单中心,单臂研究,我们纳入了2018年国际妇产科联合会(FIGO)IIIC1r-IVA和IVB期(仅远处转移伴腹股沟淋巴结转移)宫颈癌患者(18~70岁).符合条件的患者应具有正常的骨髓功能(绝对中性粒细胞计数(ANC)≥2.0×109/L)和足够的肝和肾功能。主要排除标准包括:既往化疗和/或放疗;骨髓发育不良或其他造血异常病史。所有患者均接受根治性放射治疗(骨盆放射治疗或扩展视野照射)加近距离放射治疗。化疗方案包括4个周期的3周紫杉醇和顺铂。在每个治疗周期后48-72小时施用PEG-rhG-CSF。救助粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)仅在某些情况下才允许。主要终点是3-4级中性粒细胞减少症的发生率。次要终点包括发热性中性粒细胞减少症(FN)的频率,2-4周期化疗完成率,完成放疗的时间,和安全。
    结果:总体而言,从2019年7月至2020年10月,该研究纳入了52名患者。3-4级中性粒细胞减少的发生率为28.8%,3-4级中性粒细胞减少症的平均持续时间为3.85天(1-7天)。FN的发生率为3.8%。化疗完成率为94.2%,82.7%,周期2-4分别为75.0%。第1-4周期3-4级中性粒细胞减少症的发生率为9.6%(5/52),8.2%(4/49),14.0%(6/43),2.6%(1/39),分别。所有患者在8周内完成放疗(中位数,48天;范围:41-56天),除了1例撤回同意且未接受放疗的患者.在任何患者中均未观察到严重的非血液学毒性。
    结论:PEG-rhG-CSF是宫颈癌同步放化疗患者中性粒细胞减少的有效且安全的预防性治疗方法。
    背景:中国临床试验注册中心,ChiCTR1900024494。注册日期:2019年7月13日。
    BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (PEG-rhG-CSF) for primary prophylaxis of neutropenia in patients with cervical cancer receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy.
    METHODS: In this prospective, single-center, single-arm study, we enrolled patients (18-70 years) with 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IIIC1r-IVA and IVB (distant metastasis only with inguinal lymph node metastasis) cervical cancer. Eligible patients should have normal function of the bone marrow (absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 2.0 × 109/L) and adequate hepatic and renal functions. Key exclusion criteria included: previous chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy; a history of bone marrow dysplasia or other hematopoietic abnormalities. All patients underwent radical radiotherapy (pelvic radiotherapy or extended-field irradiation) plus brachytherapy. The chemotherapy regimen included four cycles of 3-weekly paclitaxel and cisplatin. PEG-rhG-CSF was administered 48-72 h after each treatment cycle. Salvage granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) was only permitted in certain circumstances. The primary endpoint was the incidence of grade 3-4 neutropenia. The secondary endpoints included frequency of febrile neutropenia (FN), chemotherapy completion rate in cycles 2-4, time to complete radiotherapy, and safety.
    RESULTS: Overall, 52 patients were enrolled in this study from July 2019 to October 2020. The incidence of grade 3-4 neutropenia was 28.8%, with an average duration of grade 3-4 neutropenia persistence of 3.85 days (1-7 days). The incidence rate of FN was 3.8%. The chemotherapy completion rate was 94.2%, 82.7%, and 75.0% for cycles 2-4, respectively. The incidences of grade 3-4 neutropenia for cycles 1-4 were 9.6% (5/52), 8.2% (4/49), 14.0% (6/43), and 2.6% (1/39), respectively. All patients completed radiotherapy within 8 weeks (median, 48 days; range: 41-56 days), except one patient who withdrew consent and did not receive radiotherapy. Severe non-hematologic toxicity was not observed in any patient.
    CONCLUSIONS: PEG-rhG-CSF is an effective and safe prophylactic treatment for neutropenia in patients with cervical cancer undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy.
    BACKGROUND: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR1900024494. Date of Registration:13/July/2019.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在符合条件的多发性骨髓瘤(MM)患者的治疗中,建议使用大剂量化疗,然后进行自体造血干细胞支持。这项研究的目的是比较匈牙利患者人群中稳态与基于化疗的干细胞动员的疗效和安全性。
    受试者是210名MM患者,他们在2018年至2022年之间接受了干细胞动员程序。应用粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)104例,而106例患者接受化疗,随后给予G-CSF。我们评估了成功动员的比例,收集的干细胞的数量,两组的感染发生率和成本效益。
    在稳态组中,对plerixafor的需求显著增加(45%与13%,P<0.001),不成功的干细胞动员更频繁(11%vs.3%,P=0.024),收集的干细胞的平均数量较低(6.9vs.9.8×106,P<0.001)高于化疗组。然而,感染频率较低(4%vs.27%,P<0.001),住院天数显着降低(6vs.14天,P<0.001)。与接受其他方案治疗的患者相比,接受来那度胺或达拉图单抗的患者更频繁地使用Plerixafor(41%vs.23%,P=0.007和78%vs.23%,分别为P<0.001)。
    稳态动员是一种安全的方法;然而,plerixafor给药的比率较高,尝试失败,可能会质疑其对化学移植的优越性。
    UNASSIGNED: High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell support is recommended in the treatment of eligible multiple myeloma (MM) patients. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of steady-state versus chemotherapy-based stem cell mobilization in our Hungarian patient population.
    UNASSIGNED: The subjects were 210 MM patients who underwent stem cell mobilization procedure between 2018 and 2022. Solo granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) was administered in 104 cases, while 106 patients received chemotherapy which was followed by G-CSF administration. We evaluated the ratio of successful mobilizations, the amount of collected stem cells, the incidence of infections and cost-effectivity in the two groups.
    UNASSIGNED: In the steady-state group, there was a significantly higher need for plerixafor (45% vs. 13%, P < 0.001), unsuccessful stem cell mobilization was more frequent (11% vs. 3%, P = 0.024) and the mean amount of collected stem cells was lower (6.9 vs. 9.8 × 106, P < 0.001) than in the chemotherapy group. However, infections were less frequent (4% vs. 27%, P < 0.001) and the number of days spent in hospital was significantly lower (6 vs. 14 days, P < 0.001). Plerixafor was more frequently administered in those who had received lenalidomide or daratumumab than in those who had been treated with other regimens (41% vs. 23%, P = 0.007 and 78% vs. 23%, P < 0.001, respectively).
    UNASSIGNED: Steady-state mobilization is a safe method; however, the higher rate of plerixafor administration and unsuccessful attempts may question its superiority to chemomobilization.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    Objective: To explore the efficacy and safety of cryopreservation-free integrated autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) model for patients with multiple myeloma. Methods: A total of 96 patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) between July 31, 2020, and December 31, 2022, were retrospectively analyzed, of which 41 patients in the observation group received integrated non-cryopreserved transplantation mode. After hematopoietic stem cells were mobilized and collected, melphalan was started immediately for pre-transplant conditioning, and non-cryopreserved grafts from the medical blood transfusion refrigerator were directly injected intravenously into the patient within 24-48 h after the melphalan conditioning. The control group consisted of 55 patients who received traditional transplantation mode. After hematopoietic stem cells were collected, stem cell cryopreservation was performed in liquid nitrogen, and then the transplant plans were started at the right time. All patients received mobilization of autologous hematopoietic stem cells using the G-CSF combined with the plerixafor. Results: ① A total of 34 patients (82.9% ) with VGPR plus CR in the observation group were significantly higher than 33 patients (60.0% ) in the control group (P=0.016). ②Compared with the control group, the incidence of grade 1 oral mucosal inflammation was higher in the observation group (P<0.001) ; however, the incidence of grades 2 and 3 oral mucosal inflammation was lower (P=0.004, P=0.048), and neither group experienced grade 4 or above oral mucosal inflammation. The incidence of grade 1 diarrhea was higher in the observation group (P=0.002), whereas the incidence of grade 3 diarrhea was lower (P=0.007). No statistically significant difference was observed in the incidence of grade 4 diarrhea (P=0.506), and neither group experienced grade 5 diarrhea. ③ The incidence of bacterial infection in the observation group was lower than that in the control group (34.1% vs 65.5%, P=0.002), whereas no statistically significant difference was observed in the incidence of fungal infection (29.3% vs 31.4%, P=0.863) and viral infection (4.88% vs 3.64%, P=0.831). ④No statistically significant difference was observed in the implantation time of granulocytes and platelets between the observation and control groups [10 (8-20) days vs 11 (8-17) days, P=0.501; 13 (10-21) days vs 15 (10-20) days, P=0.245]. ⑤ All patients did not receive lenalidomide treatment 100 days post-transplantation. At 30 days post-transplantation, the CTL, NK, and Th cell counts in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.001, P=0.002, P=0.049), and the NKT cell counts were higher than those in the control group (P=0.024). At 100 days post-transplantation, the CTL, NKT, and Th cell counts in the observation group were higher than those in the control group (P=0.025, P=0.011, P=0.007), and no statistically significant difference in NK cell counts was observed between the two groups (P=0.396). ⑥ The median follow-up was 18 (4-33) months. The overall 2-year survival rates of the observation and control groups post-transplantation were 91.5% and 78.2%, respectively (P=0.337). The recurrence-free survival rates were 85.3% and 77.6%, respectively (P=0.386), and the cumulative recurrence rates were 9.8% and 16.9%, respectively (P=0.373) . Conclusion: In NDMM, the cryopreservation-free integrated autologous HSCT model can achieve similar therapeutic effects as traditional transplantation models, with lower rates of severe mucosal inflammation and infection compared with traditional transplantation models.
    目的: 探讨无冻存一体化自体造血干细胞移植模式在多发性骨髓瘤(MM)患者中的疗效和安全性。 方法: 纳入2020年7月31日至2022年12月31日在电子科技大学附属医院四川省人民医院接受自体造血干细胞移植的新诊断多发性骨髓瘤(NDMM)患者96例,对其临床资料进行回顾性分析。41例患者接受无冻存一体化移植模式(观察组),造血干细胞动员采集后冷藏于医用输血冰箱(4 ℃)并立即启动美法仑预处理,预处理结束24 h后回输自体造血干细胞;55例患者接受传统移植模式(对照组),造血干细胞动员采集后液氮冷冻保存,择期启动移植流程。两组患者均采用G-CSF联合普乐沙福进行自体造血干细胞动员。 结果: ①观察组移植前疾病状态为非常好的部分缓解(VGPR)及完全缓解(CR)患者占比显著高于对照组[82.9%(34/41)对60.0%(33/55),P=0.016]。②与对照组相比,观察组1级口腔黏膜炎的发生率较高(P<0.001),但2、3级口腔黏膜炎的发生率较低(P=0.004,P=0.048),两组均未发生≥4级口腔黏膜炎;观察组1级腹泻的发生率较高(P=0.002),3级腹泻的发生率较低(P=0.007),4级腹泻的发生率差异无统计学意义(P=0.506),两组均未发生5级腹泻。③观察组细菌感染发生率低于对照组(34.1%对65.5%,P=0.002),真菌感染(29.3%对31.4%,P=0.863)、病毒感染(4.88%对3.64%,P=0.831)发生率差异无统计学意义。④观察组与对照组粒细胞植入时间和血小板植入时间差异无统计学意义[10(8~20)d对11(8~17)d,P=0.501;13(10~21)d对15(10~20)d,P=0.245]。⑤移植后100 d前所有患者均未使用来那度胺治疗。移植后30 d,观察组CTL、NK、Th细胞计数低于对照组(P<0.001,P=0.049,P=0.002),NKT细胞计数高于对照组(P=0.024)。移植后100 d,观察组CTL、NKT、Th细胞计数高于对照组(P=0.025,P=0.011,P=0.007),NK细胞计数两组差异无统计学意义(P=0.396)。⑥中位随访18(4~33)个月,观察组和对照组移植后2年总生存率分别为91.5%、78.2%(P=0.337),无复发生存率分别为85.3%、77.6%(P=0.386),累积复发率分别为9.8%、16.9%(P=0.373)。 结论: 无冻存一体化自体造血干细胞移植模式在NDMM中可获得与传统移植模式相似的疗效,重度黏膜炎和感染的发生率低于传统移植模式。.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    为了研究宫内灌注粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)对子宫内膜厚度的影响,volume,薄型子宫内膜患者的血流参数及其临床结局。
    我们设计了一项前瞻性非随机同步对照试验,招募了2021年9月1日至2023年9月1日在绵阳市中心医院接受冻融胚胎移植(FET)的子宫内膜薄型患者。他们被分成两组,实验组为接受G-CSF宫内灌注实验治疗的患者,对照组为未接受实验治疗的患者。分析比较两组患者的一般资料和临床治疗效果。子宫内膜厚度,分析实验组患者宫内灌注G-CSF前后的体积和血流参数。
    83例患者的临床资料纳入研究。实验组包括51例,对照组31例。两组之间的基线数据无显著差异。实验组临床妊娠率(56.86%)高于对照组(50.00%),自然流产率(27.59%)低于对照组(37.50%),但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。在实验组中,灌注后子宫内膜厚度([0.67±0.1]cm)大于灌注前子宫内膜厚度([0.59±0.09]cm),灌注后([1.84±0.81]cm3)大于灌注前子宫内膜体积([1.54±0.69]cm3),灌注后血管化血流指数(VFI)(1.97±2.82)大于灌注前VFI(0.99±1.04),差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。
    宫腔内灌注G-CSF可增强子宫内膜厚度,volume,子宫内膜薄型患者的一些血流参数。
    UNASSIGNED: To investigate the effects of intrauterine perfusion with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) on the endometrial thickness, volume, and blood flow parameters of patients with thin endometrium and their clinical outcomes.
    UNASSIGNED: We designed a prospective non-randomized synchronous controlled trial and recruited patients with thin endometrium who underwent frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) at Mianyang Central Hospital between September 1, 2021 and September 1, 2023. They were divided into two groups, an experimental group of patients who received the experimental treatment of intrauterine perfusion with G-CSF and a control group of patients who did not receive the experimental treatment. The general data and the clinical outcomes of the two groups were analyzed and compared. The endometrial thickness, volume and blood flow parameters of patients in the experimental group before and after intrauterine perfusion with G-CSF were analyzed.
    UNASSIGNED: The clinical data of 83 patients were included in the study. The experimental group included 51 cases, while the control group included 31 cases. There were no significant differences in the baseline data between the two groups. The clinical pregnancy rate of the experimental group (56.86%) was higher than that of the control group (50.00%) and the rate of spontaneous abortion in the experimental group (27.59%) was lower than that in the control group (37.50%), but the differences were not statistically significant (P>0.05). In the experimental group, the postperfusion endometrial thickness ([0.67±0.1] cm) was greater than the preperfusion endometrial thickness ([0.59±0.09] cm), the postperfusion ([1.84±0.81] cm3) was greater than the preperfusion endometrial volume ([1.54±0.69] cm3), and the postperfusion vascularization flow index (VFI) (1.97±2.82) was greater than the preperfusion VFI (0.99±1.04), with all the differences being statistically significant (P<0.05).
    UNASSIGNED: Intrauterine perfusion with G-CSF can enhance the endometrial thickness, volume, and some blood flow parameters in patients with thin endometrium.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    脂多糖诱导的(LPS)炎症被用作模型,以了解炎症在脑疾病中的作用。然而,尚无研究评估外周低水平慢性LPS诱导外周和大脑中性粒细胞活化的能力.将亚临床水平的LPS腹膜内注射入小鼠以研究其对中性粒细胞频率和活化的影响。中性粒细胞激活,通过CD11b表达来衡量,与注射生理盐水的小鼠相比,注射LPS的小鼠在注射4周后而不是8周后更高。在第四次和最后一次注射后4-12小时和4-8小时,外周中性粒细胞频率和激活增加,分别。G-CSF水平升高,TNFa,在血浆中观察到IL-6和CXCL2,同时中性粒细胞弹性蛋白酶增加,嗜中性粒细胞胞外陷阱的标志,最终注射后4小时达到峰值。最终注射后4-8小时,与注射盐水的小鼠相比,注射LPS的小鼠的大脑中的中性粒细胞活化增加。这些结果表明外周LPS的亚临床水平诱导外周和脑中的嗜中性粒细胞活化。这种慢性低水平全身性炎症的模型可用于了解嗜中性粒细胞如何随着年龄和/或在神经退行性或神经炎性疾病的小鼠模型中充当炎症的外周-脑轴的介质。
    Lipopolysaccharide-induced (LPS) inflammation is used as model to understand the role of inflammation in brain diseases. However, no studies have assessed the ability of peripheral low-level chronic LPS to induce neutrophil activation in the periphery and brain. Subclinical levels of LPS were injected intraperitoneally into mice to investigate its impacts on neutrophil frequency and activation. Neutrophil activation, as measured by CD11b expression, was higher in LPS-injected mice compared to saline-injected mice after 4 weeks but not 8 weeks of injections. Neutrophil frequency and activation increased in the periphery 4-12 h and 4-8 h after the fourth and final injection, respectively. Increased levels of G-CSF, TNFa, IL-6, and CXCL2 were observed in the plasma along with increased neutrophil elastase, a marker of neutrophil extracellular traps, peaking 4 h following the final injection. Neutrophil activation was increased in the brain of LPS-injected mice when compared to saline-injected mice 4-8 h after the final injection. These results indicate that subclinical levels of peripheral LPS induces neutrophil activation in the periphery and brain. This model of chronic low-level systemic inflammation could be used to understand how neutrophils may act as mediators of the periphery-brain axis of inflammation with age and/or in mouse models of neurodegenerative or neuroinflammatory disease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在描述G-CSF治疗实践,评估决策标准,并测量其在乳房患者(BC)的非卧床环境中的实施情况,肺(LC),或胃肠道癌症(GIC),超出标准建议。
    方法:在这种非介入治疗中,横截面,多中心研究,使用会话界面(聊天机器人)呈现临床病例,通过语音或文本交换模拟与一个或多个虚拟对话者的对话。临床模拟由四个参数配置:癌症类型,与化疗和合并症相关的FN风险,获得护理,和治疗设置(辅助/新辅助/转移)。
    结果:问卷由102名医生完成。大多数从业者(84.5%)报告开G-CSF,无论肿瘤类型。与转移性病例相比,G-CSF用于辅助/新辅助治疗的处方频率更高。化疗的类型被认为是开G-CSF的第一个原因,获得护理是第二种。关于化疗的类型,医生不会单独考虑这个因素,但同时伴有合并症和年龄(占病例的56.7%)。在大多数BC和LC病例中开了Pegfilgrastim长效药(70.1%和86%,分别),而在大多数GIC病例中,非格司亭短效被命名(61.7%);76.3%的医生将G-CSF作为主要预防。
    结论:我们的研究结果表明,推荐的做法得到了广泛遵循。在大多数情况下,G-CSF被规定为初级预防。此外,医师似乎更倾向于为辅助/新辅助患者而非转移性患者开G-CSF.最后,化疗的类型往往是比患者背景更重要的决定因素。
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to delineate G-CSF treatment practices, assess decision criteria, and measure their implementation in ambulatory settings for patients with breast (BC), lung (LC), or gastrointestinal cancers (GIC), beyond standard recommendations.
    METHODS: In this non-interventional, cross-sectional, multicenter study, clinical cases were presented using conversational interfaces (chatbots), simulating a conversation with one or more virtual interlocutors through voice or text exchange. The clinical simulations were configured by four parameters: types of cancer, risk of FN related to chemotherapy and comorbidities, access to care, and therapy setting (adjuvant/neoadjuvant/metastatic).
    RESULTS: The questionnaire was completed by 102 physicians. Most practitioners (84.5%) reported prescribing G-CSF, regardless of tumor type. G-CSF was prescribed more frequently for adjuvant/neoadjuvant therapy than for metastatic cases. The type of chemotherapy was cited as the first reason for prescribing G-CSF, with access to care being the second. Regarding the type of chemotherapy, physicians do not consider this factor alone, but combined with comorbidities and age (56.7% of cases). Pegfilgrastim long-acting was prescribed in most cases of BC and LC (70.1% and 86%, respectively), while filgrastim short-acting was named in the majority of cases of GIC (61.7%); 76.3% of physicians prescribed G-CSF as primary prophylaxis.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that recommended practices are broadly followed. In the majority of cases, G-CSF is prescribed as primary prophylaxis. In addition, physicians seem more inclined to prescribe G-CSF to adjuvant/neoadjuvant patients rather than metastatic patients. Finally, the type of chemotherapy tends to be a more significant determining factor than the patient\'s background.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:先前的观察性研究报道,全身性炎症调节因子与慢性肾脏病(CKD)的发展有关;然而,这些关联是否是因果关系尚不清楚.本研究旨在探讨全身炎症调节因子与CKD和肾功能之间的潜在因果关系。
    方法:我们进行了双向双样本孟德尔随机化(MR)分析,以推断41个全身炎症调节因子与CKD和肾功能之间的潜在因果关系。采用方差逆加权(IVW)检验作为主要分析方法。此外,通过孟德尔随机化多效性残差和异常值(MR-PRESSO)检验和加权中位数检验进行敏感性分析.
    结果:研究结果显示,在正向分析中,11种遗传预测的全身性炎症调节因子与CKD或肾功能之间存在12种暗示性关联。包括4个CKD,3为血尿素氮(BUN),4用于eGFRcrea,1用于eGFRcys。在另一个方向,我们确定了6个显著的因果关系,包括粒细胞集落刺激因子(GCSF)的CKD(IVWβ=0.145;95%CI,0.042至0.248;P=0.006),CKD伴干细胞因子(SCF)(IVWβ=0.228;95%CI,0.133~0.323;P=2.40×10-6),eGFRcrea与SCF(IVWβ=-2.90;95%CI,-3.934至-1.867;P=3.76×10-8),eGFRcys与GCSF(IVWβ=-1.382;95%CI,-2.404至-0.361;P=0.008),eGFRcys与干扰素γ(IFNg)(IVWβ=-1.339;95%CI,-2.313至-0.366;P=0.007)和eGFRcys与血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)(IVWβ=-1.709;95%CI,-2.720至-0.699;P=9.13×10-4)。
    结论:我们的发现在正向和反向MR分析中都支持全身炎症调节因子与CKD或肾功能之间的因果关系。
    BACKGROUND: Previous observational studies have reported that systemic inflammatory regulators are related to the development of chronic kidney disease (CKD); however, whether these associations are causal remains unclear. The current study aimed to investigate the potential causal relationships between systemic inflammatory regulators and CKD and kidney function.
    METHODS: We performed bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses to infer the underlying causal associations between 41 systemic inflammatory regulators and CKD and kidney function. The inverse-variance weighting (IVW) test was used as the primary analysis method. In addition, sensitivity analyses were executed via the Mendelian randomization pleiotropy residual sum and outlier (MR-PRESSO) test and the weighted median test.
    RESULTS: The findings revealed 12 suggestive associations between 11 genetically predicted systemic inflammatory regulators and CKD or kidney function in the forward analyses, including 4 for CKD, 3 for blood urea nitrogen (BUN), 4 for eGFRcrea and 1 for eGFRcys. In the other direction, we identified 6 significant causal associations, including CKD with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (GCSF) (IVW β = 0.145; 95% CI, 0.042 to 0.248; P = 0.006), CKD with stem cell factor (SCF) (IVW β = 0.228; 95% CI, 0.133 to 0.323; P = 2.40 × 10- 6), eGFRcrea with SCF (IVW β =-2.90; 95% CI, -3.934 to -1.867; P = 3.76 × 10- 8), eGFRcys with GCSF (IVW β =-1.382; 95% CI, -2.404 to -0.361; P = 0.008), eGFRcys with interferon gamma (IFNg) (IVW β =-1.339; 95% CI, -2.313 to -0.366; P = 0.007) and eGFRcys with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) (IVW β =-1.709; 95% CI, -2.720 to -0.699; P = 9.13 × 10- 4).
    CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support causal links between systemic inflammatory regulators and CKD or kidney function both in the forward and reverse MR analyses.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    诊断为复发性或难治性(R/R)T淋巴细胞白血病/淋巴瘤(T-ALL/LBL)的患者的预后一直不令人满意。有限的治疗选择。作为报告,CAG方案可以作为R/RT-ALL/LBL的抢救治疗,但仍有一部分患者无法从中受益。最近的研究表明,达拉图单抗(Dara)和维奈托克(Ven)可能为T-ALL/LBL提供有希望的治疗益处。根据这些发现,我们对强化治疗方案进行了安全性和有效性评估,将Dara和Ven与阿克拉霉素结合,阿糖胞苷,粒细胞集落刺激因子,和依托泊苷(CAGE),在患有R/RT-ALL/LBL的患者中。这项I期试验的参与者是R/RT-ALL/LBL患者,他们没有标准治疗方案。在每个28天的周期中,患者接受了Dara的治疗,Ven,阿糖胞苷,阿克拉比星,粒细胞集落刺激因子,依托泊苷.这项研究的主要终点是缓解率。本报告介绍了21例接受Dara和Ven抢救治疗联合CAGE方案(DaraVenCAGE)的患者的前瞻性结局。客观缓解率(ORR)确定为57.1%,完全缓解(CR)率为47.6%。值得注意的是,与非ETP患者相比,早期T细胞前体(ETP)亚型患者的骨髓缓解率明显更高(100%vs.44.4%,p=0.044)。Dara+Ven+CAGE方案在R/RT-ALL/LBL患者中表现出良好的缓解率。此外,治疗耐受性良好.
    The prognosis of patients diagnosed with relapsed or refractory (R/R) T-lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (T-ALL/LBL) has consistently been unsatisfactory, with limited treatment options. As reports, the CAG regimen can serve as a salvage treatment for R/R T-ALL/LBL, but there remains a subset of patients who do not benefit from it. Recent studies have indicated that daratumumab (Dara) and venetoclax (Ven) may offer promising therapeutic benefits for T-ALL/LBL. In light of these findings, we conducted a safety and efficacy evaluation of the enhanced treatment regimen, combining Dara and Ven with aclarubicin, cytarabine, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, and etoposide (CAGE), in patients suffering from R/R T-ALL/LBL. The participants in this phase I trial were patients with R/R T-ALL/LBL who fail to standard treatment regimens. During each 28-day cycle, the patients were treated by Dara, Ven, cytarabine, aclarubicin, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, etoposide. The primary endpoint of this study was the rate of remission. This report presents the prospective outcomes of 21 patients who received the salvage therapy of Dara and Ven combined with the CAGE regimen (Dara + Ven + CAGE). The objective remission rate (ORR) was determined to be 57.1%, while the complete remission (CR) rate was 47.6%. Notably, patients with the early T-cell precursor (ETP) subtype exhibited a significantly higher remission rate in the bone marrow compared to non-ETP patients (100% vs. 44.4%, p = 0.044). The Dara + Ven + CAGE regimen demonstrated a favorable remission rate in patients with R/R T-ALL/LBL. Moreover, the treatment was well-tolerated.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号