Glycyrrhizic Acid

甘草酸
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    斑秃(AA)是一种常见的自身免疫性皮肤病。本研究旨在系统评价复方甘草酸苷(CG)联合米诺地尔外用治疗AA的疗效和安全性。
    我们搜索了PubMed,EMBASE,科克伦图书馆,WebofScience,CNKI,万方,VIP数据库。纳入了CG联合局部米诺地尔治疗与单纯局部米诺地尔治疗AA的随机对照试验(RCT)。Cochrane协作网络工具用于评估偏倚风险。使用RevMan5.3软件和Stata15.0软件完成统计学分析。GRADE系统用于评估结果的证据质量。
    11项RCT和1189例患者被纳入。与单用局部米诺地尔治疗相比,CG联合局部米诺地尔治疗在提高临床疗效方面更有效(RR=1.36,95%CI[1.27,1.45],p<0.00001)。盐评分(MD=-10.09,95%CI[-12.89,-7.30],p<0.00001),血清TNF-α水平(MD=-0.99,95%CI[-1.19,-0.39],p<0.00001),血清IL-12水平(MD=-8.84,95%CI[-11.20,-6.47],p<0.00001)和血清IFN-γ水平(MD=-7.44,95%CI[-11.51,-3.37],p=0.0003)减少,和血清TGF-β1水平(MD=2.40,95%CI[1.24,3.57],p<0.0001)增加。报告的不良事件没有显着差异,包括刺激性接触性皮炎(RR=0.51,95%CI[0.25,1.01],p=0.05),胃肠道反应(RR=2.47,95%CI[0.49,12.55],p=0.28),下肢水肿(RR=2.60,95%CI[0.61,11.06],p=0.20),面部水肿(RR=2.33,95%CI[0.61,8.93],p=0.22),或局部瘙痒(RR=0.56,95%CI[0.18,1.75],p=0.32),两组之间。
    目前的证据表明,CG联合米诺地尔局部治疗对AA有效且安全。然而,由于纳入研究的质量欠佳,需要更多高质量和大规模的RCT进行综合分析和进一步验证.
    UNASSIGNED: Alopecia areata (AA) is a common autoimmune skin disease. Our study aimed to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of compound glycyrrhizin (CG) combined with topical minoxidil therapy in treating AA.
    UNASSIGNED: We searched the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP databases. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on CG combined with topical minoxidil therapy compared with topical minoxidil therapy alone for AA were included. The Cochrane Collaborative Network Tool was used to assess the risk of bias. Statistical analysis was completed using RevMan5.3 software and Stata 15.0 software. The GRADE system was used to evaluate the quality of evidence for outcomes.
    UNASSIGNED: 11 RCTs and 1189 patients were included. Compared with topical minoxidil therapy alone, CG combined with topical minoxidil therapy was more effective at improving the clinical efficacy (RR = 1.36, 95% CI [1.27, 1.45], p < 0.00001). The SALT score (MD = -10.09, 95% CI [-12.89, -7.30], p < 0.00001), serum TNF-α levels (MD = -0.99, 95% CI [-1.19, -0.39], p < 0.00001), serum IL-12 levels (MD = -8.84, 95% CI [-11.20, -6.47], p < 0.00001) and serum IFN-γ levels (MD = -7.44, 95% CI [-11.51, -3.37], p = 0.0003) were reduced, and the serum TGF-β1 levels (MD = 2.40, 95% CI [1.24, 3.57], p < 0.0001) were increased. There were no significant differences in reported adverse events, including irritant contact dermatitis (RR = 0.51, 95% CI [0.25, 1.01], p = 0.05),\' gastrointestinal reactions (RR = 2.47, 95% CI [0.49, 12.55], p = 0.28), lower limb edema (RR = 2.60, 95% CI [0.61, 11.06], p = 0.20), facial edema (RR = 2.33, 95% CI [0.61, 8.93], p = 0.22), or localized itching (RR = 0.56, 95% CI [0.18, 1.75], p = 0.32), between the two groups.
    UNASSIGNED: The current evidence indicates that CG combined with topical minoxidil therapy is effective and safe for AA. However, owing to the suboptimal quality of the included studies, more high-quality and large-scale RCTs are needed for comprehensive analysis and further validation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    甘草(甘草属。)一直是中国和日本传统医学的基石。本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在评估甘草制剂的疗效。单独或与其他草药结合使用,对原发性肝病患者肝功能酶的影响。我们系统地搜索了MEDLINE,Embase,Scopus,WebofScience,和Cochrane图书馆截至2024年4月。比较甘草效果的随机对照试验(RCT)。包括与安慰剂或标准护理对照相比的制剂.使用标准Cochrane方法提取数据并评估合格的研究。共15项RCT,涉及1367名参与者,包括在分析中。这些研究在地理位置上差异很大,持续时间,和甘草制剂使用。与对照组相比,甘草显著降低丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)15.63U/L(95%CI:-25.08,-6.18;p=0.001)和天冬氨酸氨基转移酶(AST)7.37U/L(95%CI:-13.13,-1.61;p=0.01)。亚组分析显示,纯化的甘草酸化合物特别有效,显示更多的ALT和AST的减少没有显著的异质性。虽然甘草治疗并没有显著影响γ-谷氨酰转移酶和总胆红素(TBIL)的整体水平,特定的甘草草药制剂确实显示TBIL显着降低。甘草的安全性与已知的副作用一致,主要是轻度的,与其盐皮质激素作用有关。尽管存在异质性和潜在的语言偏见,研究结果表明,甘草可以增强肝功能。进一步的研究应规范甘草制剂,并探索其在多方面的草药配方中的作用,以更好地了解其保肝机制。
    Licorice (Glycyrrhiza spp.) has been a cornerstone of traditional Chinese and Japanese medicine. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of licorice formulations, alone or in combination with other herbs, on liver function enzymes in patients with primary liver disease. We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library up to April 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effects of Glycyrrhiza spp. preparations versus placebo or standard of care controls were included. Standard Cochrane methods were used to extract data and appraise eligible studies. A total of 15 RCTs, involving 1367 participants, were included in the analysis. The studies varied widely in geographical location, duration, and licorice preparations used. Licorice significantly reduced alanine aminotransferase (ALT) by 15.63 U/L (95% CI: -25.08, -6.18; p = 0.001) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) by 7.37 U/L (95% CI: -13.13, -1.61; p = 0.01) compared to control groups. Subgroup analyses revealed that purified glycyrrhizic acid compounds were particularly effective, showing greater reductions in ALT and AST without significant heterogeneity. Although licorice treatment did not significantly impact gamma-glutamyl transferase and total bilirubin (TBIL) levels overall, specific licorice-herb preparations did show a notable reduction in TBIL. The safety profile of licorice was consistent with known side effects, predominantly mild and related to its mineralocorticoid effects. Despite heterogeneity and potential language bias, the findings suggest that licorice can enhance liver function. Further studies should standardize licorice preparations and explore its role in multifaceted herbal formulations to better understand its hepatoprotective mechanisms.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    慢性荨麻疹(CU)是一种普遍的皮肤病,对生活产生负面影响,目前的治疗方法仍然欠佳。因此,迫切需要确定有效和安全的治疗方法。
    评估复方甘草酸苷(CG)联合第二代非镇静抗组胺药治疗CU的疗效和安全性。
    查询了9个数据库以筛选相关的RCT。两名评审员使用CochraneCollaboration独立评估偏倚风险。主要目标是总有效率,而次要的是复发率,不良事件,和治愈。使用ReviewManager5.4和Stata17进行统计分析。
    确定了24个随机对照试验。总有效率有显著差异(n=2649,RR=1.36,95CI:1.30-1.43,p<0.00001),CG联合第二代非镇静抗组胺药和抗组胺单药治疗之间的治愈(n=2649,RR=1.54,95CI:1.42-1.66,p<0.00001)和复发(n=446,RR=0.34,95CI:0.20-0.58,p<0.00001).相反,两组的不良事件发生率(n=2317,RR=0.76,95%CI:0.59~0.97,p=0.03)相当.我们的结果表明,与抗组胺单一疗法相比,CG联合第二代非镇静抗组胺药可以显着减轻CU的症状。未报告严重不良事件。
    CG联合第二代非镇静抗组胺药对CU有效。然而,需要更高质量的研究来验证我们的结果.
    UNASSIGNED: Chronic urticaria (CU) is a prevalent dermatologic disease that negatively affects life, current therapies remain suboptimal. Hence, there is an urgent need to identify effective and safe treatment.
    UNASSIGNED: Assess the efficacy and safety of compound glycyrrhizin (CG) combined with second-generation nonsedated antihistamine for the treatment of CU.
    UNASSIGNED: Nine databases were queried to screen RCTs related. Two reviewers independently assessed the risk of bias using Cochrane Collaboration. Primary objective was the total efficiency rate, while secondary was rate of recurrence, adverse events, and cure. Statistical analyses using Review Manager 5.4 and Stata17.
    UNASSIGNED: Twenty-four RCTs were identified. Significant differences were noted in rate of total efficiency (n = 2649, RR = 1.36, 95%CI:1.30-1.43, p < 0.00001), cure (n = 2649, RR = 1.54, 95%CI:1.42-1.66, p < 0.00001) and recurrence (n = 446, RR = 0.34, 95%CI:0.20-0.58, p < 0.00001) between the combination of CG with second-generation non-sedated antihistamine and antihistamine monotherapy. Contrastingly, adverse events rate (n = 2317, RR = 0.76, 95% CI:0.59-0.97, p = 0.03) was comparable between the two groups. Our results indicated that CG combined with second-generation non-sedated antihistamine could significantly mitigate the symptoms in CU compared with antihistamine monotherapy. No serious adverse events were reported.
    UNASSIGNED: CG combined with second-generation nonsedated antihistamine is effective for CU. Nevertheless, higher-quality studies are warranted to validate our results.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    背景:白癜风是一种获得性慢性色素减退性疾病,影响全球约0.5%至1%的个体。复方甘草酸苷(CG),一种补充药物,已被报道用于治疗白癜风,但证据尚未得到系统评估。我们系统评估了CG联合常规治疗白癜风的疗效和安全性。
    方法:我们搜索了Embase,WebofScience,PubMed,科克伦图书馆,中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM),万方数据,中国国家知识基础设施(CNKI),和VIP信息从成立到2022年7月。我们的分析包括比较CG联合常规治疗与单纯常规治疗白癜风的随机对照试验。主要结果是治疗反应,定义为白癜风治疗后色素恢复率>50%。次要结果是不良事件的发生率。使用ReviewManager5.4软件进行Meta分析。用卡方和I2统计量评估统计异质性,使用Mantel-Haenszal方法,将二分类数据表示为具有95%置信区间的风险比(RR).
    结果:纳入3994名参与者的39项研究被纳入本综述。我们的荟萃分析结果表明,与光疗相比,添加CG对色素沉着率的有效性更高(RR=1.28;P<.001),免疫抑制剂(RR=1.76;P<.001),中药(RR=1.38;P<.001),光疗和免疫抑制剂的组合(RR=1.42;P<.001),光疗和中药联合治疗(RR=1.37;P<.001)。此外,CG没有增加白癜风不良事件的发生率(RR=0.79;P=0.05)。
    结论:CG作为一种补充药物在白癜风的治疗中具有潜在的益处。然而,由于我们包括的研究中的方法论缺陷,有必要进行更多高质量的随机对照试验.
    BACKGROUND: Vitiligo is an acquired chronic depigmentary disorder affecting approximately 0.5% to 1% of individuals worldwide. The compound glycyrrhizin (CG), a complementary medicine, has been reported for treatment of vitiligo, but the evidence has not been systematically evaluated. We systematically assessed the efficacy and safety of CG in combination with conventional therapy for the treatment of vitiligo.
    METHODS: We searched Embase, Web of Science, PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Chinese BioMedical Literature Database (CBM), Wanfang Data, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and VIP information from inception to July 2022. Randomized controlled trials comparing CG combined with conventional therapy with conventional therapy alone for vitiligo were included in our analysis. The primary outcome was treatment response, which defined as >50% repigmentation rate of vitiligo after treatment. The secondary outcome was incidence of adverse events. Meta-analysis was performed using the Review Manager 5.4 software. Statistical heterogeneity was evaluated with chi-square and I2 statistics, dichotomous data were expressed as risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals using the Mantel-Haenszal method.
    RESULTS: Thirty-nine studies enrolling with 3994 participants were subjected to this review. The results of our meta-analysis indicated that addition of CG had superior effectiveness on repigmentation rate than phototherapy (RR = 1.28; P < .001), immunosuppressant (RR = 1.76; P < .001), traditional Chinese medicine (RR = 1.38; P < .001), combination of phototherapy and immunosuppressant (RR = 1.42; P < .001), and combination of phototherapy and traditional Chinese medicine (RR = 1.37; P < .001). In addition, CG did not increase the incidence of adverse events for vitiligo (RR = 0.79; P = .05).
    CONCLUSIONS: CG as a complementary medicine has a potential benefit in treatment of vitiligo. However, since the methodological flaws in the studies we included, more high-quality randomized controlled trials are warranted.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    丽可丽斯,一种来自甘草根和根茎的天然药物,具有广泛的治疗应用,包括抗病毒特性。甘草酸(GL)和甘草次酸(GA)是甘草中最重要的活性成份。甘草次酸3-O-单-β-d-葡糖苷酸(GAMG)是GL的活性代谢产物。GL及其代谢物对病毒具有广泛的抗病毒活性,例如,肝炎病毒,疱疹病毒和严重急性呼吸道综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)等。尽管它们的抗病毒活性已被广泛报道,涉及病毒本身等多个环节的具体作用机制,细胞,和豁免权没有明确确立。在这次审查中,我们将对GL及其代谢物作为抗病毒剂的作用进行更新,并详细说明行动的潜在用途和机制的相关证据。分析抗病毒药物,他们的信号,组织和自身免疫保护的影响可能提供有希望的新的治疗策略。
    Licorice, a natural medicine derived from the roots and rhizomes of Glycyrrhiza species, possesses a wide range of therapeutic applications, including antiviral properties. Glycyrrhizic acid (GL) and glycyrrhetinic acid (GA) are the most important active ingredients in licorice. Glycyrrhetinic acid 3-O-mono-β-d-glucuronide (GAMG) is the active metabolite of GL. GL and its metabolites have a wide range of antiviral activities against viruses, such as, the hepatitis virus, herpes virus and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and so on. Although their antiviral activity has been widely reported, the specific mechanism of action involving multiple links such as the virus itself, cells, and immunity are not clearly established. In this review, we will give an update on the role of GL and its metabolites as antiviral agents, and detail relevant evidence on the potential use and mechanisms of actions. Analyzing antivirals, their signaling, and the impacts of tissue and autoimmune protection may provide promising new therapeutic strategies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    复方甘草酸苷(CG)在中国被广泛用于治疗白癜风,CG治疗白癜风的疗效和不良事件(AE)需要进一步分析。本研究旨在系统地重新评估CG在白癜风患者中的疗效和安全性。
    搜索了截至2022年12月31日的8个文献数据库,并纳入了比较CG加常规治疗与常规治疗的随机对照试验。
    17项研究纳入1492例患者。汇总结果显示,CG和常规治疗的组合在总有效率上优于常规治疗(风险比(RR)=1.54,95%置信区间(CI)=1.40至1.69,P<0.00001),治愈率(RR=1.62,95CI=1.32~1.99,P<0.00001),血清IL-6、TNF-α、IL-17和TGF-β,和血液中CD4+/CD8+T细胞的比例。此外,少数患者患有轻度和可耐受的CGAE。
    CG加常规治疗是治疗白癜风的有效方法,具有轻度和可耐受的不良事件。未来需要更多高质量和大样本的研究,以提供更多的CG用于白癜风的证据。
    CRD42023401166。
    UNASSIGNED: Compound glycyrrhizin (CG) is widely used to treat vitiligo in China, and the efficacy and adverse events (AEs) of CG for vitiligo need further analysis. This study aimed to systematically reevaluate the efficacy and safety of CG in the patients with vitiligo.
    UNASSIGNED: Eight literature databases were searched up to 31 December 2022, and randomized controlled trials which compared CG plus conventional treatments with conventional treatments alone were included.
    UNASSIGNED: 17 studies with 1492 patients were included. The pooled results showed that the combination of CG and conventional treatments was superior to conventional treatments alone in the total efficacy rate (risk ratio (RR) = 1.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.40 to 1.69, P < 0.00001), cure rate (RR = 1.62, 95%CI = 1.32 to 1.99, P < 0.00001), the levels of serum IL-6, TNF-α, IL-17, and TGF-ß, and the ratio of CD4+/CD8+ T cell in blood. Moreover, few patients suffered from the mild and tolerable AEs of CG.
    UNASSIGNED: CG plus conventional treatments is an effective treatment for vitiligo with mild and tolerable AEs. More high-quality and large-sample studies are required in the future to provide more evidence of CG for vitiligo.
    UNASSIGNED: CRD42023401166.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    药物性肝损伤(DILI)是一种罕见但严重的不良事件,可进展为急性肝衰竭(ALF)。治疗儿童DILI的证据很少。
    我们旨在全面回顾现有的关于儿科人群中对乙酰氨基酚过量(APAP)和特异性DILI治疗的文献。
    我们纳入了在儿科人群(<18岁)中进行的原始文章,其中描述了治疗干预以管理APAP或特异性DILI。根据年龄组(早产新生儿,足月和产后新生儿,婴儿,儿童和青少年)。
    总的来说,25份出版物(15份病例报告,包括六个病例系列和四个回顾性队列研究),包括总共140例儿科DILI病例,从早产新生儿到青少年。应用N-乙酰半胱氨酸治疗19例APAP。N-乙酰半胱氨酸(n=14),熊去氧胆酸(n=3),皮质类固醇(n=31),肉碱(n=16)和甘草酸的组合,还原型谷胱甘肽,多烯磷脂酰胆碱和S-腺苷甲硫氨酸(n=31)是治疗特异性DILI的治疗选择.分子吸附剂再循环系统用于APAP(n=4)或特异性DILI(n=2)的管理,20例小儿ALF患者接受了连续性肾脏替代治疗。
    这项系统评价在接受特定治疗的儿科人群中确定了DILI。这些干预措施似乎主要是从成年人口的低质量证据中推断出来的。因此,有必要进行高质量的研究,以测试已知的和新颖的治疗DILI的专门针对儿科人群的疗效.PROSPERO注册号CRD42021214702。
    Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a rare but serious adverse event that can progress to acute liver failure (ALF). The evidence for treatment of DILI in children is scarce.
    We aimed to comprehensively review the available literature on the therapies for both acetaminophen overdose (APAP) and idiosyncratic DILI in the paediatric population.
    We included original articles conducted in a paediatric population (< 18 years) in which a therapeutic intervention was described to manage APAP or idiosyncratic DILI. Findings were summarized based on age groups (preterm newborn neonates, term and post-term neonates, infants, children and adolescents).
    Overall, 25 publications (fifteen case reports, six case series and four retrospective cohort studies) were included, including a total of 140 paediatric DILI cases, from preterm newborn neonates to adolescents. N-acetylcysteine was used to treat 19 APAP cases. N-acetylcysteine (n = 14), ursodeoxycholic acid (n = 3), corticosteroids (n = 31), carnitine (n = 16) and the combination of glycyrrhizin, reduced glutathione, polyene phosphatidylcholine and S-adenosylmethionine (n = 31) were the therapeutic options for treating idiosyncratic DILI. The molecular adsorbent recirculating system was used in the management of either APAP (n = 4) or idiosyncratic DILI (n = 2), while 20 paediatric ALF cases received continuous renal replacement therapy.
    This systematic review identified DILI in the paediatric population who have received specific treatment. These interventions appear to be mainly extrapolated from low-quality evidence from the adult population. Thus, there is a need for high-quality studies to test the efficacy of known and novel therapies to treat DILI specifically addressed to the paediatric population. PROSPERO registration number CRD42021214702.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    自从SARS-CoV-2和COVID-19大流行出现以来,科学界正在寻找治疗这种疾病的新方法。目前,计算机模拟方法已经变得很重要,一旦这种研究中使用的方法允许鉴定特定的蛋白质-配体相互作用,它可以作为分子的过滤步骤,可以作为特异性抑制剂。此外,这是一项低成本、高速度的技术。分子对接已被广泛用于寻找SARS-CoV-2的结构和非结构蛋白的潜在病毒蛋白抑制剂,旨在阻断感染和病毒繁殖。木瓜蛋白酶样蛋白酶(PLpro)参与SARS-CoV-2的蛋白水解过程,并构成了通过计算机模拟方法进行药理干预研究的主要目标之一。基于此,我们从计算机研究的角度对PLpro抑制剂进行了系统综述,包括与这种病毒蛋白相关的可能的治疗分子。还简要讨论了由COVID-19引发的神经系统问题,特别是相对于阿尔茨海默病中存在的神经炎症的相似性。在这种情况下,我们专注于两个分子,姜黄素和甘草酸,鉴于其PLpro抑制作用和神经保护特性以及对COVID-19的潜在治疗作用。
    Since the appearance of SARS-CoV-2 and the COVID-19 pandemic, the search for new approaches to treat this disease took place in the scientific community. The in silico approach has gained importance at this moment, once the methodologies used in this kind of study allow for the identification of specific protein-ligand interactions, which may serve as a filter step for molecules that can act as specific inhibitors. In addition, it is a low-cost and high-speed technology. Molecular docking has been widely used to find potential viral protein inhibitors for structural and non-structural proteins of the SARS-CoV-2, aiming to block the infection and the virus multiplication. The papain-like protease (PLpro) participates in the proteolytic processing of SARS-CoV-2 and composes one of the main targets studied for pharmacological intervention by in silico methodologies. Based on that, we performed a systematic review about PLpro inhibitors from the perspective of in silico research, including possible therapeutic molecules in relation to this viral protein. The neurological problems triggered by COVID-19 were also briefly discussed, especially relative to the similarities of neuroinflammation present in Alzheimer\'s disease. In this context, we focused on two molecules, curcumin and glycyrrhizinic acid, given their PLpro inhibitory actions and neuroprotective properties and potential therapeutic effects on COVID-19.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Even though vaccination has started against COVID-19, people should continue maintaining personal and social caution as it takes months or years to get everyone vaccinated, and we are not sure how long the vaccine remains efficacious. In order to contribute to the mitigation of COVID-19 symptoms, the pharmaceutical industry aims to develop antiviral drugs to inhibit the SARS-CoV-2 replication and produce anti-inflammatory medications that will inhibit the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), which is the primary cause of mortality among the COVID-19 patients. In reference to these tasks, this article considers the properties of a medicinal plant named licorice (Glycyrrhiza glabra), whose phytochemicals have shown both antiviral and anti-inflammatory tendencies through previous studies. All the literature was selected through extensive search in various databases such as google scholar, Scopus, the Web of Science, and PubMed. In addition to the antiviral and anti-inflammatory properties, one of the licorice components has an autophagy-enhancing mechanism that studies have suggested to be necessary for COVID-19 treatment. Based on reviewing relevant professional and historical literature regarding the medicinal properties of licorice, it is suggested that it may be worthwhile to conduct in vitro and in vivo studies, including clinical trials with glycyrrhizic and glycyrrhetinic acids together with other flavonoids found in licorice, as there is the potentiality to provide natural interventions against COVID-19 symptoms.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    COVID-19是一种高度传染性的急性肺炎。甘草酸制剂(GAP)已被发现具有保肝和抗病毒作用,但没有证据证明其对COVID-19患者的疗效和安全性。
    系统评价方法将由系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目定义。本研究将于2021年7月1日开始,至2021年10月31日结束。将进行全面的电子搜索,并搜索WebofScience,PubMed,奥维德网,中国国家知识基础设施,中国科学与期刊数据库,万方数据库和灰色文献,将进行手动搜索以搜索随机对照试验的文献,2019年12月1日至2021年7月1日,关于GAP治疗抗SARS-CoV-2药物诱导的肝损伤的单臂试验和回顾性研究。出版没有时间限制,语言将仅限于中文和英文。检索的研究将由两名研究人员独立筛选,相关数据将从研究中提取。研究间异质性将使用I2统计量进行评估,并通过荟萃回归和亚组分析进行探讨。根据数据可用性,我们计划按研究人群进行亚组分析,地理区域和其他选定的感兴趣的临床变量。将进行研究的质量评估。Cochrane干预措施系统审查手册将用于评估偏见的风险,和建议评估的分级,开发和评估将用于获取对累积证据的信心。
    不需要伦理批准,因为没有收集个体患者的主要数据。最终报告将通过发表在同行评审的期刊上与科学界分享,以及关键利益相关者,包括患者,医疗保健专业人员和从事COVID-19研究的人员。
    CRD42021234647。
    COVID-19 is a highly infectious acute pneumonia. Glycyrrhizic acid preparation (GAP) has been found to have hepatoprotective and antiviral effects, but there is no supporting evidence on its efficacy and security for patients with COVID-19.
    The systematic review methods will be defined by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. This study will start on 1 July 2021 and end on 31 October 2021. A comprehensive electronic search will be conducted with the search of Web of Science, PubMed, Ovid web, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Scientific and Journal Database, Wanfang Database and grey literature, and manual search will be conducted to search literature of randomised controlled trials, single-arm trials and retrospective studies about GAP in the treatment of anti-SARS-CoV-2 drug-induced liver injury from 1 December 2019 to 1 July 2021. There is no time limitations of publication and language will be restricted to Chinese and English. Retrieved studies will be independently screened by two researchers and relevant data will be extracted from studies. Interstudy heterogeneity will be assessed using the I2 statistic and explored through meta-regressions and subgroup analyses. Depending on data availability, we plan to conduct subgroup analyses by study population, geographical region and other selected clinical variables of interest. Quality assessment of the studies will be performed. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions will be used to assess the risk of bias, and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation will be used to access the confidence in cumulative evidence.
    Ethical approval will not be required for no primary data of individual patients will be collected. The final report will be shared with the scientific community through publication in a peer-reviewed journal, as well as with key stakeholders, including patients, healthcare professionals and those working on COVID-19 research.
    CRD42021234647.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号