The UK screening and treatment of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) updated 2022 guidelines were developed by a multidisciplinary guideline development group from the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health and the Royal College of Ophthalmologists, following the standards of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. They were published on the websites of the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health and the Royal College of Ophthalmologists in March 2022, and formally published in Early Human Development in March 2023. The guidelines provide evidence-based recommendations for the screening and treatment of ROP. The most significant change in the 2022 updated version compared to the previous guidelines is the lowering of the gestational age screening criterion to below 31 weeks. The treatment section covers treatment indications, timing, methods, and follow-up visits of ROP. This article interprets the guidelines and compares them with ROP guidelines/consensus in China, providing a reference for domestic peers.
英国早产儿视网膜病变的筛查和治疗指南2022更新版由英国皇家儿科与儿童健康学院和皇家眼科学院的多学科指南制订小组按照英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所标准制订，于2022年3月发表在英国皇家儿科与儿童健康学院网站和皇家眼科学院网站，2023年3月在Early Human Development杂志正式发表。该指南对早产儿视网膜病变的筛查及治疗进行了循证推荐和建议。与更新前的指南相比，2022更新版最重要的变化是将胎龄筛查标准降至31周以下；治疗部分涵盖了早产儿视网膜病变的治疗适应证、时间、方法及随诊。该文对该指南进行解读并与国内早产儿视网膜病变指南/共识进行比较，为国内同行提供参考和借鉴。.

Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP) significantly contributes to childhood blindness globally, with a disproportionately high burden in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) due to improved neonatal care alongside inadequate ROP screening and treatment facilities. This study aims to validate the performance of Postnatal Growth and Retinopathy of Prematurity (G-ROP) screening criteria in a cohort of premature infants presenting at a tertiary care setting in Pakistan. This cross-sectional study utilized retrospective chart review of neonates admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) at The Aga Khan University Hospital, Pakistan from January 2018 to February 2022. The complete G-ROP criteria were applied as prediction tool for infants with type 1 ROP, type 2 ROP, and no ROP outcomes. Out of the 166 cases, 125 cases were included in the final analysis, and remaining cases were excluded due to incomplete data. ROP of any stage developed in 83 infants (66.4%), of whom 55 (44%) developed type 1 ROP, 28 (22.4%) developed type 2 ROP, and 19 (15.2%) were treated for ROP. The median BW was 1060 gm (IQR = 910 to 1240 gm) and the median gestational age was 29 wk (IQR = 27 to 30 wk). The G-ROP criteria demonstrated a sensitivity of 98.18% (95% CI: 90.28-99.95%) for triggering an alarm for type 1 ROP. The G-ROP criteria achieved 100% sensitivity (95% CI: 87.66 to 100%) for type 2 ROP. The overall sensitivity of G-ROP criteria to trigger an alarm for any type of ROP was 98.8% (95% CI: 93.47 to 99.97%). Thus, the G-ROP screening model is highly sensitive in detecting at-risk infants for ROP in a Pakistani tertiary care setting, supporting its use in LMICs where standard screening criteria may not suffice.

Regional variations in the prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) have been found across Denmark. The objectives of this exploratory survey were to evaluate adherence to the national guideline for screening and diagnosing GDM and to identify variations in pre-analytical or analytical factors, which could potentially contribute to variations in GDM prevalence across regions. In a national interview-based survey, obstetric departments and laboratories throughout Denmark handling GDM screening or diagnostic testing were invited to participate. Survey questionnaires were completed through personal interviews. In total, 21 of 22 identified obstetric departments and 44 of 45 identified laboratories participated. Adherence to guideline among obstetric departments ranged 67-100% and uniformity in laboratory procedures was high. However, the gestational age at the time of late diagnostic testing with oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) varied considerably, with 48% (10/21) of departments testing outside the recommended 24-28 weeks\' gestation. Procedural heterogeneity was most pronounced for the parts not described in current guidelines, with choice of laboratory equipment being the most diverse factor ranging 3-39% nationally. In conclusion, the overall adherence to the national guidelines was high across regions, and obstetric departments and laboratories had high uniformity in the procedures for screening and diagnosing GDM. Uniformity was generally high for procedures included in the guideline and low if not included. However, a high proportion of GDM testing was performed outside the recommended gestational window in late pregnancy, which may be a pre-analytical contributor to regional differences in GDM prevalence.

OBJECTIVE: Twin pregnancies are at increased risk of preterm birth (PTB) compared to singletons. Evaluation of cervical length (CL) represents the optimal tool to screen PTB in singleton. Conversely, there is less evidence on the use of CL in twins. Our aim was to evaluate the methodological quality and clinical heterogeneity of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) on the CL application in twins using AGREE II methodology.
METHODS: MEDLINE, Scopus, and websites of the main scientific societies were examined. The following aspects were evaluated: diagnostic accuracy of CL, optimal gestational age at assessment and interventions in twin pregnancies with reduced CL. The quality of the published CPGs was carried out using \"The Appraisal of Guidelines for REsearch and Evaluation (AGREE II)\" tool. The quality of guideline was rated using a scoring system. Each considered item was evaluated by the reviewers on a seven-point scale that ranges from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). A cut-off >60 % identifies a CPGs as recommended.
RESULTS: The AGREE II standardized domain scores for the first overall assessment had a mean of 74 %. The score was more than 60 % in the 66.6 % of CPGs analyzed indicating an agreement between the reviewers on recommending the use of these CPGs. A significant heterogeneity was found; there was no specific recommendation on CL assessment in about half of the published CPGs. There was also significant heterogeneity on the CL cut-off to prompt intervention.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the fact that the AGREE II analysis showed that the majority of the included guidelines are of good quality, there was a significant heterogeneity among CPGs as regard as the indication, timing, and cut-off of CL in twins as well as in the indication of interventions.

AbstractProfessional statements guide neonatal resuscitation thresholds at the border of viability. A 2015 systematic review of international guidelines by Guillen et al. found considerable variability between statements\' clinical recommendations for infants at 23-24 weeks gestational age (GA). The authors concluded that differences in the type of data included were one potential source for differing resuscitation thresholds within this \"ethical gray zone.\" How statements present ethical considerations that support their recommendations, and how this may account for variability, has not been as rigorously explored. We performed a mixed-methods exploratory analysis of 25 current international guidelines for neonatal resuscitation at 22+0-25+0 weeks GA. Qualitative analysis using a modified grounded theory yielded 34 distinct codes, eight categories, and four overarching themes. Three themes, consequentialism, principlism, and rights-based, consisted of concepts central to these ethical frameworks. The fourth theme, clinical reasoning, described counseling practices, medical management, outcomes data, and prognostic uncertainty, without any ethical context. The theme of clinical reasoning appeared in 22 of 25 guidelines. Ten guidelines lacked any ethical theme. Guidelines with an identified ethical theme were more likely to recommend comfort care than guidelines without an identified ethical theme, and recommended it at a higher average GA (22.7 weeks vs. 22.0 weeks, p = 0.03). Thus, how ethical concepts are incorporated into guidelines potentially impacts resuscitation thresholds. We argue that inclusion of explicit discussion of ethical considerations surrounding resuscitation in the \"gray zone\" would clarify values that inform recommendations and facilitate discussions about how neonatology ought to approach periviability as outcomes continue to evolve.

With the deepening of clinical research, the management of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) needs to be optimized and improved. This article aims to introduce the 2022 European guideline on the management of neonatal RDS, focusing on its key updates. The guide has optimized the management of risk prediction for preterm birth, maternal referral, application of prenatal corticosteroids, application of lung protective ventilation strategies, and general care for infants with RDS. The guideline is mainly applicable to the management of RDS in neonates with gestational age greater than 24 weeks.
随着临床研究的深入，新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征（respiratory distress syndrome，RDS）的管理需优化和改进。该文旨在介绍2022年欧洲新生儿RDS管理指南，重点介绍其更新要点。该指南对早产风险预测、产妇转诊、产前糖皮质激素的应用、肺保护性通气策略的应用，以及RDS患儿的一般护理等方面的管理进行了优化。该指南主要适用于胎龄>24周新生儿RDS的管理。.

We aimed to gain insights into current nutritional management practices of late preterm infants (34-36 weeks gestational age) in Nigeria.
Purposive sampling was employed to recruit 19 healthcare professionals (neonatologists, paediatricians, general practitioners and nurses) involved in the care and nutritional management of late preterm infants in Lagos and Ogun states, Nigeria. Data were collected using interviews, either individually or in small focus groups, between 15 August and 6 September 2022. Thematic analysis of interview transcripts was carried out to interpret the data.
Ten distinct themes emerged across the research questions and objectives. For growth monitoring, 11, 6, 1 and 1 of our participants preferred to use the 2006 WHO growth standards, Fenton preterm growth chart, Ballard score and Intergrowth-21, respectively. Regarding the growth velocity of late preterm infants, most healthcare professionals aimed for 15 g/kg BW/day or more during hospitalisation. Breastmilk was unanimously the primary feeding option for late preterm infants. Most healthcare professionals preferred to use international guidelines over local guidelines.
Our study shows that there is a wide divergence in the nutritional guidelines used in managing late preterm infants in Nigeria. Regarding growth monitoring, healthcare professionals tended to aim for a growth velocity higher than necessary for late preterm infants, which may be disadvantageous for their long-term health.

暂无摘要。

暂无摘要。

The aim of the study was to explore the perspectives of adults born prematurely on guidelines for management at extreme premature birth and personalisation at the limit of viability.
We conducted four 2-h online focus group interviews in the Netherlands.
Twenty-three participants born prematurely were included in this study, ranging in age from 19 to 56 years and representing a variety of health outcomes. Participants shared their perspectives on different types of guidelines for managing extremely premature birth. They agreed that a guideline was necessary to prevent arbitrary treatment decisions and to avoid physician bias. All participants favoured a guideline that is based upon multiple prognostic factors beyond gestational age. They emphasised the importance of discretion, regardless of the type of guideline used. Discussions centred mainly on the heterogeneity of value judgements about outcomes after extreme premature birth. Participants defined personalisation as \'not just looking at numbers and statistics\'. They associated personalisation mainly with information provision and decision-making. Participants stressed the importance of involving families in decision-making and taking their care needs seriously.
Adults born prematurely prefer a periviability guideline that considers multiple prognostic factors and allows for discretion.