The problem: Running an efficient institutional review board (IRB) can be challenging. The research subjects: To ensure an efficient committee, our IRB adopted several operational metrics. Methods: Analysis of retrospective data from the IRB records, database, and annual reports over 12 years. Results: The IRB roster comprises 11 members. The average medical to nonmedical member ratio is 5:6, and the male to female ratio is 4:7, which has not been consistent over the years. One thousand three hundred and twenty-four proposals were reviewed including 1077 exempt (81.3%), 126 expedited (9.5%), and 121 full board (9.2%) with a median turnaround time to approval of 4.0, 35.0, and 68.0 days, respectively. Training of the IRB members was conducted to enhance their knowledge and skills. IRB at King Hussein Cancer Center has managed to stay abreast and efficient during the COVID-19 pandemic, by working remotely. Conclusion: Running an efficient IRB mandates implementing a number of operational metrics.

The percentage of female physicians has grown significantly in past decades, with women currently making up 56% of the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine\'s board-certified membership.
We aimed to describe trends in the gender of invited speakers at postgraduate courses, panels, and debates at the annual meetings of the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine over the last 2 decades.
We performed a retrospective observational study examining annual meetings of the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine in 1999, 2009, and 2015-2019. Invited speakers were identified through publicly available programs and examined by gender, degree, and the session of involvement. Postgraduate lectures (including courses, workshops, and forums), panels, and debates were examined. Speakers with Medicinae Doctor (or equivalent) degrees and obstetrics and gynecology training were included.
Among the 3 time points 1999, 2009, and 2019, there were 330 speaker slots. There was a significant difference in gender representation in the 3 time points; female representation was 25% in 1999, 21.5% in 2009, and 55.7% in 2019 (P<.001). There were significantly higher odds of having a female speaker in 2019 than in 2009 (odds ratio, 4.58; 95% confidence interval, 2.40-8.72; P<.001). Between 2015 and 2019, 813 speaker slots were identified, with a significant positive correlation between increasing year and increasing female representation (correlation coefficient=0.099; P=.005). When controlling for type of session, there were higher odds of having a female speaker with a later year (adjusted odds ratio, 1.16; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.28; P=.003). There was a significant difference in gender representation among different sessions (P=.028), with females listed in 51.2% of lecture slots but only 42.4% of panels and 38.0% of debates. Male moderators resulted in an average female representation of 29.8%±23.7% in a given session, whereas female moderators and a combination of both genders as moderators had average female representations of 71.6%±25.0% and 43.3%±19.4%, respectively, in a given session (P<.001). There was no correlation between the gender of the postgraduate course chair and either moderator or speaker gender.
There was a significant increase in the percentage of speaker slots allocated to females over the past 2 decades, a trend that moves toward reflecting the gender composition of the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine membership.