UNASSIGNED: Comparative data on long-term outcomes of mechanistically different bariatric operations are scarce.
UNASSIGNED: In this prospective, observational study, consecutive patients with severe obesity were studied using a predefined reoperation algorithm to determine long-term health outcomes after bariatric surgery (BS): adjustable gastric banding (AGB), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), or biliopancreatic diversion (BPD). All patients were assessed for mortality, postoperative weight loss, rate of reoperation, comorbidities, and quality of life (QoL) 8 years after surgery.
UNASSIGNED: Between 1996 and 2008, 2364 Swiss patients, with a mean body mass index of 43 ± 7 kg/m2 (mean ± SD) underwent AGB (n = 1404), RYGB (n = 790), or BPD (n = 170). Two thousand two hundred twenty-eight (94%) were followed for 8 years after BS. Eight-year mortality of the whole study group was 34.3 per 104 person-years. Percent excessive weight loss at 8 years was 56.7 ± 1.4% (95% confidence interval) in AGB, 62.5 ± 2.4% in RYGB and 64.8+-3.0% in BPD. The rate of major reoperation was highest in AGB and significantly lower in RYGB and BPD (63.4 vs 54.3 vs 47.2 per 103 person-years, P < 0.001). Remission of comorbidities was observed across all 3 groups, with key improvement (P < 0.01) in esophagitis in the RYGB group, and type 2 diabetes (T2D) (>60%) in procedures involving duodenal exclusion. Total improvement in QoL was similar between the 3 types of operations but was strongly correlated with weight loss preservation (P < 0.001).
UNASSIGNED: BS, at the expense of a high reoperation rate but low procedural mortality, considerably improves the QoL and results in sustained remission of comorbidities, especially T2D using a predefined reoperation algorithm developed to prevent weight regain and operation-specific complications.

Obesity is a growing global health burden which is particularly challenging to manage. Bariatric surgery is considered the most effective means of sustained weight loss, and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is considered the most effective treatment for morbid obesity. The additional benefit of placing a non-adjustable band to form a banded Roux-en-Y gastric bypass has gained interest as a measure to improve weight loss; however, comparative data are few, and complications can be high.
We conducted a prospective case-control study of 484 patients aged 18 and over who received either banded Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with a non-adjustable silastic ring or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Patients were followed up for five years and evaluated for weight loss, percentage excess weight loss (%EWL), BMI, and band-related complications.
No significant difference was detected in %EWL or BMI between BRYGB and RYGB. The mean raw weight loss, %EWL, and BMI for BRYGB verse RYGB were as follows: 27.49 SD (17.11) kg verse 34.46 SD (18.18) kg, 65.7% SD (30%) verse 62.2% SD (37%), and 32.33 SD (6.9) kg/m2 verse 32.43 SD (7.2) kg/m2. A total of 80 (21.7%) patients had the non-adjustable band removed for complications.
There is little difference in weight-loss results when comparing BRYGB to RYGB and non-adjustable bands may cause significant complications.

BACKGROUND: It is unknown whether international guidelines on gestational weight gain can be used in pregnancies after bariatric surgery.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate gestational weight gain, intrauterine growth, and postpartum weight retention in postbariatric women.
METHODS: 8 Belgian hospitals.
METHODS: Prospective data from 127 postbariatric pregnancies from September 2014 through October 2018. Patients were grouped according to achievement of 2009 Institute of Medicine (IOM) guidelines.
RESULTS: In 127 patients with a mean age of 30.2 years (standard deviation [SD], 4.7), the mean gestational weight gain was 12.5 kg (SD, 6.7). Of these patients, 24% (30 of 127) showed insufficient weight gain, 20% (26 of 127) showed adequate weight gain, and 56% (71 of 127) showed excessive weight gain. Of 127 patients, 27 (21%) had small-for-gestational-age infants. This peaked in the group with insufficient weight gain (47%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 29%-65%; P < .001). The prevalence of large-for-gestational-age infants was comparable between groups, although highest in the group with excessive weight gain (0% in those with insufficient weight gain, 4% in those with adequate weight gain, and 8% in those with excessive weight gain). Preterm births were recorded more in patients with insufficient weight gain (23%; 95% CI, 8%-38%; P = .048). The mean amounts of postpartum weight retained were 4.0 kg (SD, 7.4) at 6 weeks and 3.0 kg (SD, 9.1) at 6 months. Weight retention at 6 weeks (7.1 kg; 95% CI, 5.5-8.7; P < .001) and 6 months (8.3 kg; 95% CI, 4.5-12.2; P < .001) was highest in women gaining excessive weight.
CONCLUSIONS: Achievement of IOM guidelines is low in postbariatric pregnancies. Insufficient weight gain increases the risk for small-for-gestational-age babies. Excessive weight gain increases weight retention after delivery and could precipitate weight regain. After bariatric surgery, women should be encouraged to achieve IOM recommendations.

Few studies on series comparing sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) after failure of gastric banding (GB) are available. The objective of this study was to compare the short- and medium-term outcomes of SG and RYGB after GB.
Between January 2006 and December 2017, patients undergoing SG (n = 186) or RYGB (n = 107) for failure of primary GB were included in this two-center study. Propensity-score matching was performed based on preoperative factors with a 2:1 ratio. Primary endpoint was the weight loss at 2 years between the SG and RYGB groups. Secondary endpoints were overall mortality and morbidity, reoperation, correction of comorbidities and the rate of adverse events at 2 years follow-up.
In our propensity score matching analysis, operative time was significantly less in the SG group (95 min vs. 179 min; p < 0.001). Post-operative complications were lower in the SG group (9.5% vs. 35.4%; p = 0.003). At 2 years follow-up, the mean EWL was similar as same as comorbidities. There was a significant difference in favor of SG concerning the rate of adverse events at 2 years follow-up (p < 0.001).
Revision of GB by SG or RYGB is feasible, with a higher rate of early post-operative complications for RYGB. Weight loss at 2 years follow-up is similar; however, RYGB appears to result in a higher rate of adverse events than SG.

BACKGROUND: Data about incidence and severity of reoperations up to 6 months after bariatric surgery are currently limited. The aim of this cohort study was to evaluate the incidence and severity of reoperations after initial bariatric surgical procedures and to compare this between the 3 most frequent current surgical procedures (sleeve, gastric bypass, gastric banding).
METHODS: Nationwide observational cohort study using data from French Hospital Information System (2013-2015) to evaluate incidence and severity of reoperations within 6 months after bariatric surgery. Hazard ratios (HR) of longitudinal comparison between historical propensity-matched cohorts were estimated from a Fine and Gray\'s model using competing risk of death.
RESULTS: Cumulative reoperation rates increased from postoperative day-30 to day-180. Consequently, 31.1 to 90.0% of procedures would have been missed if the reoperation rate was based solely on a 30-day follow-up. Reoperation rate at 6 months was significantly higher after gastric bypass than after sleeve (HR 0.64; IC 95% [0.53-0.77]) and corresponded to moderate-risk reoperations (HR 0.65; IC 95% [0.53-0.78]). Reoperation rate at 6 months was significantly higher after gastric banding than after sleeve (HR 0.08; IC 95% [0.07-0.09]) and corresponded to moderate-risk reoperations (HR 0.08; IC 95% [0.07-0.10]).
CONCLUSIONS: Cumulative incidence of reoperations increased from 30 days to 6 months after sleeve, gastric bypass, or gastric banding and corresponded to moderate-risk surgical procedures. Consequently, 30-day reoperation rate should no longer be considered when evaluating complications and surgical performance after bariatric surgery.

Considering the large and increasing population of women of childbearing age with history of bariatric surgery, surgical complications of bariatric surgery during pregnancy may become more frequent in the future. The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical presentation, diagnostic procedures, and treatment of surgical complications of bariatric surgery during pregnancies. A systematic literature search was performed in accordance with the PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis) guidelines to identify all studies published up to and including December 2018 that included women with previous bariatric surgery undergoing emergency surgery during pregnancy. Sixty-eight studies were selected, including 120 women with previous bariatric surgery undergoing emergency surgery during pregnancy. Fifty cases were reported as case reports and 70 in case series. Included patients had previous history of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (n = 99), laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (n = 17), Scopinaro procedure (n = 2), vertical banded gastroplasty (n = 1), or one-anastomosis gastric bypass (n = 1). Final diagnosis in 50 case reports was internal hernia in 26 cases, bowel intussusception in 10, intestinal obstruction in 2, laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding slippage in 3, bowel volvulus in 3, gastric or jejunal perforation in 2, and other complications in 4 cases. Maternal and fetal death occurred in 3 (2.5%) and 9 cases (7.5%), respectively. In the case series, the majority of women were operated for internal hernia and laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding slippage. Surgical complications of previous bariatric surgery during pregnancy have potentially severe outcomes. Availability of multidisciplinary expertise, including bariatric/digestive surgeons, and education of healthcare providers and women on clinical signs that require urgent surgical examination are recommended in this setting. Prompt diagnosis is fundamental and based on clinical and laboratory findings and on radiologic examinations if needed, including computed tomography scan or magnetic resonance if available. Rapid surgical exploration is mandatory in case of high clinical and/or radiologic suspicion.

Dumping is currently seen as a negative side effect of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). However, it may help patients to comply with their prescribed diet. In this study, we assess the role of dumping on weight loss in patients who have undergone conversion of failed restrictive surgery into RYGB.
An analysis was performed of 100 consecutive patients who underwent revisional RYGB (rRYGB) between 2006 and 2011 due to inadequate weight loss or band intolerance after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB). The percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL) was used to evaluate weight reduction. The Sigstad clinical diagnostic index was used to detect dumping symptoms.
Fifty-five patients (59.1%) suffered from dumping. Overall, dumpers showed a greater %EWL than non-dumpers (83.8 ± 48.0 vs 66.9 ± 44.1%, respectively, p = 0.0725). When rRYGB was performed because of inadequate weight loss following LAGB, dumping played a crucial role in weight loss (88.0 ± 21.2 vs 68.9 ± 34.5%, p = 0.0137). This effect positively correlates to post-LAGB body mass index (BMI) with a statistically significant result at BMI > 35 kg/m2 (82.4 ± 15.7 vs 58.4 ± 32.4%, p = 0.00341). A regression analysis of the Sigstad dumping score and %EWL shows that dumping tends to increase the %EWL.
This study provides new insights into the effect of dumping on weight loss in patients who underwent conversion of failed restrictive surgery into RYGB. Based on the findings in our patient group, we suggest that dumping helps patients achieve sustainable weight loss. Therefore, dumping can be regarded as a positive side effect rather than a complication.

Clinical trials in the field of bariatrics, and specifically laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB), have frequently been gender imbalanced, with males representing only 20% of examinees. Long-term gender-oriented results, and specifically quality of life (QOL) parameters, have not been addressed sufficiently. The aim of our study was to examine the long-term gender association with outcome of LAGB including the impact on QOL.
A retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent LAGB between 2006 and 2014 by a single surgeon was conducted. Data were collected from the hospital registry and a telephone interview that included a standardized questionnaire. Outcomes including BMI reduction, evolution of comorbidities, complications, reoperations, and QOL were compared according to the Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System (BAROS).
Included were 114 males and 127 females, with a mean age of 38.2 years at surgery, and an average post-surgery follow-up of 6.5 years. Similar BMI reduction (p = 0.68) and perioperative complication rates (p = 0.99) were observed. Males had a greater improvement in comorbidities (p < 0.001), less band slippage (p = 0.006), underwent fewer reoperations (p = 0.02), and reported higher QOL scores (p = 0.02) than females. The total BAROS score was significantly higher for males than females (p < 0.001).
LAGB surgery results in better outcomes for male than female patients as measured by the BAROS, despite a similar BMI reduction. Gender-specific outcomes should be taken into consideration in optimizing patient selection and preoperative patient counseling.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) surgery is the safest yet least effective method for massive weight loss. Thirty to 50 percent of patients undergoing LAGB will regain part of their lost weight.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of body contouring plastic surgery (BCPS) following LAGB on long-term body mass index (BMI) control.
METHODS: Department of Surgery A, Soroka University Medical Center, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of patients aged 18-50 years, who underwent LAGB surgery between 1997 and 2007, was performed. Out of 2405 patients undergoing LAGB during those years, 861 were excluded and 1544 were recruited by phone. The final group included 72 patients matched for age and gender. Long-term weight regain was evaluated and compared between a group of patients who underwent subsequent body contouring plastic surgery (LBCPS) and a group of LAGB only (LAGBO). Groups were matched for age, gender, and pre-operative body mass index (BMI).
RESULTS: LBCPS (n = 18) had lower endpoint BMI and BMI regain percentage compared with LAGBO (n = 54) (24.64 ± 3.76 vs. 31.0 ± 7.2 kg/m2, p < 0.001; 13 ± 14% vs. 34± 31%. p < 0.001, respectively). BCPS had an independent strong protective effect for endpoint BMI regain over 25% and BMI ≥30 kg/m2 (HR = 0.19, p = 0.025; HR = 0.13, p = 0.046, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: When compared with patients who did not undergo BCPS following LAGB, patients who underwent BCPS following LAGB had improved long-term BMI control.

Gastric banding is an established and effective form of weightloss surgery. Semi-structured interviews explored the experiences of gastric banding of twenty purposively recruited patients one year after surgery. Data was analysed using thematic analysis.
RESULTS: Three themes emerged. They included \'Exercising choice\' (restriction by the band was counterbalanced by new food-related choices.); \'Rediscovering life\' (improved health, physical ability and energy enabled the patients to re-discover life.) and \'Goals achieved with no regrets\' (patients had nearly achieved their self-set goals.)
CONCLUSIONS: Beyond achieving weight loss and improved health, the participants had improved quality of life as defined by patients. Knowledge about this active process informs the care of these patients.