GLP-1 receptor agonist

GLP - 1 受体激动剂
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景和目的:全球糖尿病病例的增加,从1980年的1.08亿,到2021年达到惊人的5.29亿,突显了解决其并发症的紧迫性,特别是大血管血管,如冠状动脉,脑血管,和外周动脉疾病,这导致了50%以上的糖尿病死亡率。动脉粥样硬化,与高血糖诱导的内皮功能障碍有关,是心血管疾病发展的关键。细胞因子,包括pentraxin3(PTX3),copeptin,脂蛋白(a)[Lp(a)],和基质金属蛋白酶-9(MMP-9),影响动脉粥样硬化进展和斑块易损性。抑制动脉粥样硬化进展至关重要,尤其是糖尿病患者。胰高血糖素样肽1受体激动剂(GLP-1RAs),越来越多地用于2型糖尿病,显示出降低心血管风险的希望,引起人们对它们对动脉粥样硬化的影响的兴趣。这项研究试图检查胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1RA)对生物标志物的影响,这些生物标志物表明动脉粥样硬化斑块的不稳定性。这些生物标志物包括pentraxin3(PTX3),copeptin(CPC),基质金属蛋白酶-9(MMP-9),和脂蛋白(a)[Lp(a)]。材料与方法:共有34名参与者,年龄从41岁到81岁(平均年龄为61岁),被诊断为2型糖尿病(HbA1c中位数为8.8%),血脂异常,用B超证实动脉粥样硬化,包括在研究中。所有受试者都有资格开始用GLP-1RA-杜拉鲁肽治疗。结果:人体测量参数显着降低,血压,空腹血糖水平,治疗后观察HbA1c水平。此外,与动脉粥样硬化斑块不稳定相关的生化指标显着下降,特别是PTX3和MMP-9(p<0.001),以及Lp(a)(p<0.05),在GLP-1RA干预后很明显。结论:这些发现强调了GLP-1RA在缓解动脉粥样硬化进展和斑块易损性方面的潜力。从而增强2型糖尿病患者的心血管结局。
    Background and Objectives: The rise in global diabetes cases, reaching a staggering 529 million in 2021 from 108 million in 1980, underscores the urgency of addressing its complications, notably macrovascular ones like coronary artery, cerebrovascular, and peripheral artery diseases, which contribute to over 50% of diabetes mortality. Atherosclerosis, linked to hyperglycemia-induced endothelial dysfunction, is pivotal in cardiovascular disease development. Cytokines, including pentraxin 3 (PTX3), copeptin, lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], and matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9), influence atherosclerosis progression and plaque vulnerability. Inhibiting atherosclerosis progression is crucial, especially in diabetic individuals. Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), increasingly used for type 2 diabetes, show promise in reducing the cardiovascular risk, sparking interest in their effects on atherogenesis. This study sought to examine the effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) on biomarkers that indicate the instability of atherosclerotic plaques. These biomarkers include pentraxin 3 (PTX3), copeptin (CPC), matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9), and lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)]. Materials and Methods: A total of 34 participants, ranging in age from 41 to 81 years (with an average age of 61), who had been diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus (with a median HbA1c level of 8.8%), dyslipidemia, and verified atherosclerosis using B-mode ultrasonography, were included in the study. All subjects were eligible to initiate treatment with a GLP-1 RA-dulaglutide. Results: Significant reductions in anthropometric parameters, blood pressure, fasting glucose levels, and HbA1c levels were observed posttreatment. Moreover, a notable decrease in biochemical markers associated with atherosclerotic plaque instability, particularly PTX3 and MMP-9 (p < 0.001), as well as Lp(a) (p < 0.05), was evident following the GLP-1 RA intervention. Conclusions: These findings underscore the potential of GLP-1 RAs in mitigating atherosclerosis progression and plaque vulnerability, thus enhancing cardiovascular outcomes in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在此阶段4中,多中心,prospective,非介入性先驱真正的荷兰研究,我们评估了2型糖尿病(T2D)成人患者在实际临床实践中每天口服一次司美鲁肽与注射降糖药物相关的临床结局.
    方法:开始口服司马鲁肽的参与者随访34-44周。糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)从基线(BL)到研究结束(EOS)的变化是主要终点;次要终点包括体重(BW)从BL到EOS的变化,EOS时HbA1c<7.0%的参与者比例和EOS时HbA1c降低≥1.0%的复合终点,BW降低≥3%或≥5%。使用糖尿病治疗满意度问卷(DTSQ状态/变化)评估治疗满意度。对所有开始口服司马鲁肽治疗的参与者进行安全性评估。
    结果:187名参与者开始口服司马鲁肽;94.1%完成研究,78.6%仍在EOS治疗。在BL,54.0%的参与者是男性,平均年龄58.8岁,T2D的平均持续时间为8.7年,平均体重指数为35.1kg/m2;平均HbA1c为8.6%,平均体重为103.1kg.HbA1c和BW观察到从BL到EOS的显着改善(估计变化[95%置信区间]:-1.16%点[-1.48至-0.85];p<0.0001和-5.84kg[-6.88至-4.80];p<0.0001)。在EOS,47.5%的参与者的HbA1c水平<7.0%;41.8%和35.5%的参与者实现了HbA1c降低≥1.0%的复合终点,加上BW降低≥3%或≥5%,分别。DTSQ状态和变化分数分别提高了2.1分(p=0.0003)和10.8分(p<0.0001),分别。81.5%的参与者口服司马鲁肽很容易或非常容易食用。不良事件大多为轻度/中度,胃肠功能紊乱是最常见的。
    结论:在现实世界中,我们报道了HbA1c和BW的临床显着降低,提高了治疗满意度,没有新的安全问题。本文提供了图形摘要。
    背景:NCT04601740。
    BACKGROUND: In this phase 4, multicentre, prospective, non-interventional PIONEER REAL Netherlands study, we assessed clinical outcomes associated with once-daily oral semaglutide use in real-world clinical practice in adults living with type 2 diabetes (T2D) naïve to injectable glucose-lowering medication.
    METHODS: Participants initiated on oral semaglutide were followed for 34-44 weeks. Change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline (BL) to end of study (EOS) was the primary endpoint; secondary endpoints included change in body weight (BW) from BL to EOS, the proportion of participants with HbA1c < 7.0% at EOS and the composite endpoints of HbA1c reduction ≥ 1.0%-points with BW reduction ≥ 3% or ≥ 5% at EOS. Treatment satisfaction was assessed using the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ status/change). Safety was evaluated in all participants who initiated oral semaglutide treatment.
    RESULTS: Oral semaglutide was initiated in 187 participants; 94.1% completed the study and 78.6% remained on treatment at EOS. At BL, 54.0% of participants were male, mean age was 58.8 years, mean duration of T2D was 8.7 years and mean body mass index was 35.1 kg/m2; mean HbA1c was 8.6% and mean BW was 103.1 kg. Significant improvements from BL to EOS were observed for HbA1c and BW (estimated change [95% confidence interval]: - 1.16%-points [- 1.48 to - 0.85]; p < 0.0001, and - 5.84 kg [- 6.88 to - 4.80]; p < 0.0001, respectively). At EOS, 47.5% of participants had an HbA1c level < 7.0%; 41.8% and 35.5% of participants achieved composite endpoints of HbA1c reduction ≥ 1.0%-points plus BW reduction ≥ 3% or ≥ 5%, respectively. DTSQ status and change scores improved by 2.1 (p = 0.0003) and 10.8 points (p < 0.0001), respectively. Oral semaglutide was easy or very easy to consume for 81.5% of participants. Adverse events were mostly mild/moderate, with gastrointestinal disorders being the most common.
    CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world population, we reported clinically significant reductions in HbA1c and BW, improved treatment satisfaction and no new safety concerns. A graphical abstract is available with this article.
    BACKGROUND: NCT04601740.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    每周一次的司马鲁肽是一种广泛使用的胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1RA),用于治疗2型糖尿病(T2D)。在临床试验中,司马鲁肽改善血糖控制和肥胖,减少主要心血管事件。然而,在亚洲T2D患者中,其与血脂异常或代谢功能障碍相关的脂肪变性肝病(MASLD)等各种代谢因素相关的真实世界疗效报道有限.在我们的回顾性纵向研究中,我们选择了每周一次服用司美鲁肽的T2D患者,并比较了司美鲁肽开始前后的代谢参数.75名患者符合资格。HbA1c显著下降,0.7-0.9%,在司马鲁肽治疗期间,体重减少1.4-1.7公斤。semaglutide开始后3、6和12个月,非HDL胆固醇显着降低;LDL胆固醇在3和6个月时降低;HDL胆固醇在12个月时升高。对体重的影响,HbA1c和血脂分布在服用司马鲁肽作为第一个GLP-1RA(GLP-1R未治疗)的患者中明显,而在从其他GLP-1RA转换后给予司美鲁肽的患者中也观察到HbA1c改善。在12个月的司马鲁肽治疗中,肝脏脂肪变性指数(HSI)呈下降趋势。此外,在GLP-1RA初治患者中,AST-血小板比值指数(APRI)显著下降.我们的真实世界研究证实了每周一次司马鲁肽的有益效果,即,改善体重,血糖控制和动脉粥样硬化脂质分布。还提出了对MASLD的有益效果。
    Once-weekly semaglutide is a widely used glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D). In clinical trials, semaglutide improved glycemic control and obesity, and reduced major cardiovascular events. However, the reports are limited on its real-world efficacy relating to various metabolic factors such as dyslipidemia or metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) in Asian patients with T2D. In our retrospective longitudinal study, we selected patients with T2D who were given once-weekly semaglutide and compared metabolic parameters before and after the start of semaglutide. Seventy-five patients were eligible. HbA1c decreased significantly, by 0.7-0.9%, and body weight by 1.4-1.7 kg during the semaglutide treatment. Non-HDL cholesterol decreased significantly at 3, 6 and 12 months after the initiation of semaglutide; LDL cholesterol decreased at 3 and 6 months; and HDL cholesterol increased at 12 months. The effects on body weight, HbA1c and lipid profile were pronounced in patients who were given semaglutide as a first GLP-1RA (GLP-1R naïve), whereas improvements in HbA1c were also observed in patients who were given semaglutide after being switched from other GLP-1RAs. During a 12-month semaglutide treatment, the hepatic steatosis index (HSI) tended to decrease. Moreover, a significant decrease in the AST-to-platelet ratio index (APRI) was observed in GLP-1RA naïve patients. Our real-world study confirmed the beneficial effects of once-weekly semaglutide, namely, improved body weight, glycemic control and atherogenic lipid profile. The beneficial effects on MASLD were also suggested.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    新的肥胖药物导致大量的体重减轻。然而,在现实世界中的长期坚持是具有挑战性的,终止肥胖药物治疗会导致体重恢复到治疗前的体重。因此,我们调查了在停止胰高血糖素样肽-1(GLP-1)受体激动剂积极治疗后1年,体重减轻和身体成分改善是否持续得更好,监督锻炼计划,或两者合并1年。
    我们进行了一项治疗后研究,哥本哈根的对照试验。患有肥胖症的成年人(年龄在18-65岁,初始体重指数为32-43kg/m2)完成了为期八周的低热量饮食诱导的体重减轻13.1kg(第8至0周),并随机分配(1:1:1:1:1)进行为期一年的减肥维持(第0-52周),GLP-1受体激动剂每日一次皮下利拉鲁肽3.0mg,运动和利拉鲁肽的结合,或安慰剂。166名参与者完成了减肥维持阶段。邀请所有随机参与者参加治疗后研究,并在治疗终止后一年进行结果评估。104周治疗后评估的主要结果是初始体重减轻后的体重变化(随机分组时,第0周)至治疗终止后一年(第104周)的意向治疗人群。次要结果是体脂百分比的变化(0-104周)。这项研究在EudraCT注册,2015-005585-32,并与ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT04122716。
    在2018年12月17日至2020年12月17日之间,有109名参与者参加了治疗后研究。从随机分组到运动和利拉鲁肽联合治疗终止后一年(第0-104周),与利拉鲁肽单药终止后相比,参与者的体重降低(-5.1kg[95%CI-10.0;-0.2];P=0.040)和体脂百分比降低(-2.3%-分[-4.3~-0.3];P=0.026).与先前接受过安慰剂(比值比[OR]7.2[2.4;21.3])和利拉鲁肽(OR4.2[1.6;10.8])的参与者相比,更多先前接受过联合治疗的参与者在治疗终止后一年(第-8周至第104周)保持了初始体重的至少10%的体重减轻。与安慰剂相比,更多以前接受有监督运动的参与者的体重减轻至少10%(OR3.7[1.2;11.1])。在治疗终止后的一年(第52-104周),与终止有监督的运动后相比,终止利拉鲁肽后的体重恢复为6.0kg[2.1;10.0],与终止联合治疗后的体重恢复为2.5kg[-1.5~6.5].
    与单独的肥胖药物治疗终止治疗相比,在肥胖药物治疗中添加有监督的运动似乎可以改善治疗终止后的健康体重维持。在监督运动终止一年后,体重和身体成分保持不变,与单纯肥胖药物治疗终止后体重恢复相反.
    赫尔塞丰登和诺和诺德基金会。
    UNASSIGNED: New obesity medications result in large weight losses. However, long-term adherence in a real-world setting is challenging, and termination of obesity medication results in weight regain towards pre-treatment body weight. Therefore, we investigated whether weight loss and improved body composition are sustained better at 1 year after termination of active treatment with glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist, supervised exercise program, or both combined for 1 year.
    UNASSIGNED: We conducted a post-treatment study in extension of a randomised, controlled trial in Copenhagen. Adults with obesity (aged 18-65 years and initial body mass index 32-43 kg/m2) completed an eight-week low-calorie diet-induced weight loss of 13.1 kg (week -8 to 0) and were randomly allocated (1:1:1:1) to one-year weight loss maintenance (week 0-52) with either supervised exercise, the GLP-1 receptor agonist once-daily subcutaneous liraglutide 3.0 mg, the combination of exercise and liraglutide, or placebo. 166 Participants completed the weight loss maintenance phase. All randomised participants were invited to participate in the post-treatment study with outcome assessments one year after treatment termination, at week 104. The primary outcome of the post-treatment assessment was change in body weight from after the initial weight loss (at randomisation, week 0) to one year after treatment termination (week 104) in the intention-to-treat population. The secondary outcome was change in body-fat percentage (week 0-104). The study is registered with EudraCT, 2015-005585-32, and with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04122716.
    UNASSIGNED: Between Dec 17, 2018, and Dec 17, 2020, 109 participants attended the post-treatment study. From randomisation to one year after termination of combined exercise and liraglutide treatment (week 0-104), participants had reduced body weight (-5.1 kg [95% CI -10.0; -0.2]; P = 0.040) and body-fat percentage (-2.3%-points [-4.3 to -0.3]; P = 0.026) compared with after termination of liraglutide alone. More participants who had previously received combination treatment maintained a weight loss of at least 10% of initial body weight one year after treatment termination (week -8 to 104) compared with participants who had previously received placebo (odds ratio [OR] 7.2 [2.4; 21.3]) and liraglutide (OR 4.2 [1.6; 10.8]). More participants who had previously received supervised exercise maintained a weight loss of at least 10% compared with placebo (OR 3.7 [1.2; 11.1]). During the year after termination of treatment (week 52-104), weight regain was 6.0 kg [2.1; 10.0] larger after termination of liraglutide compared with after termination of supervised exercise and 2.5 kg [-1.5 to 6.5] compared with after termination of combination treatment.
    UNASSIGNED: The addition of supervised exercise to obesity pharmacotherapy seems to improve healthy weight maintenance after treatment termination compared with treatment termination of obesity pharmacotherapy alone. Body weight and body composition were maintained one year after termination of supervised exercise, in contrast to weight regain after termination of treatment with obesity pharmacotherapy alone.
    UNASSIGNED: Helsefonden and the Novo Nordisk Foundation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂(SGLT2i)和胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1RA)治疗对2型糖尿病和新诊断的糖尿病足并发症(DFCs)患者的主要不良心血管事件(MACE)结局尚不清楚。这项研究检查了SGLT2i和GLP-1RA的使用对2型糖尿病患者和无心血管疾病(CVD)的MACE和截肢率的影响。
    方法:分析了台湾国民健康保险研究数据库(2004-2017)的数据,重点关注没有既往MACE和新诊断的DFCs的2型糖尿病患者。主要结果是第一次发生MACE;次要结果包括MACE成分,全因死亡率,和下肢截肢(LEA)率。
    结果:SGLT2i用户与DPP-4i用户相比,MACE(风险比[HR]=0·64,95%置信区间[CI]:0·46-0·88)和HHF(HR=0·54,95%CI:0·35-0·83)发生率显着降低。在第一次DFC诊断时,没有LEA的SGLT2i使用者的截肢率也较低(HR=0·28,95%CI:0·10-0·75),有PAD或LEA病史者的截肢率没有增加。DPP-4i和GLP-1RA使用者在主要或次要结局方面没有观察到显著差异。结论:在最初诊断为DFC的2型糖尿病患者中,SGLT2i可有效降低HHF和MACE发生率。SGLT2i降低截肢率,特别是在以前没有LEA的患者中,与DPP-4i治疗相比。
    OBJECTIVE: Major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) outcomes associated with sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) therapies remain unclear in patients with type 2 diabetes and newly diagnosed diabetic foot complications (DFCs). This study examined the impact of SGLT2i and GLP-1 RA use on the rates of MACEs and amputations in patients with type 2 diabetes and without cardiovascular disease.
    METHODS: Data from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database (2004-2017) were analyzed, focusing on patients with type 2 diabetes without previous MACE and newly diagnosed DFCs. The primary outcome was the first MACE occurrence, and the secondary outcomes included MACE components, all-cause mortality, and lower extremity amputation (LEA) rates.
    RESULTS: SGLT2i users showed a significant decrease in the MACE (hazard ratio [HR], 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.46-0.88) and hospitalization for heart failure (HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.35-0.83) rates compared with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor users. The amputation rates were also lower in SGLT2i users without LEA at the first DFC diagnosis (HR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.10-0.75) and did not increase in those with a history of peripheral artery disease or LEA. No significant differences were observed between dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor and GLP-1 RA users in terms of the primary or secondary outcomes.
    CONCLUSIONS: In patients with type 2 diabetes initially diagnosed with DFC, SGLT2i are effective in significantly reducing the hospitalization for heart failure and MACE rates. SGLT2i lower the amputation rates, especially in patients who have not previously had a LEA, than the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor therapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:真实世界的数据提供了关于药物在临床实践中如何发挥作用的见解。PioneerREALSwitzerland研究旨在了解口服司马鲁肽治疗成人2型糖尿病(T2D)的临床结果。
    方法:Pioneer真正的瑞士是一个34-44周,多中心,prospective,非干预性,在常规临床实践中开始口服司马鲁肽的T2D未接受可注射降糖药的成人的单臂研究。主要终点是糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)从基线(BL)到研究结束(EOS)的变化;次要终点包括从BL到EOS的体重(BW)变化以及达到HbA1c<7.0%和复合终点HbA1c降低≥1%-点,BW降低≥3%或≥5%EOS。在接受≥1剂口服司马鲁肽的参与者中评估安全性。
    结果:在185名参与者中(女性/男性,n=67/118)开始口服司马鲁肽,168人(90.8%)完成了研究,143人(77.3%)仍在EOS口服司马鲁肽治疗。在BL,参与者的平均年龄为62岁,糖尿病病程6.4年,HbA1c为7.7%,体重为95.6kg,体重指数为33.2kg/m2;56.2%的参与者正在接受降糖药物。HbA1c(估计变化-0.91%;95%置信区间[CI]-1.10,-0.71;p<0.0001)和BW(估计变化-4.85%;95%CI-5.70,-4.00;p<0.0001)显著下降。总的来说,65名(35.1%)参与者报告了139起不良事件(AE);大多数为轻度或中度。最常见的不良事件是胃肠道疾病(27.0%);20名(10.8%)参与者中的31种不良事件导致口服司马鲁肽停药。报告了6种严重的不良事件;所有不良事件均被认为不太可能与口服司马鲁肽有关。
    结论:在瑞士口服司美鲁肽治疗的患有T2D的人在临床上实现了HbA1c和BW的显著降低,没有新的安全信号.
    背景:ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT04537624。本文提供了图形摘要。
    BACKGROUND: Real-world data provide insight into how medications perform in clinical practice. The PIONEER REAL Switzerland study aimed to understand clinical outcomes with oral semaglutide in adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D).
    METHODS: PIONEER REAL Switzerland was a 34-44-week, multicentre, prospective, non-interventional, single-arm study of adults with T2D naïve to injectable glucose-lowering medication who were initiated on oral semaglutide in routine clinical practice. The primary endpoint was change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline (BL) to end of study (EOS); secondary endpoints included change in body weight (BW) from BL to EOS and the proportion of participants achieving HbA1c < 7.0% and the composite endpoints HbA1c reduction ≥ 1%-points with BW reduction ≥ 3% or ≥ 5% at EOS. Safety was assessed in participants who received ≥ 1 dose of oral semaglutide.
    RESULTS: Of the 185 participants (female/male, n = 67/118) initiating oral semaglutide, 168 (90.8%) completed the study and 143 (77.3%) remained on treatment with oral semaglutide at EOS. At BL, participants had a mean age of 62 years, diabetes duration of 6.4 years, HbA1c of 7.7%, BW of 95.6 kg and body mass index of 33.2 kg/m2; 56.2% of participants were receiving glucose-lowering medications. Significant reductions were observed for HbA1c (estimated change - 0.91%; 95% confidence interval [CI] - 1.10, - 0.71; p < 0.0001) and BW (estimated change - 4.85%; 95% CI - 5.70, - 4.00; p < 0.0001). In total, 139 adverse events (AEs) were reported in 65 (35.1%) participants; most were mild or moderate. The most frequent AEs were gastrointestinal disorders (27.0%); 31 AEs in 20 (10.8%) participants led to discontinuation of oral semaglutide. Six serious AEs were reported; all were considered unlikely to be related to oral semaglutide.
    CONCLUSIONS: People living with T2D treated with oral semaglutide in Switzerland achieved clinically significant reductions in HbA1c and BW, with no new safety signals.
    BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04537624. A graphical abstract is available for this article.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    目的:糖异生率升高是青年型2型糖尿病(Y-T2D)的早期致病特征,但是有针对性的一线疗法并不理想,特别是在非洲裔美国人(AA)青年。我们通过测量AAY-T2D治疗后糖异生速率和β细胞功能来评估二甲双胍和利拉鲁肽的降糖机制。
    方法:在这项平行随机临床试验中,22名Y-T2D青年:年龄15.3±2.1y(平均值±SD),68%的女性,BMI40.1±7.9kg/m2,诊断持续时间1.8±1.3y被随机分为单独二甲双胍(Met)或二甲双胍+利拉鲁肽(Met+Lira),并在12周之前和之后进行评估。稳定的同位素示踪剂用于在过夜禁食和连续进餐后测量糖异生[2H2O]和葡萄糖的产生[6,6-2H2]葡萄糖。在频繁采样的2h-OGTT期间评估了β细胞功能(sigma)和全身胰岛素敏感性(mSI)。
    结果:在基线时,糖异生,葡萄糖生产,空腹血糖和2小时血糖在两组中具有可比性,尽管Met+Lira的HbA1c较高。MetLira的空腹血糖比基线下降更大(-2.0±1.3vs.-0.6±0.9mmol/L,P=0.008)和更大的sigma增加(0.72±0.68vs.-0.05±0.71,P=0.03)。各组之间糖异生分数的变化相似(MetLira:-0.36±9.4vs.Met:0.04±12.3%,P=0.9),餐时糖异生或mSI没有变化。两组葡萄糖清除率的增加与sigma有关(r=0.63,P=0.003),但与糖异生或mSI无关。
    结论:在Y-T2D中,二甲双胍联合或不联合利拉鲁肽可改善血糖,但不能抑制高糖异生率.需要能够增强β细胞功能并靶向Y-T2D中糖异生速率升高的新疗法。
    OBJECTIVE: Elevated rates of gluconeogenesis are an early pathogenic feature of youth-onset type 2 diabetes (Y-T2D), but targeted first-line therapies are suboptimal, especially in African American (AA) youth. We evaluated glucose-lowering mechanisms of metformin and liraglutide by measuring rates of gluconeogenesis and β-cell function after therapy in AA Y-T2D.
    METHODS: In this parallel randomized clinical trial, 22 youth with Y-T2D-age 15.3 ± 2.1 years (mean ± SD), 68% female, body mass index (BMI) 40.1 ± 7.9 kg/m2, duration of diagnosis 1.8 ± 1.3 years-were randomized to metformin alone (Met) or metformin + liraglutide (Lira) (Met + Lira) and evaluated before and after 12 weeks. Stable isotope tracers were used to measure gluconeogenesis [2H2O] and glucose production [6,6-2H2]glucose after an overnight fast and during a continuous meal. β-cell function (sigma) and whole-body insulin sensitivity (mSI) were assessed during a frequently sampled 2-hour oral glucose tolerance test.
    RESULTS: At baseline, gluconeogenesis, glucose production, and fasting and 2-hour glucose were comparable in both groups, though Met + Lira had higher hemoglobin A1C. Met + Lira had a greater decrease from baseline in fasting glucose (-2.0 ± 1.3 vs -0.6 ± 0.9 mmol/L, P = .008) and a greater increase in sigma (0.72 ± 0.68 vs -0.05 ± 0.71, P = .03). The change in fractional gluconeogenesis was similar between groups (Met + Lira: -0.36 ± 9.4 vs Met: 0.04 ± 12.3%, P = .9), and there were no changes in prandial gluconeogenesis or mSI. Increased glucose clearance in both groups was related to sigma (r = 0.63, P = .003) but not gluconeogenesis or mSI.
    CONCLUSIONS: Among Y-T2D, metformin with or without liraglutide improved glycemia but did not suppress high rates of gluconeogenesis. Novel therapies that will enhance β-cell function and target the elevated rates of gluconeogenesis in Y-T2D are needed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1RAs)被认为具有抗前列腺癌的抗肿瘤特性。我们研究了在现实世界中使用GLP-1RA与前列腺癌风险之间的关联。
    方法:我们使用主动比较器进行了一项全国性的基于注册的队列研究,新用户设计。我们纳入了2007-2019年期间开始使用GLP-1RAs或基础胰岛素的所有年龄≥50岁的丹麦男性。在“意向治疗”(ITT)和“符合方案”样分析中,使用多变量Cox回归估算了偶发前列腺癌的HR和95%CI。
    结果:在14,206名GLP-1RA的引发剂和21,756名基础胰岛素的引发剂中,我们在研究药物开始后约5年的平均随访期间确定了697例前列腺癌患者.与基础胰岛素使用相比,在ITT分析中,GLP-1RA的使用与0.91(95%CI0.73,1.14)的校正HR相关,在符合方案分析中,GLP-1RA的使用与0.80(95%CI0.64,1.01)相关。在年龄较大的男性(≥70岁)中发现了更强的逆关联(\'ITT\'HR0.56;95%CI0.38,0.82;\'按方案的HR0.47;95%CI0.30,0.74),和CVD患者(ITTHR0.75;95%CI0.53,1.06;符合方案HR0.60;95%CI0.39,0.91)。
    结论:在“符合方案”分析中,与使用基础胰岛素相比,使用GLP-1RA与前列腺癌风险呈负相关。在“ITT”和“符合方案”分析中,老年男性和CVD患者均表现出较强的负相关。我们的结果可能表明使用GLP-1RA可以预防前列腺癌。
    Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have been suggested to possess antineoplastic properties against prostate cancer. We examined the association between GLP-1RA use and prostate cancer risk in a real-world setting.
    We performed a nationwide register-based cohort study using an active-comparator, new-user design. We included all men in Denmark aged ≥50 years who commenced use of GLP-1RAs or basal insulin during 2007-2019. HRs and 95% CIs for incident prostate cancer were estimated using multivariable Cox regression in \'intention-to-treat\' (ITT)- and \'per-protocol\'-like analyses.
    Among 14,206 initiators of GLP-1RAs and 21,756 initiators of basal insulin, we identified 697 patients with prostate cancer during a mean follow-up period of about 5 years from initiation of the study drugs. In comparison with basal insulin use, GLP-1RA use was associated with an adjusted HR of 0.91 (95% CI 0.73, 1.14) in the \'ITT\' analysis and 0.80 (95% CI 0.64, 1.01) in the \'per-protocol\' analysis. Stronger inverse associations were seen among older men (≥70 years) (\'ITT\' HR 0.56; 95% CI 0.38, 0.82; \'per-protocol\' HR 0.47; 95% CI 0.30, 0.74), and in patients with CVD (\'ITT\' HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.53, 1.06; \'per-protocol\' HR 0.60; 95% CI 0.39, 0.91).
    GLP-1RA use was inversely associated with prostate cancer risk compared with use of basal insulin in the \'per-protocol\' analysis. Older men and patients with CVD exhibited stronger inverse associations in both the \'ITT\' and \'per-protocol\' analyses. Our results may indicate that GLP-1RA use could protect against prostate cancer.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在SUSTAIN6心血管结局试验中,与安慰剂相比,每周一次司马鲁肽与主要不良心血管事件的显著减少相关.迄今为止,没有研究评估现有的糖尿病模型如何准确预测SUSTAIN6中观察到的结局.本分析的目的是调查IQVIA核心糖尿病模型在预测持续6试验结果时的表现。为了校准模型,使预测结果反映观察到的结果,并从英国医疗保健支付者的角度研究校准对每周一次semaglutide的成本效益的影响。
    对IQVIA核心糖尿病模型进行了校准,以确保预测的非致命性卒中事件发生率反映了在2年时间范围内SUSTAIN6中观察到的非致命性卒中事件发生率。使用未经校准和校准的模型,在整个生命周期内进行每周一次的司马鲁肽与安慰剂加标准护理的成本效益分析,以评估对成本效益结果的影响。
    为了在SUSTAIN6中复制非致命性卒中事件发生率,通过每周一次的司马鲁肽和安慰剂应用1.07和1.65的卒中相对风险来校准模型,分别,是必需的。在长期成本效益分析中,未经校准的模型预测,每获得质量调整生命年(QALY),每周一次的司马鲁肽与安慰剂加标准护理的成本效益比增加22,262英镑,当使用校准模型时,每QALY的收益降至17,594英镑。
    需要校准以复制SUSTAIN6中观察到的结果,这表明每周一次的司马鲁肽所观察到的心血管并发症风险的降低不能仅由常规风险因素的差异来解释。使用校准等方法准确估计糖尿病相关并发症的风险对于确保进行准确的成本效益分析非常重要。
    UNASSIGNED: In the SUSTAIN 6 cardiovascular outcomes trial, once-weekly semaglutide was associated with a statistically significant reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events compared with placebo. To date, no studies have assessed how accurately existing diabetes models predict the outcomes observed in SUSTAIN 6. The aims of this analysis were to investigate the performance of the IQVIA Core Diabetes Model when used to predict the SUSTAIN 6 trial outcomes, to calibrate the model such that projected outcomes reflected observed outcomes, and to examine the impact of calibration on the cost-effectiveness of once-weekly semaglutide from a UK healthcare payer perspective.
    UNASSIGNED: The IQVIA Core Diabetes Model was calibrated to ensure that the projected non-fatal stroke event rates reflected the non-fatal stroke event rates observed in SUSTAIN 6 over a two-year time horizon. Cost-effectiveness analyses of once-weekly semaglutide versus placebo plus standard of care were conducted over a lifetime horizon using the uncalibrated and calibrated models to assess the impact on cost-effectiveness outcomes.
    UNASSIGNED: To replicate the non-fatal stroke event rate in SUSTAIN 6, calibration of the model through the application of relative risks for stroke of 1.07 and 1.65 with once-weekly semaglutide and placebo, respectively, was required. In the long-term cost-effectiveness analysis, the uncalibrated model projected an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for once-weekly semaglutide versus placebo plus standard of care of GBP 22,262 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained, which fell to GBP 17,594 per QALY gained when the calibrated model was used.
    UNASSIGNED: The requirement for calibration to replicate the outcomes observed in SUSTAIN 6 suggests that the reductions in risk of cardiovascular complications observed with once-weekly semaglutide cannot be solely explained by differences in conventional risk factors. Accurate estimation of the risk of diabetes-related complications using methods such as calibration is important to ensure accurate cost-effectiveness analyses are conducted.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    目的:为了评估耐受性,口服小分子胰高血糖素样肽-1受体(GLP-1R)激动剂danuglipron的不同剂量递增方案的安全性和药效学。
    方法:这个阶段2a,双盲,安慰剂对照,平行组研究将接受二甲双胍治疗的2型糖尿病(T2D)成人随机分配给安慰剂或danuglipron(低[5-mg]或高[10-mg]起始剂量,1或2周剂量递增步骤,目标剂量为每天两次80、120或200mg[BID]),而肥胖无糖尿病的成年人则服用安慰剂或danuglipron200mgBID。
    结果:患有T2D(n=123,平均糖化血红蛋白[HbA1c]8.19%)或无糖尿病肥胖(n=28,平均体重指数37.3kg/m2)的参与者被随机分配和治疗。在danuglipron组中,有27.3%至72.7%的参与者停止了研究药物治疗,而安慰剂组的参与者为16.7%至18.8%。通常是由于不良事件。恶心(danuglipron组参与者的20.0%-47.6%与安慰剂为12.5%)和呕吐(18.2%-40.9%danuglipronvs.12.5%安慰剂,分别)最常见于T2D参与者。胃肠道不良事件通常与danuglipron目标剂量有关,并且基本不受起始剂量的影响。在T2D的参与者中,HbA1c相对于基线的最小二乘均值变化(danuglipron组的-1.04%至-1.57%与-安慰剂为0.32%),空腹血糖(-23.34mg/dL至-53.94mg/dLdanuglipronvs.-13.09mg/dL安慰剂)和体重(-1.93至-5.38kgdanuglipronvs.-0.42kg安慰剂)在第12周与安慰剂相比,danuglipron通常具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。
    结论:Danuglipron导致HbA1c有统计学意义的降低,FPG和体重超过12周,在目标剂量较高的情况下,停药率和胃肠道不良事件发生率较高。
    结果:gov标识符:NCT04617275。
    To evaluate the tolerability, safety and pharmacodynamics of different dose-escalation schemes of the oral small-molecule glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) agonist danuglipron.
    This Phase 2a, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study randomly assigned adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) treated with metformin to placebo or danuglipron (low [5-mg] or high [10-mg] starting dose, with 1- or 2-week dose-escalation steps, to target doses of 80, 120 or 200 mg twice daily [BID]) and adults with obesity without diabetes to placebo or danuglipron 200 mg BID.
    Participants with T2D (n = 123, mean glycated haemoglobin [HbA1c] 8.19%) or obesity without diabetes (n = 28, mean body mass index 37.3 kg/m2 ) were randomly assigned and treated. Discontinuation from study medication occurred in 27.3% to 72.7% of participants across danuglipron groups versus 16.7% to 18.8% for placebo, most often due to adverse events. Nausea (20.0%-47.6% of participants across danuglipron groups vs. 12.5% for placebo) and vomiting (18.2%-40.9% danuglipron vs. 12.5% placebo, respectively) were most commonly reported in participants with T2D. Gastrointestinal adverse events were generally related to danuglipron target dose and were not substantially affected by starting dose. In participants with T2D, least squares mean changes from baseline in HbA1c (-1.04% to -1.57% across danuglipron groups vs. -0.32% for placebo), fasting plasma glucose (-23.34 mg/dL to -53.94 mg/dL danuglipron vs. -13.09 mg/dL placebo) and body weight (-1.93 to -5.38 kg danuglipron vs. -0.42 kg placebo) at Week 12 were generally statistically significant for danuglipron compared with placebo (P < 0.05).
    Danuglipron resulted in statistically significant reductions in HbA1c, FPG and body weight over 12 weeks, in the setting of higher discontinuation rates and incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events with higher target doses.
    gov identifier: NCT04617275.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号