FreeStyle Libre

FreeStyle Libre
  • 文章类型: Observational Study
    目的:调查FreeStyleLibre,间歇性扫描连续血糖监测(isCGM)系统,影响1型糖尿病成人患者治疗低血糖的信心.
    方法:这种纵向,在一家机构进行的观察性研究包括121名1型糖尿病成人患者.参与者在使用isCGM之前使用常规的手指刺法进行血糖自测。在基线和开始isCGM后12个月,低血糖信心量表(HCS),糖尿病治疗满意度问卷(DTSQ),和HbA1c进行。12个月时,观察到使用isCGM趋势箭头进行血糖管理的个体百分比.主要终点是使用isCGM引起的低血糖信心变化。
    结果:使用isCGM后,HCS评分从2.89(2.56,3.22)显着提高到3.00(2.20,3.33)(p<.001);中位数(25%,75%)。在基线时出现3级低血糖的参与者中,睡眠期间的低血糖信心(p<0.05),在社交场合(p<0.05),在避免严重低血糖相关问题方面(p<0.05)得到改善。尽管有低血糖风险,参与者可以通过使用isCGM继续日常活动(p<0.05),百分之六十九的人有效地利用了趋势箭头。
    结论:使用isCGM改善了1型糖尿病成人的低血糖信心。数据分析表明,1型糖尿病患者可以更自由地生活,并使用isCGM更好地管理低血糖。
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the FreeStyle Libre, an intermittent scanning continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM) system, influences confidence in managing hypoglycemia in adults with type 1 diabetes.
    METHODS: This longitudinal, observational study conducted at one facility included 121 adults with type 1 diabetes. Participants used the conventional finger-prick method for self-testing glucose before using isCGM. At baseline and 12 months after initiating isCGM, the Hypoglycemic Confidence Scale (HCS), Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ), and HbA1c were performed. At 12 months, the percentage of individuals utilizing isCGM trend arrows for glucose management was observed. The primary endpoint was hypoglycemic confidence change attributed to using isCGM.
    RESULTS: After using isCGM, HCS scores improved significantly from 2.89 (2.56, 3.22) to 3.00 (2.20, 3.33) (p < 0.001); median (25%, 75%). Among participants with level 3 hypoglycemia at baseline, hypoglycemic confidence during sleep (p < 0.05), in social situations (p < 0.05), and in avoiding serious hypoglycemia-related problems (p < 0.05) were improved. Despite hypoglycemia risk, participants could continue daily activities by using isCGM (p < 0.05), and sixty-nine percent utilized trend arrows effectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: Using isCGM improved hypoglycemic confidence among adults with type 1 diabetes. Data analysis indicated that people with type 1 diabetes could live more freely and better manage hypoglycemia using isCGM.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:瑞典国家糖尿病登记册(NDR)于2016年6月启动了FreeStyleLibre®系统和其他连续血糖监测(CGM)系统的注册。我们在瑞典使用FreeStyleLibre调查了2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者的HbA1c变化。
    方法:我们包括患有T2DM的成年人,在2014年1月1日之后在NDR中注册,首次使用FreeStyleLibre的索引日期为2016年6月或更晚。方法是比较指标日期前6个月内的HbA1c与指标日期后6个月和12个月左右的HbA1c的前/后比较。
    结果:711名使用FreeStyleLibre的T2DM成人在研究期间进行了HbA1c测量。在该组中,平均HbA1c在6个月(-0.50%-单位)和12个月(-0.52%-单位)时显著降低。变化程度与基线HbA1c呈负相关。在FreeStyleLibre患有T2DM的事件用户中观察到HbA1c的降低,这些用户对CGM确实很幼稚,或者对CGM有未知的经验。年龄25-74岁。
    结论:这项对瑞典NDR的现实世界研究表明,使用FreeStyleLibre系统6个月和12个月的T2DM患者显着降低了他们的HbA1c。
    The Swedish National Diabetes Register (NDR) initiated registration of the FreeStyle Libre® system and other continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems in June 2016. We investigated change in HbA1c for people with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) using FreeStyle Libre in Sweden.
    We included adults with T2DM, registered in the NDR after January 1, 2014, and an index date for first use of FreeStyle Libre of June 2016 or later. Methodology was a before/after comparison of HbA1c within 6 months before the index date versus HbA1c around 6 and 12 months after the index date.
    711 adults with T2DM using FreeStyle Libre had HbA1c measurements within the study period. Mean HbA1c was significantly reduced at 6 months (-0.50%-unit) and at 12 months (-0.52%-unit) in this group. Degree of change was negatively correlated to baseline HbA1c. Reductions in HbA1c were observed in incident users of FreeStyle Libre with T2DM who were truly naïve to CGM or had unknown prior experience of CGM, and aged 25-74 years.
    This real-world study on the Swedish NDR shows that people with T2DM using FreeStyle Libre system for 6 and 12 months significantly reduced their HbA1c.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经证实:为了评估闪光血糖监测(FGM)与自我血糖监测(SMBG)的交替使用,1型糖尿病患者(T1D)。
    未经批准:两周的开放FGM(P2),在使用盲法FGM系统进行SMBG之前(P1)和之后2周(P3)。平均绝对相对差(MARD)通过(|FGMi-SMBGi|)/SMBGi计算,其中它是成对的数据样本。
    未经批准:总共,对34例患者进行了评估。范围内的时间(TIR)在P1和P2之间没有变化。在12例患者中(35.3%),TIR从P1的40%增加到P2的52%(p=0.002)和22(64.7%),TIR降低或没有改变。使用FGM导致低血糖时间减少(<70mg/dL)(6.5%vs.5.0%;p=0.005),在高血糖中花费的时间%增加(>180mg/dL)(44.5%至51%;p=0.046),TIR%无显著变化。达到传感器估计的糖化血红蛋白(eA1c)<7%的患者比例从P1的23.5%下降到P2的12.9%,p=0.028。对于整个样本,两种方法之间的MARD为15.5%(95%CI14.5-16.6%)。对于正常的葡萄糖范围,高血糖水平和低血糖水平MARD为16.0%(95%CI15.0-17.0%),13.3%(95%CI11.5-15.2%)和23.4%[95%CI20.5-26.3%],分别。
    UNASSIGNED:正常SMBG后FGM减少了在低血糖中花费的时间百分比,同时在高血糖中花费的时间百分比增加。FGM关于低血糖水平的较低准确性可能导致低血糖的过度校正。
    UNASSIGNED: To evaluate the alternate use of flash glucose monitoring (FGM) with self-monitoring blood glucose (SMBG), in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D).
    UNASSIGNED: Two weeks of open FGM (P2), both preceded (P1) and followed by 2 weeks (P3) of SMBG with a blinded FGM system. Mean absolute relative difference (MARD) was calculated by (|FGMi - SMBGi|) / SMBGi, where it was a paired data sample.
    UNASSIGNED: In total, 34 patients were evaluated. Time in range (TIR) did not change between P1 and P2. In 12 patients (35.3%), TIR increased from 40% at P1 to 52% at P2 (p = 0.002) and in 22 (64.7%), TIR decreased or did not change. FGM use resulted in decreased % time spent in hypoglycemia (<70 mg/dL) (6.5% vs. 5.0%; p = 0.005), increased % time spent in hyperglycemia (>180 mg/dL) (44.5% to 51%; p = 0.046) with no significant change in % TIR. The proportion of patients who reached sensor-estimated glycated hemoglobin (eA1c) < 7% decreased from 23.5% at P1 to 12.9% at P2, p = 0.028. For the whole sample, the MARD between the two methods was 15.5% (95% CI 14.5-16.6%). For normal glucose range, hyperglycemic levels and hypoglycemic levels MARD were 16.0% (95% CI 15.0-17.0%), 13.3% (95% CI 11.5-15.2%) and 23.4% [95% CI 20.5-26.3%)], respectively.
    UNASSIGNED: FGM after usual SMBG decreased the % time spent in hypoglycemia concomitant with an undesired increase in % time spent in hyperglycemia. Lower accuracy of FGM regarding hypoglycemia levels could result in overcorrection of hypoglycemia.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:使用Flash葡萄糖监测(FGM)系统1年检查1型糖尿病(T1D)的血糖控制。
    方法:这项前瞻性研究使用了187名T1D患者(14-40岁),他们通过FGM自我测试了他们的血糖水平。收集连续血糖监测(CGM)指标,即葡萄糖变异性(GV)(%),平均时间范围(TIR),超限时间(TAR),低于范围的时间(TBR),以及3,6和12个月时低血糖事件的平均持续时间.
    结果:第6位,第9个月和第12个月,对于GV的值,%intarget,TAR和%>250mg/dL,与3个月相比,没有发现显着变化(p>0.05)。然而,从基线的显著变化是明显的平均葡萄糖水平的值在第3(p=0.028),第9个月(p=0.048)和第12个月(p=0.022)。将3个月时的平均葡萄糖值与6、9和12个月时的平均葡萄糖值进行比较,无明显变化(p>0.05)。当与基线值比较时,3个月时的低葡萄糖事件(p=0.028),6个月(p=0.048),9个月(p=0.022)和12个月(p=0.038)显示显着变化。然而,低于70毫克/分升的百分比(除非12个月时的值,p=0.046),没有观察到显著的变化。与基线值相比,HbA1c在3、6、9和12个月内显着下降。
    结论:当患者从传统的手指穿刺方法切换到FGM系统时,CGM指标显着改善。并且在整个研究期间观察到效果。
    OBJECTIVE: Examine the glycemic control on Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) wearing the Flash Glucose Monitoring (FGM) system for a one-year period of time.
    METHODS: This prospective study done using 187 patients with T1D (14-40yrs) who self-tested their glucose levels by FGM. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) metrics were gathered i.e., Glucose Variability (GV) (%), mean Time in Range (TIR), Time Above Range (TAR), Time Below Range (TBR), and average duration of hypoglycemic events at the 3, 6, and 12 month time periods.
    RESULTS: At 6th, 9th and 12th months, for values of GV, % in target, TAR and %>250 mg/dL, no significant changes (p > 0.05) were noted compared to 3 months. However, significant changes from the baseline were evident for the values of the mean glucose level at the 3rd (p = 0.028), 9th (p = 0.048) and 12th months (p = 0.022). When the mean glucose value at 3 months was compared to the same at 6, 9, and 12 month period, no significant changes (p > 0.05) were seen. When compared with baseline values, low glucose events at 3 months (p = 0.028), 6 months (p = 0.048), 9 months (p = 0.022) and 12 months (p = 0.038) showed significant changes. However, the percentage below 70 mg/dL (barring the value at 12 months, p = 0.046), no significant changes were observed. The HbA1c revealed significant drop in 3, 6, 9 and 12 months compared to baseline values.
    CONCLUSIONS: Significant improvement was noted in CGM metrics when patients switched from conventional finger pricking method over to FGM system, and the effect was observed during the entire study period.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: To examine the efficacy of FreeStyle Libre Flash Glucose Monitoring System (FGMS) on Diabetes Self-Management Practices (DSMP) and glycemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).
    METHODS: This prospective study was conducted among 105 patients with T2D (aged 30-70 years), who self-tested their glucose levels by conventional finger-prick method using blood glucose meters (BGM). At baseline visit, FGMS sensors were fixed by a diabetes educator to all patients. At the baseline and at 12 weeks of the study, an interviewer collected the responses of Diabetes Self-Management (DSM) from all the study population using a questionnaire.
    RESULTS: At 12 weeks, significant improvements in the DSM subscales were observed, which includes glucose management (P = 0.042), dietary control (P = 0.048), physical activity (P = 0.043), health care use (P = 0.001) and self-care (P = 0.001), compared to the values at baseline. At baseline, when the HbA1c level was 8.2%, at 12 weeks, it dropped to 7.9%. Also, at baseline, when the hypoglycemia frequency was 3.1, it declined to 1.2 episodes/month at 12 weeks. While comparing the blood glucose monitoring through BGM at the baseline (1.92/day), a higher degree of frequency of blood glucose monitoring was evident at 12 weeks (6.84/day), after the patients employed the FreeStyle Libre.
    CONCLUSIONS: After 12 weeks of using the FreeStyle Libre, the frequency of hypoglycemic episodes and the HbA1c levels were dropped, while the practice of DSM and frequency of blood glucose monitoring were improved.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在这项研究中,我们调查了FreeStyleLibreFlash葡萄糖监测(FGM)在实际临床环境中的实施效果,重点是初始教育对FGM系统使用的影响.
    方法:这项前瞻性观察研究包括425名1型糖尿病受试者,随访3至12个月(320名随访3个月,267个月至6个月,147个月至一年)。在研究开始时放置FGM传感器,并在5天的时间内对所有参与者进行了有关传感器使用和血糖自我管理的教育,每3个月进行一次随访。
    结果:HbA1c值从基线(T0)到3个月(T3)显着降低(p<0.001),从7.48%±0.1%降至7.30±0.1%。从T3到T12,低血糖的时间没有变化,尽管存在下降趋势。整个队列中HbA1c值的变化是由HbA1c≥7%的患者亚组的变化驱动的,在前3个月从8.22%±1.14%下降到7.68%±1.26%(p<0.0001)。此外,在每天执行SMBG少于5次的个体中,与每天进行SMBG≥5次的患者相比,HbA1c水平持续下降达6个月(分别为p<0.05和p<0.001).
    结论:HbA1c的改善主要是由于每天扫描次数的增加。血糖控制较差的受试者和很少进行SMBG的受试者受益最大。
    BACKGROUND: In this study, we investigated the effectiveness of FreeStyle Libre Flash Glucose Monitoring (FGM) implementation in a real life clinical setting with the emphasis on the effect of initial education on the use of the FGM system.
    METHODS: This prospective observational study included 425 diabetes type 1 subjects followed up for 3 to 12 months (320 were followed up to 3 months, 267 up to 6 months and 147 up to period of one year). An FGM sensor was placed at study entry and all participants were educated through a period of 5 days on sensor usage and self-management of glycemia with follow up visits every 3 months.
    RESULTS: HbA1c values significantly decreased from baseline (T0) to 3 months (T3) (p < 0.001), with a drop from 7.48% ± 0.1% to 7.30 ± 0.1%. There was no change in time spent in hypoglycemia from T3 to T12, although there was a decreasing trend present. The change in HbA1c values in the entire cohort was driven by change in the subgroup of patients with HbA1c ≥7% with a drop from 8.22% ± 1.14% to 7.68% ± 1.26% (p < 0.0001) in the first 3 months. Also, in individuals performing SMBG less than 5 times per day, there was a steady decrease in HbA1c levels up to 6 months (p < 0.05 and p < 0.001, respectively) as opposed to those who performed SMBG ≥5 times per day.
    CONCLUSIONS: The improvement in HbA1c was mainly driven by the increase in the number of scans per day. The subjects with poorer glycemic control and those who seldom performed SMBG benefited the most.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    FreeStyle Libre has been approved for use in patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD) in Japan, unlike Europe and the United States; however, evidence regarding its accuracy in such patients is sparse. Forty-one participants with type 2 diabetes undergoing HD were recruited. The overall mean absolute relative difference and mean absolute difference were 23.4% and 33.9 mg/dL, respectively. Sensor glucose levels and capillary glucose levels were significantly correlated (r = 0.858, P < .01), although the sensor glucose levels were significantly lower than the capillary glucose levels. The accuracy of FreeStyle Libre in patients undergoing HD became deteriorated with the days of usage. The percentage of sensor results in Zones A and B in the consensus error grid analysis and in the Clarke error grid analysis were 99.7% and 99.0%, respectively. Its insufficient accuracy necessitates adjunct usage of FreeStyle Libre with self-monitoring of blood glucose in patients undergoing HD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: Patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) on multiple glucose-lowering therapies who fast during Ramadan are at increased risk of hypoglycemia. We have assessed the utility of the flash glucose monitoring system after adjusting the dose of insulin and sulphonylureas to mitigate the risk of hypoglycemia in patients with T2DM who fast during Ramadan.
    METHODS: Patients with T2DM on either basal insulin or a sulphonylurea and at least 2 other glucose-lowering agents received structured education and adjustment of insulin or sulphonylurea dose according to the PROFAST Ramadan protocol. Glucose variability and episodes of hypoglycemia were assessed using the flash glucose monitoring system (Free Style Libre) before and during Ramadan.
    RESULTS: A total of 33 patients with T2DM (on sulphonylurea (SU+) (n = 21), on basal insulin (BI+) (n = 12) aged 50.8 ± 1.6 years with a diabetes duration of 13.1 ± 6.5 years were studied. The average sensor glucose was 154 ± 34 mg/dl (8.5 ± 1.88 mmol/l) with 65.2% in the target range before Ramadan and the average sensor glucose was 156 ± 36 mg/dl (8.6 ± 2.0 mmol/l) with 67.1% in the target range during Ramadan. The incidence of hypoglycemia in the whole group (2.9 v 2.9) and in the SU+ (3.7 vs 3.0) and BI+ (1.7 vs 2.9) groups and eHbA1c (P = 0.56, P = 0.93), average glucose (P = 0.56, P = 0.92) and time within range (P = 0.63, P = 0.73) did not change in the SU+ and BI+ groups, respectively, before and during Ramadan.
    CONCLUSIONS: Structured education with adjustment of the dose of glucose lowering medication alongside use of the FGMS can effectively mitigate the increased risk of hypoglycemia in patients with T2DM on multiple glucose-lowering therapies who fast during Ramadan.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:患有1型糖尿病(T1D)的青少年和年轻成年人在管理这种严重的慢性病时会承受巨大的负担,并且在此生命阶段,血糖控制处于最不健康的状态。闪光葡萄糖监测(FGM)是一种新技术,当佩戴在上臂的间质葡萄糖传感器用手持阅读器扫描时,可以轻松,谨慎地显示葡萄糖信息,从而减轻葡萄糖监测的负担,与传统的通过手指刺入毛细血管葡萄糖采样(也称为自我监测血糖,SMBG)。这项技术的有效性及其在先前存在的血糖控制欠佳的年轻人中长期使用的影响尚不清楚。因此,这项研究旨在调查切割女性生殖器官的有效性以及T1D年轻人的标准护理。
    方法:这是一个两阶段的研究计划,包括多中心随机,由SMBG和FGM之间的6个月比较组成的平行组研究,额外的6个月延续阶段。我们将招募13-20岁(含)的T1D青少年,血糖控制欠佳(过去6个月平均糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)≥75mmol/mol[≥9%])。参与者将被随机分配(1:1)到FGM(FreeStyleLibre;干预组)或继续进行SMBG与毛细血管血糖测试(常规护理组)。所有参与者将继续标准护理的其他方面,该研究仅提供FreeStyleLibre。6个月时,对照组将进行干预。主要结果是6个月时HbA1c变化的组间差异。其他结果包括一系列社会心理和健康经济措施以及女性生殖器切割的可接受性。
    结论:>如果发现改进,这将进一步鼓励采取步骤,将FGM纳入血糖控制不健康的青少年的常规糖尿病护理中,预期它将减轻这一高危人群的日常糖尿病管理负担并改善短期和长期健康结局.
    背景:该试验于2018年3月5日在澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心(ACTRN12618000320257p)和世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台(通用试验号U1111-1205-5784)注册。
    BACKGROUND: Teenagers and young adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) experience significant burden managing this serious chronic condition and glycaemic control is at its unhealthiest during this life stage. Flash glucose monitoring (FGM) is a new technology that reduces the burden of glucose monitoring by easily and discreetly displaying glucose information when an interstitial glucose sensor worn on the upper arm is scanned with a handheld reader, as opposed to traditional capillary glucose sampling by finger prick (otherwise known as self-monitored blood glucose, SMBG). The effectiveness of this technology and impacts of its long-term use in youth with pre-existing suboptimal glycaemic control are unknown. This study therefore aims to investigate the effectiveness of FGM in addition to standard care in young people with T1D.
    METHODS: This is a two phase study programme including a multi-centre randomised, parallel-group study consisting of a 6-month comparison between SMBG and FGM, with an additional 6-month continuation phase. We will enrol adolescents with T1D aged 13-20 years (inclusive), with suboptimal glycaemic control (mean glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) in past 6 months ≥75 mmol/mol [≥9%]). Participants will be randomly allocated (1:1) to FGM (FreeStyle Libre; intervention group) or to continue SMBG with capillary blood glucose testing (usual care group). All participants will continue other aspects of standard care with the study only providing the FreeStyle Libre. At 6 months, the control group will cross over to the intervention. The primary outcome is the between group difference in changes in HbA1c at 6 months. Additional outcomes include a range of psychosocial and health economic measures as well as FGM acceptability.
    CONCLUSIONS: >If improvements are found, this will further encourage steps towards integrating FGM into regular diabetes care for youth with unhealthy glycaemic control, with the expectation it will reduce daily diabetes management burden and improve short- and long-term health outcomes in this high-risk group.
    BACKGROUND: This trial was registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry on 5 March 2018 ( ACTRN12618000320257p ) and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (Universal Trial Number U1111-1205-5784).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号