Fracture de l’extrémité distale du radius

桡骨骨折
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    The aim of this study was to know if applying continuous passive motion (CPM) in addition to routine exercises is more effective than routine exercises alone in pain reduction, range of motion (ROM) and function improvement after distal radius fractures (DRFs). In this randomized controlled trial, 21 patients with non-stabilized DRF after pin removal were randomly assigned to experimental and control groups. The experimental group received stretching exercises with CPM machine for 2×15min per session. Both groups received routine exercises for 1h, three times a week for 4 weeks. The primary outcome measure was pain evaluated on a visual analog scale (VAS), and the secondary outcome measures were disability evaluated by the patient-rated wrist/hand evaluation and ROM (goniometry) at 4, 6, and 12 weeks. Univariate analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) and a one-way repeated measure mixed model analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used for data analysis. Twenty-one participants completed the 12-week follow-up. Pain relief, ROM and functional improvement revealed that the treatment was successful in both groups. We detected no significant differences (p>0.05) between the two groups at the end of the follow-up period regarding pain, ROM, and function. Using a CPM machine had no additional effect on pain reduction, ROM and function improvement compared with routine exercises in patients with DRF.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管桡骨远端骨折(DRF)的手术治疗取得了最新进展,最佳治疗仍存在争议,因为不同的固定方法通常具有相似的临床功能和影像学结局.本研究的目的是评估术后1年掌侧钢板和联合钢板治疗DRF的结果差异。在一项回顾性队列研究中,我们评估了105例接受掌侧锁定钢板或背侧和掌侧钢板联合手术的连续患者。主要结果是腕关节活动范围(ROM)。次要结果测量包括手握力,视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛评分,射线照相检查和与患者相关的结果测量。联合钢板治疗的患者腕关节下屈明显,延伸和尺骨偏差。两组术后1年的放射学Batra评分相似。掌侧电镀组的PRWE(患者评估的腕关节评估)评分为16,联合电镀组为14。QuickDASH(手臂的快速残疾,肩和手)掌侧电镀组为9,联合电镀组为16。两组患者静息时VAS疼痛评分均为0,活动时VAS疼痛评分均为2。两组的握力相似。联合钢板组18/78例患者进行硬件去除,掌侧钢板组1/27例。两名接受联合钢板治疗的患者肌腱断裂。我们的发现表明,这两种方法都可以产生令人满意的临床和影像学结果。然而,联合电镀导致腕部ROM较差,硬件移除频率大大提高。组合电镀在稳定粉碎的DRF方面的潜在优势必须通过潜在的缺点来平衡,例如下腕ROM和更高频率的硬件移除。
    Despite recent advances in the surgical management of distal radius fractures (DRFs), the optimal treatment remains controversial as different fixation methods often have similar clinical functional and radiographic outcomes. The objective of this study was to assess the differences in outcomes 1 year postoperatively between volar plating and combined plating for DRFs. In a retrospective cohort study, we evaluated 105 consecutive patients operated with either a volar locking plate or combined dorsal and volar plating. The primary outcome was wrist range of motion (ROM). Secondary outcome measures included hand grip strength, visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, radiographic examination and patient-related outcome measures. Patients treated with combined plating had significantly inferior wrist flexion, extension and ulnar deviation. The radiographic Batra score 1 year postoperatively was similar for both groups. The PRWE (patient-rated wrist evaluation) score was 16 for the volar plating group and 14 for the combined plating group. The QuickDASH (Quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) score was 9 for the volar plating group and 16 for the combined plating group. VAS pain scores were 0 at rest and 2 during activity for both groups. Grip strength was similar between the two groups. Hardware removal was done in 18/78 patients for the combined plating group and 1/27 for the volar plate group. Two patients operated with combined plating had tendon ruptures. Our findings indicate that both methods can yield satisfactory clinical and radiographic outcomes. However, combined plating resulted in inferior wrist ROM and substantially higher frequency of hardware removal. The potential advantages of combined plating in stabilizing a comminuted DRF must be balanced by the potential drawbacks such as inferior wrist ROM and higher frequency of hardware removal.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们试图研究早期手动治疗对桡骨远端骨折(DRF)掌侧钢板治疗患者功能预后的影响。这是一个潜在的,单盲,随机对照试验。接受DRF掌侧钢板治疗的患者被随机分配到早期手动治疗组(EMTG,n=19)或标准物理治疗组(SPG,n=20)。虽然SPG接受了标准物理治疗,EMTG每周接受两次标准的物理治疗以及Mulligan的运动动员技术,通过12周。Function,疼痛强度,运动范围,使用患者额定腕部评估(PRWE)评估握力和残疾水平,视觉模拟量表(VAS),测角仪,手测力计和手臂残疾,肩和手(DASH)问卷,分别。在术后3、6和12周进行测量。在54名接受筛查的患者中,39例符合纳入标准并随机分组。总的来说,32名患者(EMTG,n=15;SPG,n=17)进行分析。EMTG在12周时有明显的DASH评分和腕关节屈曲,更少的疼痛和更好的PRWE总分,手腕延伸,尺骨/径向偏差,所有时间点的旋光和握力。此外,增加早期手法治疗后,腕关节屈曲增加的幅度大于单纯标准理疗(26.50±13.19vs.16.21±16.06).在标准物理治疗中增加早期手动治疗可能有助于更好的功能结果,并且在使用DRF掌侧钢板治疗的患者中更有效地增加腕关节屈曲。
    We sought to investigate the effects of early manual therapy on functional outcomes in patients treated with volar plating of a distal radius fracture (DRF). This was a prospective, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial. Patients treated with volar plating of a DRF were randomly assigned to either Early Manual Therapy Group (EMTG, n=19) or Standard Physiotherapy Group (SPG, n=20). While SPG received standard physiotherapy, EMTG received standard physiotherapy plus Mulligan\'s Mobilization with Movement technique two sessions a week, through 12 weeks. Function, pain intensity, range of motion, grip strength and the level of disability were assessed using the Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), goniometer, hand dynamometer and Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Questionnaire, respectively. Measurements were made at 3, 6, and 12 weeks postoperatively. Of the 54-screened patients, 39 met the inclusion criteria and were randomized. In total, 32 patients (EMTG, n=15; SPG, n=17) were analyzed. EMTG had significantly better DASH score and wrist flexion at 12 weeks, less pain and better PRWE total score, wrist extension, ulnar/radial deviation, supination and grip strength at all time points. Moreover, wrist flexion increased more with the addition of early manual therapy than standard physiotherapy alone (26.50±13.19 versus 16.21±16.06). The addition of early manual therapy to standard physiotherapy may contribute to better functional outcomes and be more effective in increasing wrist flexion in patients treated with volar plating of a DRF.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    桡骨远端骨折(DRF)可能触发,在0.5-21%的病例中显示或失代偿性急性腕管综合征(CTS)。然后必须紧急进行内固定和正中神经释放。已经描述了使用内窥镜装置的正中神经释放和使用掌侧锁定板的DRF固定的侵入性较小的方法。我们评估了DRF固定和正中神经释放的可行性,微创15mm入路10例。我们回顾性回顾了8名女性和2名男性的10例与症状性CTS相关的DRF连续病例。平均年龄57岁。临床诊断为CTS。所有患者在门诊手术期间均采用掌侧锁定钢板和内镜下腕管松解术,采用单一15mm微创方法进行治疗。在一个案例中,肩胛骨关节镜修复术也是必需的。手术后六个月,所有患者均接受临床检查和放射学评估.临床和放射学结果的平均值如下:VAS上的疼痛1.5/10;QuickDASH14.3/100;屈曲90%;伸展90.6%;内旋95.6%;旋后87.9%;握力90.1%;2PD测试5.2mm(4-8mm)。发生5种并发症:2例暂时性感觉障碍在正中神经境内,1例暂时性感觉障碍在正中神经掌支,已经完全康复;两例复杂的区域性疼痛综合征I型,在6个月时仍然活跃。尽管方法上存在缺陷,我们的研究是唯一一个描述单一的15毫米微创方法的技术可行性内固定使用掌侧锁定钢板和内窥镜神经松解术,无严重并发症。此技术应添加到手和手腕的微创手术的外科工具箱中。
    Distal radius fractures (DRF) may trigger, reveal or decompensate acute carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) in 0.5-21% of cases. Internal fixation and median nerve release must then be carried out urgently. Less invasive approaches have been described for both the median nerve release using an endoscopic device and for the DRF fixation using a volar locking plate. We assessed the feasibility of DRF fixation and median nerve release through a single, minimally-invasive 15mm approach on a series of 10 cases. We reviewed retrospectively 10 consecutive cases of DRF associated with symptomatic CTS in 8 women and 2 men, aged 57 years on average. CTS was diagnosed clinically. All patients were treated during outpatient surgery with a volar locking plate and endoscopic carpal tunnel release using a single 15mm minimally-invasive approach. In one case, arthroscopic scapholunate repair was also required. Six months after the procedure, all patients were reviewed with a clinical examination and a radiological evaluation. The average values for the clinical and radiological outcomes were as follows: pain on VAS 1.5/10; QuickDASH 14.3/100; flexion 90%; extension 90.6%; pronation 95.6%; supination 87.9%; grip strength 90.1%; 2PD test 5.2mm (4-8mm). Five complications occurred: two cases of temporary dysesthesia in the territory of the median nerve and one case of temporary hypoesthesia of the palmar branch of the median nerve, which had all completely recovered; two cases of complex regional pain syndrome type I, which were still active at 6 months. Despite its methodological weaknesses, our study is the only one to describe the technical feasibility of a single 15mm minimally-invasive approach for both internal fixation using a volar locking plate and endoscopic nerve release, with no serious complications. This technique should be added to the surgical toolbox of minimally-invasive procedures for the hand and wrist.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号