Forest

森林
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    气孔指数(SI,%)及其对气候因素(温度和降水)的响应可以帮助我们了解生态系统中陆地碳和水循环以及植物的适应,然而,在这方面尚未达成共识。在这项研究中,我们从中国植物区系中收集了一个广泛的数据集来研究SI对环境变化的响应,包括188篇发表的论文中的891种草本和木本物种。结果表明,所有物种的正面SI和背面SI的平均值分别为14.06和19.22,正面SI与背面SI之比为0.84。对于近轴SI,背轴SI,以及近轴与近轴SI的比率,这些值的范围分别在0.05-43.67,0.01-48.17和0.03-4.31之间变化。与木本植物相比,草本植物在正面和背面SI中均显示出较高的值。从气候因素的影响来看,草本植物的背轴SI变化慢于近轴SI,而木本植物则表现出相反的趋势。观察到温度升高和降水对SI的阈值效应,表明SI在不同水平上对气候因素的变化反应不同。气候因素在驱动近轴SI方面比驱动近轴SI中起着至关重要的作用。我们的发现强调了SI在预测与气候和环境变化相关的未来水和碳循环方面的不同响应所带来的重大挑战。
    The stomatal index (SI, %) and its response to climate factors (temperature and precipitation) can help our understanding of terrestrial carbon and water cycling and plant adaptation in the ecosystem, however, consensus has not yet been reached in this regard. In this study, we compiled an extensive dataset from the Chinese flora to investigate the response of SI to environmental change, including 891 herbaceous and woody species from 188 published papers. The results showed that mean values of the adaxial SI and abaxial SI for all species were 14.06 and 19.22, respectively, and the ratio of adaxial to abaxial SI was 0.84. For the adaxial SI, abaxial SI, and the ratio of adaxial to abaxial SI, the range of these values varied between 0.05-43.67, 0.01-48.17, and 0.03-4.31, respectively. Compared with woody plants, herbaceous plants showed higher values in both adaxial and abaxial SI. In terms of the impact of climate factors, the abaxial SI of herbaceous plants changed slower than the adaxial SI, while woody plants showed the opposite trend. Threshold effects of increased temperature and precipitation on SI were observed, indicating that SI responded differently to changes in climate factors at different levels. Climate factors play a crucial role in driving the adaxial SI than abaxial SI. Our findings highlight the significant challenges posed by divergent responses of SI in forecasting future water and carbon cycles associated with climatic and environmental change.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:泰国的目标是到2024年消除疟疾,因此正在规划未来预防在无疟疾省份重建。了解当地地区对疟疾的接受度,可以适当地确定干预措施的目标。当前评估接受性的方法涉及收集昆虫学数据。众所周知,森林覆盖率与疟疾风险有关,作为有利于病媒繁殖和高风险人类行为的环境。
    方法:地理定位,匿名,泰国病媒传播病(DVBD)部门2011年至2021年的个体层面监测数据用于计算村一级的发病率和Rc估计值.森林覆盖率是使用公开可用的Hansen数据集中的树冠覆盖密度和森林损失年份的栅格图计算的。发病率和森林覆盖率进行了图形比较,并使用Spearman的rho。当前的疫源地分类系统已应用于过去5年(2017-2021年)的数据以及2021年的森林覆盖率,这些分类之间的比较。开发了一个简单的风险评分来识别具有高接受度的村庄。
    结果:从2011年到2021年,两个省的年度病例非线性下降了96.6%(1061至36)。在森林茂密的分区的村庄中,土著年度寄生虫指数(API)和近似Rc较高,5公里内森林覆盖率较高。每年持续报告疟疾病例的疟疾疫源地的森林覆盖率也高于未报告的疫源地。仅在森林覆盖率>25%的分区的村庄中报告了Rc>1。当使用森林覆盖率和最近的病例史应用简单的风险评分时,这些分类与DVBD目前使用的风险分层系统的分类相当.
    结论:村庄周围的森林覆盖率与本地疟疾病例之间存在正相关关系。大多数本地传播是在与老挝和柬埔寨接壤的国际边界上森林茂密的分区中观察到的,这是最容易接受的村庄所在的地方。由于人口流动和森林活动,这些地区输入疟疾的风险更大。将森林覆盖率和最近的病例监测数据与脆弱性度量相结合,可能有助于预测疟疾复发风险。
    BACKGROUND: Thailand aimed to eliminate malaria by 2024, and as such is planning for future prevention of re-establishment in malaria free provinces. Understanding the receptivity of local areas to malaria allows the appropriate targeting of interventions. Current approaches to assessing receptivity involve collecting entomological data. Forest coverage is known to be associated with malaria risk, as an environment conducive to both vector breeding and high-risk human behaviours.
    METHODS: Geolocated, anonymized, individual-level surveillance data from 2011 to 2021 from the Thai Division of Vector-Borne Disease (DVBD) was used to calculate incidence and estimated Rc at village level. Forest cover was calculated using raster maps of tree crown cover density and year of forest loss from the publicly available Hansen dataset. Incidence and forest cover were compared graphically and using Spearman\'s rho. The current foci classification system was applied to data from the last 5 years (2017-2021) and forest cover for 2021 compared between the classifications. A simple risk score was developed to identify villages with high receptivity.
    RESULTS: There was a non-linear decrease in annual cases by 96.6% (1061 to 36) across the two provinces from 2011 to 2021. Indigenous Annual Parasite Index (API) and approximated Rc were higher in villages in highly forested subdistricts, and with higher forest cover within 5 km. Forest cover was also higher in malaria foci which consistently reported malaria cases each year than those which did not. An Rc > 1 was only reported in villages in subdistricts with > 25% forest cover. When applying a simple risk score using forest cover and recent case history, the classifications were comparable to those of the risk stratification system currently used by the DVBD.
    CONCLUSIONS: There was a positive association between forest coverage around a village and indigenous malaria cases. Most local transmission was observed in the heavily forested subdistricts on the international borders with Laos and Cambodia, which are where the most receptive villages are located. These areas are at greater risk of importation of malaria due to population mobility and forest-going activities. Combining forest cover and recent case surveillance data with measures of vulnerability may be useful for prediction of malaria recurrence risk.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    不同耕作方式产生的变化会影响微生物群落的结构,从而改变土壤生态系统及其功能。这项研究的目的是探索和比较物理,不同土地利用类型土壤的化学性质和细菌群落组成(森林,草原,葡萄园,和耕地)在一个小集水区。基于16SrRNA基因的扩增子测序用于揭示取自两个不同坡度位置的夏季和秋季土壤样品的分类学多样性。对土地利用类型的人为影响越大,土壤理化参数变化越大。所有样本类型都以假虫门为主,酸杆菌,放线菌,拟杆菌和疣菌。各种细菌类群相对丰度的差异反映了不同的土地利用类型,季节性,和地形。这些多样性变化与土壤性质的差异一致。
    Changes resulting from different tillage practices can affect the structure of microbial communities, thereby altering soil ecosystems and their functioning. The aim of this study was to explore and compare the physical, chemical properties and bacterial community composition of soils from different land use types (forest, grassland, vineyard, and arable field) in a small catchment. 16S rRNA gene-based amplicon sequencing was used to reveal the taxonomic diversity of summer and autumn soil samples taken from two different slope positions. The greater the anthropogenic impact was on the type of land use, the greater the change was in soil physical and chemical parameters. All sample types were dominated by the phyla Pseudomonadota, Acidobacteriota, Actinobacteriota, Bacteroidota and Verrucomicrobiota. Differences in the relative abundance of various bacterial taxa reflected the different land use types, the seasonality, and the topography. These diversity changes were consistent with the differences in soil properties.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    不断变化的气候条件威胁着森林生态系统。干旱,疾病和侵扰,导致森林死亡,造成巨大的经济和生态损失。在中欧,这与商业上重要的针叶树种尤其相关。本研究使用气候包络超标(CEE)来估算不同未来气候情景下的物种风险。为了实现这一点,我们使用了当前物种的存在-缺失和历史气候数据,再加上各种地球系统模型的未来气候情景。气候情景倾向于更干燥和更温暖的条件,特别是对云杉造成强烈的CEE。然而,我们表明,温度和降水的年平均值掩盖了极端气候。包括极端气候表明,所有树种的CEE都有更广泛的增加。我们的研究表明,考虑极端气候,这不能充分反映在年平均值中,导致对森林风险的不同评估,从而对适应气候变化的选择进行评估。
    Changing climatic conditions threaten forest ecosystems. Drought, disease and infestation, are leading to forest die-offs which cause substantial economic and ecological losses. In central Europe, this is especially relevant for commercially important coniferous tree species. This study uses climate envelope exceedance (CEE) to approximate species risk under different future climate scenarios. To achieve this, we used current species presence-absence and historical climate data, coupled with future climate scenarios from various Earth System Models. Climate scenarios tended towards drier and warmer conditions, causing strong CEEs especially for spruce. However, we show that annual averages of temperature and precipitation obscure climate extremes. Including climate extremes reveals a broader increase in CEEs across all tree species. Our study shows that the consideration of climate extremes, which cannot be adequately reflected in annual averages, leads to a different assessment of the risk of forests and thus the options for adapting to climate change.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们介绍了Collimonassp的基因组序列草案。菌株H4R21,分离自Montiers(法国)森林实验地点的Fagussylvatica根际。该基因组具有促进植物生长的编码能力,比如溶解矿物质的能力,产生铁载体和抗真菌次生代谢产物。
    We present the draft genome sequence of Collimonas sp. strain H4R21, isolated from the rhizosphere of Fagus sylvatica in the forest experimental site of Montiers (France). This genome features coding capacity for plant growth promotion, such as the ability to solubilize minerals, to produce siderophores and antifungal secondary metabolites.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    气候变化和生物多样性丧失的危机将提高森林生态系统复原力的目标推到了林业工作者和决策者的议程上。同时,恢复森林和生物多样性的协同机会正在出现,以保护这些生态系统。自然性是森林生态系统的重要特征,在估计复原力和生物多样性保护的基准时,应考虑这一点。森林生态系统的自然性高度依赖于人类活动的强度,不同的经营强度会改变森林生态系统的原始性状。本文提出了森林生态系统的原型类型学,描述管理与自然之间的联系。这两个特征都表示为覆盖欧洲森林中观察到的整个光谱的梯度。使用整个欧洲的案例研究验证了一系列森林生态系统原型。类型学为设定森林生态系统的复原力和恢复目标提供了有用的信息。
    The crises of climate change and biodiversity loss have pushed the aim for increasing the resilience of forest ecosystems high on the agenda of foresters and policymakers. At the same time, synergistic opportunities for restoring forests and biodiversity are emerging to safeguard these ecosystems. Naturalness is a key characteristic of forest ecosystems, which should be considered when estimating benchmarks for resilience and biodiversity conservation. The naturalness of forest ecosystems is highly dependent on the intensity of human activity, as different levels of management intensity can change the original traits of forest ecosystems. This paper presents an archetypal typology of forest ecosystems, describing the association between management and naturalness. Both features are represented as gradients covering the full spectrum observed in European forests. The array of forest ecosystem archetypes was verified using case studies across Europe. The typology provides useful information for setting targets for resilience and restoration of forest ecosystems.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    生态学家面临着预测生态系统将如何应对气候变化的挑战。根据多色世界(MCW)假设,气候影响可能不会显现出来,因为火和食草动物等消费者可以超越气候对生态系统状态的影响。MCW的一种解释是气候决定论失败,因为在气候空间的某些位置可能存在替代生态系统状态(AES)。我们评估了森林和稀树草原在非洲是AES这一命题的理论和经验证据。我们发现推断AES区域所在位置的地图是矛盾的。此外,纵向和实验研究的数据为AES提供了不确定的证据。也就是说,尽管森林稀树草原AES命题在理论上是合理的,现有的证据还不能令人信服。我们得出的结论是,AES命题对于设计管理行动以减轻和适应稀树草原森林领域的气候变化具有如此根本的后果,因此在用于规定管理行动之前,需要更强大的证据基础。
    Ecologists are being challenged to predict how ecosystems will respond to climate changes. According to the Multi-Colored World (MCW) hypothesis, climate impacts may not manifest because consumers such as fire and herbivory can override the influence of climate on ecosystem state. One MCW interpretation is that climate determinism fails because alternative ecosystem states (AES) are possible at some locations in climate space. We evaluated theoretical and empirical evidence for the proposition that forest and savanna are AES in Africa. We found that maps which infer where AES zones are located were contradictory. Moreover, data from longitudinal and experimental studies provide inconclusive evidence for AES. That is, although the forest-savanna AES proposition is theoretically sound, the existing evidence is not yet convincing. We conclude by making the case that the AES proposition has such fundamental consequences for designing management actions to mitigate and adapt to climate change in the savanna-forest domain that it needs a more robust evidence base before it is used to prescribe management actions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    森林是陆地生态系统中最大的碳汇,氮(N)沉积对该碳汇的影响取决于外部N输入的命运。然而,不同林区氮素滞留的模式和驱动因素仍然难以捉摸。在这项研究中,我们从全球森林15N示踪实验中合成了408个观测值,以揭示15N在植物和土壤中滞留的变化和潜在机制。结果表明,全球森林生态系统15N总滞留量平均为63.04±1.23%,土壤池是主要的氮汇(45.76±1.29%)。植物吸收了17.28±0.83%的15N,更多的分配给叶(5.83±0.63%)和根(5.84±0.44%)。在亚热带和热带森林中,15N主要被植物和矿物土壤吸收,而温带森林的有机土壤层保留了更多的15N。此外,森林保留的N15H4+$${}^{15}\\mathrm{N}{\\mathrm{N}{\\mathrm{H}}_4^{}$$比N15O3-$$${}^{15}\\mathrm{N}{\\\mathrm{O}}}_3^{-$,主要是由于有机土壤层保留N15H4+$${}^{15}\\mathrm{N}{\\mathrm{H}}_4^{+}$的能力更强。15N滞留的机制在生态系统隔室之间有所不同,生态系统总保留15N受N沉积影响。植物15N的保留受营养和微生物营养需求的影响,而土壤15N的保留受气候因素和土壤养分供应的调节。总的来说,这项研究强调了气候和养分供需在调节森林氮素保留中的重要性,并提供数据进一步探讨氮沉降对森林碳固存的影响。
    Forests are the largest carbon sink in terrestrial ecosystems, and the impact of nitrogen (N) deposition on this carbon sink depends on the fate of external N inputs. However, the patterns and driving factors of N retention in different forest compartments remain elusive. In this study, we synthesized 408 observations from global forest 15N tracer experiments to reveal the variation and underlying mechanisms of 15N retention in plants and soils. The results showed that the average total ecosystem 15N retention in global forests was 63.04 ± 1.23%, with the soil pool being the main N sink (45.76 ± 1.29%). Plants absorbed 17.28 ± 0.83% of 15N, with more allocated to leaves (5.83 ± 0.63%) and roots (5.84 ± 0.44%). In subtropical and tropical forests, 15N was mainly absorbed by plants and mineral soils, while the organic soil layer in temperate forests retained more 15N. Additionally, forests retained more N 15 H 4 + $$ {}^{15}\\mathrm{N}{\\mathrm{H}}_4^{+} $$ than N 15 O 3 - $$ {}^{15}\\mathrm{N}{\\mathrm{O}}_3^{-} $$ , primarily due to the stronger capacity of the organic soil layer to retain N 15 H 4 + $$ {}^{15}\\mathrm{N}{\\mathrm{H}}_4^{+} $$ . The mechanisms of 15N retention varied among ecosystem compartments, with total ecosystem 15N retention affected by N deposition. Plant 15N retention was influenced by vegetative and microbial nutrient demands, while soil 15N retention was regulated by climate factors and soil nutrient supply. Overall, this study emphasizes the importance of climate and nutrient supply and demand in regulating forest N retention and provides data to further explore the impacts of N deposition on forest carbon sequestration.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    自然暴露的有益影响已被反复记录,并鼓励与自然,尤其是突出森林的频繁和定期接触。然而,在人类历史上,森林也与恐惧等负面情绪有关,被视为危险的环境。虽然现有文献可以证明自然环境可以唤起恐惧,重点是明确的感知。鉴于研究表明,额外的内隐过程在恐惧相关行为中的重要性,我们的目标是探索对森林的内隐恐惧反应的存在。因此,在一项在线研究中,我们通过N=256的德国北部样本调查了对森林的显性和隐性恐惧反应。使用三个明确的测量,与人造城市绿地“公园”和城市环境“房屋”相比,我们在刺激类别“森林”的语义和视觉层面上调查了恐惧和危险感知。此外,我们评估了三个内隐任务中对森林的无意识反应倾向:潜意识启动程序(SPP),影响错误归因程序(AMP)和方法避免任务(AAT)。在分析的样本中,与公园相比,潜意识中出现的单词森林引起了更强的正效价反应。与房屋相比,森林表现出更强的接近性和更弱的回避倾向。同时,与公园或房屋相比,三种显式和一种隐式测量都显示出对森林的更强的恐惧感知。考虑到干预措施中越来越多地利用自然的有益影响,在干预和治疗中实施自然暴露时,应承认这些发现.
    The beneficial effects of nature exposure have been repeatedly documented and encourage frequent and regular contact with nature and especially highlight forests. However, in human history, forests have also been associated with negative emotions such as fear and were seen as dangerous environments. While existing literature could demonstrate that natural environments can evoke fear, the focus was on the explicit perception. Given that research has shown the significance of additional implicit processes in fear-related behaviour, we aim to explore the presence of an implicit fear response to forests. Therefore, in an online study, we investigated the explicit and implicit fear reactions to forests by a Northern German sample of N = 256. Using three explicit measurements, we investigated fear and danger perception on a semantic and visual level of the stimulus category \"forest\" compared to the human-made urban green space \"park\" and the urban setting \"house\". Additionally, we assessed the unconscious response tendencies towards the forest within three implicit tasks: Subliminal Priming Procedure (SPP), Affect Misattribution Procedure (AMP) and Approach-Avoidance Task (AAT). Within the analyzed sample, the subliminally presented word forest evoked a stronger positive valence response compared to park (SPP). In contrast to houses, the forest showed a stronger approach and weaker avoidance tendency (AAT). At the same time, both the three explicit and one implicit measurement (AMP) showed a stronger fear perception of forests compared to parks or houses. Considering the increasingly utilised beneficial effects of nature in interventions, these findings should be acknowledged when implementing nature exposure in interventions and treatments.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    了解不同生态区域对森林碳的生物物理限制对于准确评估和管理森林碳储量至关重要。本研究调查了气候和干扰对两个关键森林碳库空间变化的作用:地上碳(AGC)和土壤有机碳(SOC)。使用尼泊尔国家森林清单和结构方程模型的地块级碳库估计,我们探讨了森林碳储量与大尺度气候水和能源可用性以及细尺度地形和扰动的关系。森林AGC和SOC模型解释了观测到的森林AGC和SOC空间变化的25%和59%,分别。在评估的变量中,扰动与AGC表现出最强的负相关,而气候能源的可获得性与SOC的负相关性最强。选择性伐木和收集木柴等干扰导致森林碳立即流失,而土壤碳变化需要更长的时间来响应。高海拔地区分解速率较低,由于温度较低,保护有机物质,并有助于那里观察到的高SOC库存。这些结果强调了气候和扰动机制在塑造森林碳储量景观格局中的关键作用。了解这些模式的潜在驱动因素对于包括喜马拉雅山中部在内的不同生态区的森林碳管理和保护至关重要。
    Understanding the biophysical limitations on forest carbon across diverse ecological regions is crucial for accurately assessing and managing forest carbon stocks. This study investigates the role of climate and disturbance on the spatial variation of two key forest carbon pools: aboveground carbon (AGC) and soil organic carbon (SOC). Using plot-level carbon pool estimates from Nepal\'s national forest inventory and structural equation modelling, we explore the relationship of forest carbon stocks to broad-scale climatic water and energy availability and fine-scale terrain and disturbance. The forest AGC and SOC models explained 25% and 59% of the observed spatial variation in forest AGC and SOC, respectively. Among the evaluated variables, disturbance exhibited the strongest negative correlation with AGC, while the availability of climatic energy demonstrated the strongest negative correlation with SOC. Disturbances such as selective logging and firewood collection result in immediate forest carbon loss, while soil carbon changes take longer to respond. The lower decomposition rates in the high-elevation region, due to lower temperatures, preserve organic matter and contribute to the high SOC stocks observed there. These results highlight the critical role of climate and disturbance regimes in shaping landscape patterns of forest carbon stocks. Understanding the underlying drivers of these patterns is crucial for forest carbon management and conservation across diverse ecological zones including the Central Himalayas.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号